戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 applied field strength and administration of contrast agent.
2 anges were not significantly associated with contrast agent.
3 ier, but not with gadofosveset, a blood-pool contrast agent.
4 imited by the cytotoxic levels of the Mn(2+) contrast agent.
5  subharmonic imaging during infusion of a US contrast agent.
6 anelle motility inside somas as an intrinsic contrast agent.
7  as well as to the local administration of a contrast agent.
8 K-1, in addition to serving as an ultrasound contrast agent.
9 tially be favorable for use as a clinical CT contrast agent.
10  technique by employing a stimuli-responsive contrast agent.
11 ponses, if acquired with a molecular imaging contrast agent.
12 ol has gained considerable interest as an MR contrast agent.
13 ength and administration of gadolinium-based contrast agent.
14 e level without the need for any staining or contrast agent.
15 ensitivity of a hyperpolarized xenon-129 MRI contrast agent.
16 h gold nanoparticles (AuNP) and an iodinated contrast agent.
17  repeated administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents.
18 ers are widely used clinically as ultrasound contrast agents.
19 ostic quality was equivalent between the two contrast agents.
20 ravenous injection of hepatobiliary-specific contrast agents.
21  the most successful near-infrared (NIR) USF contrast agents.
22  their use for in vivo delivery of drugs and contrast agents.
23 gth sensitivity without the use of exogenous contrast agents.
24 ar 'blueprint'; this could be supplied using contrast agents.
25 gical processes with systemically introduced contrast agents.
26 r the design of biochemically responsive MRI contrast agents.
27 ss of USF imaging highly relies on excellent contrast agents.
28  linked to exposure to gadolinium-containing contrast agents.
29  the development of activatable molecular MR contrast agents.
30 developing fluoride-responsive complexes and contrast agents.
31  blood plasma is comparable to commercial Gd contrast agents.
32 ts the translational potential of MPIO-based contrast agents.
33 duce cavitation of lipid-shelled microbubble contrast agents.
34 linical and research use of gadolinium-based contrast agents.
35 nitude higher than those of gadolinium-based contrast agents.
36 able potential for employment of specialized contrast agents.
37 al clinical translation of molecular imaging contrast agents.
38 ions in a phantom containing mixtures of the contrast agents.
39 hout exposure to iodine- or gadolinium-based contrast agents.
40 al outcome after MI without gadolinium-based contrast agents.
41 ially noise-limited detection of fluorescent contrast agents.
42 oints after injections of AuNP and iodinated contrast agents.
43 rucial to the design of high-performance MRI contrast agents.
44 iled Gradient Echo method at 9.4 T using two contrast agents: a clinically approved Gd chelate, Multi
45 molecular imaging by MRI requires the use of contrast agents able to recognize specifically a peculia
46              Results In patients with rectal contrast agent administration (n = 151), AUCs were 0.90-
47 (AUC, 0.86-0.99) in the group without rectal contrast agent administration (n = 31).
48                The quality of the colorectal contrast agent administration was recorded.
49 acy remained high in patients without rectal contrast agent administration.
50 g T1-weighted, T2-weighted, before and after contrast agent administrtion T2 fluid attenuation invers
51 y found to act as both a H2O2-responsive MRI contrast agent and a mimic of superoxide dismutase (SOD)
52 gahertz pulsed ultrasound in the presence of contrast agent and assessed the efficiency of fluorescen
53 and HIFU are limited by the half-life of the contrast agent and challenges in accurate control of lar
54 le of a Cu-based PARACEST magnetic resonance contrast agent and demonstrate the potential to expand t
55 ent production of payloads of hyperpolarized contrast agent and in situ quality assurance of the prod
56 ed noninvasively using an albumin-binding MR contrast agent and may be used as surrogate markers for
57  shell) nanoparticles (GTNPs@PANI) as an OCT contrast agent and pH-responsive nanoprobe for 3D imagin
58 e rat brain 1 and 20 weeks after dosing with contrast agent and to determine if there are any histopa
59                                          The contrast agents and calcium phosphate were imaged in pha
60 obtained by combining a variety of different contrast agents and fixative treatments that provides ge
61 uable tool for in vitro fertilization, where contrast agents and fluorophores may impact the viabilit
62 nderstanding of the biodistribution of these contrast agents and their safety.
