ライフサイエンスコーパス: conspicuity

1 ) significantly increased pulmonary arterial conspicuity.

2 red for 23 (15%) of 150 patients due to poor conspicuity.

3 , fallopian tube conspicuity, and free spill conspicuity.

4 on overall reader confidence and bowel wall conspicuity.

5 ists to determine lesion detection rates and conspicuity.

6 at triglyceride-enhanced CT, which increased conspicuity.

7 glucagon had a significant effect on lesion conspicuity.

8 microcalcification clusters and rated their conspicuity.

9 and McNemar tests were used to compare polyp conspicuity.

10 image quality, lesion conspicuity, and vein conspicuity.

11 ty (on a scale of 1 to 5) on the basis of PV conspicuity.

12 were evaluated for image quality and vessel conspicuity.

13 t readers qualitatively assessed small-bowel conspicuity.

14 well seen) and identified causes of reduced conspicuity.

15 ide comparison using a 5-point scale, lesion conspicuity (4.3 +/- 0.6), lesion sharpness (4.3 +/- 0.6

16 0.1 vs 4.6 +/- 0.1, P: <.005) and bowel wall conspicuity (4.6 +/- 0.2 vs 4.2 +/- 0.2, P: <.005) compa

17 ilters are limited by a compromise in lesion conspicuity and appearance in comparison with lesion con

18 ity and appearance in comparison with lesion conspicuity and appearance on baseline low-dose CT image

19 Tumor conspicuity and CNR were higher with the 60-keV split-bo

20 ieved in all subjects, with excellent vessel conspicuity and depiction of stenoses.

21 mproves image noise without affecting lesion conspicuity and detection on low-dose abdominal and pelv

22 Anatomic conspicuity and diagnostic quality scores were compared

23 Lesion conspicuity and image quality of readout-segmented echo-

24 semiquantitatively evaluated images for fat conspicuity and image quality.

25 Readers also graded conspicuity and margins of each stone on a five-point sc

26 sing a five-point scale for assessing lesion conspicuity and margins, image noise, beam hardening, an

27 ults show that optimized contrast and lesion conspicuity and minimized motion artifacts can be obtain

28 mages were scored independently for anatomic conspicuity and overall diagnostic quality by two radiol

29 Regression models focused on conspicuity and quantified enhancement were used to esti

30 Lesion conspicuity and radiologist confidence in lesion detecti

31 oss all imaging modalities, varying in their conspicuity and significance.

32 r confidence in the assessment of bowel wall conspicuity and the ability of CT colonography to depict

33 omplications because there was high vascular conspicuity and tissue contrast.

34 aders reviewed each phase for lesion number, conspicuity, and attenuation relative to liver.

35 oise, visibility of small structures, lesion conspicuity, and diagnostic confidence.

36 solution, spatial resolution, fallopian tube conspicuity, and free spill conspicuity.

37 Image quality, lesion conspicuity, and image properties (ie, signal-to-noise r

38 s visually assessed image quality and lesion conspicuity, and image properties (ie, signal-to-noise r

39 -liver contrast-to-noise ratio (C/N), lesion conspicuity, and image quality.

40 noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), lesion conspicuity, and radiation dose.

41 nd peripancreatic vasculature, improve tumor conspicuity, and reduce patient radiation dose during th

42 /CT images for overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, and sharpness.

43 o-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, lesion conspicuity, and vascular pulsation artifact.

44 ment was performed for image quality, lesion conspicuity, and vein conspicuity.

45 r cuff, glenoid labrum, and anterior capsule conspicuity; and partial-thickness or full-thickness rot

46 of patients at CT, 80% at MR), and decreased conspicuity at portal venous and delayed-phase imaging.

47 moderate to substantial agreement in vessel conspicuity between 4D flow acquisitions in arteries and

48 y, there was no significant difference in PV conspicuity between the techniques.

