ライフサイエンスコーパス: construct validity

1 ity simulation scenarios support evidence of construct validity.

2 tion and puncture that has adequate face and construct validity.

3 ternal consistency, concurrent validity, and construct validity.

4 he Ramsay scale and the Harris scale to test construct validity.

5 perties in terms of reliability and external construct validity.

6 </= r </= 0.50) and divergent (r, </= 0.12) construct validity.

7 s and 18 of 24 (P < 0.05) items demonstrated construct validity.

8 with quality-of-life measures and suggested construct validity.

9 ty, with evidence for strong reliability and construct validity.

10 ity and quality variables supported adequate construct validity.

11 ministered cognitive battery showed adequate construct validity.

12 ge sample provide indications of content and construct validity.

13 directly scaled BMI data and good criterion/construct validity.

14 DS (16.3 vs. 27.3, P < 0.001) demonstrating construct validity.

15 es are rarely assessed, especially regarding construct validity.

16 moderate correlations suggesting evidence of construct validity.

17 ine severity, and both demonstrate excellent construct validity.

18 with both excellent reliability and superior construct validity.

19 lysis produced 7 scales, displaying internal construct validity: (1) colleagues' external HIV stigma,

20 lity of life, and frailty) demonstrated good construct validity across all three tools.

21 tients) subsequently evaluated criterion and construct validity against a range of outcome measures,

22 Construct validity analysis of the full Alcohol Use Diso

23 Both end points revealed strong construct validity and detected "minimally clinically im

24 nal culture scale demonstrated high level of construct validity and internal consistency.

25 In stages 4 and 5 construct validity and internal reliability of the 3 ver

26 Construct validity and learning value (comparison betwee

27 formed using ordinal logistic regression for construct validity and logistic regression for criterion

28 delines for Americans (DGA), to evaluate the construct validity and reliability of the revised index,

29 This study examined the criterion and construct validity and response distribution of proSPI-s

30 Construct validity and responsiveness to change were eva

31 Eight tasks in possession of construct validity and significant learning curves were

32 S (score 0-180) with evidence of content and construct validity and suggested use in clinical researc

33 self-administration model has both face and construct validity and therefore will be useful for inve

34 To confirm the construct validity and to characterize the measurement p

35 l validity using measures of discrimination, construct validity, and forecasting.

36 ed in terms of interhospital discrimination, construct validity, and forecasting.

37 good properties in terms of discrimination, construct validity, and forecasting.

38 LEDAI-2K scores were used in the analysis of construct validity, and increase in therapy was used as

39 Feasibility, construct validity, and interpretability of WCWs were de

40 The PedsQL demonstrated responsiveness, construct validity, and predictive validity in hospitali

41 The SLAQ demonstrates adequate reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness in our large, com

42 mall studies have confirmed the reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of this measure,

43 NEI VFQ-25 demonstrated good reliability and construct validity as a measure of vision-related functi

44 OTAS exhibits adequate construct validity as assessed by consistency in the sco

45 We found adequate construct validity, as mice that met criteria for acute

46 f EMRs by abstractor as a gold standard) and construct validity (association with known risk factors

47 Definitions of RHOA were assessed for construct validity (association with symptoms and signs

48 sophisticated reliability measures, improved construct validity, avoidance of exposure effects, and i

49 well as evidence of content, criterion, and construct validity based on its comparison with other me

50 Regarding construct validity, both the CDASI and the CAT-BM were s

51 s using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and the construct validity by assessing the relationship between

52 otheses regarding HRQOL domains and measured construct validity by comparing HBQOL v1.0 scores across

53 We assessed construct validity by interviewing 254 consecutive derma

54 in the healthy control group supported RiSE construct validity by revealing expected memory effects

55 nd principal factor analysis and ascertained construct validity by studying the association of the SL

56 We assessed construct validity by temporally matching mice that met

57 The SAQ-7 demonstrated good construct validity (compared with Canadian Cardiovascula

58 Test-retest and inter-rater reliability, construct validity (convergent, discriminant, and known

59 ency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.74) and excellent construct validity, correlating strongly with asthma sev

60 Overall, 119 of 124 items met at least 1 construct validity criterion.

61 estionnaire (LLQ) were determined, including construct validity, criterion validity, and test-retest

62 they lead immediately to model systems with construct validity, critical for understanding the under

63 d principal components analysis to determine construct validity, Cronbach's alpha for internal consis

64 These results support the construct validity, discriminant validity, and reliabili

65 The WTP technique is feasible and has construct validity for measuring health care preferences

66 ised of three performance-based metrics, has construct validity for the concept of frailty and improv

67 ltimethod matrices for each scale to examine construct validity for the constructs of food availabili

68 EF and DB measures displayed criterion and construct validity, had incremental utility at low DB le

69 The ECLAM has construct validity in cSLE and, like the SLEDAI, is high

70 Our data indicate greater construct validity in non-Medicaid (n=163) than Medicaid

71 The QOLIBRI-OS showed good construct validity in the TBI group.

72 escription of at least one of face, content, construct validity, intra- or inter-rater reliability, o

73 ed by cognitive processing, measurement, and construct validity issues.

