ライフサイエンスコーパス: conservative management

1 cases that are symptomatic and refractory to conservative management.

2 alfa-2b; empirical interferon treatment; and conservative management.

3 n treated by prostatectomy, radiotherapy, or conservative management.

4 2) after radiotherapy, and 93% (91-94) after conservative management.

5 longed air leak, both of which resolved with conservative management.

6 creatinine kinase level, which improved with conservative management.

7 ntion (placement of vesicoamniotic shunt) or conservative management.

8 g 324 patients with IPN who received primary conservative management.

9 randomized trial of fluid liberal vs. fluid conservative management.

10 The majority of the cases required conservative management.

11 tment options include surgery, radiation, or conservative management.

12 prognosis are older age, cancer etiology and conservative management.

13 ; HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96-1.05) compared with conservative management.

14 localized prostate cancer when compared with conservative management.

15 aphy than in those successfully treated with conservative management.

16 transient acuity decrease that resolved with conservative management.

17 is no difference between interventional and conservative management.

18 hers may significantly enhance or facilitate conservative management.

19 independently predicts adverse events under conservative management.

20 immature patients are generally amenable to conservative management.

21 tion ACS randomized to early invasive versus conservative management.

22 tality and morbidity are both observed under conservative management.

23 of death or MI within 42 days compared with conservative management.

24 hetica did not benefit in the long term from conservative management.

25 yes with recurrence was 56.7% (68/120) after conservative management, 14.8% (8/54) after diamond burr

26 Initial conservative management (31 of 87) and coronary artery b

27 >6 weeks follow-up: 120 of 166 (72.3%) after conservative management, 54 of 68 (79.4%) after diamond

28 compared with endoscopic treatment (65%) and conservative management (97%) (adjusted odds ratio, 24.9

29 observation that many patients improve with conservative management alone.

30 sider this information when deciding between conservative management and aggressive treatment for low

31 The patient elected for conservative management and at 3-month follow-up her sym

32 ve not been proved to be more effective than conservative management and there is limited evidence th

33 ients with cancer who do not respond to more conservative management and who continue to experience d

34 ervatively and ideally in combination with a conservative management approach for low-risk disease.

35 iated with substantially higher risks, and a conservative management approach is indicated for most p

36 ive systematic consideration with respect to conservative management are those with postprostatectomy

37 Although conservative management can be a reasonable choice, ther

38 ular diseases, and delayed surgery or overly conservative management can result in sudden death.

39 diagnosed as having unruptured bAVM, use of conservative management compared with intervention was a

40 Conservative management consisting of local analgesics,

41 her "invasive" management (462 patients) or "conservative" management, defined as medical therapy and

42 ce (eye-years) was 0.74, 0.19, and 0.23 with conservative management, diamond burr polishing, and PTK

43 Conservative management, diamond burr polishing, excimer

44 rate of the secondary outcome was lower with conservative management during 12 years of follow-up (14

45 ession to the primary outcome was lower with conservative management during the first 4 years of foll

46 ncontinence, treatment generally begins with conservative management emphasizing the most bothersome

47 The options include conservative management, extracorporeal shockwave lithot

48 rhinosinusitis not controlled by appropriate conservative management for 4 months, and difficult-to-t

49 ite successful sinus surgery and appropriate conservative management for at least 1 year.

50 meta-analysis of studies related to primary conservative management for IPN.

51 es-particularly when combined with increased conservative management for low-risk cases-is uncertain.

52 as an alternative to surgery, radiation, or conservative management for the treatment of localized p

53 in the invasive management group than in the conservative management group (11 vs. 2).

54 In the conservative management group one intrauterine death occ

55 the vesicoamniotic shunt group and 15 to the conservative management group.

