ライフサイエンスコーパス: condom

1 e (vasectomy) or not sufficiently effective (condom).

2 ar the humiliation associated with procuring condoms.

3 behavior, including use of contraceptives or condoms.

4 ; 22.4% used oral contraceptives; 40.8% used condoms; 11.8% used withdrawal or other method; 15.7% us

5 1% [P = .002]; pills, 41% to 65% [P < .001]; condoms, 25% to 45% [P = .003]; withdrawal, 74% to 90% [

6 e infected because of delayed application of condoms (4.3% of uses), breakage (2.0%), early removal (

7 urs after vaginal intercourse without a male condom (5 visits total, including the baseline visit).

8 n overestimated the typical effectiveness of condoms (75%), contraceptive injections (57%), and oral

9 chanical problems (male condom, 9.6%; female condom, 9.4%) but less frequent with other problems (3.0

10 more frequent with mechanical problems (male condom, 9.6%; female condom, 9.4%) but less frequent wit

11 n than those reporting no anal sex without a condom (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 5.11, 95% CI 1.55-16

12 ing more likely to report having ever used a condom (adjusted OR = 2.62, 95%CI:2.32-2.95).

13 Data supporting the efficacy of condoms against human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in

14 (wow) Condom Feminine, and the Cupid female condom-against the existing second-generation female con

15 l, and condoms (intervention), compared with condoms alone (control) on HIV seroincidence in women in

16 sis examined the prevalence of problems with condoms among 1,152 participants who completed a supplem

17 espondents could select birth control pills; condoms; an intrauterine device or implant; injection, p

18 Condom and lubricant access for MSM globally is highly c

19 compared the effectiveness of the male latex condom and the female polyurethane condom by assessing f

20 Participants returned 700 male condoms and 678 female condoms, and they reported mechan

21 d lubricant gel were provided in addition to condoms and a comprehensive HIV prevention package.

22 During this time, comfort procuring condoms and ability to convince sexual partners to use c

23 Condoms and counseling were available in most of the cli

24 ntrolled trial, ART used in combination with condoms and counselling reduced HIV transmission by 96.4

25 mly assigned to begin the study with 10 male condoms and then switch to 10 female condoms (n = 55), o

26 Condoms and vasectomy are male-controlled family plannin

27 pants received risk-reduction counseling and condoms and were regularly tested for HIV-1 and HIV-2 an

28 s but suffer from limitations in compliance (condoms) and limited reversibility (vasectomy); thus man

29 hours after vaginal intercourse with a male condom, and 2-6 hours and 10-14 hours after vaginal inte

30 , acceptance of more money for sex without a condom, and experience of client violence.

31 h even among those who reported always using condoms, and its associations with always using condoms

32 ived HIV testing, risk-reduction counseling, condoms, and management of sexually transmitted infectio

33 nts returned 700 male condoms and 678 female condoms, and they reported mechanical problems for 9% an

34 ients per day (AOR, 3.3; 1.8-6.1), no use of condoms (AOR, 3.8, 2.1-7.1), and frequent alcohol use (A

35 Condoms are recommended as an effective preventive metho

36 a) consistent condom use, defined as using a condom at each occasion of sexual intercourse in the pre

37 of 113 participants who reported not using a condom at enrolment reported using condoms at their firs

38 parate item asked whether respondents used a condom at last sexual intercourse.

39 t using a condom at enrolment reported using condoms at their first follow-up visit (p<0.0001).

40 nprotected transactional sex, than levels of condom awareness and availability.

41 police to avoid trouble, having police take condoms away, experiencing a workplace raid, and being a

42 38, 45) reporting condom use indicated that condoms broke, slipped off, leaked, or were not used thr

43 ion motivated many to get HIV tested and use condoms, but such affect also led some to avoid HIV test

44 ale latex condom and the female polyurethane condom by assessing frequency and types of mechanical fa

45 The use of condoms by young people remained stable during this peri

46 tent straight catheters (ISCs), and external condom catheters for hospitalized adults on medical serv

47 ceptive for men since the development of the condom, centuries ago.

