ライフサイエンスコーパス: contralateral

1 pRS neuron somata are on average larger than contralateral.

2 Patients with CP (n = 14) with 42 contralateral 2- and 3-walled defects were randomly assi

3 38; compliance: spastic: 1.79 +/- 0.12 mm/N, contralateral: 2.21 +/- 0.18 mm/kg, p = 0.048).

4 cle displacement: spastic: 4.84 +/- 0.33 mm, contralateral: 6.02 +/- 0.49 mm, p = 0.038; compliance:

5 the same task using acoustic pure tones in a contralateral acoustic ear.

6 inhibitory inputs driven by ipsilateral and contralateral acoustic stimuli, respectively, and vary t

7 with the temporally specific attenuation of contralateral alpha (8-14 Hz) oscillations that, moreove

8 Bdnf knockdown accompanied by lesions of the contralateral amygdala impede goal-directed response sel

9 teral OFC Bdnf knockdown with lesions of the contralateral amygdala.

10 r engraftment in the injected and uninjected contralateral and ipsilateral glands.

11 direct current stimulation (tDCS) over both contralateral and ipsilateral motor cortex in a between-

12 ial listening (location tasks) enhanced both contralateral and ipsilateral responses in the right hem

13 egy: culprit-vessel revascularization first, contralateral angiography first, or complete angiography

14 often associated with microphthalmia and/or contralateral anophthalmia.

15 tes given through 1 end hole (n=6) or in the contralateral artery (n=6) did not induce a significant

16 in the clinically adjudicated culprit to the contralateral asymptomatic artery, and assessed the rela

17 le range [Q1-Q3], 1.5-2.5) compared with the contralateral asymptomatic carotid arteries (median: 1.4

18 ipsilateral symptomatic carotid plaques and contralateral asymptomatic carotid arteries, which was c

19 imb had lower Grad and SRi compared with the contralateral asymptomatic limb, age-matched control sub

20 quency of activation in both ipsilateral and contralateral atria (P<0.05 for both), whereas ablation

21 Av on each side also projects directly to contralateral Av. dNCLSHELL and Av each integrate inputs

22 The contralateral bias of high spatial frequency tuning was

23 hemisphere controls the motor output of the contralateral body.

24 bone within metastatic sites than in normal contralateral bone as well as co-localization with the t

25 bserved between treated teeth (T1) and their contralateral, both buccal-lingually in the alveolar rid

26 assessed amount of FGT and BPE in the normal contralateral breast by subjective visual estimation, as

27 ving disease recurrence or the occurrence of contralateral breast cancer (67 with letrozole and 98 wi

28 er diagnosis, roughly 5% of patients develop contralateral breast cancer (CBC).

29 47 years; IQR, 40-55 years) eligible for the contralateral breast cancer analysis, 426 were diagnosed

30 ancer, 109 with ovarian cancer, and 245 with contralateral breast cancer during follow-up.

31 e age-specific risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for mutation carriers and to

32 The annual incidence rate of contralateral breast cancer in the letrozole group was 0

33 Contralateral breast cancer rates are declining as well

34 Contralateral breast cancer risk decreased significantly

35 ts, the current evidence for ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer risks in older survivors of

36 sease-free survival and a lower incidence of contralateral breast cancer than those with placebo, but

37 arly dependent on TN status, but the risk of contralateral breast cancer was not.

38 e corresponding risks of any recurrence or a contralateral breast cancer were 17%, 22%, and 26%, resp

39 for disease recurrence or the occurrence of contralateral breast cancer, 0.66; P=0.01 by a two-sided

40 (local, regional, or distant recurrence, or contralateral breast cancer, invasive disease, or ductal

41 For contralateral breast cancer, the cumulative risk 20 year

42 and cumulative risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer.

43 rrence of invasive locoregional, distant, or contralateral breast cancer.

44 netic resonance imaging (MRI) detects occult contralateral breast cancers (CBCs) in women with breast

45 mutation with a palpable abnormality in the contralateral breast.

46 t do not contain a lesion or that are in the contralateral breast.