63 laxivity comparable to that of Gd(III)-based contrast agents and undergo spontaneous cytosolic locali
64                Ten pharmaceuticals, an X-ray contrast agent, and an artificial sweetener were studied
65    At one-tenth the current clinical dose of contrast agent, and following a single imaging session,
66 cially deeper pockets) were treated with the contrast agent, and the probing depths were measured wit
67 n diverse fields such organic magnetism, MRI contrast agents, and spintronics.
68  typically low concentrations of fluorescent contrast agents, and tissue motion.
69 al ions; as nonlinear optical materials, MRI contrasting agents, and sensitizers for photodynamic the
70                         Although some linear contrast agents appear to cause greater MRI signal chang
71              Near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent contrast agents are emerging in optical imaging as sensi
72 f photoacoustic imaging, novel photoacoustic contrast agents are highly desired for molecular imaging
73                    Additionally, microbubble contrast agents are improving the sensitivity and specif
74    However, most gadolinium (Gd)-chelator MR contrast agents are limited by their relatively low rela
75                                     Most MRI contrast agents are polar and membrane impermeant, makin
76                        Conclusion Iron-based contrast agents are promising as alternatives for contra
77                           Although iodinated contrast agents are relatively safe and widely used, adv
78                                        As no contrast agents are required, this label-free imaging ap
79                                        These contrast agents are used for ultrafast molecular imaging
80 n microscopy, where individual microbubbles (contrast agents) are detected and tracked within the vas
81 cal proof of concept for use of this imaging contrast agent as administered before surgery to dogs wi
82 ing the relative merits of the vast range of contrast agents available, from small-molecule dyes to g
83 e ocular vasculature without using exogenous contrast agents, avoiding associated side effects.
84 eptor binding, in contrast to the use of MRI contrast agents based on agonists that tend to be intern
85 tion, 28 (34.1%) received a gadolinium-based contrast agent before and had no reaction.
86 context, retention is a measure of molecular contrast agent binding.
87 s, metabolic precursors and nuclear medicine contrast agents) by single cells without perturbing endo
88 antum dot (B-GQD) as a metal-free multimodal contrast agent (CA) for safe magnetic resonance imaging
89 arge-scale synthesis of a cationic iodinated contrast agent (CA4+) is described for imaging articular
90  dual-mode, dual-Gadolinium (DM-Dual-Gd-ICG) contrast agent can be used to visualize ovarian tumors i
91                        We show that this new contrast agent can generate up to 30 times stronger phot
92 ssues labeled in vivo with gold nanoparticle contrast agents can be detected using SFHI.
93                           Nonionic iodinated contrast agents can be divided into monomeric, low-osmol
94 classification of different tissue types and contrast agents can be extremely challenging.
95 +)-based T1 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents (CAs) are suboptimal or unsuitable, espe
96                        The relaxivity of the contrast agent changes by a factor of 6.7.
97  cm at 1064 nm excitation is achieved with a contrast-agent concentration as low as 40 microg mL(-1)
98 n the tissues allowing quantification of the contrast agents' concentrations, which matched their exp
99 ation with Gd, this PTPmu-targeted molecular contrast agent containing a single Gd ion showed signifi
100 olecular-weight Gd(III) -based PSMA-targeted contrast agents containing one to three Gd(III) chelates
101 inium-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent, CREKA-Tris(Gd-DOTA)3 (Gd-DOTA (4,7,10-tr
102  bolus administration of iodinated non ionic contrast agent; CT images demonstrated the presence of a
103 protein crystallization, as drug and medical contrast agent delivery vehicles, and as biosensors and
104 ing, and in vivo application of pH-sensitive contrast agents designed specifically for Cerenkov imagi
105 s, in contrast, are ultrastable, fluorescent contrast agents detectable even at the single nanopartic
106  not completely sGAG specific and requires a contrast agent, dGEMRIC is a validated and robust method
107                                   All of the contrast agents distributed in foci around the cortex an
108 ith greater sensitivity, and may allow lower contrast agent doses to be used.
