ライフサイエンスコーパス: conversation

1 rs necessary to promote 'appreciative caring conversations'.

2 rtant when trying to participate in a lively conversation).

3 es of speech/no-speech or general content of conversation.

4 nd produced sound levels too high for normal conversation.

5 ated this personal history to the authors in conversation.

6 viewing a driving video, with and without a conversation.

7 The secondary task was a hands-free conversation.

8 patterns and opportunities in instructional conversation.

9 r of biomedical information giving or social conversation.

10 s and recommendations to their peers through conversation.

11 ble processes of clarification and repair in conversation.

12 is experience, and invite you to join in the conversation.

13 monkeys that may facilitate natural primate conversations.

14 ather than during actual clinician-surrogate conversations.

15 ed feedback on the oncologists' own recorded conversations.

16 ma changes during spontaneous inter-personal conversations.

17 amilies and themselves; and having difficult conversations.

18 ly made any sounds during the ensuing signed conversations.

19 roaches and models for enhancing end-of-life conversations.

20 ity and creating a counterspace for critical conversations.

21 characteristic of human and nonhuman primate conversations.

22 er changes in firing rate evident for longer conversations.

23 that were embedded in a mixture of competing conversations.

24 better enable us to navigate these important conversations.

25 ore the use of "fix-it" in 48 audio-recorded conversations.

26 external staff, followed by case-irrelevant conversations.

27 for 2 separate purposes during preoperative conversations: (1) as an explanatory tool to facilitate

28 In 398 conversations, 37% contained at least one empathic oppor

29 onger than for the primary task (baseline no conversation (944 ms, SE=48 ms)).

30 Regarding who initiated conversation about donation after cardiac death, nine ca

31 ck of education and reluctance to initiate a conversation about live donor kidney transplantation is

32 Semi-structured conversation about quality of life, expectations, and pl

33 ers that might be important, and join in the conversation about the future of epidemiology.

34 n more than 88% of conferences, there was no conversation about the patient's values regarding autono

35 Comfort in initiating a conversation about transplantation increased over time f

36 Conversations about advance directives averaged 5.6 minu

37 Still, evidence shows that conversations about end-of-life care options between phy

38 e not adequately prepared to have meaningful conversations about EOL planning.

39 Conversations about goals of care and cardiopulmonary re

40 EXPOSURE Parent conversations about healthful eating and weight/size.

41 ilies who discussed more topics and had more conversations about organ donation were more likely to d

42 ician's opportunities to engage in difficult conversations about poor prognosis may be rare, but such

43 enterologists may find it useful to initiate conversations about probiotics within the context of a c

44 evidence suggests that, too often, realistic conversations about prognosis, the potential benefits an

45 h RBT that has become inextricably linked to conversations about sport-related concussion and mild tr

46 persistently engage adolescents directly in conversations about their disease prognosis and correspo

47 have an opportunity to contribute to public conversations about their work, and its potential implic

48 e support on the basis of these preoperative conversations alone.

49 s of scientific research aims to further the conversation among all stakeholders in the interactions

50 Conversation among medical microbiologists is needed to

51 cial media messages that inspire far-ranging conversation among social media users, whereas the vast

52 Comparison of 174 day and nighttime conversations among the Ju/'hoan (!Kung) Bushmen of sout

53 pe and limitation of questionnaire-based and conversation analytic approaches to the differential dia

54 the frontal cortex persisted throughout the conversation and its magnitude scaled linearly with the

55 9 risk allele is associated with stereotyped conversation and lower pragmatic communication skills, a

56 despread human use of firelight for intimate conversation and our appetite for evening stories.

57 assistive listening devices for face-to-face conversation and, while part of an audience, their satis

58 ing a busy urban setting, including multiple conversations and events recorded from a neighborhood ga

59 3 days of presentations that spurred active conversations and highlighted the rapidly advancing rese

60 team communication, a decrease in disturbing conversations and sudden noise peaks (P < 0.05).

61 ing and facilitating more timely end-of-life conversations and supportive care consultations, and (5)

62 proach (Ask-Tell-Ask) that promotes tailored conversations and value-based recommendations.

