ライフサイエンスコーパス: contingency table

1 ll correlation between rows and columns in a contingency table.

2 s and controls can be expressed as a two-way contingency table.

3 n = 179) control subjects using a chi-square contingency table.

4 ity, and diagnostic odds ratio using a 2 x 2 contingency table.

5 analyses and by Fisher exact test for 2 x 2 contingency tables.

6 pairwise t test and the McNemar test in 2x2 contingency tables.

7 tion and having sufficient data to calculate contingency tables.

8 nd accuracy were calculated by using two-way contingency tables.

9 Genotype frequencies were compared by 2 x 2 contingency tables.

10 statistic, and power and subject population contingency tables.

11 Data were analyzed using r x c contingency tables.

12 t presented data that allowed calculation of contingency tables.

13 vel, with sufficient data to construct 2 x 2 contingency tables.

14 to partition the original data into two-way contingency tables.

15 ios (ORs) extracted or calculated from 2 x 2 contingency tables.

16 pain with analysis of variance, t tests, and contingency table analyses.

17 Sex differences were assessed using contingency table analysis (for categorical variables) a

18 Associations were assessed using contingency table analysis and the chi2 test, using a tw

19 Contingency table analysis showed that all MS affected i

20 This contingency table analysis suggests that many amino acid

21 We used contingency table analysis to compare allele and genotyp

22 Two-way contingency table analysis was used to determine the cor

23 MDR using a variety of measures for two-way contingency table analysis.

24 of traditional analysis techniques, such as contingency-table analysis, regression methods, and anal

25 of allele counts across multiple pools using contingency tables and (ii) evaluating the probability o

26 explored variables by defining double-entry contingency tables and calculating Odds Ratio (OR) with

27 They used contingency tables and chi-square statistics to examine

28 he effect of meniscal damage was analyzed by contingency tables and logistic regression.

29 Contingency tables and multivariate models were used to

30 ion of paired t tests, analysis of variance, contingency tables, and chi2 tests.

31 pports any statistical test that is based on contingency tables, and enables both family-wise error r

32 ata were presented to allow recalculation of contingency tables, and established diagnostic criteria

33 all portion of the individuals to update the contingency tables, and it achieves at least an order of

34 o demonstrates superior performance over two contingency table based over-representation methods.

35 elopments in the analysis of categorical and contingency-table data.

36 Contingency tables exceeding 2x2 with ranked alternative

37 Student t test for continuous variables and contingency tables for categorical variables were used.

38 We constructed contingency tables for each diagnostic test and calculat

39 ure, the algorithm incrementally updates the contingency tables for epistatic tests without scanning

40 chi-square test for the [Formula: see text] contingency table generated by associated variants.

41 for specific HLA-B allele was estimated from contingency table generated from the HLA-B and -C haplot

42 A chi2 analysis of contingency tables indicated that the beta2a subunit cau

43 Data were analyzed by contingency table methods.

44 Then, a series of contingency tables nested according to the cladogram hie

45 parametric tests are used to analyze a 2 x 2 contingency table of categorical data.

46 Statistical analysis involved use of a 2 x 2 contingency table of diskogram results for each of the s

47 he reference standard, and for which a 2 x 2 contingency table of lesion diagnosis could be construct

48 We fit a log-linear model to the contingency table of spine features such as spine type a

49 FIPSA maximizes the likelihood ratio of the contingency table of the allele counts multiplied by the

50 y into the standard statistical framework of contingency tables primarily due to the serious under-sa

51 nostic accuracy were extracted to form 2 x 2 contingency tables separately for endometrial cancer and

52 d disease-free survival, were assessed using contingency table tests and Cox proportional hazard mode

53 nicopathologic variables were assessed using contingency table tests and Cox proportional hazard mode

54 served when the analysis was performed using contingency tables that split sibs into three age-at-ons

55 By a traditional method (two-by-two contingency table), the sensitivities for detection of l

56 stic analyses or Fisher exact test for 2 x 2 contingency tables using subsequent histologic analysis

57 rs in sufficient detail to reconstruct 2 x 2 contingency tables were reviewed.

58 The ELISA results were analyzed using contingency tables with Fisher's exact test and compared

59 These operate on the contingency table, with i, jth element equal to the numb