ライフサイエンスコーパス: contact lens

1 o either primary IOL or no IOL implantation (contact lens).

2 pplying increasing pressure on the eye via a contact lens.

3 the eye aphakic and focusing the eye with a contact lens.

4 months of age with a primary IOL implant or contact lens.

5 as noted to be a folded, discoloured bandage contact lens.

6 ministration-approved gas-permeable, scleral contact lens.

7 dicted and was more varied than the hydrogel contact lens.

8 the econazole-PLGA film encapsulated in the contact lens.

9 contact lenses (no reported UV blocking); no contact lens.

10 y comparable to the control case without the contact lens.

11 ethafilcon hydrogel, which was lathed into a contact lens.

12 ieved 20/17 (1.2); 5 eyes were fitted with a contact lens.

13 lectrodes cured on a silicone elastomer soft contact lens.

14 ity as an intermittent power source in smart contact lenses.

15 available for review, 287 (99%) did not wear contact lenses.

16 error of each participant was corrected with contact lenses.

17 eases, and P aeruginosa biofilm formation on contact lenses.

18 cy of glaucoma therapy through extended wear contact lenses.

19 25), from molecularly imprinted, therapeutic contact lenses.

20 ch suggested higher drug bioavailability for contact lenses.

21 ophomonas formed a biofilm on the surface of contact lenses.

22 of applications from biological scaffolds to contact lenses.

23 electrical power sources for so called smart contact lenses.

24 th DNase to reduce biofilm formation on test contact lenses.

25 as some UV-blocking ability, albeit minimal) contact lenses.

26 biofilm plate and on unworn etafilcon A soft contact lenses.

27 of CW of either GP (n = 42) or SiH (n = 49) contact lenses.

28 hort period of adaptation to monovision with contact lenses.

29 atients who are intolerant of spectacles and contact lenses.

30 bismus who fail treatment with spectacles or contact lenses.

31 onia and can be intolerant of spectacles and contact lenses.

32 ng continuous wear of silicone hydrogel (SH) contact lenses.

33 ible method to fabricate customized hydrogel contact lenses.

34 study demonstrated the safety of TM-implant contact lenses.

35 h myopia and difficulties wearing glasses or contact lenses.

36 affect the optical and physical property of contact lenses.

37 d at least 1 additional intraocular surgery (contact lens, 21%; IOL, 72%; P < .001).

38 ns, 6 [11%]; IOL, 7 [13%]; P = .99), Randot (contact lens, 3 [6%]; IOL, 1 [2%]; P = .62), or Titmus (

39 east 1 adverse event after cataract surgery (contact lens, 56%; IOL, 81%; P = .02).

40 psis between the 2 treatment groups: Frisby (contact lens, 6 [11%]; IOL, 7 [13%]; P = .99), Randot (c

41 s, 3 [6%]; IOL, 1 [2%]; P = .62), or Titmus (contact lens, 8 [15%]; IOL, 13 [23%]; P = .34).

42 resence of either a UV-blocking senofilcon A contact lens, a minimally UV-blocking lotrafilcon A cont

43 These contact lenses also prevented actin and microtubule cyto

44 The contact lens and IOL groups were not significantly diffe

45 ncorporated into a conventional, transparent contact lens and provide for sustained and effective bac

46 as aeruginosa isolates were obtained from 36 contact lenses and 14 contact lens protective fluid samp

47 s, semi-transparent 'smart' glasses, 'smart' contact lenses and artificial retina devices.

48 nts to disrupt pathogenic biofilms formed on contact lenses and as a treatment for established cornea

49 tep toward achieving self-powered electronic contact lenses and ocular devices with an integrated pow

50 Compared with ocular lubrication, bandage contact lenses and punctal plugs were more effective in

51 To compare the effectiveness of bandage contact lenses and punctal plugs with ocular lubricants

52 The contact lenses and their release media were tested in an

53 cholesterol extracted from silicone hydrogel contact lenses and, potentially, the meibum and/or tear

54 , a variety of tear film and ocular surface, contact lens, and patient-related factors were examined.

