ライフサイエンスコーパス: conditioning paradigm

1 eurons and reduced fear expression in a fear-conditioning paradigm.

2 n learning and memory in the contextual fear-conditioning paradigm.

3 lay (Experiment 1) or a trace (Experiment 2) conditioning paradigm.

4 nce or learning in either a delay or a trace conditioning paradigm.

5 measured by performance in a contextual fear-conditioning paradigm.

6 arning using a combined trace and delay fear conditioning paradigm.

7 behavior to the tone was increased in a fear-conditioning paradigm.

8 od approach in mice trained with a Pavlovian conditioning paradigm.

9 essed greater associative learning in a fear conditioning paradigm.

10 l dopamine in the striatum using a Pavlovian conditioning paradigm.

11 ormance in an open-field and contextual fear-conditioning paradigm.

12 ibe a simple, unrestrained associative place-conditioning paradigm.

13 isition than extinction, validating the fear-conditioning paradigm.

14 h an aversive air-puff to the eye in a trace-conditioning paradigm.

15 uice reward with a visual cue in a classical conditioning paradigm.

16 test, and cognition, using a contextual fear conditioning paradigm.

17 ng the hippocampal-dependent trace eye-blink conditioning paradigm.

18 opamine, we used a food-reinforced Pavlovian conditioning paradigm.

19 patory activity in a D1R-dependent Pavlovian conditioning paradigm.

20 pathways used to detect the CS depend on the conditioning paradigm.

21 ved to a food-sated state in an instrumental conditioning paradigm.

22 ere trained in an unsignaled contextual fear conditioning paradigm.

23 rm association memories in a contextual fear conditioning paradigm.

24 ehavior and hippocampal plasticity in a fear-conditioning paradigm.

25 exhibit facilitated learning in a Pavlovian conditioning paradigm.

26 st, on ethanol's rewarding effect in a place conditioning paradigm.

27 a single test session in a modified operant conditioning paradigm.

28 g associative learning using classical delay conditioning paradigms.

29 tracortical microstimulation or by classical conditioning paradigms.

30 irement observed in most mammalian classical conditioning paradigms.

31 er, are the age differences in the different conditioning paradigms.

32 has been dominated by pavlovian and operant conditioning paradigms.

33 ceptors in memory processes in fear and drug conditioning paradigms.

34 les in the description of numerous classical conditioning paradigms.

35 esions and both signaled and unsignaled fear conditioning paradigms.

36 as assessed through contextual and cued fear conditioning paradigms.

37 haracterized by a deficient response to fear-conditioning paradigms.

38 ired stimulus reinforcement and instrumental conditioning paradigms.

39 POR or PER were tested in 2 contextual fear conditioning paradigms.

40 e rats were trained using the trace eyeblink conditioning paradigm, an associative learning task that

41 ors promotes memory consolidation in several conditioning paradigms, an effect primarily associated w

42 s measured using delayed eye blink classical conditioning paradigm and results were compared with the

43 or LA/BA nuclei in rats in a contextual fear conditioning paradigm and unconditioned fear to a predat

44 raining in the Drosophila aversive olfactory conditioning paradigm and we used mutants to define the

45 inbred mice in two different contextual fear conditioning paradigms and transitive inference to test

46 duced CPP was established using an eight day conditioning paradigm, and expression of CPP was tested

47 of the eyeblink EMG response in this general conditioning paradigm are considered.

48 amework whereby the temporal features of the conditioning paradigm are critical in determining the ab

49 ior analysis in the cued and contextual fear conditioning paradigm, as well as immunohistological and

50 In this conditioning paradigm, asymptotic performance is reached

51 Using a fear-conditioning paradigm called the AX+, BX- discrimination

52 of a variety of drugs after training in fear-conditioning paradigms can impair consolidation of fear

53 In classical conditioning paradigms, conditioned stimuli trigger a tr

54 The authors applied a novel fear conditioning paradigm consisting of socially relevant un

55 an subjects were trained in a Pavlovian fear conditioning paradigm during functional magnetic resonan

56 ins are required for associative learning in conditioning paradigms, e.g., two-way active avoidance a

57 This indicates that, under the current fear conditioning paradigm, early-life FGF2 has protective ef

58 To test this prediction, we developed a fear conditioning paradigm for mice based on gap detection.

59 etic resonance imaging (fMRI) and an operant conditioning paradigm for the discrete delivery of small

60 Recently, in a classical Pavlovian fear conditioning paradigm, Gruene and colleagues described a

61 This conditioning paradigm has been used to show that the hip

62 in the hippocampus-dependent contextual fear-conditioning paradigm in adulthood.

