コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 n high-level areas) equally likely to become conscious?
5 We used two masking techniques and show that conscious access for visual stimuli synchronous to parti
8 ach restricted in time, while the failure of conscious access results in the breaking of this chain a
9 oth tasks required sustained attention, thus conscious access to the rules of tonality was manipulate
11 cit safety vs. threat) that is distinct from conscious affective experience and more closely tracks t
12 GROUND DATA: Novices are hypothesized to use conscious analysis (effortful DM) leading to activation
15 and then later (15-20 min) recognizing a non-conscious and complex (second-order) visuospatial sequen
16 100% sensitivity and specificity between the conscious and the unconscious conditions in the benchmar
17 of conscious decision-making to explain both conscious and unconscious accumulation of decisional evi
19 clusion affects the sub-processes underlying conscious and unconscious cognitive control differently.
21 el dichoptic suppression paradigm to titrate conscious and unconscious evidence, we show that unconsc
26 ion of emotional stimuli at the threshold of conscious awareness and alter judgments of emotionality
27 ole in perception, associative learning, and conscious awareness and have been shown to be disrupted
28 had made a decision, supports the idea that conscious awareness occurs when evidence has accumulated
32 parent future influences "earlier" events in conscious awareness, might affect people's most fundamen
33 duals are physically connected without their conscious awareness, we investigated how the interaction
45 by the central nervous system, muscles, and conscious brain is of interest since body sway carries i
47 ious care, and a culture of high-value, cost-conscious care reinforce the desired training goals (27
48 ating physicians to deliver high-value, cost-conscious care suggests that learning by practicing phys
49 f role models of delivering high-value, cost-conscious care, and a culture of high-value, cost-consci
54 was similar in 1PP and 3PP, suggesting that conscious coding of errors is similar for self and other
56 focused primarily on exclusion's effects on conscious cognitive control, while recent studies have s
57 l and neural science of unconscious (C0) and conscious computations (C1 and C2) and outline how they
59 hat excluded people invest more attention in conscious conflict detection, but less in conscious inhi
60 mand for lean meat from progressively health conscious consumers, are considered drivers for change i
62 versus the back of the cortex in specifying conscious contents and discuss promising research avenue
63 consciousness is to increase the saliency of conscious contents by facilitating the deployment of foc
64 ive-mechanistic, and representational (e.g., conscious contents) processes associated with consciousn
66 e LFN is real-time measure that is not under conscious control and which reflects conceptually-mediat
68 of these misdiagnosed patients as minimally conscious, corroborating their behavioural diagnoses.
69 in vivo electrophysiology, and a guinea pig conscious cough model to investigate a role for TRPV4 in
71 delivered intravesically to SCI rats during conscious cystometry significantly decreased the frequen
74 behaviorally, the attentional blink impairs conscious decisions about the presence of integrated sur
75 er-level brain systems interactions modulate conscious detection of prediction error through top-down
79 be accumulated over time and integrated with conscious elements presented either before or after to b
80 res on insomnia severity, hyperarousal, self-conscious emotional distress, and thought-like nocturnal
83 theory: the role of negative evaluations of conscious emotions, and the role of emotions without phy
85 lations) or if it has an effect only through conscious evaluation of the separation between targets.
86 are characterized by brief interruptions of conscious experience accompanied by oscillations of acti
88 somatosensory stimuli from getting access to conscious experience and which (2) can explain the assoc
89 advances that are important for dissociating conscious experience from related enabling and executive
91 is approach provided strong evidence for the conscious experience of a brain-injured patient, who had
92 ce that the amygdala is not required for the conscious experience of fear induced via interoceptive s
94 As shown here, when subjects reported no conscious experience upon awakening, TMS evoked a larger
96 e, features of volition, namely, its link to conscious experience, and reviews stimulation and patien
97 f the temporal and spatial dimensions of our conscious experience, their neuroanatomical implementati
106 cted from the environment while still having conscious experiences, as demonstrated by sleep states a
111 hese results inform contemporary theories of conscious face perception in particular and visual atten
113 logical changes in the brain and body and 2) conscious feeling states reflected in self-reports of fe
116 al circuits are not directly responsible for conscious feelings, they provide nonconscious inputs tha
119 s a whole do not influence each other in the conscious field; however, research shows that some of th
126 show that implementation of PBM with a more conscious handling of transfusion practice can be achiev
129 s instead the forum that brings conflicting (conscious) inputs into a form that allows them to be (un
131 pseudo-imitative behavior can occur without conscious intent or other higher-order cognitive process
133 a direct sensory-motor pathway; and a slower conscious intention code that computes the required resp
139 The mental representations are not crisp and conscious like the perceived objects are, but vague and
147 of ischemia in a specific cortical region of conscious mice of any postnatal age, including perinatal
151 temporally extended brain process underlying conscious movement intention that spans seconds around m
152 ary motor cortex caused the reported time of conscious movement intention to be approximately 60-70 m
153 ial question of whether machines may ever be conscious must be based on a careful consideration of ho
155 tomaticity features (e.g., un/controlled, un/conscious, non/efficient, fast/slow) and their interrela
162 andomized and placebo-controlled study in 11 conscious patients (nine men, two women) undergoing comm
165 d that cortical activity trajectories during conscious perception are fast evolving and robust to sma
166 eloped method for manipulating attention and conscious perception during EEG recording (modified inat
167 ed preattentively and unconsciously, whereas conscious perception emerges with late-stage (>300 ms) n
169 ctor networks, and its possible relevance to conscious perception has been suggested by theorists.
173 asic effects have led to the hypothesis that conscious perception occurs in discrete temporal windows
176 ble known electrophysiological correlates of conscious perception of near-threshold visual stimuli.
