ライフサイエンスコーパス: conjunctival

1 Conjunctival allergen provocation test (CAPT) reproduces

2 After allergen EPIT but not placebo EPIT, conjunctival allergen reactivity was significantly decre

3 Conjunctival amyloidosis is a rare entity that may be ov

4 Conjunctival amyloidosis is a very rare condition, gener

5 valuated using the OSDI questionnaire, TBUT, conjunctival and corneal staining, Schirmer test results

6 calculated for tear break-up time (TBUT) and conjunctival and corneal staining.

7 eibomian glands develop from the prospective conjunctival and eyelid epithelia and produce secretions

8 .02) and 0.63 (0.14; 0.56-0.70; P = .02) in conjunctival and eyelid margin cells, respectively, of p

9 The clinical diagnosis of conjunctival and eyelid margin tumors is challenging, an

10 the application of this technique applied to conjunctival and gut microbiome metagenomics sequencing

11 Conjunctival and oral/pharyngeal lesions with subepithel

12 ver, there were still multiple emboli in the conjunctival and retinal arteries.

13 idosis with a Glu34Lys mutation; testicular, conjunctival, and renal involvement; and the notable fin

14 s and allergenic pollens and having a unique conjunctival associated lymphoid tissue.

15 corrective lenses did not explain the lower conjunctival autofluorescence observed in myopic subject

16 evalence of myopia in the lowest quartile of conjunctival autofluorescence than the highest quartile

17 tic review of the effectiveness and risks of conjunctival autograft (CAG) compared with amniotic memb

18 Fashioning and repositioning of the conjunctival autograft (flap time) was significantly sho

19 aluate the outcome of pterygium surgery with conjunctival autograft using Vicryl sutures (Ethicon, NJ

20 Patients undergoing pterygium surgery with conjunctival autografting were randomized into groups re

21 Tisseel fibrin glue for the repositioning of conjunctival autografts in pterygium surgery was associa

22 ldlife disease system, house finches and the conjunctival bacterial pathogen Mycoplasma gallisepticum

23 tation signifies the usually small number of conjunctival basal dendritic melanocytes that synthesize

24 Patients who had conjunctival biopsies were more likely to have a negativ

25 However, in 8 of 21 separate conjunctival biopsy specimens with intraepithelial cytol

26 Conjunctival biopsy under optical microscopy revealed am

27 Conjunctival biopsy was taken and the location of the bi

28 h retinal necrosis and hypotony, a filtering conjunctival bleb, and focal scleromalacia with localize

29 (15 %) had HIV retinopathy and 7 (15 %) had conjunctival carcinoma.

30 92; 11.08-15.90; P < .001), respectively, in conjunctival cells and to 11.75 (3.96; 9.81-13.69; P < .

31 Cultured conjunctival cells respond to cytokines and inflammatory

32 Testing of cultured conjunctival cells revealed an increase in the levels of

33 rformed to measure HLA-DR RNA transcripts in conjunctival cells taken by impression cytology at each

34 tests, such as molecular assays of tears and conjunctival cells, are currently being used in studies

35 We also examined the conjunctival challenge route to mimic the natural histor

36 ation findings included palpable mass (2/8), conjunctival chemosis (2/8), hyperglobus (1/8), hypoglob

37 dings included eyelid swelling and erythema, conjunctival chemosis, pain on eye movement, minimal dip

38 Conjunctival congestion persisted in 44% (11/25) in the

39 chirmer test, tear film breakup time (TBUT), conjunctival congestion, corneal haze, vascularization,

40 slit-lamp examination with mild to moderate conjunctival congestion, suggestive of microsporidial su

41 rtion of conjunctival injection (P = 0.003), conjunctival corkscrew vessels (P < 0.001), corneal scar

42 at the larger nanoparticles were "gulped" in conjunctival, corneal, retinal, and scleral cells, simil

43 Conjunctival cultures from the treatment eye were perfor

44 Over the course of the serial conjunctival cultures in each patient, there was no evid

45 A minimum of 3 monthly conjunctival cultures were obtained per eye over the cou

46 at CTR eyelet, repaired with CV-8 Gore-Tex), conjunctival dehiscence (5.3%), suture exposure (5.3%) (

47 The primary morbidity of anterior surface conjunctival disorders that include allergic conjunctivi

48 ents underwent mapping biopsies and detailed conjunctival drawings to delineate the pathologic extent

49 , tear break-up time (TBUT), and corneal and conjunctival dye staining were measured.