63 de details for a novel context threat (fear) conditioning paradigm in humans using a commercially ava

64 However, the use of a single-trial conditioning paradigm in Lymnaea solves this problem.

65 We used a fear-conditioning paradigm in mice to condition footshock to

66 show that training with a single pulse in a conditioning paradigm in vivo does not result in learnin

67 We used a classic conditioning paradigm in which 3 neutral stimuli (differ

68 Here, we developed a classical conditioning paradigm in which 6- to 8-d-old larvae deve

69 n the acquisition of a novel contextual fear conditioning paradigm in which a unimodal (olfactory) cu

70 We designed a human parallel aversive conditioning paradigm in which different Pavlovian visua

71 bjected rats to a differential auditory fear conditioning paradigm in which one conditioned auditory

72 , nondependent volunteers (N=90) completed a conditioning paradigm in which they received a moderate

73 being systematically examined with eyeblink conditioning paradigms in nonprimate mammalian animal mo

74 oned responses (CRs) in both delay and trace conditioning paradigms in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cunicu

75 e response topography formed under a complex conditioning paradigm, involving 2 randomly alternating

76 The trace version of the conditioning paradigm is a particularly good system to e

77 The eyeblink conditioning paradigm is used to describe a neural mecha

78 mical circuitry underlying the auditory fear-conditioning paradigm is well characterized.

79 campus could not learn a standard trace fear-conditioning paradigm, lesioned rats trained on CTC show

80 ablation abolished learning in an olfactory conditioning paradigm, MB-ablated males were able to lea

81 learning and memory formation of an operant conditioning paradigm occur better during the day than d

82 A classical conditioning paradigm (P3-P4) showed that the learning g

83 Using separate single-cue and differential conditioning paradigms, participants were fear condition

84 the region during blocks of a trace eyeblink conditioning paradigm performed in two environments and

85 In a fear-conditioning paradigm, PPEKO mice significantly increase

86 bital shock as both the CS and US in a US-US conditioning paradigm previously shown to be effective i

87 el of forebrain dependence between these two conditioning paradigms should produce a differential blo

88 In the trace conditioning paradigm, significant conditioning deficits

89 behaving mice during training in a cued fear-conditioning paradigm slowed the extinction of learned f

90 area stimulation with a sound in a backward conditioning paradigm specifically reduced representatio

91 This conditioning paradigm stimulated the cortical site for a

92 Classical conditioning paradigms, such as trace conditioning, in w

93 An olfactory conditioning paradigm tested the hypothesis that newborn

94 We also describe a novel courtship conditioning paradigm that established long-term memory,

95 and report behavioral results using a trace conditioning paradigm that is sensitive to hippocampal d

96 Collapsing across conditioning paradigms, there is a general tendency for

97 tion of motor cortex and eye blink classical conditioning paradigm, to test whether dystonia symptoms

98 , subjects were trained in a delay classical conditioning paradigm using a tone conditioned stimulus

99 mphetamine as a reinforcer and in an operant conditioning paradigm using sucrose reinforcement.

100 Rabbits were trained in a delay classical conditioning paradigm, using a tone as the conditioned s

101 The first experiment assessed whether a conditioning paradigm, using clearly visible cues for hi

102 use, or domestic violence), completed a fear conditioning paradigm utilizing blue and yellow bells as

103 ulus), whose performance in a delay eyeblink conditioning paradigm was compared with that of intact c

104 A discriminable context conditioning paradigm was developed that demonstrated bo

105 A forelimb-withdrawal classical conditioning paradigm was used in awake cats (n = 4) to

106 A second-order fear-conditioning paradigm was used to test whether the dopam

107 l discrimination in trace and delay eyeblink conditioning paradigms was investigated.

108 Using an operant conditioning paradigm, we demonstrated that rats cannot

109 Using a conditioning paradigm, we investigated how directly and

110 s the hind-paw formalin model with the place-conditioning paradigm, we measured a learned behavior th

111 By using an operant conditioning paradigm, we show that CNGA4-null mice are

112 r for sucrose in a progressive ratio operant-conditioning paradigm when administered peripherally.

113 ablished a Pavlovian serial feature-negative conditioning paradigm, where male mice are trained on a

114 aired with cocaine, as measured by the place conditioning paradigm, whereas blockade of IRS-2 activit

115 fMRI) in an olfactory version of a classical conditioning paradigm, whereby neutral faces were paired

116 and quinine paired with cues in a classical conditioning paradigm while the electrophysiological act

117 ulation as a CS in the well studied eyeblink conditioning paradigm will facilitate characterizing sen

118 Using an unbiased place-conditioning paradigm with two doses of cocaine (10 mg/k