109 ble to identify tumor-induced alterations in contrast agent drainage into the popliteal LN, while low
110                 The application of iodinated contrast agents during diagnostic x-ray procedures, such
111 etric cardiac and respiratory motion phases, contrast-agent dynamics, and blood flow velocity fields.
112 the commercially available echocardiographic contrast agents (ECA) Definity and Optison after spontan
113                                            A contrast agent enema may be used to confirm or exclude l
114 ull-field digital (FFD) mammography, dynamic contrast agent-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance (MR) im
115 ation, to study its correlation with dynamic contrast agent-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance (MR) im
116 20-89 years]) were obtained before and after contrast agent-enhanced cardiac MR imaging.
117                        Materials and Methods Contrast agent-enhanced CT findings in a cohort of 256 p
118  routine nonenhanced and portal venous phase contrast agent-enhanced liver CT imaging with thick-sect
119               Radiation dose-matched delayed contrast agent-enhanced spiral and axial abdominal EID a
120 , color Doppler US, strain elastography, and contrast agent-enhanced US in the assessment of intrates
121 ever received injections of gadolinium-based contrast agent) examined with a standard T1-weighted two
122         In a separate cohort of rats, an MRI contrast agent, Feraheme(R) (USPIO), was administered 2d
123 tify the local concentration of multiple MRI contrast agents following simultaneous administration.
124                              The dose of the contrast agent for effective molecular MRI is only sligh
125 detect cancer cells and a photoacoustic (PA) contrast agent for imaging-guided cancer therapy.
126 P=0.25% for hydroxyethyl propionate, a known contrast agent for magnetic resonance angiography.
127 oxygen encapsulated bubbles as an ultrasound contrast agent for methylation reversal is expected to h
128     SiNc appears to be a promising family of contrast agent for optoacoustic imaging.
129  nanoparticles (TSPNs) are investigated as a contrast agent for photoacoustic (PA) imaging in the sec
130 operoxidase (MPO), might be a more sensitive contrast agent for the detection of multiple sclerosis (
131 yperpolarized (hp) (83)Kr is a promising MRI contrast agent for the diagnosis of pulmonary diseases a
132  with those of a commercial gadolinium-based contrast agent for their applicability in dynamic contra
133 gnificant application of PHIP is to generate contrast agents for biomedical imaging.
134 lasmonic nanoparticles are explored as image contrast agents for both superlocalization and super-res
135 PET/MR scanners, the utility and need for MR contrast agents for combined scans is questioned.
136 per complexes for potential use as (19)F MRI contrast agents for detecting cellular hypoxia.
137 ng (SERRS) nanoparticles make them promising contrast agents for in vivo cancer imaging.
138 other Gd-chelates, making them the promising contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
139 e been used for treating iron deficiency, as contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging and as dr
140 itals and research centers that use Gd-based contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging.
141 by nanoparticle "strings" are useful both as contrast agents for photoacoustic imaging and as light-a
142    We met this challenge by developing novel contrast agents for retinopathy, which we used with magn
143 hy, its interpretation, and intravasation of contrast agents for safer procedure and to minimize the
144 e Au nanocups exhibit superior efficiency as contrast agents for spectral-domain optical coherence to
145 hese DHCA functionalized IONPs are promising contrast agents for stem cell tracking by T2-weighted MR
146  that remain for polymer coated IONPs as MRI contrast agents for stem cell tracking.
147 ntribute to the development of new DNA-based contrast agents for superresolution imaging.
148 igational optical imaging devices as well as contrast agents for surgical applications.
149 t property of AuNPs is that they also act as contrast agents for X-ray microtomography and electron m
150 citation, denoted as beta, serves as a vital contrasting agent for imaging local environment.
