ライフサイエンスコーパス: control test

1 thma control was assessed through the Asthma Control Test.

2 rcise); no exercise was performed before the control test.

3 uilibrium, haplotype relative risk, and case-control tests.

4 did not behave differently during snake and control tests.

5 stantial power advantages over standard case-control tests.

6 , while adult ALC numbers were comparable to control testes.

7 EGF mutant testes divide faster than GSCs in control testes.

8 xtraction cartridge and subjected to quality control testing.

9 ntly offered psychotherapy in the absence of controlled tests.

10 ory Disorders (14 points), (3) the Sinusitis Control Test (14 points), and (4) the EQ-5D (13 points).

11 n this region and the validity of the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and childhood ACT (C-ACT) in relation

12 thma QOL Questionnaire (miniAQLQ) and Asthma Control Test (ACT) at baseline and 6 months postoperativ

13 Poor asthma control was defined by an Asthma Control Test (ACT) score <20 (n = 287), and dyspnea was

14 ercentage of patients who achieved an asthma control test (ACT) score of 20 or greater or an increase

15 asure of ICS response was a change in Asthma Control Test (ACT) score; the secondary measure was a ch

16 controller inhalers, with suboptimal Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores (ACT score </=19).

17 d Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) and the Asthma Control Test (ACT), and calculated the minimal important

18 Pulmonary function tests, Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Health Questionnaire-JAPAN (A

19 hma control was assessed by using the Asthma Control Test (ACT).

20 Communication Instrument (PACCI), the Asthma Control Test (ACT; or the childhood ACT for children 4-1

21 ut remembered a similar number of details as controls tested after 1 mo.

22 control, as measured by the Childhood Asthma Control Test and Asthma Control Test in children and adu

23 ry, physical examination, spirometry, asthma control test, and doctor's diagnosis were collected.

24 ife Questionnaire-Marks (AQLQ-M), the Asthma Control Test, and generic measures of QoL developed by t

25 IQOLS, other asthma outcome measures (Asthma Control Test, Asthma Symptom Utility Index, and the Mark

26 column) and distilled water (1-phase column/control test) at constant influx rates for a period of t

27 Higher scores on the Asthma Control Test before randomization (indicating better con

28 However, on the working memory control tests, both groups performed similarly.

29 ll-controlled asthma of the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) and the Asthma Control Test (ACT),

30 The Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) is a clinically validated tool.

31 d in the serum of other inflammatory disease controls tested compared to healthy controls.

32 Control tests confirmed that light aversion was dependen

33 Odor-controlled tests confirmed that turtles were using visua

34 Although asthma control test did not differ between groups (P=.288), pat

35 ocampal damage remembered fewer details than controls tested directly after the walk but remembered a

36 rly produced ventricular fibrillation in the control tests done 1 week before and after the test, wit

37 uents in powder and to conduct rapid quality-control tests during GnP production.

38 Controlled test environments were created in a chamber t

39 ontal lobe lesions and PD while the VMT is a control test for the visuomotor component of the SWT.

40 e efficiency of treatments compared with the control tests for debittering process of table black oli

41 lowest oxyhaemoglobin saturation during the control test had the greatest quadriceps fatigue attenua

42 went the psychometric battery and inhibitory control test (ICT) (a test of response inhibition) and d

43 ndard psychometric tests (SPT) or inhibitory control test (ICT) can be used to diagnose MHE.

44 The Inhibitory Control Test (ICT) measures response inhibition and has

45 iagnosis by rapid screening using inhibitory control test (ICT) with treatment; and (5) no MHE diagno

46 connection [NCT-A and B]) and the inhibitory control test (ICT).

47 encephalopathy score (PHES), and inhibitory control tests (ICTs) were administered to patients with

48 the Childhood Asthma Control Test and Asthma Control Test in children and adults, respectively.

49 rming single-marker and haplotype-based case-control tests, including a novel haplotype test based on

50 serial product characterization and quality control tests, including measurements of their fluoresce

51 ificity of 100% (95% CI 98.9-100; 339 of 339 controls tested negative) and sensitivity of 95.9% (89.8

52 irus by real-time polymerase chain reaction; controls tested negative.

53 rse-transcription polymerase chain reaction; controls tested negative.

54 0-2011, and 2011-2012 using a case-positive, control test-negative study design.