47 g to several factors, including patient age, contralateral/bulky neck disease, increasing number of p

48 nitor-to-postmitotic transition to implement contralateral, but not ipsilateral, RGC differentiation,

49 P4 polarity and accumulation of p-tau in the contralateral CA1 area in A2AR knockout mice.

50 survivors will develop a new ipsilateral or contralateral cancer (in-breast event) over the 5 years

51 of patients, and women at increased risk for contralateral cancer are a small proportion of the breas

52 the symptomatic plaques and the asymptomatic contralateral carotid arteries/plaques showed no signifi

53 plaques is not significantly different from contralateral carotids/plaques.

54 rn receive preferential input from local and contralateral CCPCs as opposed to BLAPCs and BLA neurons

55 teral cerebral hemisphere (THGr(Ce)) and the contralateral cerebellar hemisphere (THGr(Cb))-by its re

56 somedial striatum responded more strongly to contralateral choices.

57 ats AKI was induced by right nephrectomy and contralateral clamping of the renal pedicle for 40 minut

58 y motor areas send denser projections to the contralateral claustrum than to the ipsilateral one.

59 s barely send projections to either ipsi- or contralateral claustrum.

60 ht-sensitive interneurons from the ipsi- and contralateral compound eye.

61 -siRNA-electroporated legs compared with the contralateral control legs, which correlated with a redu

62 -siRNA-electroporated muscles, compared with contralateral control muscles.

63 significantly less bone mineral density than contralateral controls, confirming reduced load.

64 dala (BLAPC) compared to those projecting to contralateral cortex (CCPC).

65 neuronal subclasses projecting either to the contralateral cortex or to the brainstem suggesting that

66 o intratelencephalic (IT) targets, including contralateral cortex, nucleus accumbens, and basolateral

67 inputs from both lower brain regions and the contralateral cortex.

68 laminar distribution patterns and to certain contralateral cortical areas.

69 The distinct properties of contralateral cortical responses may reflect the functio

70 ly identified and reciprocally inhibit their contralateral counterparts, contributing to left-right b

71 s were given a disconnection treatment using contralateral cytotoxic lesions of the PF and pDMS (Grou

72 related potential analysis revealed that the contralateral delay activity was similar for all conditi

73 ctrophysiological index of VWM contents (the contralateral delay activity), presumably indicating the

74 of unilateral or dominant concha bullosa and contralateral direction of septal deviation [right-sided

75 right hemisphere but maintained or enhanced contralateral dominance in the left hemisphere.

76 nucleus receives inhibitory inputs from the contralateral dorsolateral IP, and mainly excitatory inp

77 e counseled to continue to use the HA in the contralateral ear postimplantation in order to determine

78 bimodal listening experience (CI plus HA in contralateral ear) completed a questionnaire that focuse

79 s of auditory nerve afferent synapses in the contralateral ear.

80 elbow greater than 1.0 mm compared with the contralateral elbow yielded a sensitivity, specificity,

81 ss both at the injured and at the uninjured (contralateral) elbow.

82 ckness also showed greater diminution in the contralateral eye (P = .040 and P = .0004).

83 cular visual cortex that respond only to the contralateral eye are tuned to higher spatial frequencie

84 are dominated by contralateral eye input and contralateral eye deprivation shifts mouse V1 neurons to

85 eived a second subretinal injection in their contralateral eye in a follow-on clinical trial.

86 ty of administration of AAV2-hRPE65v2 to the contralateral eye in patients enrolled in the phase 1 st

87 Normal mouse V1 neurons are dominated by contralateral eye input and contralateral eye deprivatio

88 ency preference of cortical responses to the contralateral eye is approximately 35% higher than respo

89 ye ipsilateral to the side of surgery to the contralateral eye was achieved employing paired t tests

90 ide of the hemispherectomy compared with the contralateral eye.

91 m(2) [range, 1543-3289 cells/mm(2)]) than in contralateral eyes (2812.5 cells/mm(2) [range, 1887-3546

92 with uveitis (54% [range, 33%-66%]) than in contralateral eyes (58.5% [range, 52%-82%]; P = 0.004).

93 t mice, while AAV-lacZ was injected into the contralateral eyes as a control.

94 ons of normal, age-matched controls and with contralateral eyes in individuals with unilateral uveiti

95 icroscopy of cryosectioned and immunolabeled contralateral eyes.

96 ADI-PEG 20 treatment of mice bearing contralateral flank UM-UC-3 and RT112 xenografts selecti

97 tumors on one flank led to regression in the contralateral flank.