48 LARC users were about 60% less likely to use condoms compared with oral contraceptive users (adjusted

49 n with no steady sex partner who always used condoms, compared with those who never used condoms (haz

50 and parents tended to be more likely to use condoms consistently and be tested for HIV.

51 Half reported not using condoms consistently and one quarter had not been HIV-te

52 ess of HIV serostatus, along with reinforced condom counseling for HIV-serodiscordant couples.

53 ure was 3.43% for FC2, 3.85% for the Woman's Condom (difference 0.42%, 90% CI -1.42 to 2.26), 3.02% f

54 sting, HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART), and condom distribution programmes.

55 uding provision of pre-exposure prophylaxis, condom distribution, and male circumcision, could avert

56 prevention measures such as needle exchange, condom distribution, and opioid substitution therapy in

57 structed to use one applicator of gel plus a condom during each vaginal sex act.

58 Spousal partnerships and never using a condom during sex were associated with larger age differ

59 ompare the frequency of sex-unprotected by a condom-during the 12 months after compared with the 12 m

60 ghly infectious STD to avoid underestimating condom effectiveness.

61 Condom efficacy has not previously measured on a per-act

62 Condom efficacy was computed as the proportionate reduct

63 RC methods may no longer perceive a need for condoms even if they have multiple sexual partners, whic

64 report receptive anal intercourse without a condom, even if they perceive their partners to be HIV n

65 Non-inferiority was shown for all condom failure events for the three new devices versus t

66 Total female condom failure was 3.43% for FC2, 3.85% for the Woman's

67 were total clinical failure and total female condom failure, with a non-inferiority margin of 3%.

68 gainst the existing second-generation female condom (FC2).

69 e Woman's Condom, the VA worn-of-women (wow) Condom Feminine, and the Cupid female condom-against the

70 ners in the past 3 months, and never using a condom for anal sex in the past 6 months were independen

71 in condom use may reflect motivations to use condoms for backup pregnancy prevention.

72 lescent LARC users may be less likely to use condoms for preventing sexually transmitted infections c

73 The efficacy of condoms for protection against transmission of herpes si

74 one partner and insertive anal sex without a condom had the highest NNTs (100 and 77, respectively).

75 .91 [95% CI, 0.60-1.39; P = .39] for using a condom half the time or less with a casual partner).

76 New designs of female condom have been developed to reduce costs and improve a

77 condoms, compared with those who never used condoms (hazard ratio, 0.54), after adjustment for count

78 x partners, compared with men who never used condoms (hazard ratio, 1.29), after adjustment for count

79 eported significantly more consistent use of condoms, hormonal contraception, and dual-method contrac

80 The male condom, if used correctly and consistently, has been pro

81 her proportion of coital acts protected by a condom in analyses adjusted for study visit and coital f

82 h men who had had anal intercourse without a condom in the previous 90 days.

83 ge of coital acts reported as protected by a condom increased from 56% at baseline to 68% at the 6-mo

84 omote specific behaviors, such as the use of condoms, injectable methods or permanent sterilization.

85 ing >/=16 lifetime sexual partners and using condoms intermittently.

86 ision of latex diaphragm, lubricant gel, and condoms (intervention), compared with condoms alone (con

87 s (tubal ligation, rhythm method, diaphragm, condoms, intrauterine device, foam, spousal vasectomy) a

88 study was to examine if the installation of condom machines in Ethiopia predicts changes in student

89 There was no evidence that the condom machines led to an increase in promiscuity.

90 The results suggest that condom machines may be associated with more condom procu

91 A study in Thailand suggests condom machines may provide comfortable condom procureme

92 After installing condom machines, the average number of trips made to pro

93 2,000), six months after the installation of condom machines.

94 10 male condoms and then switch to 10 female condoms (n = 55), or vice versa (n = 53), and were train

95 porting receptive anal intercourse without a condom (NNT 36), cocaine use (12), or a sexually transmi

96 gaging in sexual intercourse with the use of condoms (odds ratio [OR], 6.3 [95% confidence interval {

97 women completed follow-up, with at least one condom of each type.