50 ths on, apart from a degree of fading of the conjunctival dye.

51 a of VKC patients and assess their levels in conjunctival epithelial and fibroblast cultures exposed

52 Conjunctival epithelial cells and fibroblasts were cultu

53 S transcription factor (SPDEF) in stratified conjunctival epithelial cells in Tgfbr2 cKO mice, sugges

54 riven by multiple episodes of reinfection of conjunctival epithelial cells, producing an intense chro

55 Sixteen of the 17 eyes had persistent conjunctival epithelial defects, with 10 eyes requiring

56 residual atypical intraepithelial cells when conjunctival epithelial sloughing occurred.

57 There was significantly less corneal and conjunctival epitheliopathy after the low-humidity expos

58 It is composed of rabbit conjunctival epithelium and lacrimal gland cell spheroid

59 Sox9 expression localizes to the presumptive conjunctival epithelium as early as E11.5 and is detecte

60 ed BUT, mucus filaments in the tear film and conjunctival epithelium metaplasic changes.

61 luid was collected from inferior fornix, and conjunctival epithelium was obtained by impression cytol

62 30.8% showed an irregular mixed corneal and conjunctival epithelium, and 23.0% showed conjunctival e

63 fied but non-keratinized corneal, limbal and conjunctival epithelium, in concert with the epidermal k

64 n in tears, but not galectin-3 expression in conjunctival epithelium, was significantly higher in tea

65 nd conjunctival epithelium, and 23.0% showed conjunctival epithelium.

66 and flat cells with hyperreflective nuclei; conjunctival epithelium: stratified cuboidal or polygona

67 There were 2 incidents of conjunctival erosion and 1 inferotemporal macula-on reti

68 risks of complications such as hypotony and conjunctival erosion.

69 lated 10 primary fibrotic and 7 non-fibrotic conjunctival fibroblast cell lines from patients with an

70 roblasts to disease progression, we isolated conjunctival fibroblasts from patients with scarring tra

71 pare the clinical phenotype of patients with conjunctival fibrosis after glaucoma surgery with candid

72 markers of disease severity and prognosis in conjunctival fibrosis after glaucoma surgery.

73 Quantifying the extent of conjunctival fibrosis for documentation of progression i

74 for novel and more targeted means to control conjunctival fibrosis without such limitations has broug

75 6- as a potential contributor to the chronic conjunctival fibrosis, mediating reciprocal pro-fibrotic

76 on-viral delivery system for MRTF-B siRNA in conjunctival fibrosis.

77 st genome-wide RNA-Sequencing study in human conjunctival fibrosis.

78 or IOP control was observed in both types of conjunctival flap incisions.

79 re effectiveness of fornix- and limbal-based conjunctival flaps in trabeculectomy surgery.

80 cin) or significant alteration from baseline conjunctival flora.

81 ia detected correlated with patient's ocular conjunctival flora.

82 terial resistance or a discernible change in conjunctival flora.

83 Eighteen patients (46%) had culture positive conjunctival flora.

84 We collected and tested axillary, blood, conjunctival, forehead, mouth, rectal, semen, urine, and

85 (1) to define the limits of the normal human conjunctival fornices and how these alter with age and (

86 C57BL/6J mice received weekly periocular conjunctival fornix injections of a dexamethasone-21-ace

87 Significant conjunctival GC loss occurs in both experimental dry eye

88 gan Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator (ITN) on conjunctival goblet cell (GC) degranulation.

89 on had significant positive correlation with conjunctival goblet cell density (r = 0.181, P = 0.03).

90 n of HC-HA/PTX3 preserved tear secretion and conjunctival goblet cell density and mitigated inflammat

91 ntified using enzyme-linked immunoassay, and conjunctival goblet cell density was counted after Perio

92 purpose was to evaluate the correlations of conjunctival goblet cell density with tear MUC5AC concen

93 Conjunctival goblet cell dysfunction and death are promo

94 es ocular surface epithelial hyperplasia and conjunctival goblet cell expansion that invaginates into

95 develops properly, but young mice displayed conjunctival goblet cell expansion, demonstrating that T

96 ermine the actions of LXA4 on cultured human conjunctival goblet cell mucin secretion and increase in

97 the effectiveness of the ITN application on conjunctival goblet cell secretory response.