55 added in the presence of a silicone hydrogel contact lens, and we examined corneal inflammation by co

56 lantation technology to treat glaucoma using contact lenses, and could serve as a platform for other

57 If only one half of the patients in the contact lens (aphakic) group eventually undergo secondar

58 Bandage contact lenses are commonly used by ophthalmic practitio

59 Contact lenses are ideally suited for controlled drug de

60 Contact lenses are increasingly used in laboratories for

61 ver, the choices from commercially available contact lenses are rather limited.

62 an gland heating and expression, and scleral contact lenses are some of the latest options available

63 Using a sterile soft contact lens as scaffold, the tissue was loaded in this

64 s aeruginosa isolates are mainly involved in contact lens associated infections.

65 lates from contact lens of the patients with contact lens associated infections.

66 uently isolated from lenses of patients with contact lens-associated corneal infiltrates.

67 V-blocking lotrafilcon A contact lens, or no contact lens at all.

68 A contact lens avoided cataract development and resulted i

69 up to 100 degrees (ultra-wide-field) using a contact lens-based approach in a single 2-second scan.

70 Bandage contact lens (BCL) was applied at the end of the procedu

71 any glasses users having tried and abandoned contact lenses because of latent dry eye problems.

72 The contact lens biofuel cell presented here is a step towar

73 Contact lens biofuel cell testing was performed in a syn

74 A contact lens biofuel cell was fabricated using buckypape

75 lesterol and cholesterol esters derived from contact lenses, both in vitro and ex vivo.

76 lease duration of timolol from ACUVUE TruEye contact lenses by incorporating vitamin E diffusion barr

77 t, and selection of a different size bandage contact lens can help reduce shunt-associated complicati

78 sure (IOP) of timolol from the ACUVUE TruEye contact lenses can be significantly increased by incorpo

79 rium grown as a biofilm on silicone hydrogel contact lenses can induce keratitis on injured corneas,

80 Commercial contact lenses cannot provide extended delivery of ophth

81 1999 and 2014 who had documented exposure to contact lens care disinfecting solutions or artificial t

82 Notably, neither contact lens care solutions nor disinfectants were assoc

83 ly associated with corneal staining than are contact lens care solutions or other ocular surface and

84 ted into commercially available multipurpose contact lens care solutions.

85 ty of Acanthamoeba trophozoites and cysts to contact lens care systems has been developed.

86 was to examine ocular surface and tear film, contact lens, care solution, medical, and patient-relate

87 Multi-species biofilms associated with contact lens cases and lenses can predispose individuals

88 Contact lens cases and lenses from 28 patients referred

89 disease and bacteria residing in biofilms of contact lens cases and lenses.

90 The need for frequent replacement of contact lens cases is enforced.

91 rpose contact lens disinfection solutions on contact lens cases may induce and harbor dormant-resista

92 e diversity of bacterial types isolated from contact lens cases.

93 is detailing demographics, risk factors, and contact lens (CL) wearing habits was completed for 23 ca

94 Since the 2005-2006 outbreak of contact lens (CL)-associated Fusarium keratitis, there m

95 eye, visual outcome, and treatment modality (contact lens [CL] vs. intraocular lens [IOL]).

96 low-dose contact lenses (CLLO) and high-dose contact lenses (CLHI) were produced by encapsulating a t

97 Latanoprost-eluting low-dose contact lenses (CLLO) and high-dose contact lenses (CLHI

98 duction in artificial tear use, and improved contact lens comfort in patients with dry eye.

99 ocular-surface status, artificial tear use, contact lens comfort, and tear break-up time.

100 from 63% at baseline to 54% at year 3 in the contact lens control group, whereas 88% of former contac

101 ctacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), best contact lens-corrected visual acuity (BCLVA), Scheimpflu

102 kely that the family will be successful with contact lens correction.

103 expensive than cataract surgery coupled with contact lens correction.

104 implantation was $14 752 versus $10 726 with contact lens correction.

105 to either primary intraocular lens (IOL) or contact lens correction.