98 the average number of trips made to procure condoms on-campus significantly increased 101% for sexua

99 prevention guidelines recommend that men use condoms or abstain from sex for 6 months after ZIKV expo

100 ncrease supply of prevention methods such as condoms or clean needles can be effective.

101 al sex, receptive anal intercourse without a condom, or more than five partners in the past 3 months.

102 vaginal coitus, vaginal coitus with use of a condom, or no coitus.

103 % among those who reported they "never" used condoms (P for trend = .008).

104 ent condom use, multiple partners, and other condom problems.

105 condom machines may be associated with more condom procurement among vulnerable female students in E

106 anges in student sexual behavior, as well as condom procurement and associated stigma over the subseq

107 ests condom machines may provide comfortable condom procurement, but the relevance to a high-risk Afr

108 coverage of NSP, OST, HIV testing, ART, and condom programmes for PWID.

109 African heterosexual epidemic suggests that condom promotion and distribution programmes in South Af

110 Condom promotion campaigns in sub-Saharan Africa have af

111 ention portfolio for Nairobi should focus on condom promotion for male sex workers and MSM in particu

112 d spread to future partners is in support of condom promotion to prevent sexually transmitted infecti

113 ering cost of drug and delivery, undermining condom promotion, and facilitating resistant strains) th

114 ement strategies, including behavior change, condom promotion, and therapy have not reduced the globa

115 The scale-up of existing interventions (condom promotion, antiretroviral therapy, and male circu

116 ated 113 480 sex acts, of which 17% were not condom protected, was reported within 1672 HIV-serodisco

117 uitment did not occur without coitus or with condom-protected coitus.

118 es included the following: (1) proportion of condom-protected sexual acts in the 6 months and 90 days

119 al condition reported a higher proportion of condom-protected sexual acts in the 90 days (mean differ

120 1 PSA-positive participants (36.2%) reported condom-protected vaginal sex only; their reports also in

121 r age, with more schooling, who reported non-condom receptive anal intercourse, who had more sexual p

122 porting receptive anal intercourse without a condom seroconverted significantly more often than those

123 Condoms should be promoted in combination with HPV vacci

124 mutual HIV testing, and a desire to not use condoms, suggesting that trust, commitment and intimacy

125 s lower (1) among students who always used a condom than among those who had sexual intercourse witho

126 cal problems are more common with the female condom than with the male condom, these devices may invo

127 safety of three new condom types-the Woman's Condom, the VA worn-of-women (wow) Condom Feminine, and

128 on with the female condom than with the male condom, these devices may involve a similar risk of seme

129 9% among men who reported they "always" used condoms to 53.9% among those who reported they "never" u

130 about the importance of dual protection with condoms to decrease HIV-1 risk.

131 Women were asked to use five of each condom type and were interviewed after use of each type.

132 Participants were not masked to condom type, but allocation was concealed from study inv

133 ility, of whom 600 were randomly assigned to condom-type order (30, 120, and 150 women in the three s

134 nctional performance and safety of three new condom types-the Woman's Condom, the VA worn-of-women (w

135 Universal Access to Female Condoms (UAFC).

136 ines in Ethiopia predicts changes in student condom uptake and use, as well as changes in procurement

137 nic types only was estimated by frequency of condom use ("always" or "not always").

138 8% in the last injection), the low levels of condom use (20%-54% ever condom use), the high levels of

139 0-1 vs 8-14 days after last vaginal sex) and condom use (22.6% higher concordance in never vs always

140 el use (96.2% Carraguard, 95.9% placebo) and condom use (64.1% in both groups) at last sex acts were

141 {CI}, 1.46-2.53]), decreased with consistent condom use (adjIRR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.36-0.89]) and male c

142 In MSM, history of inconsistent condom use (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.09; 95% CI, 1.

143 [AHR] = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.0), inconsistent condom use (AHR = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.0-3.3), and being non-A

144 or erectile dysfunction (p<0.0001), and 100% condom use (p<0.0001) increased over time, whereas the p

