ライフサイエンスコーパス: conventional method

1 e the same achievements as those of the 24-h conventional method.

2 sphincterotome and contrast injection as the conventional method.

3 n a higher quality of the libraries than the conventional method.

4 nd agrees well with values obtained from the conventional method.

5 ate' applicable than the presently available conventional method.

6 grity of the extracted DNA as opposed to the conventional method.

7 lidate the analysis from the cytometry-based conventional method.

8 agreement with the values obtained using the conventional method.

9 h much improved temporal resolution than the conventional method.

10 erhauser effects, which were not found using conventional method.

11 r purity of wild type HBc particles than the conventional method.

12 ules that would hardly be producible through conventional method.

13 s were well agreed with that obtained with a conventional method.

14 , Y. pestis, and B. pseudomallei compared to conventional methods.

15 candidates that are hard to achieve through conventional methods.

16 that have previously eluded targeting using conventional methods.

17 th soil-gas characterization collected using conventional methods.

18 tection limits comparable with those of most conventional methods.

19 presence of multiscale features, and defies conventional methods.

20 tistically rigorous manner not possible with conventional methods.

21 ore complex structure than those obtained by conventional methods.

22 ally greater number of motor units than with conventional methods.

23 Results were compared to oils obtained by conventional methods.

24 enable to structural and kinetic analysis by conventional methods.

25 that would not otherwise react via existing conventional methods.

26 e (p = 1.38 x 10(-6)) and would be missed by conventional methods.

27 i contacts, a result that is not possible by conventional methods.

28 en and agrees well with values obtained from conventional methods.

29 nt intermediates that are not accessible via conventional methods.

30 esponse that is difficult to achieve through conventional methods.

31 h compared to the amount of time required by conventional methods.

32 ATSlope-hybrid) show less variation than the conventional methods.

33 hich is 25 times lower than that possible by conventional methods.

34 aging or glaucomatous change not detected by conventional methods.

35 -slag) with 60% less energy consumption than conventional methods.

36 sistent outbreak could not be confirmed with conventional methods.

37 solution may not be currently feasible using conventional methods.

38 nd three times the imaging speed compared to conventional methods.

39 n difficult to disentangle their roles using conventional methods.

40 published analysis of the same dataset using conventional methods.

41 inaccessible or challenging to prepare using conventional methods.

42 y clinically suspected but then ruled out by conventional methods.

43 od cultures at least 24 to 48 h earlier than conventional methods.

44 sensitivity, a 100,000-fold improvement over conventional methods.

45 ultrafast 2D NMR with the high resolution of conventional methods.

46 generating activated carbon when compared to conventional methods.

47 ococcal isolate identification compared with conventional methods.

48 he measurement of biexciton dynamics by more conventional methods.

49 chicken fillets, which cannot be achieved by conventional methods.

50 e use of whole-body MR imaging compared with conventional methods.

51 e determined by more laborious and expensive conventional methods.

52 in 109 (95.6%) of 114 specimens compared to conventional methods.

53 difficulty of studying these materials using conventional methods.

54 rameworks that are nontrivial to access with conventional methods.

55 ut difficult to observe in fine detail using conventional methods.

56 e were able to recover twice more H(2)S than conventional methods.

57 nts within 2-5 min compared with 4-5 h using conventional methods.

58 n the "best effort" structures determined by conventional methods.

59 investigated in situ and in real-time using conventional methods.

60 cumbersome sample preparation procedures in conventional methods.

61 tion offers some advantages in comparison to conventional methods.

62 old nanoparticle, which is not possible with conventional methods.

63 garose gel and SSB yields were determined by conventional methods.

64 egulatory hotspots that were not detected by conventional methods.

65 oser approximation of neuronal activity than conventional methods.

66 als classified as H. pylori uninfected using conventional methods.

67 ds the correction area to nine times that of conventional methods.

68 mplifies the synthesis procedure compared to conventional methods.

69 r organisms that are difficult to culture by conventional methods.

70 h, 75 to 80% less than the time required for conventional methods.

71 new tool to identify organisms undetected by conventional methods.

72 t easy to synthesize as 2D materials through conventional methods.

73 e DENV with a low sample volume, compared to conventional methods.

