ライフサイエンスコーパス: contact angle

1 ot spread completely but exhibit an apparent contact angle.

2 equally probable at approximately 40 degrees contact angle.

3 which results in meshes with a high apparent contact angle.

4 atio of the nanostructures and the intrinsic contact angle.

5 characterized macroscopically by the droplet contact angle.

6 tures and the liquid through its equilibrium contact angle.

7 ribed as a function of liquid properties and contact angle.

8 e r(K) is the Kelvin radius and theta is the contact angle.

9 s wetting is typically described in terms of contact angle.

10 d long range interactions to the macroscopic contact angle.

11 ate diagram as a function of the two surface contact angles.

12 nds on the sum of the two individual surface contact angles.

13 lic, surfaces form thin films with near-zero contact angles.

14 maintaining easy condensate removal and low contact angles.

15 thickness was measured in vitro with varying contact angles.

16 represent the measurement accuracy of large contact angles.

17 n energies of single H2O molecules and water contact angles.

18 The superhydrophobic properties (water contact angle: 136 +/- 5 degrees ) of the PEDOT-C14 SC p

19 o reagent yields a superhydrophobic surface (contact angle 151 degrees ).

20 itania tubes are superhydrophobic with water contact angles 163 +/- 1 degrees (advancing) and 157 +/-

21 , N2, was nonwetting with a smaller range of contact angle 24 degrees < theta < 68 degrees .

22 Water contact angles (7.5 degrees +/- 0.7, 22.8 degrees +/- 1.

23 uspended graphene exhibits the highest water contact angle (85 degrees +/- 5 degrees ) compared to pa

24 In that case, the condition of constant contact angle along the three-phase contact line can onl

25 e resulting films are characterized by using contact angle analysis (CAA), atomic force microscopy (A

26 otoelectron spectroscopy, surface FT-IR, and contact angle analysis confirmed the sequential grafting

27 onduits requires the existence of a non-zero contact angle and a flared opening into the bordered pit

28 oelectron spectroscopy, X-ray reflectometry, contact angle and cell adhesion studies.

29 FTIR-ATR, contact angle and electrochemical measurements were used

30 ate plays a decisive role in determining the contact angle and nucleation barrier, which were found t

31 We measured the contact angle and pit chamber geometry for six species.

32 We quantitatively recover the dynamic contact angle and provide a mechanism for stick-slip mot

33 Considering the variation of contact angle and surface tension with pore size improve

34 from linearity are observed, increasing the contact angle and the vapor pressure above their values

35 plets during compression indicates that both contact angle and total area of the water-oil interfaces

36 As shown by contact angle and transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

37 ed area, warping in frames due to changes in contact angle and varying resolution with depth.

38 by photodeprotection, which was confirmed by contact angle and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy.

39 Contact angle and XPS measurements postderivatization in

40 This conclusion was further confirmed by contact angle and XPS measurements.

41 ith cyclohexane, a selective solvent for PS, contact angle and XPS studies indicated that the mixed b

42 ectron microscopy (SEM), Raman spectroscopy, contact angle and zeta potential measurements.

43 ate, yet the other desired properties of low contact angles and high nucleation densities for high he

44 collective role and relative significance of contact angles and module wavelength on hydrodynamic ins

45 the surface conductivity and also influences contact angles and zeta potentials.

46 ility of the bubble allows us to measure the contact-angle and perform in-situ imaging of the contact

47 Fluorescence microscopy, contact angle, and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) measure

48 al surface tension, density, viscosity, wall contact angle, and flow velocity on the type of flow obs

49 investigated using AFM, optical microscopy, contact angle, and FTIR.

50 d gastrointestinal bleeding, decreased ileal contact angles, and induced erythrocyte hemolysis, all o

51 a macroscopic wetting transition from finite contact angles ( approximately 10 degrees ) with to near

52 th high (bottom left) and low (bottom right) contact angle are observed.

53 mined experimentally, on the molecular scale contact angles are hardly accessible.