145 Condom use after male circumcision is essential for HIV

146 t with self-reported increases in consistent condom use after the implementation of Avahan or with a

147 ct HSV-2 transmission rates with and without condom use among 911 African HSV-2 and human immunodefic

148 per-bound risk may be unfeasible due to high condom use among HIV-serodiscordant couples in most rese

149 in premarital sex, multiple partnership and condom use among young people (15-24 years) in Zambia fr

150 However, condom use among young people has remained low and stabl

151 We investigated self-reported frequency of condom use and detection of genital HPV among men.

152 terventions is needed for further increasing condom use and for reversing the rising trend of HIV epi

153 ogram (China Global Fund Round 5 Project) on condom use and HIV infection, we analyzed four yearly cr

154 indicate that similar factors influence the condom use and HIV testing of MSM in Beirut as those obs

155 to examine associations between frequency of condom use and HPV detection.

156 Reported associations of condom use and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection have

157 Reported associations between condom use and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in m

158 h hunger was associated with reduced odds of condom use and increased odds of itchy vaginal discharge

159 collection included questionnaires for each condom use and measurement of prostate-specific antigen

160 Changes in the rates of condom use and number of sexual partners were evaluated

161 e relation between increased protection from condom use and reduced gonorrhea and chlamydia risk (p(t

162 Prevention will be modeled via consistent condom use and self-awareness via STD testing frequency.

163 regular virological monitoring, reporting on condom use and sexual activity.

164 ) and consistent (40.4% to 48.8%, p < 0.001) condom use as well as condom use during commercial anal

165 Self-reported condom use at last sex with a male partner increased fro

166 ns was an independent predictor of increased condom use at last sex with a male partner over time (ad

167 s ratio [AOR] = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48-0.92) and condom use at last sexual intercourse (AOR = 0.75; 95% C

168 lnerable groups for STDs show differences in condom use behaviors (CUBs) depending on their STD infec

169 se of hormonal creams, alcohol drinking, and condom use by a sexual partner.

170 Similar increases were observed for condom use by all partner types.

171 significantly lower likelihood of consistent condom use by rural venue-based FSWs (adjusted OR: 0.34

172 pared self-reports of recent vaginal sex and condom use collected through ACASI or face-to-face inter

173 rust, commitment and intimacy play a role in condom use decisions.

174 umcision (VMMC) and for partner reduction or condom use driven by HIV testing and counselling (HTC).

175 P = .045), recent anal sex (P = .04), and no condom use during anal sex (P = .04) were associated wit

176 % to 48.8%, p < 0.001) condom use as well as condom use during commercial anal sex (46.5% to 55.0%, p

177 Condom use during last oral or anal sex was relatively u

178 Additionally, reports of condom use during last sexual intercourse showed a non-s

179 of adult males circumcised, the frequency of condom use during sex acts, acceptance of HIV testing, l

180 OR for > or =21, 7.4 [95% CI, 3.4-16.3]) and condom use during the past 3 months (OR for more than ha

181 er number of new sex partners (P = .024) and condom use during vaginal sex (P = .003) were associated

182 egarding number of partners and frequency of condom use during vaginal sex in the past 3 months (5 ca

183 A 25-percentage-point drop in condom use from the 2015 levels among FSW and MSM would

184 ts, the evidence was weaker, with consistent condom use generally already high before Avahan began.

185 uch communication to youth contraceptive and condom use has not been empirically synthesized.

186 ted in 62% lower incidence; cessation of all condom use in 2000 resulted in a 424% increase in incide

187 s among PrEP users and reported decreases in condom use in a subset, there were no new HIV infections

188 tween SES and HIV/AIDS-related knowledge and condom use in sub-Saharan Africa in terms of communicati

189 associated with a reduced odds of consistent condom use in the past 12 mo (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]

190 poor predictor of recent sexual activity and condom use in this study, regardless of interview mode,

191 Our observation that lower condom use in women provided with diaphragms did not res

192 ult in more risky sexual behaviors, reported condom use increased and number of partners decreased.