63 adults in 2011, enumerating "close" (shared conversation) and "casual" (shared indoor space) social

64 wake), lightly sedated (a slowed response to conversation), and deeply sedated (no conversational res

65 spent on EHR use, 4.7 (4.2) minutes (42%) on conversation, and 3.5 (2.3) minutes (31%) on examination

66 mologists directly with patients on EHR use, conversation, and examination as well as total time requ

67 ents on the following 3 activities: EHR use, conversation, and examination.

68 der 3 conditions (no distraction, cell phone conversation, and texting).

69 nds on specific issues, join national policy conversations, and express themselves publicly-all key c

70 These end-of-life conversations are important because they affect consent

71 about end-of-life care are common, yet these conversations are often difficult.

72 nt, understandable concerns about initiating conversations are reduced.

73 subtilis build a multicellular biofilm, some conversations are unidirectional.

74 cteristics of the context and content of the conversation as well as physician characteristics.

75 our visual gaze, e.g when shadowing a nearby conversation at a cocktail party.

76 the cultural context, timing, and content of conversations at the end of adolescents' lives.

77 s the evolution of and need for "end-of-life conversations." Barriers to end-of-life discussions that

78 on the phrase structure of spoken or signed conversation, being akin to punctuation in written text.

79 strating a hypothetical case and the ensuing conversation between a physician and her patient, a mode

80 omeostasis in the gut/pancreas and reveals a conversation between the nervous and immune systems usin

81 tterning in the sea urchin embryo requires a conversation between the skeletogenic primary mesenchyme

82 Observational study of audio-recorded conversations between 253 adolescents (mean age, 14.3 ye

83 The data were drawn from decision-making conversations between 32 older inpatients with an acute

84 We audio-recorded 398 clinic conversations between 51 oncologists and 270 patients wi

85 ect measurement in real time of the chemical conversations between cells in the nervous system.

86 l attention-getting sounds and sign language conversations between each of 4 originally cross-fostere

87 sions as to which technology to use and fuel conversations between expert imaging laboratories, resea

88 Patient observations included 91 recorded conversations between patients and surgeons and 61 patie

89 al study of laughter during seminaturalistic conversations between patients with dementia and familia

90 f medical knowledge and discovery as ongoing conversations between professionals and their extended n

91 Vocal laughter fills conversations between speakers with normal hearing and b

92 host response, the temporal features of the 'conversation' between host and pathogen, novel strategie

93 Natural styles of communication, such as conversations, brought about population-level changes in

94 After preconference telephone and e-mail conversations by the panelists in which questions to be

95 s about poor prognosis may be rare, but such conversations can be crucial.

96 Participating in end-of-life care conversations can be emotionally challenging for everyon

97 Can a single conversation change minds on divisive social issues, suc

98 er, these studies have had limited access to conversation content, rendering changes in expression as

99 ed brain activations for conversation vs. no conversation during such simulated driving was found not

100 e show that a single approximately 10-minute conversation encouraging actively taking the perspective

101 at selectively listening to specific target conversations, even in the presence of multiple concurre

102 lescent disordered eating behaviors, whereas conversations focused on healthful eating are protective

103 Parent conversations focused on weight/size are associated with

104 Eliciting wishes stimulates conversations for people of diverse spiritual orientatio

105 ion by shifting the focus of decision-making conversations from an isolated surgical problem to a dis

106 Overt and covert conversation gave rise to longer visual event reaction t

107 A national conversation, guided by the best data and information, a

108 rs and fathers who engaged in weight-related conversations had adolescents who were more likely to di

109 Physicians ought to initiate a deactivation conversation, ideally at the time of implantation.

110 u are sitting in a plane, and you can hear a conversation in a foreign language in the row behind you

111 Surgeons regularly proceeded through the conversation in a manner that suggested they believed bu

112 ir findings with the public and to engage in conversation in a relaxed setting.

113 s, and distal ones, such as national Twitter conversation in broad policy areas.