179 ain objective was to implicitly (i.e., below conscious perception) associate disgust with high-calori
181 ventral striatum activity may contribute to conscious perception, presumably by gating cortical info
191 Null Findings Falsify Prefrontal Theories of Conscious Perception?, by Brian Odegaard, Robert T.Knigh
192 equally likely to become conscious; rather, conscious percepts emerge preferentially at a global lev
194 before or after a target stimulus can hinder conscious perceptual processing of the target via an emo
195 stification - that decision making must be a conscious process unless proved otherwise, and they plac
197 he DMN in global information integration for conscious processing, can potentially provide an explana
200 al hierarchy is not equally likely to become conscious; rather, conscious percepts emerge preferentia
201 ic ketamine (1-30 mg/kg, i.v.) or vehicle to conscious rats (n=12) and testing their EEG entrainment
203 ry consequences of Arch activation (10 s) in conscious rats during normoxia, hypoxia, or hyperoxia.
204 transduced C1 neurons were photoactivated in conscious rats while EEG, neck muscle EMG, blood pressur
205 and normalizes carotid body hyperreflexia in conscious rats with hypertension; no effect was observed
206 ctivation via electrical CSN stimulation, in conscious rats, controls the innate immune response to l
211 ing and recognition separately predicted non-conscious recognition memory, and functional coupling be
212 suospatial information and support later non-conscious recognition memory-guided behavior (cf.[5]) an
213 aisal - first, if appraisal is restricted to conscious reflection on one's circumstances, and second,
216 ort a close relationship between IPS and the conscious representation of the body external appearance
219 techniques are excitingly friendly to budget conscious scientific research organizations where probab
220 o investigate whether the sedation mode (ie, conscious sedation [CS] vs general anesthesia [GA]) affe
221 n raw analyses, intraprocedural success with conscious sedation and general anesthesia was similar (9
223 , -3.2 points [95% CI, -5.6 to -0.8]) vs the conscious sedation group (mean NIHSS score, 17.2 at admi
224 anesthesia group (n = 73) or a nonintubated conscious sedation group (n = 77) during stroke thrombec
228 erformed in one session with US guidance and conscious sedation in 20 euthyroid patients (mean age, 4
233 nesthesia with patients undergoing TAVR with conscious sedation on an intention-to-treat basis for th
235 nterior circulation undergoing thrombectomy, conscious sedation vs general anesthesia did not result
236 tment-weighted adjustment for 51 covariates, conscious sedation was associated with lower procedural
241 ls are not consciously selected and that the conscious self is involved just in post hoc rationalizat
242 signals covary with changes in participants' conscious self-identification with a body that were mani
243 omotor control neglects the contributions to conscious selfhood and subjectivity that rest on interoc
244 muli and innocuous stimuli that do not reach conscious sensations from visceral organs to the central
245 various physiological processes such as the conscious sensations of touch and hearing, and the uncon
246 mediate this effect and is it restricted to conscious sensory events (suprathreshold), or does it al
252 ness syndrome (VS/UWS; n = 70) and minimally conscious state (MCS; n = 57) were presented with the lo
253 ommunicative DOC patients (38 in a minimally conscious state [MCS] and 43 in a vegetative state [VS])
255 >80%) for separating patients in a minimally conscious state and vegetative state/unresponsive wakefu
256 o discriminate between patients in minimally conscious state and vegetative state/unresponsive wakefu
257 uch as coma, vegetative state, and minimally conscious state are clearly distinct and unambiguously d
258 ctionally connected in patients in minimally conscious state compared to vegetative state/unresponsiv
259 tterns between the FPN and DMN could predict conscious state more effectively than connectivity withi
260 us state without language (n = 3), minimally conscious state with language (n = 4) or post-traumatic
261 (n = 2), vegetative state (n = 3), minimally conscious state without language (n = 3), minimally cons
262 fulness syndrome, one emerged from minimally conscious state) were used to validate the classificatio
263 al entities (eg, vegetative state, minimally conscious state), (3) clinical measures of consciousness
265 (Liege) including 51 patients (26 minimally conscious state, 19 vegetative state/unresponsive wakefu
266 in two other centres (Salzburg: 10 minimally conscious state, five vegetative state/unresponsive wake
267 akefulness syndrome, VS/UWS, and 7 minimally conscious state, MCS) and compared these properties with
268 kefulness syndrome; New York: five minimally conscious state, one vegetative state/unresponsive wakef
269 collected data from 73 patients in minimally conscious state, vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulne
274 " level of analysis (how neurons instantiate conscious states), an enigma for various disciplines.
276 range between actions that are almost always conscious, such as finger movements, and those that are
277 s finger movements, and those that are never conscious, such as the smooth-muscle actions of the dige
278 ervention of automatic goals by higher-order conscious systems with examples from social cognitive af
280 e to the attentional blink by revealing that conscious target perception may be determined by T1 proc
283 Specifically, it challenges the notions that conscious thoughts are not connected and that consciousn
284 hrough those who have emerged from minimally conscious, to the fully conscious locked-in syndrome.
287 We have evaluated luciferase bioimaging in conscious, unrestrained mice after neonatal intracranial
290 ubsystems, image-forming circuits that drive conscious vision and non-image-forming circuits for beha
292 igh levels can account for two properties of conscious vision, namely, the dominance of global percep
294 sults suggest that brain dynamics underlying conscious visual perception belongs to the class of init
297 The literature on the neural correlates of conscious visual perception remains inconclusive regardi
298 and patient studies of the cortical basis of conscious volition down to the single-neuron level.
299 brain-injured subjects in various states of conscious wakefulness, disconnected consciousness, and u
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。