74 ted states that is too fast to resolve using conventional methods.

75 ay meningitis/encephalitis panel compared to conventional methods.

76 egetable oil is investigated and compared to conventional methods.

77 meningitidis carriage isolates compared with conventional methods.

78 ctures is often too complex to profile using conventional methods.

79 ts, but can be challenging to genotype using conventional methods.

80 subdomains that have not been classified by conventional methods.

81 0-fold improvement in measurement speed over conventional methods.

82 unized animals that could not be obtained by conventional methods.

83 Method 2 had the strongest correlation with conventional method 1 (r = 0.98) and values similar to m

84 orm possesses several advantages compared to conventional methods: (1) analysis of antibiotic action

85 an be summarized in four categories: (1) non-conventional methods, (2) structures incorporating seven

86 r paper had a sensitivity similar to that of conventional methods (4.9% versus 5.7%; P = 0.33).

87 ng with SVCI was almost the same as with the conventional method (85-90% atrial fibrillation freedom)

88 livered results a median of 30 h sooner than conventional methods (a median of 46.9 h versus a median

89 rsely, when the analyses were conducted with conventional methods, a strong protective effect of high

90 y patterns, inability to control bleeding by conventional methods, administration of a large volume o

91 ng results in approximately half the time of conventional methods, allowing its results to be used th

92 In addition, the conventional method also had a good result even 5 years

93 accuracy of IOL power determination using 2 conventional methods and 2 new technologies: the Haigis-

94 eby more effective than networks designed by conventional methods and a recently published algorithm

95 to disprove transmission events indicated by conventional methods and also to reveal otherwise unsusp

96 dy of Adolescent to Adult Health, we applied conventional methods and coarsened exact matching to ass

97 ssay showed superior sensitivity compared to conventional methods and excellent specificity for the d

98 shows strong agreement (kappa of 0.92) with conventional methods and increased serotype assignment (

99 GS protocol obviated most molecular steps in conventional methods and is cost saving for parasite pop

100 f a combinatorial testing approach including conventional methods and new technologies for evaluation

101 notubes, nanohorns, graphene, etc.) when non-conventional methods and techniques, such as microwave i

102 In this review, we discuss conventional methods and tools used to control oxygen co

103 monic-based SWV with those obtained with the conventional method, and demonstrate imaging capability

104 ii) the performance of the assay compared to conventional methods, and (vi) the reproducibility of ch

105 isolates that are serotyped as "unknown" by conventional methods, and it is useful for a laboratory

106 cause of measurement inaccuracy inherent in conventional methods, and show that all differentiated b

107 cross-correlation artifacts that arise with conventional methods, and substantially outperforms clus

108 and in vitro approaches in combination with conventional methods appears to be an effective strategy

109 seful to get serotype information before the conventional methods are done.

110 reasing importance of molecular testing when conventional methods are limited.

111 Conventional methods are not efficient and have severe l

112 However, conventional methods are not readily adaptable to gene t

113 I, to cardiac imaging is desirable; however, conventional methods are poorly suited for cardiac imagi

114 RVA can complement or replace current and/or conventional methods as a hardness descriptor.

115 aster alternative for browning monitoring to conventional methods, as well as useful key indicators f

116 This conventional method assumes that the sample returns to a

117 y enhancer-promoter architecture better than conventional methods at a lower sequencing depth and wit

118 al samples were prepared by the laboratory's conventional methods (automated or manual) and by a new

119 possible for the intermediate structure via conventional methods because of diffraction peak broaden

120 icult to characterize at the atomic level by conventional methods because they exist for too little t

121 nformational heterogeneity that is hidden to conventional methods, but motions of the NTD are beyond

122 ave the same fold as those transcribed using conventional methods, but they greatly simplify the inte

123 ltiplexed technique offers improvements over conventional methods by permitting the simultaneous and

124 Compared with conventional methods, CAP has a broader linear range for

125 Conventional methods, comparing the concentration of cho

126 However, no conventional methods could probe the fibril surface desp

127 addition of gene expression measurements to conventional methods could serve as a molecular microsco

128 he PEC assays showed better sensitivity than conventional methods, covering a wide range of potential

129 article provides a comprehensive overview of conventional methods, current trends and advances in fun

130 e and compared with an analog prepared using conventional methods (DA-TOC).