114 This demonstrates that there is considerable conversation in the distribution and nature of the ligan

115 answer pairs were presented amidst competing conversations in an ongoing, spatially dynamic listening

116 sease-specific agendas dominate many current conversations in global health, this is nonetheless a ti

117 n everyday situations, such as understanding conversations in noise.

118 People with hearing loss struggle to follow conversations in noisy environments.

119 n use the telephone and follow auditory-only conversations in quiet environments.

120 needed to learn how to best structure these conversations in the emergency surgical setting.

121 However, it is challenging to hold sensitive conversations in this environment.

122 ontent analysis to analyze each preoperative conversation inductively.

123 Irrelevant conversations initiated by surgeons were associated with

124 t assignment and psychological encouragement conversations/interactions that increase the participant

125 te, relationship-centred care but that these conversations involve practitioners taking risks.

126 more topics, having one-on-one and repeated conversations, involving families in discussions and ini

127 n utilised for thousands of years, but a new conversation is emerging on the role of these materials

128 al benefit of seeing a speaker's face during conversation is especially pronounced in challenging lis

129 olitical divides to support end-of-life care conversations is needed to promote care that is consiste

130 atching a speaker's lips during face-to-face conversation (lipreading) markedly improves speech perce

131 n order to determine the potential influence Conversation Map can have on long-term health outcomes.

132 ting non-significant differences between the Conversation Map intervention and the control groups.

133 Our review shows that although the Diabetes Conversation Map program holds the potential to improve

134 REVIEW Studies that evaluated the Conversation Map program since 2005 were included.

135 ence regarding the effects that the Diabetes Conversation Map program, an educational tool that engag

136 lized to identify studies that evaluated the Conversation Map program.

137 Conversation may contribute to increased reaction times

138 ht not be available to listeners in everyday conversations, meaning that speech recognition in conven

139 We conclude that end-of-life conversations must become a routine, structured interven

140 These conversations need to occur multiple times, allowing sig

141 Analysis of the conversation of residues in the extracellular portion of

142 Finally, the conversation of the molecular components of clocks is an

143 This experiment is part of the global conversation on maximizing returns on research investmen

144 gated the neural mechanisms of the effect of conversation on visual event detection during a driving-

145 objective of this article is to stimulate a conversation on, and advance research in, EHL.

146 trol areas, fully natural switching within a conversation only engaged auditory cortices.

147 logy (OR = 1.8), and prior attempt at breast conversation (OR = 1.7) to be independent predictors of

148 fore, productive inflammation results from a conversation, or mutually responding signals, between th

149 roponents of some ideologies seek debate and conversation, others create echo chambers.

150 trates that engaging in 'appreciative caring conversations' promotes compassionate, relationship-cent

151 e comprehension of a fully natural bilingual conversation recorded "in the wild." Our results showed

152 Conversation reduced the strengths of these regression r

153 tivated when participants, engaged in social conversations, refer to objects with numerical content.

154 ogy providers and patients to help encourage conversations regarding weight management in cancer surv

155 hat a highly local intramyocardial IL-33/ST2 conversation regulates the heart's response to pressure

156 ty to join them in an ongoing Web-based blog conversation so that together we might develop novel app

157 stions on the basis of the norms of everyday conversation, so violations of those conventions introdu

158 content analysis to characterize patterns in conversation structure, description of outcomes, and del

159 A randomized trial found that these conversations substantially reduced transphobia, with de

160 ch as "What is your birth date?" RTs for the conversation task (1043 ms, SE=65 ms) were slightly long

161 The covert conversation task was then undertaken by ten right-hande

162 ained event detection performance during the conversation task while watching the driving video.

163 reaction time effects from overt and covert conversation tasks in this paradigm.

164 Cell phone conversation, texting, and no distraction while driving.

165 ing the use of memory to fill in bits of the conversation that are missed.