106 Contact lens costs accounted for 15% ($1600/patient) in

107 An econazole-eluting contact lens could be used as a treatment for fungal ocu

108 in epithelial permeability can be caused by contact lens CW, despite the elimination of hypoxia.

109 ine green conjunctival staining (P = 0.002), contact lens deposition (P = 0.007), increased tear meni

110 ; this should be taken into consideration in contact lens design, IOL selection, and in the optimizat

111 patients had a history of recent exposure to contact lens disinfecting solutions (Opti-Free, Equate)

112 Various multipurpose contact lens disinfection solutions formed distinctive d

113 t the evaporation and drying of multipurpose contact lens disinfection solutions may have been an add

114 Regions of drying films of multipurpose contact lens disinfection solutions on contact lens case

115 Contact lens drug delivery may become an option for the

116 ION: A patient was applied a pair of bandage contact lenses due to persistent ocular pain secondary t

117 eye from light exposure by applying a black contact lens during waking hours for >/=12 months.

118 The soft contact lens edge fitting was characterized by the conju

119 from one eye of each subject using a bipolar contact-lens electrode.

120 ed a study-specific baseline survey during a contact lens examination or while being evaluated as a c

121 se in marmosets raised on +5 D single vision contact lenses (exp-con mean MSE +/- SE +1.62 +/- 0.44 D

122 We previously reported that contact lens exposure, a major cause of P. aeruginosa ke

123 These data suggest that contact lens factors (water content, material, wearing t

124 cantly (P < 0.001) to the prediction of soft contact lens fit compared with keratometry and videokera

125 hitecture provide valuable insight into soft contact lens fit dynamics.

126 n 10 of 178 eyes (5.6%), sometimes requiring contact lens fitting.

127 virgin eyes, and some cases may benefit from contact lens fitting.

128 f drug is maintained in the tear film from a contact lens for an extended period of time for the enti

129 A prototype contact lens for sustained drug release consisting of a

130 cts wore both lotrafilcon B and galyfilcon A contact lenses for 7 days.

131 134 participants who refused to remove their contact lenses for the refraction measurement, 4430 adul

132 umber of patients with adverse events in the contact lens group increased (15 to 24) in postoperative

133 spect occurred in 35% of treated eyes in the contact lens group vs 28% of eyes in the IOL group (P =

134 16%, P < .0001) in the IOL group than in the contact lens group.

135 ce tomography in rats wearing our customized contact lenses has the quality comparable to the control

136 nowledge, no other cases of retained bandage contact lens have previously been reported in the litera

137 iled to heal with extended silicone hydrogel contact lenses healed with PROSE.

138 patients were initially treated with bandage contact lens; however, continuous silicone hydrogel lens

139 meable lenses, custom wave front-guided soft contact lenses, hybrid lenses and tandem soft contact le

140 g treatment of aphakia with a primary IOL or contact lens in 114 infants with a unilateral congenital

141 g treatment of aphakia with a primary IOL or contact lens in 114 infants with unilateral congenital c

142 and area under curve (AUC), with TM-implant contact lenses in comparison to eye drop therapy.

143 ed shapes, and benefit the laboratorial-used contact lenses in pre-clinical studies.

144 te rabbits were fit with P. aeruginosa laden contact lenses in the absence of a penetrating wound.

145 fort drop, instilled before the insertion of contact lenses, in a population of symptomatic contact l

146 Asians appear to be more susceptible to contact lens-induced epithelial changes than do non-Asia

147 acterial load in the corneal epithelium in a contact lens infection model in the rabbit.

148 Indications for surgery included contact lens intolerance or poor corrected visual acuity

149 s with progressive, advanced keratoconus and contact lens intolerance underwent the procedure with no

150 h clinical diagnosis of keratoconus who were contact lens intolerant and whose corrected distance vis

151 results indicate that use of a senofilcon A contact lens is beneficial in protecting ocular tissues

152 Sustained delivery of latanoprost by contact lenses is at least as effective as delivery with

153 successful option to correct presbyopia with contact lenses is monovision.