98 around the tumor or intracutaneously in the contralateral footpad.

99 Hypothesizing that preserved contralateral grasping ability after hemidisconnection c

100 ater than bone]) and a quantitative heart to contralateral (H/CL) ratio.

101 Sustained amplitude modulations in the contralateral hand area show decrease for alpha (10-12 H

102 Before the operation, contralateral hand function was normal in 3/102 patients

103 eir transfer of learning when switching to a contralateral hand, the second identical cup, or switchi

104 thread in the second upper-left molar, with contralateral hemiarcade as control.

105 aDBS can lead to substantial improvements in contralateral hemibody Unified Parkinson's Disease Ratin

106 re a large excitatory receptive field in the contralateral hemifield.

107 he right cortex for stimuli leading from the contralateral hemifield.

108 mies or hemispherotomies) invariably lead to contralateral hemiparesis.

109 e densest terminal labeling appearing in the contralateral hemisphere around retrogradely labeled neu

110 ) in 7/17 animals in the ipsilateral but not contralateral hemisphere in 6 h of monitoring, without m

111 each voxel and the mean signal of global and contralateral hemisphere was calculated using TSA.

112 t is beneficial to boost excitability in the contralateral hemisphere while attenuating that of the i

113 s post-injury remained unchanged compared to contralateral hemisphere, and PDH activity was not affec

114 o the midline and then directing them to the contralateral hemisphere.

115 Although contralateral hemispheres had equal numbers of macrophag

116 Leukocytes from ischemic and contralateral hemispheres were analyzed by flow cytometr

117 ounding the directly impacted region and the contralateral hippocampal CA1 area and was accompanied b

118 urons also produced changes extending to the contralateral hippocampus, detectable by both electrophy

119 Ipsi- and contralateral histaminergic compound eyes are required f

120 17.0% (8.5%), respectively, compared to the contralateral homologous NAWM (p < 0.001).

121 11.0% (7.2%), respectively, compared to the contralateral homologous NAWM that did not progress (p <

122 Sixty-four contralateral homologous sites (control group), with or

123 ns preceded by high-gamma attenuation in the contralateral homotopic regions.

124 following recovery from deactivation of the contralateral IC by cryoloop cooling or microdialysis of

125 mentary, and the lesion was feeding from the contralateral IMA.

126 FC infusions of DA antagonists combined with contralateral inactivation of the BLA or NAc.

127 cochlear nucleus (DCN) target primarily the contralateral inferior colliculus (IC).

128 which integrates ipsilateral excitation and contralateral inhibition to compute interaural level dif

129 rs by integrating ipsilateral excitation and contralateral inhibition, but it remains unclear what pa

130 t firing responses, and selective loss of CC contralateral innervation.

131 coincidence detection if the ipsilateral and contralateral inputs originated from different cochlear

132 psilateral inputs joined broadly distributed contralateral inputs.

133 These observations indicate that contralateral, instead of bilateral, representation of t

134 don transection sites when compared with the contralateral, intact tendon based on LYVE1+ tubules (10

135 d stroke after adjusting for ipsilateral and contralateral internal carotid artery injury grade (adju

136 usion injury and unilateral nephrectomy plus contralateral ischemia-reperfusion injury.

137 (n = 2), with one metachronous tumor in the contralateral kidney (n = 1) at a median time of 4.3 mon

138 ose in the STK (151.8-185.5 ml/min, P=0.01); contralateral kidney RBF increased (212.7-271.8 ml/min,

139 taneous heart-kidney (SHK) recipient and the contralateral kidney to a kidney transplant alone (KTA)

140 ly lower in SLK versus KTA recipients of the contralateral kidney.

141 compared with adjacent normal tissue and the contralateral kidney.

142 l renal lesions were included, and 75 normal contralateral kidneys served as controls.

143 (n = 5) was performed, and the stenotic and contralateral kidneys were studied longitudinally in viv

144 hours of experimental period compared to the contralateral kidneys.