193 r with a counterfactual (assuming consistent condom use increased at slower, pre-Avahan rates) using

194 , 95% confidence interval: 38, 45) reporting condom use indicated that condoms broke, slipped off, le

195 The finding that condom use limited onward spread to future partners is i

196 Observed differences in condom use may reflect motivations to use condoms for ba

197 Significant decreases in condom use occurred in both male circumcision acceptors

198 eterosexual anal and oral sex and associated condom use on a more frequent basis.

199 refore, we examined the effect of consistent condom use on genital HPV acquisition and duration of in

200 Effects did not differ for contraceptive vs condom use or among longitudinal vs cross-sectional stud

201 ting testing and treatment, without changing condom use or circumcision rates, resulted in an 89% red

202 e reductions in partner numbers or increased condom use or should not be considered as contributing t

203 change over time was reported in consistent condom use or the number of sexual partners in the last

204 viral treatment of the infected partners and condom use reduce the risk of sexual transmission of HSV

205 rotective against HSV-2 transmission by sex; condom use reduced per-act risk of transmission from men

206 Self-reported condom use reduced the per-act risk by 78% (RR = 0.22 [9

207 Condom use remains important for sexually transmitted di

208 Increased condom use should be promoted to avoid the erosion of th

209 Client requests for condom use significantly predicted protected sex (P < .0

210 e large self-reported increase in consistent condom use since Avahan implementation.

211 ar need exists to incorporate messages about condom use specifically for sexually transmitted infecti

212 unprotected sex threaten the high levels of condom use that contributed to the decline in Zimbabwe's

213 ch incorporated the higher rates of reported condom use that we found with non-cohabiting partners, w

214 HIV/AIDS-related knowledge and the degree of condom use varies by socioeconomic status (SES).

215 ysis shows that the likelihood of consistent condom use was higher among urban venue-based FSWs for w

216 Condom use was higher for men who have sex with men (MSM

217 urse during menses in the previous 6 months; condom use was protective.

218 Consistent condom use was strongly associated with lower HPV preval

219 dence interval [CI], 3.0-6.2/100 PYARs), and condom use was very low.

220 ll and at each anatomic site by frequency of condom use were calculated.

221 FSW who reported more frequent condom use were more likely to be infected with M. genit

222 However, the magnitudes of decrease in condom use were not significantly different between the

223 No protective effects of condom use were observed among monogamous men.

224 No significant differences in condom use were observed between LARC users and Depo-Pro

225 elationship between sexual risk behavior and condom use when they had experience of STD infection.

226 infections, and with increases in consistent condom use with all clients.

227 last 7 days, with high levels of consistent condom use with clients and low use with steady partners

228 potential side effects, the need to combine condom use with PrEP, and for regular HIV testing.

229 e among FSW-IDUs, and had no effect on FSWs' condom use with their noncommercial partners.

230 partners' reports of number of sex acts and condom use with their study partner.

231 Risk reduction strategies included condom use within partnerships and/or with other partner

232 gh its immediate and sustained effect on non-condom use) among FSWs and their clients in the next dec

233 es among non-adherers (over 80% reduction in condom use) and a low PrEP conditional efficacy (40%) wo

234 d by other behavior changes (e.g., increased condom use) in HIV status aware serodiscordant partnersh

235 C (a reduction in the per-act probability of condom use), and the STI screening interval.

236 , the low levels of condom use (20%-54% ever condom use), the high levels of having sex with sex work

237 transmitted infection symptoms, inconsistent condom use, acceptance of more money for sex without a c

238 targets) with differing combinations of male condom use, adult male circumcision, HIV testing, and ea

239 es different types of sex acts, incorporates condom use, and distinguishes between regular and casual

240 osttreatment sexual partner and inconsistent condom use, and halved with use of estrogen-containing c

241 of sexual partners, partner characteristics, condom use, and history of sexually transmitted infectio

242 uilding on the backbone of behaviour change, condom use, and medical male circumcision, as well as ex

243 Lifetime and recent number of FSPs, condom use, and smoking were modifiable risk factors ass

244 completed questionnaires on sexual history, condom use, and sociodemographic characteristics.