151                                              Contrast agent free ultrasound imaging, computed tomogra
152            Compared with reference Gd2O3 and contrast agent Gadodiamide, the features in the RIXS spe
153          T1 mapping using an albumin-binding contrast agent (gadofosveset) could quantify the changes
154  resonance imaging using the albumin-binding contrast agent, gadofosveset, is a surrogate marker of r
155  the applicability of the albumin-binding MR contrast agent, gadofosveset, to noninvasively monitor f
156 epeated administration of the liver-specific contrast agent gadoxetic acid.
157 (MR) images with increasing gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) doses in patients who received 35
158 ities following intravenous gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) exposure might be related to blood
159 jections of the macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) gadoterate meglumine on the signal
160 pediatric brain to a linear gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) is associated with an increase in
161 epatic function who undergo gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) i
162 ltiple intravenous doses of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA).
163 ing after administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) for magnetic resonance imaging (M
164 tween the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) and gadolinium retention in bone
165  contrast-enhanced MRI, and gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are the mainstream MRI contrast
166 who had not received linear gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) but had received many injections
167 iple administrations of the gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) gadodiamide and gadoteridol and
168 stration of the macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) gadoteridol and gadoterate meglu
169 l injections of macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) on the signal intensity (SI) of
170                             Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), once believed to be safe for pa
171 nt of the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs).
172 c events between classes of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs).
173 th prior exposure to linear gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs).
174 t Ktrans describing extravasation of the MRI contrast agent Gd-DTPA was significantly increased in bo
175 f a previously reported Zn(II)-sensitive MRI contrast agent, GdDOTA-diBPEN, new structural targets we
176                            In each case, the contrast agents gives rise to robust T1-weighted MRI enh
177  application of more than a single molecular contrast agent has been limited by MRI's ability to only
178 st associated with the structurally modified contrast agents has been performed.
179 AM-alkyl complexes as potential PARACEST MRI contrast agents has been synthesized with the aim to dec
180 lar magnetic resonance with gadolinium-based contrast agents has established as gold standard for tis
181                   The scope of available MRI contrast agents has expanded over the years with the eme
182 netic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) as a contrast agent have been widely used in magnetic resonan
183                        While a number of OCT contrast agents have been previously studied, demonstrat
184  diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents have been reported, the metallofullerene
185  Injectable Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) contrast agents have been widely used to provide critica
186                                    These NIR contrast agents have potential for clinical translation
187 haracteristics of the existing photoacoustic contrast agents, highlighting key applications and prese
188 pically used low molecular weight gadolinium contrast agents, however larger gadolinium-loaded nanopa
189 norganic materials, and thus can be used as 'contrast agents' if biologically absent elements are enc
190 pectrum potentially allows simultaneous dual contrast agent imaging, however, this has not yet been d
191 the concentration of a gadolinium-containing contrast agent in a region of interest, thereby allowing
192 t in gold nanoparticles enables their use as contrast agents in a variety of applications for compoun
193 oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) could be used as contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that
194 irst implementation of gadolinium(III)-based contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging in the 198
195 es), which can enable new uses of ultrasound contrast agents in molecular imaging and drug delivery,
196 ations have shown extraordinary potential as contrast agents in various bioimaging modalities, near-I
197 ow, where background signals from endogenous contrast agents, including blood and lipid, are at the l
198 s potential characteristics for targeted MRI contrast agents, including high relaxivity, unappreciabl
199 an 9 minutes examination time, works without contrast agent injection, and offers a diagnostic accura
200 en hypothesized as an alternative ultrasound contrast agent instead of gas-core agents.
201 gadoteridol, an exogenous magnetic resonance contrast agent intravenously injected.
202  (n=73) after application of 70 to 120 mL of contrast agent, Iomeprol 300.
203 ntravenous administration of a pH-responsive contrast agent (iopamidol).
204 ase-3-sensitive nanoaggregation MRI (C-SNAM) contrast agent is reported.
205 ned with superparamagnetic iron-oxide (SPIO) contrast agents is an effective cell-tracking method.