145 OA, n = 32) and with ROA risk factors in the contralateral knee (riskROA, n = 28), and 89 healthy sub

146 onths after surgery, operated and unoperated contralateral knees were harvested and evaluated using c

147 ronal cells dissociated from SNE-injured and contralateral L4 and L5 dorsal root ganglia were culture

148 No injections performed in contralateral left eyes (control positive group II).

149 ediately by a smaller (greater) value of the contralateral leg (interleg control), or the deviation f

150 IMTG was higher in the immobilized than the contralateral leg in young and older men.

151 al hind paw of C57 mice while the tumor-free contralateral leg served as an intraindividual control.

152 are at heightened risk of amputation on the contralateral leg.

153 azonin-ir medial neuron integrates ipsi- and contralateral light information as part of the phase-adv

154 nces in the signal ratio (metastatic node to contralateral limb) between the two modalities were dete

155 of the ipsilateral limb or midstance of the contralateral limb.

156 counting for the number of metastatic nodes, contralateral LN involvement (N2c status) and LN size we

157 ediastinum (UM), lower mediastinum (LM), and contralateral lung (CL).

158 lateral lymph nodes; ICON-S N2, bilateral or contralateral lymph nodes; and ICON-S N3, lymph nodes la

159 d by more intense drug extravasation than in contralateral mammary fat pad tissue, which is consisten

160 er in the tumor than in muscle tissue or the contralateral mammary fat pad.

161 aps crowd in a space normally devoted to the contralateral map alone and in a nonoverlapping fashion.

162 Contralateral molars served as unmanipulated controls.

163 creased in a nearly monotonic fashion in the contralateral monkeys, whereas the ipsilateral monkey pr

164 view is that ipsilateral activity suppresses contralateral motor cortex and, accordingly, that inhibi

165 This suggests that in both ipsilateral and contralateral motor cortices, neural populations have ef

166 the rest ( approximately 30%) fired with the contralateral motor output.

167 tor system areas that encode ipsilateral and contralateral movements in a similar manner: according t

168 Is coding similar during ipsilateral and contralateral movements?

169 L and glutamate signaling was blocked in the contralateral NAcC.

170 certainty the visual outcome of a sequential contralateral NAION event based on the severity of visua

171 rength of excitatory inputs originating from contralateral neocortex.

172 In addition, we evaluated the effects of contralateral noise on auditory nerve responses as a mea

173 , while less than 6% were transfected in the contralateral non-FUS treated hemisphere.

174 Surprisingly, the contralateral non-massaged limb exhibited a comparable 1

175 DNA synthesis, are elevated in muscle of the contralateral non-massaged limb.

176 ical legs without implant placement and with contralateral nonoperated normal legs.

177 erformed together with an examination of the contralateral normal shoulder, followed by MRI of the sy

178 s Wilcoxon signed-rank test) relative to the contralateral normal-appearing cortex.

179 2.02%) was significantly higher than that in contralateral normal-appearing white matter (DGErho = 0.

180 sible occlusions of the ipsilateral (but not contralateral) nostril, known to abolish gamma oscillati

181 e-affected gastrocnemius, as compared to the contralateral one.

182 Inhibitory GABAergic input to the contralateral optic tectum arises instead from a nearby

183 ry percutaneous coronary intervention before contralateral or complete diagnostic angiography is asso

184 iPMd) and in the opposite hemisphere (i.e., contralateral or cPMd) can shape M1 outputs and then com

185 (tDCS) with the excitatory anode either over contralateral or ipsilateral motor cortex facilitated mo

186 ndently of whether the anode was placed over contralateral or ipsilateral motor cortex, bihemispheric

187 A multi-electrode array was implanted in M1 contralateral or ipsilateral to the amputation in three

188 receive more synapses from ipsilateral than contralateral ORNs, providing a structural basis for odo

189 ix were beyond the margins of resection, and contralateral parahippocampal changes may suggest a bite

190 in the ipsilateral dorsal fornix and in the contralateral parahippocampal white matter bundle.

191 included: unilateral total nephrectomy with contralateral partial nephrectomy (48%), bilateral parti

192 At the highest spatial frequencies, the contralateral pathway strongly prefers to respond to vis

193 E relative risk (RR) was most significant in contralateral PCME (RR 19.5), diabetic retinopathy (RR 1

194 sk factors for PCME were assessed including, contralateral PCME, diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein o

195 We found that rats with contralateral PER-POR lesions were impaired in object-co

196 ossed excitotoxic lesions to the POR and the contralateral PER.