131 tein-pathogen interactions were validated by conventional methods, demonstrating that the MPA is an i

132 analysis was used to compare RootScape with conventional methods designed to measure root architectu

133 cities of 150 and 50, respectively, with the conventional method detecting approximately 19000 featur

134 tandard for bacteremia diagnosis is based on conventional methods developed in the mid-1800s-growth o

135 relation to their antioxidant activity using conventional methods (DPPH and FRAP assays) and correlat

136 ignificance artificially inflated when using conventional methods due to over-fitting.

137 (+) T cells are rarely detectable ex vivo by conventional methods during chronic hepatitis C virus (H

138 he extraction time was around 1 min, whereas conventional methods employed to perform this kind of ex

139 the Balch homogenizer equals or outperforms conventional methods employing boiling, sonication, or D

140 biochemical markers is of great advance over conventional methods, especially in pediatric patients,

141 l for efficient biomaterial engineering, but conventional methods fail to evaluate heterogeneous popu

142 that can uniquely estimate parameters where conventional methods fail.

143 The conventional method for creating targeted contrast agent

144 The results agreed with those of the conventional method for different kinds of vinegars, wit

145 The conventional method for the detection of both point muta

146 A conventional method for the synthesis of C-P bonds invol

147 Conventional methods for advanced polarization control i

148 It complements the conventional methods for analysis of the electromagnetic

149 enerally spread rapidly among swine, and the conventional methods for antigenic characterization requ

150 Conventional methods for assaying drug metabolism (e.g.,

151 Conventional methods for BPA exposure assessment rely on

152 l data--improvements that go undetected when conventional methods for comparing ensembles are used--a

153 ions and inversions are important in cancer, conventional methods for detecting DNA rearrangements re

154 Conventional methods for detecting pharyngeal carriage o

155 Whole-genome sequencing should replace conventional methods for detection of nosocomial S. aure

156 Conventional methods for determining HMF are cumbersome

157 We have previously demonstrated by conventional methods for determining viral titer that hi

158 In contrast, conventional methods for estimating energy potentials ar

159 Conventional methods for evaluating epigenetic modificat

160 Conventional methods for fecal source tracking typically

161 ntration of furfural in the hydrolysate, the conventional methods for furfural recovery are energy-in

162 isely controlled composition, in contrast to conventional methods for giant vesicle formation.

163 ogy may be preferred over nanotechnology and conventional methods for high expected benefits and low

164 Conventional methods for IgA N- and O-glycosylation anal

165 e are in agreement with those acquired using conventional methods for immunoglobulin detection, indic

166 Conventional methods for inferring FOI estimate a time-a

167 The various conventional methods for its diagnosis are laborious and

168 In addition to 16S rRNA gene sequencing, conventional methods for leucine aminopeptidase (LAP) an

169 Conventional methods for modeling isotopic distributions

170 e devices could be a valuable alternative to conventional methods for monitoring fermentation process

171 sion occurs on a millisecond time scale, but conventional methods for monitoring nonelectroactive neu

172 However, conventional methods for natural extraction or chemical

173 rm positives and identify genes missed using conventional methods for on-target gene selection.

174 ific and social developments have challenged conventional methods for protecting privacy.

175 Using conventional methods for pulmonary drug administration,

176 However, conventional methods for relating either individual vari

177 However, conventional methods for sequencing proteins, such as ma

178 However, their small size challenges the conventional methods for structure characterization.

179 This kind of reactive systems challenges conventional methods for successfully processing corresp

180 Some deficiencies in conventional methods for testing this product encourage

181 molecules offer an attractive alternative to conventional methods for the analysis of the absolute co

182 (kappa, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95 to 0.98) with the conventional methods for the detection of ETEC, Vibrio,

183 nsive, rapid, and streamlined alternative to conventional methods for the etiologic diagnosis of infe

184 MDomics was significantly more powerful than conventional methods for the identification of drug resi

185 Conventional methods for the identification of gastroint

186 In contrast, the conventional methods for this purpose require use of a c

187 Conventional methods for Ti extraction involve several e

188 comparative performance of the GPP ASRs with conventional methods in clinical samples was 94.5% (rang

189 e in THB was more than twice as sensitive as conventional methods in detecting N. meningitidis (13.2%

190 self-reports and that ML methods improve on conventional methods in developing such models.

