ライフサイエンスコーパス: coronary artery stenosis

1 rmal value, and is independent of epicardial coronary artery stenosis.

2 risk with significant unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.

3 ularization method for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.

4 aring PCI and CABG for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.

5 to ischemia in myocardium subject to severe coronary artery stenosis.

6 y artery calcium score (CACS) for predicting coronary artery stenosis.

7 nostic accuracy for functional assessment of coronary artery stenosis.

8 nostic accuracy for functional assessment of coronary artery stenosis.

9 cardial ischemia at rest secondary to severe coronary artery stenosis.

10 etween patients with different severities of coronary artery stenosis.

11 was determined by the presence and extent of coronary artery stenosis.

12 e alternative to ICA to rule out obstructive coronary artery stenosis.

13 d for detection and exclusion of obstructive coronary artery stenosis.

14 (PES) or sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) for coronary artery stenosis.

15 significantly underestimate the severity of coronary artery stenosis.

16 onary atherosclerotic plaque and significant coronary artery stenosis.

17 ver, may be useful for reliable exclusion of coronary artery stenosis.

18 underwent 90% proximal left circumflex (LCx) coronary artery stenosis.

19 and systolic thickening in the presence of a coronary artery stenosis.

20 the absence of angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis.

21 Thus, it may reflect the severity of the coronary artery stenosis.

22 lters coronary perfusion in canine models of coronary artery stenosis.

23 al region during exercise in the presence of coronary artery stenosis.

24 women with chest pain but without epicardial coronary artery stenosis.

25 erial inflow or when flow is restricted by a coronary artery stenosis.

26 in the diagnosis of left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis.

27 in the normal heart and in the presence of a coronary artery stenosis.

28 ) is an index used to assess the severity of coronary-artery stenosis.

29 ften occur at sites of angiographically mild coronary-artery stenosis.

30 Both the absence of significant coronary artery stenosis (73 of 103 patients) and nonsig

31 lar sensitivity for left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis (88%, 79% and 100%, respectivel

32 exercise in the presence of a flow-limiting coronary artery stenosis, acts to counterbalance vascula

33 infused during exercise in the presence of a coronary artery stenosis after LNNA administration, idaz

34 ied in an open-chest dog model with critical coronary artery stenosis and deep vessel wall injury.

35 anatomy, and techniques of assessing native coronary artery stenosis and flow are close to being cli

36 It is a disease that occurs as a result of coronary artery stenosis and is caused by the lack of ox

37 clinical significance of CACS in predicting coronary artery stenosis and its severity.

38 am, the presence of NAFLD is associated with coronary artery stenosis and need for coronary intervent

39 -146e; n=9 critical left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis), and hemodynamic responses wer

40 efined by intimal thickness (ultrasound) and coronary artery stenosis (angiographic); and incidence a

41 ams, more physiological methods of assessing coronary artery stenosis are being investigated.

42 ring treadmill exercise in the presence of a coronary artery stenosis before and during infusion of t

43 te prognostic value for the determination of coronary artery stenosis but not for discriminating betw

44 oes exert a flow-limiting effect distal to a coronary artery stenosis but that this action is counter

45 observed in 8 (53%) of 15 segments with >20% coronary artery stenosis by QCA but also in 12 (15%) of

46 data, PR (mean +/- SD) decreased stepwise as coronary artery stenosis (CAS) severity increased: 2.42

47 cardiac nerves on the response to 90-minute coronary artery stenosis (CAS), which reduced coronary b

48 For grading coronary artery stenosis, correlation was 0.64 for singl

49 Coronary artery stenosis defined by angiography was clas

50 Area under the curve for different levels of coronary artery stenosis did not have sufficient sensiti

51 after creation of a left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis, endothelial injury, thrombus f

52 T abnormalities were severity (p < 0.001) of coronary artery stenosis, followed by total exercise dur

53 They also had a greater prevalence of coronary artery stenosis greater than 50% (PR, 1.48 [CI,

54 tion series were independently evaluated for coronary artery stenosis greater than 50%, and their dia

55 the incidence of significant CAD defined as coronary artery stenosis >50% on angiography, abnormal c

56 lloon pump, prolonged bypass time, left main coronary artery stenosis >50%, and a surgeon's impressio

57 e-vessel disease, and 20 (30%) had left main coronary artery stenosis >50%.