55 ip-based system as a new tool in the quality control testing of a recombinant, adenoviral, gene thera

56 roved methods for the production and quality control testing of inactivated polio vaccines.

57 nd will be incorporated into routine quality control testing of polysaccharide powders to be used in

58 thinlayer chromatographic method for quality control testing of the purified CBB lots was also develo

59 Many case-control tests of rare variation are implemented in stati

60 Quality control tests of the B. subtilis GeneChip were performed

61 tion was impaired, there were no deficits in control tests of the discrimination of unfamiliar voices

62 ecognition, and odor identification, and two control tests of working memory.

63 We built several nanostructures for well-controlled testing of various design rules, and demonstr

64 th baseline testing on day 1, post-stress or control testing on day 2, and evaluation of long-term st

65 RM was assessed using a novel computer-controlled test paradigm in which ES to left or right hi

66 logy and culture remain important as quality control tests, particularly in studies of treatment effi

67 Mean changes in symptom scores on the Asthma Control Test (placebo, 1.98 [95% CI, 1.42-2.54] vs soy i

68 assay (EIA) were similar, but 18% of healthy controls tested positive by RT-PCR.

69 We develop a general powerful mdFDR controlling testing procedure and illustrate the methodo

70 re of Olfactory Disorders, and the Sinusitis Control Test provided the highest quality CRS-specific P

71 ogue Scale (r = 0.5722, P < 0.01) and asthma control test (r = -0.6483, P < 0.01).

72 tation tests for any situation in which case-control tests require adjustment for confounding covaria

73 +/- 5% (n = 5) and passed all of the quality control tests required by the U.S. Pharmacopeia for radi

74 Based on these laboratory-controlled test results and observations, recommendation

75 = -0.43; P = 0.01) and directly with Asthma Control Test score (beta = 1.09; P = 0.04), while patrol

76 1.44; P = .68; age 6-11 years) or the Asthma Control Test score (DeltaM - DeltaP, 0.51; 95% CI, -0.46

77 re was no difference in the Childhood Asthma Control Test score (difference in change with mometasone

78 oms, episodes of poor asthma control, Asthma Control Test score (range, 5-25; higher scores indicate

79 ntrolled or uncontrolled according to Asthma Control Test score cut-off: 20) and eight healthy contro

80 onide: normalization of (1) symptoms (Asthma Control Test score, >19/25 or 50% increase), (2) spirome

81 er prevalence of uncontrolled asthma (Asthma Control Test score, <20) than subjects with singly incre

82 [SD] change from baseline to week 52: Asthma Control Test score, -1.16 [4.14] vs placebo, -2.88 [5.38

83 nophil counts and negatively with the Asthma Control Test score, FEV1 (percent predicted), FEV1/force

84 c parameters were associated based on Asthma Control Test scores, numbers of exacerbations, and visit

85 s in Asthma Control Questionnaire and Asthma Control Test scores.

86 Control tests showed little evidence of gross deficits i

87 Control tests showed that they solved the task using lea

88 In contrast, control test sites outside of the bithorax complex permi

89 RA also underwent symptom assessment (Asthma Control Test), spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide and indu

90 During the first (control) test, subjects exercised at approximately 85% o

91 Multiple samples were taken from subjects in controlled tests such as secondary contact with gunshot

92 rasferase (ChAT)-negative, and preabsorption control tests suggest they may contain chicken-GnRH-II (

93 nglucosylated substrates that fail a quality control test, supporting additional rounds of chaperone

94 nglucosylated proteins that fail the quality control test, supporting ER retention through persistent

95 blishment of ES cell lines, rigorous quality control testing that included assessment of pluripotency

96 on, lengthy sample preparation, and multiple control tests that need to be performed separately must

97 Quality control testing to assess system and substrate reproduci

98 vely assess urticaria control, the Urticaria Control Test (UCT).

99 Control tests used for each trial were fermented only by

100 he four filters was predicted to be 41% in a control test using 37 known HIV-1 non-nucleoside reverse

101 Control tests using non-specific myoglobin antigen confi

102 Quality control tests were performed for both scanners.

103 Standard quality control tests were performed on the product according to

104 The properties of this robust genomic control test with 2 df are examined by simulation.

105 g non-specific binding low as established in control tests with a non-metastatic cancer cell line (He

106 To test for linkage after significant case-control tests, within-family tests are performed.

107 Only 1 of 40 control tests yielded a false-positive result.