206              The application of targeted MRI contrast agents is particularly well-suited to this task
207        The purely intravascular nature of US contrast agents is valuable as the rapid washout of nonh
208 t and ovarian lesions using a clinical-grade contrast agent (kinase insert domain receptor [KDR] -tar
209                                          The contrast agent kinetic characteristics of T1-weighted DC
210               Semiquantitative parameters of contrast agent kinetics were calculated from the relativ
211 nning was done, which allowed measurement of contrast agent kinetics with high temporal resolution.
212 olumetric visualization of moving organs and contrast agent kinetics, molecular imaging using targete
213                       In addition, the USPIO contrast agent labeled macrophages were shown to be pres
214 tom algorithms to spectrally identify unique contrast agents: large gold nanorods (LGNRs).
215                                              Contrast agent leak was highly specific (96%-98%), but i
216 tory had excellent sensitivity, while rectal contrast agent leak was specific but insensitive.
217       Additional signs evaluated were rectal contrast agent leak, collections of extruded fecal mater
218 rtcoming, we demonstrate the use of a living contrast agent, magneto-endosymbionts (MEs) derived from
219 ganese-based magnetic resonance (MR) imaging contrast agent manganese-N-picolyl-N,N',N'-trans-1,2-cyc
220                           Here, we developed contrast agent mass spectrometry imaging (CA-MSI) that u
221 ombined with systemic infusion of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles (MB) causes localized blood-
222 focused ultrasound (FUS) in conjunction with contrast agent microbubbles may be used to non-invasivel
223 ssible with nanoparticle presentation of the contrast agent molecules.
224 herent contrast detectable by OCT, exogenous contrast agents must be employed for imaging specific ce
225                                        These contrast agents of 6-8 mum in diameter can circulate thr
226 ngths (1, 1.5, 3, and 7 T) and the effect of contrast agent on DNA double-strand-break (DSB) formatio
227   To assess the effect of this hepatobiliary contrast agent on T2-weighted TSE images and DW images T
228 scanned phantoms containing either an iodine contrast agent or gold nanoparticles.
229 two decades, either as effective bio-imaging contrast agents or as carriers of biomolecules such as d
230 s, nucleic acids, magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents or catalysts.
231 ith a folate receptor targeted near-infrared contrast agent (OTL38) can improve malignant pulmonary n
232 f folate receptor (FR)-targeted phase-change contrast agents (PCCAs) in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast c
233 bicin (Dox) were co-loaded with a nanobubble contrast agent (perfluoropentane, PFP) using a one-step
234     The typical method for creating targeted contrast agents requires covalent conjugation of separat
235 l lanthanide complexes relavant to PARASHIFT contrast agents reveals unexpected trends in the magneti
236 some of these problems by combining MRI with contrast agents sensitive to neural signaling.
237 iary phase imaging, only gadoxetate disodium contrast agent showed significant independent associatio
238                          Gadoxetate disodium contrast agent showed the strongest association with inc
239 on (GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway) microbubble contrast agent solution (perflutren protein-type A micro
240 ed by X-ray computed tomography imaging of a contrast agent solution infiltrating the mesh.
241 tered a folate receptor-targeted fluorescent contrast agent specific for primary lung adenocarcinomas
242 ears with the emergence of molecular imaging contrast agents specifically targeted to biological mark
243 ties of the cells and requires no additional contrast agent, stain or label to image the cell structu
244 globin, fat, melanin, and water or exogenous contrast agents such as dyes and nanoparticles.
245 ilizes high frequency ultrasound without any contrast agents such as microbubbles, bringing a single-
246                        Validation of imaging contrast agents, such as fluorescently labeled imaging a
247  utilizes a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent targeted to disease sites, as a label, to
248 ors develop a targeted peptide gadofullerene contrast agent that can sensitively distinguish between
249  often requires the addition of an exogenous contrast agent that may have limited tissue access.