98 We conclude that conjunctival goblet cells respond to LXA4 through the AL

99 Conjunctival goblet cells synthesize and secrete mucins

100 eye disease such as aqueous tear secretion, conjunctival goblet cells, epithelial corneal integrity,

101 Complications included 5 cases of conjunctival graft dislocation in the Evicel group, 1 ca

102 Conjunctival hemodynamic descriptors, namely vessel diam

103 Quantitative assessment of conjunctival hemodynamics can potentially be useful for

104 66-years-old caucasian female complaining of conjunctival hemorrhage and chemosis in both eyes for th

105 uent AEs reported for the RTH258 groups were conjunctival hemorrhage, eye pain, and conjunctival hype

106 .6%) with Janeway lesions, and 3 (0.6%) with conjunctival hemorrhages (5 patients had 2 skin manifest

107 (Osler nodes, Janeway lesions, purpura, and conjunctival hemorrhages).

108 woman was referred with repeated episodes of conjunctival "hemorrhages" and chemosis with extended re

109 ut corneal or eyelid changes and mild bulbar conjunctival hyperaemia in a third of cases.

110 Biomicroscopy showed conjunctival hyperaemia in the left eye with a slight el

111 7 +/- 3.0 vs 327.7 +/- 5.1 mOsm/L, P = .03), conjunctival hyperemia (1.3 +/- 0.1 vs 1.6 +/- 0.1, P =

112 Bulbar conjunctival hyperemia and ocular symptoms decreased and

113 sensation, tearing, foreign body sensation, conjunctival hyperemia and photophobia.

114 All but 1 subject exhibited transient conjunctival hyperemia to some degree in the 8-hour peri

115 Conjunctival hyperemia was the most common treatment-rel

116 Conjunctival hyperemia with onset later than 2 days afte

117 re: tear osmolarity, phenol red thread test, conjunctival hyperemia, fluorescein tear break-up time,

118 re: tear osmolarity, phenol red thread test, conjunctival hyperemia, fluorescein tear film break-up t

119 smolarity, Schirmer test, tear breakup time, conjunctival hyperemia, staining of the cornea and conju

120 Corneal and conjunctival staining, conjunctival hyperemia, tear film breakup time (TBUT), t

121 The most frequent adverse event was conjunctival hyperemia, the incidence of which ranged fr

122 were conjunctival hemorrhage, eye pain, and conjunctival hyperemia; the majority of these events wer

123 Conjunctival impression cytology samples collected from

124 Tear washes and conjunctival impression cytology specimens were collecte

125 tivity, in vivo corneal confocal microscopy, conjunctival impression cytology, tonometry and fundus e

126 a1) levels as evaluated by eyelid margin and conjunctival impression cytology.

127 to consistent dissemination to kidney after conjunctival infection was approximately 10(8) leptospir

128 teen patients with posterior blepharitis and conjunctival inflammation due to MGD were treated with a

129 cular microbiomes had more severe MG-induced conjunctival inflammation than birds with unaltered micr

130 ydia trachomatis in childhood lead to severe conjunctival inflammation, scarring, and potentially bli

131 rious adverse events, though a local sterile conjunctival inflammatory reaction was observed.

132 erpalpebral conjunctival melanosis (44%) and conjunctival injection (43%).

133 ategory 1, including a greater proportion of conjunctival injection (P = 0.003), conjunctival corkscr

134 nilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT), short-lastin

135 macular or maculopapular rash, arthralgias, conjunctival injection, and headache; 27% had fever (sho

136 t injection typically presents without pain, conjunctival injection, or hypopyon, and responds to top

137 Inflammation (ie, conjunctival injection, presence of keratic precipitates

138 nced coughing, nasal drop, eyelid edema, and conjunctival injection.

139 3 of 20 (15%) had pain and 2 of 20 (10%) had conjunctival injection.

140 Any corneal or conjunctival injury in a blast survivor should prompt a

141 term because it does not distinguish between conjunctival intraepithelial melanin overproduction ("hy

142 Comparison of conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) vs SCC reve

143 as squamous (2 benign papillomas, 2 grade 2 conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasias, 7 in situ squam

144 and conjunctival involvement while 16.3% had conjunctival involvement only.

145 al of 83.7% of subjects had both corneal and conjunctival involvement while 16.3% had conjunctival in

146 ase of systemic amyloidosis with a bilateral conjunctival involvement.

