戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1      Whether these differences affect family experience and consent rates deserves investigation.
2 it exceeds the risk, and 3) patients are fully informed and consent, can adhere to follow-up, and alert providers to hepa
3 tionships with communities may increase acceptance of broad consent and wide data sharing in biobank research.
4 haring; broad consent and controlled data sharing; or broad consent and open data sharing.
5 cenarios: tiered consent and controlled data sharing; broad consent and controlled data sharing; or broad consent and ope
6     The most common reason given for endorsing the deferred consent process was the stress of the early ICU experience 25
7 fy the process and manner of the request to increase family consent rates.
8  This scoping review of the literature on requesting family consent was prepared to support of the development of leading
9                                                    Informed consent was provided according to the last will of the donors
10 study was approved by the ethics review board, and informed consent was obtained.
11 titutional review board approval was obtained, and informed consent was waived in this HIPAA-compliant retrospective stud
12 nd Methods Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained.
13 itutional review board approval, and patients gave informed consent.
14 ndemnity payments, malpractice lawsuits, including informed consent allegations, still present a time, money, and reputat
15 er, there is a paucity of literature investigating informed consent in spinal surgery malpractice.
16                                  Failure to obtain informed consent and associated medical malpractice case verdict.
17 titutional review board; the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived.
18                                    After obtaining informed consent from the readers, 12 CT colonography fly-through exam
19  centre, found to have inadequate documentation of informed consent, immediately withdrew consent, or randomly assigned t
20   Kidney transplant candidates (KTCs) must provide informed consent to accept kidneys from increased risk donors (IRD), b
21 football players (age range, 52-65 years) provided informed consent to participate in this cross-sectional study.
22 retrospective, HIPAA-compliant, multicenter study; informed consent was waived.
23 was approved by the local ethics board and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
24                                            Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
25                                            Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
26 ved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants.
27 pproved by the institutional board review; written informed consent was obtained from healthy subjects and was waived for
28                                            Written informed consent was obtained from patients or their parents.
29 ds Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained for the Effect of Iso-osmolar Contrast
30 ds Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained from all subjects.
31 aterials and Methods All subjects provided written informed consent, and the protocol was approved by the university inst
32 gnosed with paracetamol overdose, and gave written informed consent.
33  board approval, and all participants gave written informed consent.
34 ee, and all patients or their parents gave written informed consent.
35                      All subjects provided written informed consent.
36 sh, and all participating parents provided written informed consent.
37 or disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or investigator decision.
38 rrence or new breast cancer, intolerable adverse events, or consent withdrawal occurred.
39 tutional review board approval and written informed patient consent were obtained.
40 anagement of uncertainty, the extent of donor and recipient consent, the scope of the obligation that the organization ha
41                                    Overall, 76 women signed consent (mean [range] age, 56 [37-78] years), 75 started trea
42  qualify for a waiver of the consent requirements, targeted consent's verbal disclosure is preferable to waiving consent,
43                 For trials that qualify for a waiver of the consent requirements, targeted consent's verbal disclosure is
44 ly allocated to one of three hypothetical scenarios: tiered consent and controlled data sharing; broad consent and contro
45 rgeted consent's verbal disclosure is preferable to waiving consent, provided a slight delay is consistent with appropria
46                 There has been significant debate over what consent process, if any, should be used for clinical trials t
47 distant metastases at the time of randomization; 2 withdrew consent).
48                     One patient (in the FST group) withdrew consent before drug administration and was excluded from anal
49 ate documentation of informed consent, immediately withdrew consent, or randomly assigned to intervention groups in error
50 nts were available for analysis because 3 patients withdrew consent before scanning.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。