250  a new biochemically responsive Mn-based MRI contrast agent that provides a 9-fold change in relaxivi
251 lso a large number of novel, cancer-specific contrast agents that are in early stage clinical trials
252 OCT have been limited by a lack of exogenous contrast agents that can be distinguished from tissue.
253     There is a need in surgical oncology for contrast agents that can enable real-time intraoperative
254  storage and multistage release of drugs and contrast agents that can facilitate the diagnosis and tr
255 and in vivo testing of two multimeric NIR-MR contrast agents that contain three Gd(III) chelates and
256 he tissue structure but lacks specificity to contrast agents that could be used for in vivo molecular
257 evelopment and clinical use of molecular MRI contrast agents that could provide vital diagnostic info
258                                              Contrast agents that go beyond qualitative visualization
259 proach provides a platform for molecular MRI contrast agents that is potentially more suitable for tr
260                              We have created contrast agents that selectively quench photons emitted
261 in perfusion can be augmented by microbubble contrast agents that undergo ultrasound-mediated cavitat
262                                  Microbubble contrast agents that undergo ultrasound-mediated cavitat
263                      Aided by tumor-targeted contrast agents, the system detected tumors in subcutane
264  exploit the potential of these materials as contrast agents, there is still a need for a greater und
265                       For magnetic resonance contrast agents, this rotation results in diminished rel
266   Further DESI-MS imaging of the flux of the contrast agent through mouse kidneys was performed indic
267 ed to a corresponding time-varying iodinated contrast agent to create the contrast material-enhanced
268 R-based reconstruction techniques will allow contrast agents to be detected with greater sensitivity,
269 to standardize surgical navigation tools and contrast agents to facilitate swift regulatory approval.
270 of difficulties in delivering electron-dense contrast agents to specific subcellular targets within i
271 ime that microbeads (microBs) can be used as contrast agents to target cellular biomarkers in lymphat
272  the MEs are robust and effective biological contrast agents to track iCMs in an in vivo murine model
273                                  Addition of contrast agents (trypan blue or brilliant blue R) improv
274 m(2) [59-171 Grayxcm(2)]; P=0.06), and lower contrast agent use (200 mL [150-310 mL] versus 250 mL [2
275 clinical studies on the safety of gadolinium contrast agent use in pregnancy.
276 nd sex, whether premedication was given, the contrast agent used, the volume injected, the patient's
277 ntrast agents (GBCAs) are the mainstream MRI contrast agents used in the clinic.
278 shown promise for visualization of molecular contrast agents used to study disease in vivo.
279 yperpolarizer producing (13)C hyperpolarized contrast agents using parahydrogen induced polarization
280                                              Contrast agent was administrated intravenously.
281                         Extravasation of the contrast agent was defined as anastomotic leakage.
282 rast swallow with the use of a water-soluble contrast agent was performed on the 5(th) postoperative
283                          Low-dose CT without contrast agent was used for anatomic localization and at
284   A novel class of near-infrared fluorescent contrast agents was developed.
285 n which the presence of fibrosis or paraCEST contrast agents was directly encoded into the steady-sta
286 ty of liposomal Gadolinium (Gd) nanoparticle contrast agents was evaluated in a pregnant mouse model.
287 rs to serve as tumour-selective fluorescence contrast agents, we demonstrate the capability of a cons
288  in both the presence and the absence of the contrast agent were tested by using an independent sampl
289 tional CT section, absorption values of both contrast agents were similar at approximately 110 HU.
290 eted perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions (PFCs) as contrast agent, which is cross-linked to fibrin by activ
291                          These native-tissue contrast agents will arm surgeons with a powerful and ve
292 -targeted, molecular magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agent with a single gadolinium (Gd) chelate usi
293  enhance with gadobutrol, a gadolinium-based contrast agent with high propensity to extravasate acros
294    To address a perceived need for a Gd-free contrast agent with pharmacokinetic and imaging properti
295 y enable production of (13) C hyperpolarized contrast agents with %P13C of 20-50 % in seconds using t
296   By dynamically modulating signals from the contrast agents with an external near-infrared optical s
297          The performance of three gadolinium contrast agents with different sizes and properties was
298 h was started 5 seconds after injection of a contrast agent, with a scan at 200 mAs, followed after 4
299  vivo detection of the cucurbit[6]uril (CB6) contrast agent within the vasculature of a living rat.
300 monstrate that, even in the absence of X-ray contrast agents, X-ray computed microtomography (microCT

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top