166 ders should engage in shared decision-making conversations that include full disclosure of evidence i

167 n and decisional support during preoperative conversations that included clarification of treatment o

168 It illustrates the conversations that should be initiated with transplant c

169 r obese adolescents whose mothers engaged in conversations that were focused only on healthful eating

170 e in practice, based on 'appreciative caring conversations' that enable all parties to gain two forms

171 that describes the placement of laughter in conversation, the dominance of speech over laughter, the

172 hen both parents engaged in healthful eating conversations, their overweight or obese adolescent chil

173 The use of breast conversation therapy increased almost threefold during t

174 tute of Technology in 1964, and a fortuitous conversation there ignited my interest in DNA ring forma

175 otocol is a new technology that allows voice conversations to be routed over computer networks.

176 ake, nearly all Japanese users changed their conversations to earthquake-related content.

177 d decision-making approach, engaging in open conversations to learn about the mother's preferences an

178 tion can help surgeons structure challenging conversations to promote shared decision making in the a

179 e non-Japanese speakers did not change their conversation topics significantly after the earthquake,

180 We scored conversation transcripts using OPTION 5, an observer mea

181 ies, such as watching a movie or engaging in conversation, unfold over many minutes.

182 m was to create consensus through structured conversations via a range of stakeholders (general denta

183 Increased brain activations for conversation vs. no conversation during such simulated d

184 In this Conversation, we explore some of these driving forces an

185 Four scripted videos of a bad news conversation were created that differed only in the leve

186 Case-irrelevant conversations were associated with poorer team performan

187 Conversations were coded for the presence of empathic op

188 Conversations were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed.

189 te the reaction time to visual events during conversation while driving.

190 After a simulated informed consent conversation with a surgeon by using semiquantitative te

191 The article concludes in a conversation with four oncologists regarding what they f

192 onal goals and preferences after an informed conversation with her physician.

193 of this belief and more explicitly spiritual conversation with the patient by his treating team might

194 iplinary review and consensus, and a careful conversation with the patient, before deciding it is not

195 both studies were observed and audiotaped in conversation with their oncologists, and interviewed aft

196 ation should be available routinely and that conversation with their personal physician or endorsed,

197 loratory, qualitative study that used guided conversations with 18 people with dementia, living in si

198 We recorded preoperative conversations with 3 to 7 patients facing high-risk surg

199 eepen understanding and facilitate difficult conversations with adolescents, parents, and other famil

200 .1 more clinic visits and 6.7 more telephone conversations with clinic staff (P<.001 for both).

201 ntervention and share what they learned from conversations with doctors and patients during the plann

202 der patients (OR = 1.37; 95% CI, 1.13-1.65), conversations with explicit confidentiality discussions

203 ing practice recommendations for end-of-life conversations with families of potential donors.

204 n of opinion change, but only in the wake of conversations with gay canvassers.

205 rlocutor waited for a chimpanzee to initiate conversations with her and then responded with 1 of 4 ty

206 to care for these patients and many have had conversations with patients about assisted suicide.

207 We audio-recorded their conversations with patients considering high-risk surger

208 ans alter the content of their goals-of-care conversations with patients or families to accommodate i

209 ge needed for clinicians to have substantive conversations with patients.

210 drug adherence, lifestyle modification, and conversations with providers (patient education).

211 eferences near the EOL beginning with making conversations with providers and families something that

212 evere reduction in direct eye contact during conversations with real people, together with an abnorma

213 ty, partner-mutuality, and self-mutuality in conversations with spouses/partners in the whole sample

214 RA patients' perceptions of mutuality in conversations with spouses/partners predicted better hea

215 ructured interviews (n=56) and informal open conversations with staff and carers (family members).

216 We recorded 43 patients' conversations with surgeons, 34 preoperative, and 27 pos

217 Based on a literature search and conversations with the carbon capture community, we revi

218 cts of their lives or their emotions) during conversations with their physicians.

219 s subjects' perceptions of responsiveness in conversations with their spouse/partners, is linked with

220 icians should have frequent, well-documented conversations with these patients about end-of-life wish

221 atory response, the extent of its "molecular conversations" with recruited leukocytes, and its influe

222 eural activity scaled with the length of the conversation, with greater changes in firing rate eviden

223 ng paradigm compared to just driving with no conversation, with negligible effect on miss rates.

224 models, including outcomes; (2) initiates a conversation within the American Heart Association on th