54 Lower contact angles are observed for lipids on completely de-

55 lystyrene microdroplets, with nonequilibrium contact angle, are placed on solid self-assembled monola

56 heterogeneously on Ag nanoparticles we find contact angles around 15 degrees compared to 90 degrees

57 Water droplets possessed contact angles as low as 45 degrees on the grafted surfa

58 e first direct experimental determination of contact angles as well as contact line curvature on a sc

59 fluid, as an index of bleeding, and mucosal contact angles, as an index of surface hydrophobicity.

60 For the lack of an identifiable contact angle at small scales, we introduce a droplet's

61 nd that the conventional theory predicts the contact angle at the global minimum if the droplet size

62 model that relates the catalyst volume, the contact angle at the trijunction (the point at which sol

63 Unlike Young's equation, which specifies the contact angles at the junction of two fluids and a (rigi

64 the in situ wettability, the distribution of contact angles, at the pore scale in calcite cores from

65 mproved surfaces were characterized by using contact angle, atomic force microscopy (AFM) and Fourier

66 AMs and characterization using ellipsometry, contact angle, atomic force microscopy (AFM), grazing an

67 In this regime, the contact angle becomes ambiguous, and a scalable metric f

68 We further find that near a critical point (contact angle being ca. 153 degrees ) the bulk thermal r

69 ree energy minimization and predict that the contact angle between the two liquids in the aerosol dep

70 t a fluid interface, with a size-independent contact angle between the undeformed surface and the par

71 le measurements, adhesion could increase the contact angle by a factor of 3.

72 modes suggest the possibility of tuning the contact angle by adjusting the surface texture.

73 pe (SEM), quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), contact angle (CA) and attenuated total reflectance-Four

74 y of the modified surface were determined by contact angle (CA) measurement, Fourier transform infrar

75 ated electrode have been characterized using contact angle (CA) measurements, cyclic voltammetry (CV)

76 IRS), spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE), water contact angle (CA), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

77 r than approximately 100 nm, the equilibrium contact angle can be accurately predicted from the surfa

78 While in macroscopic systems the contact angle can be determined experimentally, on the m

79 Thus, any method by which one can vary the contact angle can be used to switch the length of the fi

80 The obtained microscopic contact angles can be attributed to negative line tensio

81 mniphobic surface, we discover their dynamic contact angles can be measured with a consistent accurac

82 Measurements of droplet contact angles can be used to estimate the energy of ena

83 As a result of the decreased contact angle, capillary channels self-wet through capil

84 found to be directly related to the apparent contact angle change (Deltatheta) of the ILs.

85 All tested ILs showed greater apparent contact angle changes with AC voltage conditions than wi

86 very was seen for the sample with an average contact angle close to 90 degrees , with an intermediate

87 ydration repulsion we find a narrow range of contact angle combinations where the surfaces adhere at

88 th FA monitoring, we show that the cell body contact angle controls the onset of force generation and

89 Furthermore, contact angle data indicated that the 3DP bio-carriers w

90 c as well as hydrophobic peptides when their contact angle decreases below theta approximately 50 deg

91 hould mimic that of a liquid droplet, with a contact angle determined by surface tensions.

92 -ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), water contact angle, ellipsometry, and atomic force microscopy

93 of the SAMs was carried out by sessile drop contact angle, ellipsometry, grazing angle FT-IR spectro

94 and patterned features were characterized by contact angle, ellipsometry, optical, and atomic force m

95 in a superoleophobic coating with hexadecane contact angles exceeding 155 degrees and tilt angles of

96 X-ray electron spectroscopy and temporal contact angle experiments were employed to monitor funct

97 Adjustment of limb contact angle explains 80% of the variation in stance-ph

98 chemistry, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, contact angle, fluorescence microscopy, and atomic force

99 Addition of lipids always decreases the contact angle for all liquid tested, except for water.

100 Furthermore, the contact angle for modified PDMS was reduced to <40 degre

101 proximately 90.2 degrees compared to a water contact angle for Sylgard 184 of approximately 108.5 deg