191 onal neural networks (CNN) have outperformed conventional methods in modeling the sequence specificit

192 normal method (CvN method) to be superior to conventional methods in stratifying AML patients with ab

193 Infections were diagnosed by conventional methods in the first season and by multiple

194 pe MTBDRplus molecular assay was compared to conventional methods including AFB smear, culture and dr

195 of 85% and 77%, respectively, compared with conventional methods (including microscopy, culture, and

196 surement of biomarkers and EMB together with conventional methods, including cardiopulmonary exercise

197 we observe additional features, not seen by conventional methods, including extensive lipid droplets

198 that have been difficult to characterize by conventional methods, including Fermi resonances of vari

199 ed, the cellular contents were analyzed with conventional methods, including fluorescence, enzymatic

200 was substantially broadened contrary to the conventional methods introducing solely the azide anion

201 The results were validated by a conventional method involving solvent extraction of beta

202 tion efficiency of the materials prepared by conventional method is higher than those obtained using

203 Monitoring of actinides with sophisticated conventional methods is affected by matrix interferences

204 inaccessible or challenging to prepare using conventional methods is disclosed.

205 Yet delivering monoclonal antibodies using conventional methods is impractical due to high costs.

206 gDNA extraction using conventional methods is laborious.

207 sitions that can be used to grow GUVs by the conventional methods is quite limited, and many of the a

208 A benefit of LTP over conventional methods is the possibility to successfully

209 sequencing exhibits longer read lengths than conventional methods, less GC bias, and the ability to r

210 The results indicate that conventional methods may be complemented by state-of-the

211 e time to diagnosis of influenza compared to conventional methods (median turnaround times of 1.7 h v

212 ile maintaining product yields comparable to conventional methods (n = 14, P > 0.05).

213 Unlike conventional methods, native MS can resolve individual l

214 notypes have been investigated mostly by the conventional method of batch cultivation using test tube

215 Conventional method of detection like the enzyme-linked

216 isotopic spacings, which is the basis of the conventional method of determining the charge state of a

217 ates of slopes of functional change than the conventional method of OLS regression.

218 stimates of slopes of change compared to the conventional method of ordinary least squares linear reg

219 However, flow cytometry, the conventional method of quantification of the CD4 density

220 agen onto the substrate when compared to the conventional method of using sulfo-succinimidyl-6-(4-azi

221 fferent event classes can be extracted, when conventional methods of analysis fail.

222 ory assessment for mucormycosis includes the conventional methods of direct examination and culture o

223 than EMB results, other biomarkers, and the conventional methods of follow-up.

224 Conventional methods of HBV detection are time consuming

225 ucture-enabled method is a complement to the conventional methods of hydrographic sampling in which t

226 While conventional methods of nanocarrier-mediated drug delive

227 ation development, our algorithm outperforms conventional methods of network inference.

228 Because symptoms are often unresponsive to conventional methods of pain treatment, new therapeutic

229 n of proteins in single cells that surpasses conventional methods of quantitating total diffuse fluor

230 The limitations of conventional methods of structural biology for fibril ch

231 SCs also confer considerable advantages over conventional methods of studying human diseases.

232 However, conventional methods often lead to heterogeneous PEGylat

233 he enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) conventional method (p-value of < 0.05) showed that this

234 dern analytical methods have advantages over conventional methods (particularly when some data are mi

235 as long been used for this purpose; however, conventional methods perform poorly when applied to data

236 Conventional methods rely on annotation of polyA sites;

237 tation of the DMN log-likelihood function by conventional methods results in instability in the neigh

238 f the viral population than is possible with conventional methods, revealing low-level drug resistanc

239 splittings that are too small to probe with conventional methods.Silicon quantum dots provide a prom

240 Compared with conventional methods, single-molecule real-time (SMRT) D

241 Conventional methods (spa typing combined with overlappi

242 Conventional methods such as blood smears and automated

243 osed method is more robust and reliable than conventional methods such as Student's t-test or the Wil

244 itric acid; Re background reduction requires conventional methods such as sub-boiling distillation.