197 ese regions contained representations of the contralateral periphery and were selectively active for

198 d culprit plaques compared with asymptomatic contralateral plaques (log10standardized uptake valuemea

199 es in uptake were observed in culprit versus contralateral plaques or control patients.

200 ns of interest along the carotid plaques and contralateral plaques/carotid arteries by an experienced

201 and posterior parietal cortex, as well as in contralateral prefrontal cortex are also shown to be act

202 f 300 muL was subretinally injected into the contralateral, previously uninjected, eyes of 11 childre

203 l cortex and dorsal premotor cortex onto the contralateral primary motor cortex (M1) during the prepa

204 um and posterior amygdala (PoA) demonstrated contralateral projection fields within the anterior arco

205 synchronizes between hemispheres and intact, contralateral projections can release dopamine in the mi

206 mygdaloid neurons constitute a wide range of contralateral projections to sensorimotor and limbic str

207 signaling and support a functional role for contralateral projections.

208 The use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomies (CPMs) among pat

209 of life experienced by patients who undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) and breast r

210 date and examine national temporal trends in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) and determin

211 Guidelines assert that contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) should be di

212 Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) use is incre

213 Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy use is substantial

214 s are generally high among patients choosing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, complications and

215 Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

216 The only L-neurons that project to the contralateral protocerebrum are those that have their de

217 Ipsilateral and contralateral pRS axons have distinctly different trajec

218 ajectories also differ, with ipsilateral and contralateral pRS axons more highly concentrated mediall

219 stral and caudal regions of the PRF, whereas contralateral pRS neurons are concentrated in the rostra

220 Ipsilateral pRS neurons outnumber contralateral pRS neurons by threefold and are distribut

221 n +/- interquartile range for ipsilateral-to-contralateral ratio of the activity in middle cerebral a

222 er in the SE-PMMA IOL eyes compared with the contralateral RE-PMMA eyes at all follow-up visits (P <

223 nd in the thalamus than in the corresponding contralateral regions.

224 in the hippocampus than in the corresponding contralateral regions; this increase was probably relate

225 Furthermore, we find that contralateral responses are more direction-selective tha

226 y evoking and characterizing ipsilateral and contralateral responses in semitendinosus, vastus latera

227 intained across speeds, with ipsilateral and contralateral responses peaking during the stance-to-swi

228 mbered stimulus because both ipsilateral and contralateral responses showed similar signals reflectin

229 The amplitudes of ipsilateral and contralateral responses were largest at intermediate spe

230 n3c(+) Ret(+) RGCs project preferentially to contralateral retinorecipient areas, while Brn3b(+) Ret(

231 SoxC genes are deleted in postmitotic RGCs, contralateral RGC axons grow poorly on chiasm cells in v

232 nown about the transcriptional regulation of contralateral RGC development.

233 C transcription factors in the regulation of contralateral RGC differentiation and axon guidance.

234 BPbeta in the ipsilateral SCDH compared with contralateral SCDH.

235 er in the SE-PMMA IOL eyes compared with the contralateral SE-Acrylic IOL eyes at all but the 1- and

236 rmation from the ipsilateral hemisphere with contralateral sensory and song-learning regions.

237 ns to ipsilateral Av; Av in turn projects to contralateral SHELL, dNCLSHELL , and regions of nidopall

238 of FA in the ROI of the NEPTR to that in the contralateral side (FAcontra) and to that in the interna

239 sis in the ipsilateral arm compared with the contralateral side (HR 23.44, 95% CI 2.96-185.83; p=0.00

240 ce in the spastic muscles as compared to the contralateral side (muscle displacement: spastic: 4.84 +

241 sensory cortex gates sensory inputs from the contralateral side of the body.

242 t it processes afferent information from the contralateral side of the body.

243 formation is mapped topographically onto the contralateral side of the brain in the primary somatosen

244 g that they are activated by inputs from the contralateral side of the cord.

245 cluding incorrectly localized adenoma on the contralateral side of the neck, missed double adenoma, a

246 uring metamorphosis, one eye migrates to the contralateral side of the skull, and this migration is a

247 The contralateral side served as a non-treated control.

248 tly and consistently reduced compared to the contralateral side, following testing and re-testing by

249 llar hemisphere (THGr(Cb))-by its respective contralateral side.