147 onths compared with 30 months for those with conjunctival JXG.

148 Conjunctival Kaposi's sarcoma developed in 1 patient.

149 ay be challenging, as tumors mimic a primary conjunctival lesion.

150 8 ophthalmologists were shown photographs of conjunctival lesions and asked to independently classify

151 n-invasive tool, useful in the evaluation of conjunctival lesions and planning surgery.

152 est interobserver agreement, OSSN and benign conjunctival lesions are not reliably distinguished clin

153 and presented to our service with suspicious conjunctival lesions at a median of 22 years later (mean

154 flectance confocal microscopy features of 53 conjunctival lesions clinically suspicious for tumors of

155 Conjunctival lesions may lead to impaired vision and, fi

156 There is a trend toward treating conjunctival lesions suspected to be ocular surface squa

157 of IVCM for distinguishing OSSN from benign conjunctival lesions were 38.5% and 66.7%, respectively.

158 Conjunctival lesions were diagnosed with a conventional

159 Conjunctival lesions were excised in toto using a standa

160 years), a total of 166 eyelid margin and 129 conjunctival lesions were included in the analysis.

161 8 consecutive patients with eyelid margin or conjunctival lesions were included.

162 Patients with conjunctival lesions were offered excisional biopsy with

163 ex vivo preliminary diagnosis of suspicious conjunctival lesions with good histologic details and ma

164 ared with histopathology among patients with conjunctival lesions, toluidine blue 0.05% vital stainin

165 sional biopsies for diagnosing indeterminate conjunctival lesions.

166 ough July 2014 of 496 adults presenting with conjunctival lesions.

167 play a role in the noninvasive diagnosis of conjunctival lesions.

168 urface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) from benign conjunctival lesions.

169 ough July 2014 of 419 adults with suspicious conjunctival lesions.

170 the diagnosis of precancerous and cancerous conjunctival lesions.

171 isional biopsies in diagnosing indeterminate conjunctival lesions; and its association with cardiac m

172 Four eyes (29%) underwent living-related conjunctival limbal allograft and 10 eyes (71%) underwen

173 l staining score in the study eye, and nasal conjunctival lissamine green staining score (0-4 scale)

174 break-up time, corneal fluorescein staining, conjunctival lissamine green staining, and Schirmer test

175 scores (superior, central, total region) and conjunctival lissamine scores (nasal, temporal, total re

176 r, P = 0.0392; total cornea, P = 0.0148) and conjunctival lissamine staining (nasal, P = 0.0039; tota

177 ignificantly reduced corneal fluorescein and conjunctival lissamine staining and improved symptoms of

178 We report a case of conjunctival lymphangiectasia in which anterior segment

179 Conjunctival lymphangiectasia is a rare condition presum

180 nical appearance we suspected the case to be conjunctival lymphangiectasia or lymphangioma.

181 munhistochemistry confirmed the diagnosis of conjunctival lymphangiectasia.

182 hannels or by an abnormal connection between conjunctival lymphatic and blood vessels.

183 clinical features of the various subtypes of conjunctival lymphoma (CL) have not been previously eval

184 Conjunctival lymphoma commonly manifested in elderly ind

185 Conjunctival lymphoma consists of mainly 4 subtypes of B

186 To present a case of conjunctival lymphoma in a young woman complicated by pr

187 Partial regrowth of conjunctival lymphoma occurred 6 months after excision a

188 Adjunct treatments for conjunctival malignancies are needed when standard thera

189 fferentiated from chronic conjunctivitis and conjunctival malignancies.

190 eratectomy, and cryotherapy to the remaining conjunctival margins.

191 festing with follicular conjunctivitis and a conjunctival mass in one eye with no evidence of leucocy

192 VA-induced allergic response, the numbers of conjunctival mast cells were lower in CCL7-deficient mic

193 All pre- and postoperative biopsies of flat conjunctival melanocytic disorders should be evaluated i

194 inical presentation and treatment in primary conjunctival melanoma (CM) are rare.

195 Conjunctival melanoma (CM) is a highly aggressive ocular

196 r surface burns (2 eyes), trauma (1 eye) and conjunctival melanoma treatment (1 eye) underwent modifi

197 elanosis with moderate to severe atypia, and conjunctival melanoma) that provided sufficient quantity

198 nomas, conjunctival squamous dysplasias, and conjunctival melanomas.