245 ing the functions of ID proteins/peptides by conventional methods, such as X-ray crystallography, bec

246 Mo in ammonium diuranate samples, where the conventional methods suffer from the loss of Mo.

247 y the SDAE-based CADx algorithm over the two conventional methods, suggesting that deep learning tech

248 Compared to conventional methods, the MTBDRplus assay had high accur

249 We show that, compared to conventional methods, the new DMF approach reported here

250 ossil fuels used for synthesis of ammonia by conventional methods, this is a renewable and sustainabl

251 Though it is an improvement over conventional methods, this multistep procedure has not t

252 Compared with conventional methods, this technology can more readily a

253 In comparison to conventional methods, this technology is much less labor

254 We have also shown that the conventional method to extract the dissociation constant

255 Conventional methods to analyse power use closed-form so

256 Conventional methods to assess local activation time (LA

257 erving, allowing nanocrystals synthesized by conventional methods to be used as templates for product

258 Conventional methods to determine the aggregation number

259 Conventional methods to determine the kinetic parameters

260 Conventional methods to diagnose and monitor chronic kid

261 Conventional methods to engineer electroconductive hydro

262 Conventional methods to extend the life of primary cultu

263 Conventional methods to identify HBEC in bronchoalveolar

264 The inability of conventional methods to identify these disorders earlier

265 ave remained opaque given the limitations of conventional methods to interrogate the order and mechan

266 t these limitations, we used microarrays and conventional methods to investigate rejection in 703 uns

267 Conventional methods to predict nucleosome occupancy are

268 As conventional methods to preserve cardiac cell viability

269 Conventional methods to probe the binding kinetics of ma

270 The advantage of IF compared to conventional methods to quantify interaction in microsco

271 Conventional methods to study the interaction of nanopar

272 Conventional methods to study this reaction are not sens

273 nto gold nanoparticles synthesized using the conventional method (trisodium citrate as reducing agent

274 s the turnaround time by 10-fold compared to conventional methods used for routine application, and a

275 their diagnostic value, there have been many conventional methods used in detection of miRNAs includi

276 otential for superior data quality, than the conventional methods used in most research labs currentl

277 However, the conventional methods used to deliver siRNA into stem cel

278 The turnaround times for conventional methods used to detect Mycobacterium tuberc

279 Unfortunately, the conventional methods used to evaluate DBS samples for ne

280 a Barocycler NEP 2320 was compared with the conventional method using atmospheric pressure.

281 c range and better sensitivity compared to a conventional method using tetramethylbenzidine as the HR

282 e results compare favourably well with other conventional methods using combined experimental and num

283 The HMF amount which was measured by the conventional method was found to be dependent on the sam

284 sensitivity and sampling frequency than the conventional method, we characterize short-term kinetics

285 Using conventional methods, we diagnosed rejection in 205 biop

286 ies of nanostructures that cannot be made by conventional methods were developed.

287 Bacterial isolates identified by conventional methods were grown on various media and ide

288 This is in contrast with conventional methods where high transfer efficiency can

289 rifugation processes that are fundamental to conventional methods where sample is typically discarded

290 The proposed method was compared to conventional methods which employ one or two extraction

291 esent in too low numbers to be detected with conventional methods, which poses a particular challenge

292 nd 90-fold times faster separation time over conventional methods while maintaining comparable resolu

293 atasets, BPSC performs well against edgeR, a conventional method widely used in bulk-cell RNA-sequenc

294 In comparison with the conventional method with simulated stars, this method ut

295 k(f) measurement by 91% as compared with the conventional method with spatial localization.

296 n average, in contrast to comparison between conventional methods with variations on the order of 1-2

297 We compared the performance of conventional methods with WGS for strain typing clinical

298 s it a simpler and more rapid alternative to conventional methods, with sensitivity and accuracy simi

299 xpensive process to synthesize ZnO-NPs using conventional methods without the use of sophisticated eq

300 s and robustness on practical examples where conventional methods would not be applicable.