102 This difference suggests that the water contact angle for the GSCC is larger than for the MSCC,

103 The water contact angle for the PDMS-SiO2 chips was approximately

104 design parameters that predict the measured contact angles for a liquid droplet on a textured surfac

105 ethod provides direct measurement of dynamic contact angles for AFM tips and can also be taken as a g

106 o investigate how cells select particular MT contact angles for bundling, we used an in vitro reconst

107 Measurement is more difficult for dynamic contact angles, for which theoretical profiles do not fi

108 hydrophilic or hydrophobic depending on the contact angle formed by a water droplet.

109 rmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and contact angle goniometry on model, planar silicon substr

110 roscopy (FTIR), cyclic voltammetry (CV), and contact angle goniometry were utilized to characterize a

111 UV photoelectron spectroscopy, ellipsometry, contact angle goniometry, differential pulse polarograph

112 Using water contact angle goniometry, it is shown that all adlayers

113 city methods, thermogravimetric analysis and contact angle goniometry, next to more traditional metho

114 nolayers were characterized by ellipsometry, contact angle goniometry, polarization modulated IR refl

115 cture of the monolayers were investigated by contact angle goniometry, XPS, PM-IRRAS, and TOF-SIMS.

116 These omniphobic surfaces display contact angles greater than 150 degrees and low contact

117 Superhydrophobic surfaces display water contact angles greater than 150 degrees in conjunction w

118 superoleophobic surfaces-those that display contact angles greater than 150 degrees with organic liq

119 result, these films exhibit advancing water contact angles greater than 160 degrees, dramatically di

120 Superomniphobic surfaces display contact angles >150 degrees and low contact angle hyster

121 superoleophobic coatings display hexadecane contact angles >150 degrees with tilt angles <5 degrees

122 the superhydrophobic coatings display water contact angles >160 degrees with tilt angles <2 degrees

123 The difficulty of measuring very large contact angles (>150 degrees) has become more relevant w

124 ose ester fatty acid (w/w wet base)) had low contact angle, high spread coefficient onto banana surfa

125 ocarbons, crude oil and blood), maintain low contact angle hysteresis (<2.5 degrees ), quickly restor

126 " surfaces have demonstrated that minimizing contact angle hysteresis (CAH) is the key criterion for

127 aCA) greater than 150 degrees along with low contact angle hysteresis (CAH) not only towards probing

128 The contact angle hysteresis and the adhesion force that res

129 ergy barrier of pinning which can induce the contact angle hysteresis as a function of geometric fact

130 demonstrated that display one of the lowest contact angle hysteresis values ever reported - even wit

131 tact angles greater than 150 degrees and low contact angle hysteresis with both polar and nonpolar li

132 display contact angles >150 degrees and low contact angle hysteresis with essentially all contacting

133 pplications: limited oleophobicity with high contact angle hysteresis, failure under pressure and upo

134 neously possess characteristics of low water contact angle hysteresis, low friction and mechanical ro

135 ter than 150 degrees in conjunction with low contact angle hysteresis.

136 with water greater than 150 degrees and low contact angle hysteresis.

137 ynthesized to examine the individual role of contact angles in connecting lateral Rayleigh-Taylor wav

138 The contact angle increased up to 175% and 38% as 3% (v/v) o

139 The brine contact angles increased from initial values near 0 degr

140 of the composite films, as measured by water contact angle, increased after the two homogenization tr

141 film thinning, water droplet formation, and contact angle increases within single pores.

142 Contact angles indicated a shift to strongly water-wet,

143 Dynamic changes in liquid/wall contact angles indicated that the processes of embolism

144 these two regimes in terms of the advancing contact angle is governed by an interplay of wettability

145 The static contact angle is increased when a bubble is applied.

146 d graphene is hydrophobic and that its water contact angle is similar to that of graphite.

147 ion and adsorption resistance as the surface contact angle is varied.