199 and ocular surface, including interpalpebral conjunctival melanosis (44%) and conjunctival injection

200 This, together with conjunctival membranes and subconjunctival hemorrhage, w

201 es, even after accounting for differences in conjunctival MG load.

202 The conjunctival microcirculation can be non-invasively imag

203 In this study, alterations in conjunctival microvascular hemodynamics were quantitativ

204 In conjunctival MLs, the use of VR with Melan-A and HMB45 p

205 ubstrate for immunohistochemical analysis of conjunctival MLs.

206 ltivariate analysis, the use of a disposable conjunctival mould assist device and the use of prophyla

207 Among cases of conjunctival mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma,

208 estigations in all patients who present with conjunctival myxoma (J Ophthalmol (1);1-5, 2014; Ophthal

209 This case of conjunctival myxoma adds to the small number of document

210 y to cardiac myxoma, thus early diagnosis of conjunctival myxoma can prevent potentially devastating

211 under local anaesthesia and reported to be a conjunctival myxoma.

212 ion were consistent with previous reports on conjunctival myxoma:80-84, 1986).

213 Conjunctival myxomas can occur in association with the C

214 py in selected cases of recalcitrant diffuse conjunctival neoplasms.

215 anoma) and 8 from the diagnostic categories (conjunctival nevus, primary acquired melanosis with mild

216 e most frequently reported adverse event was conjunctival/ocular hyperemia, with a combined incidence

217 ration, and conjunctivalization), history of conjunctival or lid surgery, and requirement for systemi

218 al moderate to severe upper and lower tarsal conjunctival papillary reaction, without corneal or eyel

219 seen in Kenya with a lesion that resembled a conjunctival papilloma.

220 und to reliably distinguish OSSN from benign conjunctival pathology because of an overlap in the feat

221 In East Africa, conjunctival pathology is relatively common and can pres

222 ntropion (adjusted OR, 11.25; P = .003), and conjunctival prolapse (adjusted OR, 7.10; P = .03).

223 Efficacy was assessed by comparing conjunctival provocation test (CPT) reactions at baselin

224 Conjunctival provocation test (CPT) response thresholds

225 Conjunctival provocation tests (CPT) were performed befo

226 e effects can occur after extensive cosmetic conjunctival resection followed by topical mitomycin C a

227 Mild conjunctival retraction occurred in 4 eyes (8.9%) betwee

228 The conjunctival route resulted in a delay in the time to pe

229 using an enzootic mode of transmission, the conjunctival route.

230 s, intratracheal, intravenous, or oral-nasal-conjunctival routes did not recapitulate all the hallmar

231 doses of EBOV (Makona strain) by the oral or conjunctival routes.

232 serts and bioadhesive matrices placed in the conjunctival sac can enhance drug delivery by increasing

233 In this case, previous animal contact and conjunctival samples showing Enterobacteriaceae like col

234 Conjunctival samples were done before placing the sclero

235 ease severity as determined by the degree of conjunctival scarring (using Tauber staging), central co

236 fibrosis for documentation of progression in conjunctival scarring disease is a clinical challenge.

237 l comparative datasets for the assessment of conjunctival scarring disorders among all anthropologica

238 I, 1.31-7.70; P = 0.01) in PLTR and baseline conjunctival scarring in BLTR (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.06-2.

239 nce of epilation, in association with tarsal conjunctival scarring.

240 Five of 28 patients had mild tarsal conjunctival scarring.

241 nce of epilation, in association with tarsal conjunctival scarring.

242 to enucleation for residual scleral-invasive conjunctival SCC following resection.

243 Histopathology confirmed conjunctival SCC in all cases with residual tumor demons

244 Direct bacteriological examination of conjunctival secretions showed gram-negative bacilli and

245 demonstrates sex variations and progressive conjunctival shrinkage with age.

246 Conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is surgically

247 on 7 eyes of 6 patients treated for diffuse conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma, sebaceous carcinom

248 inomas, 95% of basal cell carcinomas, 73% of conjunctival squamous cell carcinomas, and 60% of mucoep

249 carcinomas, eyelid squamous cell carcinomas, conjunctival squamous dysplasias, and conjunctival melan

250 It may resemble conjunctival squamous papilloma.

251 , corneal staining (1.4 vs 0.2, P < 0.0001), conjunctival staining (1.4 vs 0.3, P < 0.0001), and tear

252 0.59-1.51, for visit 2 and 3, respectively), conjunctival staining (mean, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.54-1.37 vs.