250 whereas the EMD vehicle was injected in the contralateral side.

251 n procedures (GAPs) and untreated homologous contralateral sites.

252 This contralateral SNr projection is important in intertectal

253 sulted in mirror infection restricted to the contralateral somatosensory cortex without any infection

254 our finding of a projection from nTTD to the contralateral somatosensory thalamic nucleus dorsalis in

255 synaptic inputs that are driven by ipsi- and contralateral sound stimuli, respectively, and changes i

256 inct cortical loci following ipsilateral and contralateral stimulation of the specific whiskers.

257 such comparisons, receives information about contralateral stimuli directly from sensory neurons in t

258 ough responses of individual LPFC neurons to contralateral stimuli were stronger and emerged 40 ms ea

259 sion strength depended on when and where the contralateral stimulus was presented, an effect stronger

260 whereas phase-based connectivity between the contralateral STN and motor cortex decreased.

261 iologically relevant dopamine release in the contralateral striatum.

262 sal ganglia via both the ipsilateral and the contralateral substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr).

263 nal ganglion cells (RGCs) to ipsilateral and contralateral targets in the brain.

264 with 2 posterior implants and corresponding contralateral teeth were examined at enrollment; at day

265 after 6 to 12 months between the treated and contralateral teeth, although both were greater than T0

266 o 25.6 mm at T1, and 14.8 to 25.29 mm in the contralateral teeth.

267 3.81 mm at T1 and 0.25 mm to 1.60 mm in the contralateral teeth.

268 We also find a projection from nTTD to the contralateral thalamic nucleus uvaeformis, a multi-senso

269 modules called barreloids and barrels in the contralateral thalamus and cortex represent each whisker

270 Average ED for contralateral TMJs was significantly larger ( P = 0.012)

271 emiplegia, i.e. the denial of motor deficits contralateral to a brain lesion.

272 shed that cerebro-cerebellar connections are contralateral to each other and include the cerebello-th

273 e R2* within the thalamus ipsilateral versus contralateral to infarct and we focused on the 95th perc

274 of alpha band (8-14 Hz) activity in regions contralateral to remembered items, comprising both local

275 lysis using only sensors from the hemisphere contralateral to stimulation.

276 Specifically, for the hand contralateral to the anode, electroencephalographic acti

277 In contrast, for the hand contralateral to the cathode, hemispheric lateralization

278 The fMRI activity in visual cortical regions contralateral to the cued direction of attention covarie

279 nd an increase in occipital alpha-band power contralateral to the direction of gaze, indicative of a

280 ) levels were measured from the motor cortex contralateral to the greater functional deficit side in

281 s (8-12 Hz) in brain regions ipsilateral and contralateral to the locus of attention, respectively.

282 central electrodes in the right hemisphere, contralateral to the PA-induced, compensatory leftward s

283 t of the visual field was smaller in the eye contralateral to the side of surgery compared with the i

284 ically for items encoded in the visual field contralateral to the site of stimulation.

285 algesic effect that was ipsilateral, but not contralateral, to optogenetic stimulation, suggesting in

286 The contralateral tooth was considered the intragroup contro

287 ickness of buccal wall was compared with the contralateral tooth.

288 cellular IFNgamma in both the irradiated and contralateral tumors.

289 s of L-dopa in the 6OHDA (6-hydroxydopamine) contralateral turning model.

290 RecRed up to complete root coverage, whereas contralateral untreated sites showed a tendency to incre

291 al denudation at 24 h and 21 d compared with contralateral untreated, nondenuded CCA.

292 ly, NVP-AAM077 at 0.3 nmol perfused into the contralateral ventricle, considerably suppressed the mag

293 confer the whisker-related patterning to the contralateral ventroposteromedial nucleus of the thalamu

294 substrate of such dynamic prioritization in contralateral visual brain areas and show that this subs

295 ere multiple gradients of polar angle of the contralateral visual field share a confluent fovea.

296 Stimuli in the contralateral visual field suppressed responses to ipsil

297 The contralateral visual pathway is tuned to higher spatial

298 Because literature has focused on contralateral volume differences, subcortical disease la

299 ws competitive interactions between the ipsi/contralateral whisker maps.

300 and interference between the ipsilateral and contralateral whisker representations in the same thalam