148 Water contact angles, material swelling, polymer degradation t

149 The contact angle measured in the vessel lumen ranged betwee

150 Contact angle measurement and X-ray photoelectron spectr

151 sed method and mathematic models for dynamic contact angle measurement are presented.

152 urfaces normally inaccessible by traditional contact angle measurement techniques.

153 de AFM tips are investigated through dynamic contact angle measurement using a nano-Wilhelmy balance

154 neous wettability characterization (from the contact angle measurement) and appropriately large so th

155 nning electron microscopy, profilometry, and contact angle measurement) were used to characterize the

156 d using atomic force microscopy (AFM), water contact angle measurement, grazing-angle attenuated tota

157 Contact angle measurements and atomic force microscopy w

158 l surfaces were studied using static pendant contact angle measurements and captive advancing/recedin

159 ization of acrylic acid as verified by water contact angle measurements and FT-IR analysis.

160 s of H and O-NDs by Atomic Force Microscopy, contact angle measurements and protein adsorption sugges

161 On the basis of contact angle measurements and surface characterization,

162 The surface of TPE was characterized using contact angle measurements and X-ray photoelectron spect

163 The modified surfaces were characterized by contact angle measurements and X-ray photoelectron spect

164 um layer were evaluated through static water contact angle measurements and, thereby, the effective r

165 Our contact angle measurements indicate that a graphene mono

166 electron micrographs, visual inspection, and contact angle measurements of the pellicles, we defined

167 Dynamic contact angle measurements of these compounds were taken

168 licity of these films has been documented by contact angle measurements over PEDOT(PSS)-coated Au, GC

169 Contact angle measurements revealed strong lipid adheren

170 Contact angle measurements revealed that the DOM adlayer

171 Contact angle measurements show that the lipid membranes

172 be considered to understand a wide range of contact angle measurements that cannot be fitted with a

173 then be performed in a facile manner through contact angle measurements using the Cassie equation.

174 ate the mechanisms, zeta potential and water contact angle measurements were conducted.

175 Complementary macroscopic contact angle measurements were used to assist in the qu

176 Results from contact angle measurements with mineral oil and surfacta

177 the surface of TPE increases (determined by contact angle measurements) and the proportion of oxygen

178 In advancing/receding contact angle measurements, adhesion could increase the

179 s by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), contact angle measurements, and atomic force microscopy

180 d using infrared spectroscopy, ellipsometry, contact angle measurements, and atomic force microscopy.

181 reflection-absorption infrared spectroscopy, contact angle measurements, and electrochemical impedanc

182 , quartz crystal microbalance, ellipsometry, contact angle measurements, atomic force microscopy, and

183 these molecules were characterized by water contact angle measurements, ellipsometry, and X-ray phot

184 ng both X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and contact angle measurements, enabling the calculation of

185 racterized by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), Contact angle measurements, Fourier transform infrared (

186 ayer formed was inferred by a combination of contact angle measurements, FT-IR spectroscopy, SEM, EDX

187 reflection-absorption infrared spectroscopy, contact angle measurements, lateral force microscopy, an

188 the palladium and the thiol were studied by contact angle measurements, optical ellipsometry, reflec

189 transmission optical spectroscopy, advancing contact angle measurements, synchrotron X-ray reflectivi

190 xadecanethiol and hexadecaneisocyanide, with contact angle measurements, X-ray photoelectron spectros

191 Modified surfaces are characterized by contact angle measurements, X-ray photoelectron spectros

192 re characterized by a battery of techniques: contact angle measurements, X-ray reflectivity, X-ray ph

193 ctroscopy, atomic force microscopy (AFM) and contact angle measurements.

194 ic acid, a result that was verified by water contact angle measurements.

195 ies of plant surfaces were monitored through contact angle measurements.

196 y (FTIR), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and contact angle measurements.

197 oscopy-energy dispersive X-ray analysis, and contact angle measurements.

198 g X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and contact angle measurements.

199 bsorption infrared spectroscopy (RAIRS), and contact angle measurements.

200 y and at a macroscopic level with the use of contact angle measurements.