49 Osteoid osteomas can be imaged with greater conspicuity by using dynamic gadolinium-enhanced instead

50 for presence, number, margins, attenuation, conspicuity, calcification, and enhancement of lesions,

51 Image interpretation comprised lesion conspicuity defined as visual lesion-to-background contr

52 all diagnostic preference in terms of lesion conspicuity, detectability, and diagnostic confidence wa

53 Assessed were image quality, lesion conspicuity, diagnostic confidence, and the benefit of a

54 Tumor conspicuity (difference in attenuation between tumor and

55 s in neurooncology, including improved tumor conspicuity, distinguishing actual response to therapy f

56 Subjective analysis revealed that tumor conspicuity during the PPP and PVP was equivalent but su

57 d instead of nonenhanced MR imaging and with conspicuity equal to or better than that obtained with t

58 liver, and pancreatic attenuation and tumor conspicuity equal to or greater than that with multiphas

59 er diagnostic confidence for accurate lesion conspicuity (especially in the nasopharynx and in the la

60 Two radiologists independently scored lesion conspicuity for contrast-enhanced breast CT versus mammo

61 For both readers, lesion conspicuity for solid lesions on enhanced images was sig

62 Lesion conspicuity, image artifacts, and incidental findings we

63 Organ or region conspicuity, image quality, and the limitations of image

64 Regarding small-bowel conspicuity, images obtained during the enteric phase we

65 Constant conspicuity implies that reduced compression would have

66 pear to affect hepatic enhancement or lesion conspicuity in humans.

67 well in eight of 11 patients and with better conspicuity in three of 11 patients, although this diffe

68 The greatest tumor conspicuity occurred during the delayed phase.

69 conditions, as well as the effects on lesion conspicuity of (a) collimation, (b) table pitch, and (c)

70 The conspicuity of 12 anatomic characteristics (comprising t

71 Three radiologists independently graded the conspicuity of 16 simulated lesions.

72 iastinum, cardiac chambers, and aortic wall; conspicuity of abnormality; intraluminal signal void uni

73 clarity of the mediastinum and aortic wall, conspicuity of any abnormality other than aortic dissect

74 In a third session, readers assessed conspicuity of biopsy-proved lesions on T2-weighted MR i

75 ging processing system that can suppress the conspicuity of bones was applied to the standard radiogr

76 artifacts, the pulsation artifacts, and the conspicuity of cranial nerves in the posterior fossa.

77 ed the image noise and the visualization and conspicuity of CT features of ILD.

78 ZTE exhibited greater conspicuity of enthesopathic cysts and marrow edema.

79 n T2-weighted MR images, which increases the conspicuity of focal hepatic lesions with negligible ret

80 r on T1-weighted images, which increases the conspicuity of focal lesions that do not contain hepatoc

81 f four peak voltage settings on the in vitro conspicuity of gallstones in an anthropomorphic phantom

82 Evaluation of ADC maps can improve conspicuity of hypoxic-ischemic injury in the acute and/

83 myocardium in all patients and in excellent conspicuity of infarcted myocardium in all nine patients

84 Conspicuity of ischemic segments was significantly great

85 No significant difference was shown for conspicuity of kidney stones in 22 patients who underwen

86 ection is attributable primarily to the poor conspicuity of lesions.

87 Conspicuity of malignant breast lesions, including ducta

88 high tube current CT technique improves the conspicuity of malignant hypervascular liver tumors duri

89 bust fat and blood suppression for increased conspicuity of nerves at 3.0 T in clinically feasible ac

90 Conspicuity of pulmonary arteries in the central zone wa

91 a dual-detector CT system, yielding greater conspicuity of small lesions and improved lesion detecti

92 The conspicuity of small renal calculi at CT increases with

93 The conspicuity of stone fragments increased with increasing

94 se and improves diagnostic confidence in and conspicuity of subtle abdominal lesions at 8.4 mGy when

95 The conspicuity of subtle and medium clusters with the 16 de

96 To improve the conspicuity of synovial enhancement, postcontrast CT was

97 Despite the simplicity and conspicuity of the appearance of the CC on anatomical ma

98 , number of enhancing levels, and quality of conspicuity of the depiction of lymph nodes and lymph ve

99 The extent, severity, and conspicuity of the disease were determined.

100 Dual-energy CT significantly improved the conspicuity of the ischemic bowel compared with conventi

101 nd blood suppression, resulting in increased conspicuity of the nerves, in clinically feasible imagin

102 ed with all three techniques were scored for conspicuity of the osteoid osteoma relative to the surro

103 h all imaging modalities and helped increase conspicuity of the tumor as well as its feeding arteries

104 very initial and reconstructed 2D image, but conspicuity on 3D reconstructions varied as the imaging