245 ished data for HIV prevalence and incidence, condom use, and structural determinants among this group

246 least one of: HIV incidence, HIV prevalence, condom use, and uptake of HIV testing.

247 transmission were plasma HIV-1 RNA level and condom use, and, in HIV-1-uninfected partners, herpes si

248 of PrEP is reduced if those on PrEP decrease condom use, but only extreme behaviour changes among non

249 Self-reported outcomes were (a) consistent condom use, defined as using a condom at each occasion o

250 n in number of sexual partners, increases in condom use, etc) that are achieved by use of multilevel

251 ronment where clients' preferences determine condom use, FSWs effectively use their individual capita

252 , together with other interventions, such as condom use, it can serve as a strong weapon to fight aga

253 ated promising findings - such as consistent condom use, less impaired sex, and less unprotected vagi

254 ntercourse in the previous 12 mo; (b) recent condom use, less stringently defined as using a condom w

255 cale-up of existing interventions (promoting condom use, male circumcision, early antiretroviral ther

256 antly associated with reporting inconsistent condom use, multiple partners, and other condom problems

257 For multiple partnerships and condom use, the explained variance was 29 and 18% in 200

258 intercourse together with a 33% decrease in condom use, the resulting preventive effect was 47% (95%

259 ected sex could help maintain high levels of condom use.

260 ensive sexuality education including regular condom use.

261 ntinuation, treatment failure, and levels of condom use.

262 en SES, media use, HIV-related outcomes, and condom use.

263 ely to cleanse after sex if they reported no condom use.

264 V/AIDS and are significantly associated with condom use.

265 roup to assess independent associations with condom use.

266 onship between high-risk sexual behavior and condom use.

267 ssociated with low premarital sex and higher condom use.

268 , sexual beliefs, sexual risk behaviors, and condom use.

269 tios (PRs) for HPV according to frequency of condom use.

270 by age, duration of sexual relationship, and condom use.

271 x partner-specific coitus and event-specific condom use.

272 f sexual partners, past use of hormones, and condom use.

273 artner numbers and 12.8% reporting increased condom use.

274 should be counseled on sexual abstinence and condom use.

275 tal status, age, number of sex partners, and condom use.

276 individual capital to negotiate the terms of condom use.

277 Sustaining the high condom-use levels among key populations should remain an

278 3.5% of male condom uses and 4.5% of female condom uses (difference = 1%, 95% confidence interval: -

279 or = 22 ng/ml) were detected in 3.5% of male condom uses and 4.5% of female condom uses (difference =

280 doms, and its associations with always using condoms varied among countries.

281 Always using condoms (vs using them less frequently) was associated w

282 porting receptive anal intercourse without a condom was 64% (prevalence 60%).

283 e adjusted PR for always vs not always using condoms was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], .77-.97)

284 The proportion of women using condoms was significantly lower in the intervention than

285 We found that condoms were differentially protective against HSV-2 tra

286 Condoms were more likely to be used with casual partners

287 th one or both partners, and in one-quarter, condoms were never used with either partner.

288 d ability to convince sexual partners to use condoms were significantly higher for sexually active ma

289 %) of 45 who tested HIV-positive (p<0.0001); condoms were used in all eight intercourse events after

290 In over half of the gaps, condoms were used inconsistently with one or both partne

291 as drug use, sexual practices, and how often condoms were used.

292 mbers of partners, especially without use of condoms, were risk factors.

293 ey were infected with STDs, FSWs always used condom when they had high sexual beliefs.

294 PAF for receptive anal intercourse without a condom with an HIV-positive partner was 1% (prevalence 1

295 me from receptive anal intercourse without a condom with partners with unknown serostatus (PAF 53%, p

296 dom use, less stringently defined as using a condom with the most recent sexual partner; and (c) itch

297 Many described not using condoms with a regular partner in the context of a meani

298 gher among nonmonogamous men who always used condoms with nonsteady sex partners, compared with men w

299 Dyads that always used condoms with previous partner(s) were 27% (95% confidenc

300 rol device, or the Woman's, VA wow, or Cupid condoms, with 12 potential allocations.