ライフサイエンスコーパス: continuous performance test

1 ng speed, or sustained attention by Conners' Continuous Performance Test.

2 a Verbal Learning Test and degraded-stimulus Continuous Performance Test.

3 during performance of an A-X version of the Continuous Performance Test.

4 he more difficult distraction version of the Continuous Performance Test.

5 magnetic resonance imaging and completed the Continuous Performance Test.

6 mpleted the degraded-stimulus version of the Continuous Performance Test.

7 characterized by impaired performance on the continuous performance test.

8 d inattention ratings on visual and auditory continuous performance tests.

9 The authors used the Continuous Performance Test, 1-9 version, with and witho

10 Learning Test (8q24), the degraded-stimulus Continuous Performance Test (10q26), face memory (10q26

11 paired attention as measured by the 5-Choice Continuous Performance Test, an effect that was attenuat

12 ocessing, a degraded stimulus version of the continuous performance test and a forced choice span of

13 n outcome measures: accuracy during the Penn Continuous Performance Test and diagnosis with attention

14 The patients performed worse on the Continuous Performance Test and had smaller prefrontal c

15 nd nondeficit patients in performance on the continuous performance test and span of apprehension tas

16 ients and the normal comparison group on the continuous performance test and span of apprehension tas

17 Performance on the continuous performance test and span of apprehension tas

18 On the Degraded Stimulus-Continuous Performance Test and the Trail-Making Test B-

19 memory and/or cognitive control (N-back, AX Continuous Performance Test, and Preparing to Overcome P

20 with improved performance on the N-back, AX Continuous Performance Test, and Preparing to Overcome P

21 Poor performance on the Continuous Performance Test appears to be familial and,

22 simultaneously in 2 tasks: an AX-type visual continuous performance test (AX-CPT), which required sub

23 deficit patients and the normal group on the continuous performance test, but nondeficit patients per

24 ns were done using the computerized Conners' Continuous Performance Test (CCPT).

25 On the Continuous Performance Test, commission errors decreased

26 cent) of the normal comparison group in both Continuous Performance Test conditions.

27 E) and attention and impulse control using a Continuous Performance Test (CPT) and components of the

28 on on a computerized version of the Conners' Continuous Performance Test (CPT) in the 16(th) percenti

29 nomolgus macaques fully trained to perform a continuous performance test (CPT) in the presence and ab

30 Children completed the Conner's Continuous Performance Test (CPT) measuring omission err

31 evaluation, eye tracking evaluation, and the Continuous Performance Test (CPT) of visual attention.

32 mbers a person can remember in sequence, and continuous performance test (CPT), a test that measures

33 d 2 versions of a visual vigilance task, the Continuous Performance Test (CPT).

34 h mathematical processing (MTH-CVc), AC with continuous performance test (CPT-AC), and CVc with spati

35 cal function was assessed using the Conners' Continuous Performance Tests (CPT).

36 Measures of attention (Conners' Continuous Performance Test [CPT], Conners' Rating Scale

37 ments and the neurocognitive measures of the Continuous Performance Test (Degraded Stimulus version),

38 rse of their illness on a new variant of the Continuous Performance Test designed specifically to eli

39 S, 0.65), and processing speed (eg, Conners' Continuous Performance Test hit reaction time, -2.10 +/-

40 Attention was assessed by using the Continuous Performance Test, Identical Pairs Version.

41 on both the verbal and spatial tasks of the Continuous Performance Test, Identical Pairs Version.

42 y mechanistic accounts of performance on the Continuous Performance Test in patients with schizophren

43 s suggest that attentional impairment on the Continuous Performance Test is associated with psychosis

44 nd Edition (BASC-2), and the Conners' Kiddie Continuous Performance Test (K-CPT).

45 it patients' differential performance on the continuous performance test may be related to either an

46 =0.05) and attentiveness index (P=0.03) on a continuous performance test of attention.

47 Within the patient group, Continuous Performance Test performance significantly co

48 The authors examined whether Continuous Performance Test scores correlate with fronto

49 Continuous Performance Test scores of patients with majo

50 The authors examined Continuous Performance Test scores of patients with majo

51 The patients with Continuous Performance Test scores one standard deviatio

52 subgroup of siblings had significantly lower Continuous Performance Test scores.

53 wever, none of the four manipulations of the Continuous Performance Test tasks had a differential imp

54 Given the ease of administering the Continuous Performance Test, the use of impaired attenti

55 across all groups, whereas no effect on the Continuous Performance Test was seen, suggesting that ge

56 Variations of the Continuous Performance Test were used to test the four m

57 For each participant, digit span and continuous performance testing were performed before fun