201 aner graphene features as confirmed by water contact angle measurements.

202 substrate added charge carrier density using contact angle measurements.

203 s ) with subtle but important differences in contact angles observed between the surfaces.

204 and that a concurrent decrease in the water contact angle occurs when these contaminants are partial

205 polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) with a static contact angle of 112.4 degrees for water.

206 By controlling the contact angle of (1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctyl) trichloros

207 The water contact angle of (PANI/PAA)(2) is approximately 16 degre

208 MPa) and hydrophobicity (with a sessile drop contact angle of 40.5 degrees ) have also been character

209 in a hydrophobic PPy-PFOS film with a water contact angle of 97 +/- 5 degrees , which effectively pr

210 dynamics model to reproduce the experimental contact angle of a macroscopic mercury droplet on graphi

211 onsistent with this hypothesis, we observe a contact angle of a soft silicone substrate on rigid sili

212 This nanopattern was used to increase the contact angle of aqueous solutions on the surface of the

213 We measure the microscale receding contact angle of each bridge and show that the Gibbs cri

214 a simple analytical equation to compute the contact angle of liquid-liquid droplets should have broa

215 The contact angle of mercury in a circular pore increases ex

216 We find that the contact angle of model atmospheric aerosols is rarely hi

217 have imaged and characterized the height and contact angle of ordered water layer(s) formed by wettin

218 s growth by changing the shape, position and contact angle of the catalytic droplet.

219 The contact angle of the hydrophilic film-coated PDMS surfac

220 ace free energy of the liquid, the advancing contact angle of the liquid on the hydrophobic regions,

221 vative surface chemistry helps to reduce the contact angle of the novel membrane by at least a 48% an

222 ct ratio of the groove geometry and (ii) The contact angle of the underlying substrate material.

223 We demonstrate that the apparent contact angle of these meshes dictates the rate at which

224 beads: lag times correlated negatively with contact angle of water and degree of protein adhesion (s

225 The contact angle of water droplet on phosphorene exhibits a

226 th increasing number of graphene layers, the contact angle of water on copper gradually transitions t

227 Contact angle of water on esters' pelleted surface incre

228 ophobicity is characterized by computing the contact angle of water on flat interfaces and the desorp

229 Moreover, the contact angle of water on strained phosphorene is propor

230 y was assessed over 4 weeks by measuring the contact angle of water on the surface.

231 Overall, the contact angle of water on this electrospun surface is 11

232 reated surface, and its correlation with the contact angle of water.

233 e and temperature on the surface tension and contact angle of water/vapor and oil/gas systems, by whi

234 Contact angles of acetonitrile-water solutions were meas

235 Here, we show that the water contact angles of freshly prepared supported graphene an

236 issue to the limit by investigating dynamic contact angles of liquids with an extremely small capill

237 m to wet a nonpolar surface by measuring the contact angles of small drops.

238 The dynamic contact angles of the AFM tips were calculated from the

239 cle stiffness dynamically by controlling the contact angles of the cylinders.

240 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and contact angles of water.

241 The observed static water contact angles of ZnO NRs samples were 103 degrees +/- 3

242 n surface temperature, surface roughness, or contact angle on any surfaces tested.

243 gas atmospheres, a large change in the water contact angle on the as-prepared LIG surfaces has been o

244 Local alteration of the contact angle on the nanopillar arrays by LBL films crea

245 uence of solution viscosity, ink volume, and contact angle on the process of dewetting of inkjet-prin

246 macroscopic measurements such as the dynamic contact angle or the speed of a moving liquid front to p

247 ely due to reliance on macroscopic values of contact angles or to liquid-phase instability within the

248 r true portable detection, in which the high contact angle pinning of the droplet makes this format r

249 100k(B)T, moderate ellipticities, and large contact angle proteins, we find thermally averaged attra

250 on of time, vapor temperature, and substrate contact angle, providing us optimized SNR performance fo

251 g to wetting throughout the pore space, with contact angles ranging 25 degrees < theta < 127 degrees

252 degrees and 40 degrees water and hexadecane contact angles, respectively.