154 Senofilcon A class 1 UV-blocking contact lenses largely prevented UVB-induced changes in

155 follows: senofilcon A (class I UV blocking) contact lenses; lotrafilcon A contact lenses (no reporte

156 ous-drug diffusion coefficients in five soft-contact-lens material hydrogels where solute-specific ad

157 ction, was determined (130 mJ/cm(2)), 6 soft contact lens materials (etafilcon A, senofilcon A, galyf

158 The 'upper fornix trap', where the contact lens may be retained by the upper tarsal edge, p

159 Moreover, soft contact lenses may be more likely to retain asymptomatic

160 d the affected eyes fitted with compensatory contact lenses (mean duration of deprivation = 4.4 month

161 lm formation was assessed using our in vitro contact lens model and in vivo murine model.

162 are with ocular lubricants (n = 38), bandage contact lenses (n = 33), or punctal plugs (n = 33).

163 I UV blocking) contact lenses; lotrafilcon A contact lenses (no reported UV blocking); no contact len

164 tial of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from contact lens of the patients with contact lens associate

165 Ten marmosets were reared with multizone contact lenses of alternating powers (-5 diopters [D]/+5

166 wed that IOP reduction from baseline by pure contact lens on daily basis was comparable with that by

167 hange at the anterior corneal surface, using contact lenses, on the location of the scan path and mea

168 in all participants bilaterally by means of contact lens ophthalmodynamometry.

169 come a new prophylactic agent for preventing contact lens or trauma/injury-associated microbial kerat

170 covering by senofilcon A class 1 UV-blocking contact lenses or lotrafilcon A non-UV-blocking (lotrafi

171 lens, a minimally UV-blocking lotrafilcon A contact lens, or no contact lens at all.

172 Each received monovision spectacles, contact lenses, or both with distance correction in the

173 were wearing their own prescribed soft toric contact lenses over a 6-mm pupil.

174 f activated neutrophils by 79.2% on hydrogel contact lenses (P < 0.001).

175 lth, having diabetes, and wearing glasses or contact lenses (p < 0.05).

176 ts (life-table estimate, 74.5%) treated with contact lenses (P = 0.59).

177 HEMA-based contact lenses polymerized with nanosphere/cipro were tr

178 .52%/D, r = 0.97, P < 0.01) with increase in contact lens power (-12 to +8).

179 e scaling, were not related significantly to contact lens power (863 mum(2)/D, r = 0.06, P = 0.47).

180 Contact lens power can be estimated using an A-constant

181 Different types of contact lenses presented different levels of conjunctiva

182 ee RNFL scans were repeated with 10 separate contact lenses, (Proclear daily, Omafilcon A/60%) rangin

183 lace scarred tarsal conjunctiva, specialized contact lenses (PROSE), conjunctival replacement surgery

184 Eyes irradiated with no contact lens protection showed corneal epithelial cell l

185 were obtained from 36 contact lenses and 14 contact lens protective fluid samples.

186 Econazole-eluting contact lenses provided extended antifungal activity aga

187 The contaminated contact lens provides Pseudomonas aeruginosa an ideal si

188 anoparticle-based formulations, drug-eluting contact lenses, punctum inserts and bioadhesive matrices

189 o untreated, and -5 D and +5 D single vision contact lens-reared marmosets.

190 teral blurring induced by wearing monovision contact lenses reduces feed-forward activity in the prim

191 lated from cases and lenses of patients with contact lens-related corneal disease.

192 ess the relationship between the severity of contact lens-related disease and bacteria residing in bi

193 drawing attention to their emerging role in contact lens-related disease.

194 ses and lenses can predispose individuals to contact lens-related inflammatory complications.

195 decreases the severity and susceptibility of contact lens-related keratitis.

196 ard increased susceptibility and severity of contact lens-related keratitis.

197 Contact lens-related microbial keratitis increased in Ta

198 opic defocus simultaneously using concentric contact lenses resulted in relatively smaller and less m

199 We report a case of folded bandage contact lens retained for six and a half years in the up

200 buds, and maintaining clinical suspicion of contact lens retention.

201 effectiveness of orthokeratology versus soft contact lenses, rigid gas permeable lenses, and spectacl

202 ontact lenses, hybrid lenses and tandem soft contact lens-rigid gas permeable lenses.

