ライフサイエンスコーパス: conventional radiography

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します

1 v for computed radiography and 0.027 mSv for conventional radiography).

2 ecific morphological changes not depicted by conventional radiography.

3 ondral bone that have not been apparent with conventional radiography.

4 used techniques of intravenous urography and conventional radiography.

5 Traditionally, knee OA is diagnosed using conventional radiography.

6 osteoarthritis (OA) has relied primarily on conventional radiography.

7 normalities that were not clearly defined at conventional radiography.

8 ss of presence of osteolytic bone lesions on conventional radiography.

9 Average costs (in 2001 dollars) were $44 for conventional radiography, 126 US dollars for 1.5-T rapid

10 For 23 conventional radiography, 27 rapid MR imaging, and 38 co

11 tion was 0.43 mGy (range, 0.01-22.5 mGy) for conventional radiography, 4.3 mGy (range, 0.01-43.9 mGy)

12 e of cardiac imaging in 1975 was centered on conventional radiography and angiography, but, in the pa

13 Conventional radiography and MR imaging were performed i

14 rochanteric bursa complex were injected, and conventional radiography and MR imaging were performed.

15 The ASD was imaged and sized by both conventional radiography and MRI.

16 Conventional radiography and pre- and postcontrast T1-we

17 nclusions regarding cost differences between conventional radiography and rapid MR imaging were robus

18 Gy for computed radiography and 0.16 mGy for conventional radiography), and the effective doses were

19 maging modalities, such as the barium enema, conventional radiography, and ultrasound, play a much mo

20 techniques, such as computed tomography and conventional radiography are of no significance in the d

21 n patients with calcific tendonitis by using conventional radiography as a reference and offers bette

22 MR imaging are roughly three times those for conventional radiography but about half those for conven

23 all rapid MR imaging times exceeded those of conventional radiography but were less than those of con

24 Skull base fractures that cannot be shown by conventional radiography can be clearly imaged by high-r

25 While current conventional radiography costs exceed reimbursement, cur

26 The utilization rate for conventional radiography decreased 13.7%, while that of

27 g depicted 136 (79%) acute abnormalities and conventional radiography depicted 39 (23%).

28 sonography, a modern imaging technique, with conventional radiography for the detection of erosions i

29 MR imaging was superior to conventional radiography in the evaluation of pre- or pa

30 ing was limited mainly to the performance of conventional radiography, including barium esophagograph

31 Initial conventional radiography is relatively insensitive in th

32 of the same order of magnitude as those for conventional radiography (median: 0.012 mSv [95% CI conf

33 Paget disease is diagnosed economically with conventional radiography, MR imaging is well suited for

34 In contrast to conventional radiography, MRI can directly visualize the

35 Because of the suspected diagnosis, conventional radiography of the skeleton was performed.

36 ) sites, patients were randomized to undergo conventional radiography or rapid MR imaging of the lumb

37 Conventional radiography reimbursement was 44 US dollars

38 Although conventional radiography remains the gold standard for a

39 enteroclysis for small-bowel assessment, and conventional radiography still have a role, despite the

40 Preliminary data suggest that, compared with conventional radiography, tomosynthesis may also improve

41 In the first few decades, conventional radiography was the diagnostic modality for

42 Conventional radiography was the most utilized imaging t

43 The sensitivity and specificity of conventional radiography were 22% and 94% and of MRI wer

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語（用法）は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。