105 Visual lesion conspicuity on PET was comparable for PET/CT (mean ratin

106 very lesion using a 4-point scale for lesion conspicuity on PET, a 4-point scale for anatomic allocat

107 Two observers independently assessed vessel conspicuity on phase-contrast three-dimensional angiogra

108 Polyp conspicuity on the initial and reconstructed 2D images a

109 diameter polyp was clearly depicted (grade 2 conspicuity) on every initial and reconstructed 2D image

110 diameter polyp was clearly depicted (grade 2 conspicuity) on every initial and reconstructed 2D image

111 diameter polyp was faintly depicted (grade 1 conspicuity) on the initial and reconstructed 2D images

112 ere analyzed for mass and microcalcification conspicuity, or the ratio of the lesion contrast to the

113 s were compared for lesion detection, lesion conspicuity, overall image quality, and signal-to-noise

114 MRI conspicuity peaked at 4h after incubation of the nanocom

115 glandular dose, mass and microcalcification conspicuity remained approximately constant with decreas

116 ion and the liver parenchyma (ie, subjective conspicuity score [SCS]).

117 the liver in all cases; the median objective conspicuity score was -4.7% (all scores were <6%), and t

118 7% (all scores were <6%), and the subjective conspicuity score was 1 or lower for both observers.

119 with more variability; the median objective conspicuity score was 41% (range, 9%-72%), and the media

120 e assessed with videodensitometry (objective conspicuity score), and two observers assessed each lesi

121 esion by using a six-point scale (subjective conspicuity score).

122 stant metastases (n = 66) were evaluated for conspicuity (scored 0-4), artifacts (scored 0-2), and re

123 ificantly higher CNR (8.2 vs 6.4) and lesion conspicuity scores (4.6 vs 4.1) than protocol A, along w

124 always depicted in group 2, with subjective conspicuity scores (a) improved in group 2 for ground-gl

125 Analysis of average conspicuity scores showed that the direct coronal and di

126 % (range, 9%-72%), and the median subjective conspicuity scores were 2 (range, 1-4) and 3.5 (range, 1

127 ere > or =43%), respectively, and subjective conspicuity scores were 2 or higher for both observers.

128 imulated acoustic emission; median objective conspicuity scores were 70% and 68% (all scores were > o

129 Reader evaluation of tumor conspicuity showed a significant preference for precontr

130 images, scoring them as equal or better for conspicuity, spatial resolution, and image noise in 94.1

131 tion images and assigned scores for relative conspicuity, spatial resolution, image noise, and image

132 ignificantly higher image quality and lesion conspicuity than single-shot echo-planar imaging by redu

133 omosynthesis provided higher sensitivity and conspicuity than wide-angle DBT digital breast tomosynth

134 e radiologists independently analyzed lesion conspicuity to assess sensitivity and specificity.

135 ructed 2D images and 3D reconstructions, but conspicuity varied on the 3D reconstructions as the imag

136 The highest lesion conspicuity was achieved with the 80-kVp protocol.

137 The change in conspicuity was analyzed for significance by using a boo

138 ders' perception of image quality and lesion conspicuity was consistently ranked superior with SAFIRE

139 Lesion conspicuity was graded as well seen on both FBP and ASIR

140 s with metastatic melanoma, and liver lesion conspicuity was graded.

141 Anatomic conspicuity was not significantly different for groups 2

142 Lesion conspicuity was rated on a continuous scale.

143 the majority of lesions, the greatest tumor conspicuity was seen during the portal venous phase.

144 Lesion conspicuity was significantly better at 4.2 mGy on ASIR

145 nd reduced compression levels, the mean mass conspicuities were 1.39 +/- 0.15 (standard error of the

146 ast phantom, and the mean microcalcification conspicuities were 16.2 +/- 2.87 and 18.6 +/- 2.63 for a

147 Relative attenuation and lesion conspicuity were assessed.

148 ise), and presence and number of lesions and conspicuity were assessed.

149 rterial branches and parenchymal enhancement conspicuity were evaluated independently by two radiolog

150 and subjective qualitative analysis of tumor conspicuity were performed.

151 small liver lesions (<10 mm), detection and conspicuity were significantly higher with MBIR than wit

152 reader rankings of image quality and lesion conspicuity when compared with routine-dose FBP.