203 tion curves from quantifications of in vitro contact lens samples soaked in successively decreasing c

204 For in vitro contact lens samples, galyfilcon A was associated with a

205 For ex vivo contact lens samples, there was significantly more chole

206 implant) and implanted the same in hydrogel contact lenses (sandwich system).

207 te in situ corneal oxygen uptake during soft-contact-lens (SCL) wear using a micro-polarographic Clar

208 We used a contact lens sensor (CLS) to measure change in limbal st

209 taB2-crystallin, and G3PDH, and UV-absorbing contact lenses significantly prevented these alterations

210 ater (OR, 16.00; P = 0.001), and topping off contact lens solution in the case (OR, 4.80; P = 0.01).

211 A total of 20 of 233 (8.6 %) contact lens solution specimens collected from 16 patien

212 performed to determine whether multipurpose contact lens solutions (MPCLSs) can cause increased infe

213 Between 2009 and 2014, the contact lens solutions collected from patients presentin

214 The repertoire of protozoa in contact lens solutions is larger than previously known.

215 The repertoire of free-living protozoa in contact lens solutions is poorly known despite the fact

216 reported for the first time as contaminating contact lens solutions.

217 onservative management with various types of contact lenses such as rigid gas permeable lenses, custo

218 , possible treatment options were iris print contact lenses, sunglasses, and simple iris prostheses.

219 Novel metrics for quantifying TBU over the contact lens surface were developed by quantifying the c

220 compression of the cornea using a flat rigid contact lens sutured to the cornea during the treatment

221 properties or cytotoxicity tests in any soft contact lenses tested.

222 To develop extended wear contact lenses that can also provide extended glaucoma t

223 ellulose nanoparticle-laden ring in hydrogel contact lenses that could provide controlled drug delive

224 Extended wear contact lenses that deliver glaucoma drugs for extended

225 /cipro was then incorporated into HEMA-based contact lenses that were tested for growth inhibition of

226 te the ability of a class I UV-blocking soft contact lens to protect against UVB-induced effects on t

227 t to the idea of using concentric multifocal contact lenses to appropriately manipulate peripheral re

228 a suitable power source for glucose-sensing contact lenses to be used for continuous health monitori

229 drogels have many applications, ranging from contact lenses to tissue engineering scaffolds.

230 onfidence interval [CI], 1.33-2.11), current contact lens use (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.53-2.64), allergie

231 nt for time-varying psychological stress and contact lens use and selection bias from dropout.

232 e, a compromised ocular surface, and bandage contact lens use are associated with MDR-PA keratitis.

233 tion background and pay further attention to contact lens use in pediatric patients.

234 of a compromised ocular surface, and bandage contact lens use were associated with MDR-PA keratitis.

235 eal phacoemulsification, myopia >6 diopters, contact lens use, and corneal abnormality.

236 for microbial keratitis during 2008-2012 was contact lens use, and the infection rate significantly i

237 ographic data, indication for K-Pro, bandage contact lens use, prophylactic antibiotic use, timing an

238 d nighttime visual disturbances among former contact lens users and former glasses users.

239 Most contact lens users had worn them successfully >/=5 years

240 e differential diagnosis of keratitis in all contact lens users with keratitis, particularly before m

241 rsal edge, presents an anatomical hazard for contact lens users.

242 At her subsequent visit, bandage contact lens was removed from her left eye, but none was

243 icacy of timolol delivered via extended wear contact lenses was then compared to eye drops in beagle

244 athy, and their use, particularly of bandage contact lenses, was associated with significant healing

245 %]), organic matter trauma (9/49 [18%]), and contact lens wear (3/49 [6%]).