74 All basic tasks demonstrated construct validity (Mann-Whitney U test, P < 0.05), and

75 Construct validity, measured by comparing questionnaire

76 e adapted a psychometric tool to examine the construct validity of 4 such measures for 3 constructs.

77 sults provide a comprehensive picture of the construct validity of children's self-reported psychotic

78 r in young children, review evidence for the construct validity of DSM-based oppositional defiant dis

79 We conclude that the construct validity of food environment measures varies o

80 le is known about interrater reliability and construct validity of HRCT-reported nodules, ground-glas

81 Few studies have assessed the construct validity of measures of neighborhood food envi

82 ttachment theory approach to investigate the construct validity of symbolic attachment to one's natio

83 Construct validity of the 8-item Council on Nutrition ap

84 variable diagnostic practices compromise the construct validity of the diagnosis and threaten the cla

85 patient's shoes) to provide support for the construct validity of the empathy scale that was also fo

86 We sought to confirm the construct validity of the full Alcohol Use Disorders Ide

87 Construct validity of the KF cases was supported by incr

88 The content, concurrent, known-group, and construct validity of the MDASI-CML were evaluated.

89 ataract surgery (rho < 0.05), indicating the construct validity of the modules simulated with augment

90 n visual acuity was abnormal, supporting the construct validity of the NEI-VFQ.

91 ates high reliability as well as evidence of construct validity of the OSAUS scale for assessment of

92 The construct validity of the OSAUS scale was supported by a

93 In addition, 5 methods were used to test the construct validity of the RASS, including correlation wi

94 Internal consistency reliability and construct validity of the resulting subscales were asses

95 er, providing support for the predictive and construct validity of the Rosenthal et al. diagnosis of

96 The construct validity of the RT measures as an estimate of

97 The construct validity of the scale was examined in a sample

98 n this study demonstrate the reliability and construct validity of the secondary-task RT measure as a

99 SF-36 correlated with the SIP, affirming the construct validity of the SF-36.

100 e used as comparator measures in testing the construct validity of the Sickness Insight in Coping Que

101 ingle-item pain measure, thus supporting the construct validity of these subscales.

102 to test the sensitivity, face validity, and construct validity of this approach.

103 For construct validity, pairwise agreement was assessed.

104 Construct validity, reliability of the empathy scale, an

105 d checklist of content, face, criterion, and construct validity, reliability, and sensitivity to chan

106 aseline disease activity and to assess their construct validity, sensitivity to change, and reliabili

107 The subscales demonstrated both construct validity (significantly higher subscale scores

108 group comments by persons with ARM, has good construct validity, subscale scores related to rod-media

109 Construct validity testing demonstrates the efficacy of

110 poll was not subjected previously to formal construct-validity testing.

111 All definitions displayed significant construct validity; the most consistent was found for co

112 We evaluated construct validity through comparisons with conceptually

113 s and measures of comorbidity, and evaluated construct validity through consideration of relations wi

114 All HF-CAT scales demonstrated good construct validity through high correlations with the co

115 r clinical care should have high content and construct validity, timeliness, and low measurement burd

116 seline severity on performance, and measured construct validity using clinical anchors.

117 Construct validity was also supported by the data: (1) L

118 Construct validity was assessed by comparing Adapted Cog

119 Construct validity was assessed in exploratory factor an

120 Construct validity was assessed in two ways: (i) in a co

121 Construct validity was conducted by comparing similar co

122 Construct validity was confirmed by comparing NICS with

123 Construct validity was demonstrated by comparing each do

124 Construct validity was demonstrated by high correlations

125 Construct validity was demonstrated by significant corre

126 Construct validity was demonstrated via a significant co

127 ubscales were >0.88, and initial evidence of construct validity was demonstrated.

128 Construct validity was established between delegates who

129 Construct validity was examined by comparing performance

130 Construct validity was examined by comparing the mean im

131 alphas were calculated for each factor, and construct validity was examined with Pearson's correlati

132 Construct validity was measured on the basis of content

133 Construct validity was rated using the Objective Structu

134 Construct validity was shown with model fit statistics.

135 Construct validity was supported by inverse correlations

136 Construct validity was tested, using Pearson's correlati

137 An examination of construct validity was undertaken on a subsample of 153

138 Internal consistency and construct validity were assessed using correlational ana

139 Reliability and construct validity were evaluated by comparing 10 gradua

140 Internal consistency reliability and construct validity were examined.

141 Criterion-related content and construct validity were obtained first by means of a nat

142 e Index was found to have face, content, and construct validity when used in children.

143 tent validity (similar to face validity), 3) construct validity (whether criteria measure what they p

144 developed for providing precise estimates of construct validity with contrast analysis applied to cor

145 We evaluated construct validity with principal components analysis an

146 t included all 5 criteria in order to assess construct validity with regard to frailty syndrome chara