56 r disease (eg, obstruction and perforation), conservative management has been emphasized over more ra

57 However, in patients for whom conservative management has failed or who are at particu

58 Recently published information regarding conservative management has revealed that plaque radioth

59 Further research into the roles of conservative management, Heimlich valves, digital air-le

60 ent evidence-based strategies for the use of conservative management in men with urinary incontinence

61 the first to describe the successful use of conservative management in select cases, a very appealin

62 surgical repair is the treatment of choice, conservative management in selected patients with increa

63 We analyzed the occurrence of AF under conservative management in two populations of patients w

64 Conservative management includes salt restriction and di

65 no complications of GER may respond well to conservative management, including positioning and thick

66 ith four from the 15 pregnancies assigned to conservative management (intention-to-treat relative ris

67 aflets, the strategy of early surgery versus conservative management is associated with an improved l

68 agnosis, the incidence of AF occurring under conservative management is high and similar whether the

69 in biomarker-positive women and men, whereas conservative management is indicated for biomarker-negat

70 NH) is a common benign liver tumor for which conservative management is indicated.

71 roach for treatment of neuropathic pain when conservative management is ineffective.

72 Conservative management is likely optimal for most patie

73 a strategy of early intervention or initial conservative management is most appropriate.

74 Whether conservative management is superior to interventional tr

75 Conservative management is the first line treatment for

76 e a sphincter defect by anal ultrasound, and conservative management is usually successful in these p

77 Our goal in describing 'conservative' management is to prevent this step.

78 Conservative management led to improvement of graft func

79 f pneumoperitoneum and should recognize that conservative management may be indicated in many cases.

80 Patients who fail conservative management may undergo spinal fusion with p

81 With conservative management, mortality rate was higher than

82 Conservative management (no intervention) vs interventio

83 received PADT, and 11,404 were treated with conservative management, not including PADT.

84 Advocates of conservative management note that some CLMs disappear po

85 e sensitivity analyses, suggestive that more conservative management of abnormal preoperative interna

86 On the basis of the retrospective studies, conservative management of appendiceal abscess is recomm

87 Results following conservative management of clinically localized prostate

88 the young athlete, current research suggests conservative management of concussion and return-to-play

89 s was performed to evaluate the influence of conservative management of grade 2 rejection on long-ter

90 Conservative management of late grade 2 rejection neithe

91 Conservative management of midsubstance anterior cruciat

92 tute a recognized alternative in cases where conservative management of obesity fails.

93 The role of interval appendectomy after conservative management of perforated appendicitis remai

94 Conservative management of severe preeclampsia, when per

95 The results of our survey support conservative management of Spitz nevi in children, with

96 Advances in the conservative management of the disease by extracorporeal

97 tion over 40 d of follow-up, suggesting that conservative management of these lesions, at least in th

98 Conservative management of traumatic shoulder dislocatio

99 ss and perfusion data in patients triaged to conservative management on clinical grounds, especially

100 Failed conservative management or unstable lesions will more li

101 inary-stone passage for patients amenable to conservative management, potentially obviating the need

102 ion margins having limited predictive value, conservative management protocols have been difficult to

103 Conservative management rarely is successful in these ca

104 Conservative management strategies have been developed a

105 As such, clinicians have tended toward conservative management strategies; however, the benefit

106 A conservative management strategy was followed.

107 Outcome measures were the success of conservative management strategy, need for necrosectomy,

108 re randomly assigned to an early invasive or conservative management strategy.

109 yielded similar results for radiotherapy and conservative management, the 10-year disease-specific su

110 Although such findings argue for more conservative management, the availability of diagnostic

111 The benefit of invasive vs conservative management through 30 days was evident even

112 Based on a random effects model, conservative management was successful for 64% of patien

113 -duct counterparts, and guidelines for their conservative management were recently proposed.

114 as observed in the effect of invasive versus conservative management when stratified by baseline leve

115 , the choice of carotid revascularization or conservative management will depend on clinical characte

116 Conservative management with bracing continues to be a m

117 enerally viewed as indolent and suitable for conservative management with only interval repeat biopsi

118 A strategy of conservative management with prolonged observation may b

119 nt options for postoperative ectasia include conservative management with various types of contact le

120 d for (131)I therapy or alternative options (conservative management without ablation, surgical reint

121 Conservative management without necrosectomy is a succes