246 significantly increased relative to baseline contact lens wear but was significantly increased relati

247 cal vancomycin use, topical steroid use, and contact lens wear did not increase the incidence of infe

248 res, including lubrication and discontinuing contact lens wear in 4 patients (4 eyes), whereas in 11

249 e included contact lens wear only (13 eyes), contact lens wear in the setting of ocular rosacea (3 ey

250 ome, and propose a theoretical model for how contact lens wear might change those interactions to ena

251 Causes of the LSC disease included contact lens wear only (13 eyes), contact lens wear in t

252 des of research focused on understanding how contact lens wear predisposes to P aeruginosa infection,

253 Contact lens wear predisposes to Pseudomonas aeruginosa

254 %) comprised the control group who continued contact lens wear, 819 (45%) wore contacts at baseline a

255 Compared with contact lens wear, current LASIK technology improved eas

256 Compared with continued contact lens wear, LASIK significantly reduced the self-

257 s a viable option for the management of soft contact lens wear-related limbal stem cell deficiency in

258 ion with systemic immunosuppression for soft contact lens wear-related limbal stem cell deficiency.

259 us, potentially allowing continued long-term contact lens wear.

260 athies that may occur in dry eye disease and contact lens wear.

261 rneal infections following trauma and during contact lens wear.

262 have chronic difficulties with spectacle or contact lens wear.

263 ere compared with conventional daytime rigid contact lens wear.

264 state corneal oxygen uptake rate during soft-contact-lens wear.

265 neal-oxygen-uptake rates during in vivo soft-contact-lens wear.

266 None was a corneal-contact lens wearer, one had previous cataract surgery a

267 r development of serious infections, such as contact lens wearers (P = 0.21) or patients with human i

268 ct lens control group, whereas 88% of former contact lens wearers and 77% of former glasses wearers w

269 nosa bacterial infection, commonly occurs in contact lens wearers and may lead to vision impairment.

270 esis that blurry vision symptoms reported by contact lens wearers are caused by poor quality of the r

271 Thirty-nine neophytes and soft contact lens wearers completed the study.

272 Corneal staining in contact lens wearers continues to be a frequent, but not

273 It is well documented that contact lens wearers have much higher incidences of corn

274 gonorrhea or chlamydia and conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers should be treated with antibiotics.

275 Cases and lenses from nine asymptomatic contact lens wearers were processed in a manner similar

276 Controls were RGP contact lens wearers with no history of AK who were at l

277 orneal infections compared with those of non-contact lens wearers, although the exact cause(s) of thi

278 itis, a rare eye disease primarily affecting contact lens wearers, is caused by free-living amebae, A

279 ntact lenses, in a population of symptomatic contact lens wearers.

280 that are associated with corneal staining in contact lens wearers.

281 erent during SCL and RGPL wearing in IN, and contact lens wearing does not significantly reduce nysta

282 ls, cultured human corneal epithelial cells, contact lens-wearing animal models, and bacterial geneti

283 Patients were RGP contact lens-wearing United States residents with a diag

284 root mean square errors in the KC eyes with contact lenses were 2.72 +/- 0.83 mum and 1.36 +/- 0.29

285 Ten wearers of silicone hydrogel contact lenses were asked to keep one eye open for appro

286 The bandage contact lenses were changed every 4 days, whereas the pu

287 Cross sections of the pre- and postrelease contact lenses were characterized by scanning electron m

288 Curved contact lenses were created by encapsulating econazole-i

289 Custom-made hydrogel contact lenses were fitted to rats after incubation in P

290 n, Inc., Jacksonville, FL) silicone hydrogel contact lenses were independently incubated in cholester

291 n from further visit stated that the bandage contact lenses were no longer in situ.

292 Conversely, non-UV-blocking contact lenses were not protective.

293 y(HEMA-co-AA-co-AM-co-NVP-co-PEG200DMA) soft contact lenses were prepared (100+/-5 mum thickness, dia

294 Four different types of soft contact lenses were randomly fitted to both eyes of each

295 Four different types of soft contact lenses were tested on the left eye of 10 subject

296 Trauma and contact lenses were the main predisposing factors.

297 Contact lenses were used to correct aphakia in patients

298 cost and the lead time for fabricating soft contact lenses with customized shapes, and benefit the l

299 e presence of neutrophils to form biofilm on contact lenses within a short time.

300 n of the surgeon, the cost and handling of a contact lens would be so burdensome as to result in sign