ライフサイエンスコーパス: coronary angiogram

1 evascularization (ie, abnormal postoperative coronary angiogram).

2 lar Health (LURIC) study (2579 patients with coronary angiograms).

3 ronary flow velocity reserve assessment, and coronary angiogram.

4 sion could not help in the decision of early coronary angiogram.

5 ng cardiovascular risk factor assessment and coronary angiogram.

6 ogram), scintigraphic perfusion defects, and coronary angiogram.

7 Flt-1 in 791 HF patients undergoing elective coronary angiogram.

8 The patient who developed an MI had a normal coronary angiogram.

9 cipients at the time of their routine annual coronary angiogram.

10 ain in patients with hypertension and normal coronary angiograms.

11 ry flow reserve abnormalities despite normal coronary angiograms.

12 wenty-two patients had 91 DSE studies and 45 coronary angiograms.

13 n 7 patients without risk factors and normal coronary angiograms.

14 on of 15:1 lossy JPEG compression to digital coronary angiograms.

15 opment of chest pain in patients with normal coronary angiograms.

16 r three years of follow-up (30 percent fewer coronary angiograms, 15 percent fewer coronary angioplas

17 Patients in group A and B had a normal coronary angiogram and a coronary flow reserve (CFR) of

18 delivery, in spite of a normal pretransplant coronary angiogram and good pancreas function.

19 ome because patients have generally a normal coronary angiogram and left ventricular dysfunction, whi

20 e SS is a purely anatomic score based on the coronary angiogram and predicts outcome after PCI in pat

21 sted of 298 unrelated patients with positive coronary angiograms and controls were 138 unrelated heal

22 cluded 988 consecutive patients who had both coronary angiograms and echocardiographic examinations i

23 ccess and transfemoral access for diagnostic coronary angiograms and percutaneous coronary interventi

24 e clinical characteristics, imaging results, coronary angiograms and revascularization outcomes were

25 se BAV registry (n=600, n=231 with available coronary angiogram) and compared with the frequency of C

26 ercise stress test, computerized tomographic coronary angiogram, and cardiovascular magnetic resonanc

27 positive stress test result (n=67) underwent coronary angiogram, and significant coronary artery dise

28 ostic test for obstructive CAD with invasive coronary angiogram as a reference standard.

29 These data suggest that using the coronary angiogram as the arbiter for the presence of LV

30 was presence of coronary culprit lesions on coronary angiograms as analyzed by independent intervent

31 baseline, early postoperative and follow-up coronary angiograms, as well as a subset of 47 patients

32 went a 64-slice coronary computed tomography coronary angiogram at the time of phlebotomy, on average

33 s prospectively whether patients with normal coronary angiograms but with impaired myocardial blood f

34 Compression of digital coronary angiograms facilitates playback of images and d

35 Coronary angiograms from 350 patients randomized to the

36 Coronary angiograms from 39 patients undergoing coronary

37 To examine this, we obtained posttransplant coronary angiograms from a group of patients bridged wit

38 Coronary angiograms from patients with asymptomatic AECG

39 igh negative predictive value of a normal CT coronary angiogram, however, may be useful for reliable

40 erformed by abdominal ultrasonography before coronary angiogram in 612 consecutive patients.

41 s similar to what is usually expected from a coronary angiogram in the present cohort.

42 ipant change between base-line and follow-up coronary angiograms in the percent stenosis measured by

43 ng plasma lipids and indices of quantitative coronary angiograms obtained at baseline and 2.5 years a

44 Coronary angiograms obtained five years following revasc

45 lossy compression, a degradation of digital coronary angiograms occurs that results in decreased dia

46 The coronary angiograms of 425 patients with HCM (mean age 6

47 We retrospectively studied the coronary angiograms of 882 siblings with CAD from 401 fa

48 ith VAD and compared them to post transplant coronary angiograms of a non-VAD cohort.

49 We reviewed the medical histories and coronary angiograms of all adults <40 years of age who u

50 or older) men (54%), with either an abnormal coronary angiogram or prior MI (71%).

51 ssing creatinine values, no or an incomplete coronary angiogram, or previous dialysis.

52 , 1-, 2-, or 3-vessel disease) obtained from coronary angiograms performed no more than 1 day after t

53 access PtDA for eligible patients undergoing coronary angiogram procedures reduces decisional conflic

54 Up to 20% of all coronary angiograms reveal coronary chronic total occlus

55 In 90 patients with coronary angiograms, RT-3D had a sensitivity of 87.9% in

56 Annual coronary angiograms, serial endomyocardial biopsies, and

57 f patients with angina-like chest pain whose coronary angiograms show no evidence of obstructive coro

58 aution is warranted in the interpretation of coronary angiograms that have been subjected to lossy JP

59 In patients with clinical indications for coronary angiogram, the presence of NAFLD is associated

60 mong patients referred for their first x-ray coronary angiogram, three-dimensional coronary magnetic

61 The DJS was calculated from the coronary angiograms to quantify the myocardium at risk.

62 Atherosclerosis change on 2-year coronary angiograms was evaluated by a consensus panel a

63 increase in fluoroscopy time for diagnostic coronary angiograms (weighted mean difference [WMD], fix

64 996 through November 2010 with pretransplant coronary angiogram were included in our study.

65 Base-line and follow-up coronary angiograms were analyzed by quantitative corona

66 The coronary angiograms were analyzed using quantitative cor

67 Coronary angiograms were assessed by a technician blinde

68 Serial coronary angiograms were assessed for development, sever

69 Preoperative coronary angiograms were evaluated for collaterals, whic

70 Coronary angiograms were independently read by 3 reviewe

71 Fasting plasma lipids and quantitative coronary angiograms were obtained at baseline and 2.5 ye

72 plasma lipids were measured and quantitative coronary angiograms were obtained at baseline and 2.5 ye

73 All coronary angiograms were reevaluated blinded for postres

74 Coronary angiograms were retrospectively reviewed and se

75 2 without coronary risk factors) with normal coronary angiograms were studied.

76 perators performed 506 consecutive immediate coronary angiograms with primary angioplasty when approp

77 onary artery disease was evaluated by annual coronary angiograms with side-by-side comparisons.

78 Patients undergoing coronary angiogram within 4 mo after SPECT myocardial pe

79 ise testing for suspected CAD and then had a coronary angiogram within 90 days.

80 in, abnormal exercise treadmill test, normal coronary angiogram without other causes of microvascular

81 ith higher kerma-area product for diagnostic coronary angiograms (WMD, fixed effect: 1.72 Gy.cm(2), 9

82 s that NAFLD screening in patients requiring coronary angiogram would identify high-risk patients and