58 ly accurate for the exclusion of significant coronary artery stenosis (>50% luminal narrowing), with

59 f the -407G > C polymorphism had significant coronary artery stenosis (>75%) at a younger age than th

60 nt of patients with significant (> or = 50%) coronary artery stenosis had SPECT abnormalities, wherea

61 Angiographic severity of coronary artery stenosis has historically been the prima

62 erize its capacity to assess the severity of coronary artery stenosis in a canine model in vivo and e

63 for the detection of significant obstructive coronary artery stenosis in a population with a high pre

64 remic physiologic marker for the severity of coronary artery stenosis in humans.

65 There was no increased incidence of right coronary artery stenosis in patients with paradoxical si

66 cardia oxygenation in the presence of severe coronary artery stenosis in swine.

67 tudy sought to examine to what extent native coronary artery stenosis is accompanied by vessel wall t

68 cle, the region subtended by the most severe coronary artery stenosis (Isc), and remote myocardium su

69 ed to assess the significance of a left main coronary artery stenosis (LMCS).

70 osis > or =70%), and 250 controls had normal coronary arteries (stenosis <10%).

71 wine with a chronic left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis (n=26).

72 years) with severe stenosis of at least one coronary artery (stenosis of >70 percent of the vessel d

73 were associated with a greater prevalence of coronary artery stenosis of >/=50%.

74 t of multivessel as opposed to single-vessel coronary artery stenosis on myocardial contrast defects

75 Patients with varying degrees of coronary artery stenosis on quantitative angiography und

76 en and women and those with either > or =50% coronary artery stenosis or no CAD.

77 cantly different between different levels of coronary artery stenosis (P<0.001) and there was a signi

78 severity score (r=0.11, P<0.004) and maximum coronary artery stenosis (r=0.11, P<0.003).

79 ogs, a severe left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery stenosis resulted in a 54.3% mean flow r

80 specificity was 67% for detecting > or = 75% coronary artery stenosis (sensitivity was 44% and specif

81 specificity was 76% for detecting > or = 75% coronary artery stenosis (sensitivity was 53% and specif

82 erior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary artery stenosis, sensitivity was 84%, 86%, and

83 nstriction restricted blood flow distal to a coronary artery stenosis that resulted in myocardial hyp

84 ng exercise in normal hearts and distal to a coronary artery stenosis that results in myocardial hypo

85 ng a stent in a single, previously untreated coronary-artery stenosis (vessel diameter, 2.5 to 3.75 m

86 A left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis was created in 13 pigs and main

87 In nine pigs, a left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis was created to reduce flow rese

88 A severe left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis was created to reduce resting f

89 r discriminating between different levels of coronary artery stenosis was determined using receiver o

90 In protocol III, coronary artery stenosis was induced by a stenosis in th

91 Progressive left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis was induced by an ameroid occlu

92 Coronary artery stenosis was judged as obstructive when

93 tamine stress echocardiography when a single coronary artery stenosis was present (> or = 50% diamete

94 At 20 weeks, coronary artery stenosis was significantly greater in D-

95 ause patients with diabetes have more severe coronary artery stenosis, we hypothesized that graft pat

96 e test response for left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis were 36% and 51% for exercise c

97 ion for physiologically guided assessment of coronary-artery stenosis were randomly assigned to under

98 ual autopsy diagnoses, including 32 cases of coronary artery stenosis, were identified solely by mult

99 ated through severe left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis with coronary flow reductions o