ライフサイエンスコーパス: conscious sedation

1 s do not support an advantage for the use of conscious sedation.

2 al programs to train residents in the use of conscious sedation.

3 maintain sleep, reduce seizures, and induce conscious sedation.

4 cy department to monitor patients undergoing conscious sedation.

5 heter ablation for atrial fibrillation under conscious sedation.

6 heter ablation for atrial fibrillation under conscious sedation.

7 87%] of 52 private practice) respondents use conscious sedation.

8 lses did not change and no patients required conscious sedation.

9 lters were placed using local anesthesia and conscious sedation.

10 in the prepectoral subfascial position under conscious sedation.

11 s above the established threshold), by using conscious sedation and 8-12-F catheters.

12 n raw analyses, intraprocedural success with conscious sedation and general anesthesia was similar (9

13 Under conscious sedation and local anesthesia or local anesthe

14 gents for general anaesthesia as well as for conscious sedation and their respective drawbacks.

15 roidectomy (ex-MIP; locoregional anesthesia, conscious sedation, and exploration via a limited incisi

16 Locoregional anesthesia, conscious sedation, and exploration via a limited incisi

17 New pharmacologic agents for conscious sedation are being used with increasing freque

18 nces between 'monitored anesthesia care' and conscious sedation are defined.

19 The first seven patients underwent conscious sedation, but the other 22 patients required o

20 time and labor intensive, and often require conscious sedation by a pediatric anesthesiology team.

21 examination, 4,761 patients (78.1%) received conscious sedation by the MR conscious sedation service.

22 nesthesia was noted in 102 of 1737 (5.9%) of conscious sedation cases.

23 f 5 mL of 1% lidocaine injected locally, and conscious sedation consisted of 50 microg of fentanyl an

24 o investigate whether the sedation mode (ie, conscious sedation [CS] vs general anesthesia [GA]) affe

25 ion who underwent left atrial ablation under conscious sedation, digital cine-fluoroscopic imaging of

26 ications such as fever), use of analgesia or conscious sedation, drainage method, and imaging techniq

27 In 162 patients, conscious sedation during ICD placement was achieved wit

28 edation (BPS) titrated to moderate sedation (conscious sedation) for endoscopic procedures.

29 , -3.2 points [95% CI, -5.6 to -0.8]) vs the conscious sedation group (mean NIHSS score, 17.2 at admi

30 anesthesia group (n = 73) or a nonintubated conscious sedation group (n = 77) during stroke thrombec

31 the general anesthesia group vs 18.2% in the conscious sedation group P = .01]).

32 The conscious sedation group was less likely to experience i

33 In the general anesthesia vs the conscious sedation group, substantial patient movement w

34 erformed in one session with US guidance and conscious sedation in 20 euthyroid patients (mean age, 4

35 can be performed safely and effectively with conscious sedation in patients with malignant compressio

36 ic agents and their possible application for conscious sedation in the ambulatory care setting.

37 These results suggest the safety of conscious sedation in this population, although comparat

38 In US practice, conscious sedation is associated with briefer length of

39 Conscious sedation is safe and has a high effectiveness

40 Objective: To assess whether conscious sedation is superior to general anesthesia for

41 Conscious sedation is used during transcatheter aortic v

42 tional radiologists, to document patterns of conscious sedation, nursing assistance, and care before

43 Implantation under conscious sedation of ICDs in the prepectoral subfascial

44 nesthesia with patients undergoing TAVR with conscious sedation on an intention-to-treat basis for th

45 either under sedation, which is deeper than conscious sedation, or under anaesthesia.

46 performed safely with general anesthesia or conscious sedation, provided that there are properly tra

47 A database of conscious sedation records for MR imaging at the Johns H

48 78.1%) received conscious sedation by the MR conscious sedation service.

49 Has this new form of conscious sedation the potential to be safer and more ef

50 Conversion from conscious sedation to general anesthesia was noted in 10

51 nterior circulation undergoing thrombectomy, conscious sedation vs general anesthesia did not result

52 tment-weighted adjustment for 51 covariates, conscious sedation was associated with lower procedural

53 Conscious sedation was associated with reductions in pro

54 Conscious sedation was used in 1737/10 997 (15.8%) cases

55 Conscious sedation was used in 59.9% of transfemoral pro

56 Implantation of ICDs under conscious sedation with combined hypnotic agents and dee

57 s) in the electrophysiology laboratory using conscious sedation with combined hypnotic agents and dee

58 logy laboratories under local anesthesia and conscious sedation with intravenous midazolam and propof