253 h respect to the obtained (1)H NMR, GPC, and contact angle results, the possibility for further degra

254 spectroscopy (EIS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), contact angle, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomi

255 XRD, contact angle, SEM, AFM and SECM studies revealed that t

256 In situ measurements of contact angles showed that CO2 varied from nonwetting to

257 effect of a surface, we have also conducted contact-angle simulations of water on self-assembled mon

258 ilica diameter and concentration on membrane contact angle, sliding angle, and MD performance were in

259 ctroscopy (EIS), atomic force microscopy and contact angle studies.

260 electrodes have been characterized by using contact angle surface analysis, oxygen influence, and te

261 Contact angle tests on a model cellulose surface showed

262 e with a striking dependence on the apparent contact angle that can be explained by this displacement

263 are provided in the literature, and provides contact angles that cannot be accurately determined with

264 se torsional travelling waves to control the contact angles, thereby imposing a desired spatio-tempor

265 the PCL fibers lend a local hydrophilicity (contact angle theta=74 degrees ) for sufficient sub-micr

266 ged PS M(n), a transition in water advancing contact angle (theta(a)) from 74 degrees, the value for

267 Here, the contact angle (theta) at the CO(2)-brine-mineral interfa

268 ribing the measured relationship between the contact angle (theta) of a water droplet applied to the

269 organic liquid, channel depth, and advancing contact angle (theta;(a)).

270 tions to measure the microscopic analogue of contact angle, Theta(c), of aqueous nanodrops on heterog

271 superhydrophobic and superoleophobic, i.e., contact angles (thetaCA) greater than 150 degrees along

272 Water contact angle titrations demonstrate interfacial pKa shi

273 apped between the solid and oil) with a high contact angle (top left) or in the Wenzel state (top rig

274 zed to form a hydrophobic material with high contact angle up to 147 degrees that floats on the surfa

275 tically enhance the effect and lead to water contact angles up to 70 degrees in the presence of Ca(2+

276 The contact angle used in the Fletcher model is identified a

277 The measurements of contact angles using three probe liquids suggested that

278 ies have produced anisotropic wetting, where contact-angle variations in different directions resulte

279 Contact angle was found to decrease during the CO(2) pha

280 The contact angle was measured at hundreds of thousands of p

281 -SIMS data from the novel polymers and water contact angle was obtained.

282 to determine the relationship between water contact angle (WCA) and the surface chemistry of the pol

283 (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), water contact angle (WCA) measurement and UV-vis titration.

284 bility of the flow cell over a wide range of contact angles, we find that increasing the substrate's

285 es in temperature, microroughness, and water contact angle were analyzed.

286 Tar-aqueous interfacial tensions (IFTs) and contact angles were measured, and column flushing experi

287 pared polydimethylsiloxane); although, their contact angles were smaller than that of the medium harv

288 egree of wettability is then captured by the contact angle where the liquid-vapor interface meets the

289 nanoscale induces a local change in dynamic contact angles which manifests as a smooth and continuou

290 tcher model is identified as the microscopic contact angle, which can be directly obtained from heter

291 IV and RSV CA assemblies have very different contact angles, which may reflect differences in the cap

292 h water gives rise to a linear dependence of contact angle with respect to composition, in agreement

293 Here an equivalent condition, increasing contact angle with temperature, is found necessary for o

294 e, depending on the proteins' shape, height, contact angle with the bilayer, and a pre-existing local

295 or partially intact even at surfaces with a contact angle with water of close to 100 degrees.

296 d approach teaches how to measure very large contact angles with consistent accuracy when any of the

297 s of brine flooding.We found a wide range of contact angles with values both above and below 90 degre

298 hydrophobic surfaces, which exhibit apparent contact angles with water greater than 150 degrees and l

299 approximately 10 degrees ) with to near-zero contact angles without divalent cations.

300 e aminosilanation process was analyzed using contact angle, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), a