253 te [NEI] scale), and average lissamine green conjunctival staining (NEI scale).

254 < 0.013), Schirmer test results (P < 0.001), conjunctival staining (P < 0.001), and corneal staining

255 6-0.93, left eye 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-0.95) and conjunctival staining (right eye 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.93,

256 tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal staining, conjunctival staining, and an irritation symptom questio

257 chirmer test, tear breakup time, corneal and conjunctival staining, and meibomian gland dysfunction,

258 Outcome measures included corneal and conjunctival staining, blink rate, and irritation sympto

259 Corneal and conjunctival staining, conjunctival hyperemia, tear film

260 p showed greater improvements in corneal and conjunctival staining, hyperemia, and TBUT than the PA g

261 , tear film breakup time (TBUT), corneal and conjunctival staining, meibomian grading, and Ocular Sur

262 ining) at 6 months within plug groups except conjunctival staining.

263 1.57-2.33 vs. mean, 2.58; 95% CI, 2.17-2.98; conjunctival staining: mean, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.29-2.08 vs.

264 , diagnosis of uveitis or dry eye, and prior conjunctival surgery were not correlated with the presen

265 /18 patients had 1 species identified on the conjunctival swab.

266 quantification of ZIKAV RNA was performed on conjunctival swabs collected from both eyes of these pat

267 V and the viral RNA copy numbers detected in conjunctival swabs ranged from 5.2 to 9.3 copies respect

268 blade on a Bard-Parker handle, whereas only conjunctival swabs were taken from Group 2 patients.

269 d antibody testing: TF and TT were assessed, conjunctival swabs were tested for chlamydial infection,

270 al colonies were tabulated in total from the conjunctival swabs.

271 n examination there were 3 distinct areas of conjunctival swelling in each eye, representing a total

272 In vivo, CCL7 was upregulated in conjunctival tissue during an OVA-induced allergic respo

273 ed with IgE-mediated mast cell activation in conjunctival tissue leading to the release of preformed

274 athologic evaluation of biopsied corneal and conjunctival tissues demonstrated immunoglobulin deposit

275 The IL6 and PRG4 protein expression in conjunctival tissues was also assessed using in situ imm

276 We characterized the conjunctival, tongue and fecal microbiome profiles of pa

277 rospective case series reviewed 806 cases of conjunctival tumor in children (aged <21 years) who were

278 However, 4 cases showed further distant conjunctival tumor recurrence remote from the site of ra

279 Among the 806 patients with conjunctival tumor, the top 5 diagnoses included nevus (

280 lar uveal tumor spread rather than a primary conjunctival tumor.

281 74% vs 46%), but slightly less for malignant conjunctival tumors (78% vs 88%).

282 In an ocular oncology practice, conjunctival tumors are benign (52%), premalignant (18%)

283 To evaluate frequency of conjunctival tumors in all ages and compare benign vs ma

284 cular tertiary referral center, suggest that conjunctival tumors in children are nearly always benign

285 Conjunctival tumors in children are usually benign and r

286 To evaluate clinical features of conjunctival tumors in children by comparing benign tumo

287 Treatment of the conjunctival tumors included excisional biopsy (n = 4),

288 Overall, conjunctival tumors were benign (779 [97%]) or malignant

289 the main cause for misdiagnosis of malignant conjunctival tumors with IVCM.

290 elative frequency of any malignancy (per all conjunctival tumors) by age bracket (0-5 years, >5-10 ye

291 ntraoperative and postsurgical management of conjunctival tumors.

292 IVCM) for the diagnosis of eyelid margin and conjunctival tumors.

293 ful tool for the identification of malignant conjunctival tumors.

294 It often presents as a benign conjunctival tumour but may mimic other ocular condition

295 and corneal epithelial defects, 25%, 3 days; conjunctival ulceration, 39%, 3.5 days; symblepharon, 28

296 valent less than -0.50 diopters) and area of conjunctival ultraviolet autofluorescence in mm(2).

297 Cycloplegic autorefraction, conjunctival ultraviolet autofluorescence photography, p

298 Conjunctival UV autofluorescence (CUVAF) photography was

299 at the level of the conjunctiva or increased conjunctival vessel diameter is also frequent.

300 Modulating conjunctival wound healing has the potential to improve