ライフサイエンスコーパス: coronary risk factor

1 with altered PAI-1 levels and proposed as a coronary risk factor.

2 ffee may lower the risk of diabetes, a major coronary risk factor.

3 se are associated with changes in modifiable coronary risk factors.

4 ot differ within subgroups of men defined by coronary risk factors.

5 ity is attenuated by associations with other coronary risk factors.

6 isk of CHD also extends to men with multiple coronary risk factors.

7 pulation in a manner independent of multiple coronary risk factors.

8 tivity with CHD risk and the impact of other coronary risk factors.

9 Little of this is explained by known coronary risk factors.

10 nt risk in asymptomatic adults with multiple coronary risk factors.

11 ckness and plaque score independent of known coronary risk factors.

12 h preexisting heart disease or altered other coronary risk factors.

13 ho had died suddenly and also analyzed their coronary risk factors.

14 rter of this gradient could be attributed to coronary risk factors.

15 aterially altered after control for nonlipid coronary risk factors.

16 show long-time effects of in utero smoke on coronary risk factors.

17 increased risk of SCD after controlling for coronary risk factors.

18 4.54 (95% CI, 1.65 to 12.44), independent of coronary risk factors.

19 lipid exposure after age 35 years and other coronary risk factors.

20 y heart disease independently of traditional coronary risk factors.

21 ngly related to CHD, mediated by established coronary risk factors.

22 incident CHD that is incremental to measured coronary risk factors.

23 e value for coronary outcomes above standard coronary risk factors.

24 ary calcification that were not explained by coronary risk factors.

25 vitamin B12 among women with CVD or > or =3 coronary risk factors.

26 significant after accounting for traditional coronary risk factors.

27 ine BP, as well as those with no traditional coronary risk factors.

28 ired in individuals with atherosclerosis and coronary risk factors.

29 erially changed after adjustment for several coronary risk factors.

30 nd all-cause death compared with traditional coronary risk factors.

31 rkers of inflammation, and with some classic coronary risk factors.

32 lso existed in patients without CAD but with coronary risk factors.

33 variate analysis adjusting for several other coronary risk factors (0.1 to 4.9 g/d: RR 0.72 [95% CI 0

34 nterval (CI) 0.49-1.42) after adjustment for coronary risk factors (1 cup = 237 ml).

35 Current hormone users with coronary risk factors (69 percent of the women) had the

36 cholesterol >/= 160 mg/dL with fewer than 2 coronary risk factors, a low-density lipoprotein cholest

37 Changes in coronary risk factors accounted for 66% (95% confidence

38 Changes in modifiable coronary risk factors accounted for 66% of the decline i

39 We examined the relations of classic coronary risk factors, adiposity and its associated meta

40 g dipyridamole hyperemia in 36 patients with coronary risk factors (age, 55+/-10 years) and in 36 age

41 sociated low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels with coronary risk factors and adverse cardiovascular outcome

42 lar relationships with regard to traditional coronary risk factors and angiographic CAD in premenopau

43 We undertook an analysis of weight cycling, coronary risk factors and angiographic coronary artery d

44 hetic stimulus is altered in the presence of coronary risk factors and CAD and appears to reflect end

45 C frequently coexist and are associated with coronary risk factors and CAD in the elderly.

46 f CVD (linear trend, P=0.049) independent of coronary risk factors and current DBP.

47 e older (63 years vs. 59 years) and had more coronary risk factors and evidence of coronary artery di

48 ired in individuals with atherosclerosis and coronary risk factors and improves with risk reduction t

49 0.75-1.64) after adjustment for some classic coronary risk factors and indicators of socioeconomic st

50 roportion of adults have multiple borderline coronary risk factors and may benefit from treatment.

51 d our control group as well as patients with coronary risk factors and normal perfusion demonstrated

52 After controlling for coronary risk factors and other fatty acids, including l

53 ssure elevation after age 35 years and other coronary risk factors and participant characteristics.

54 ents, carotid IMT is associated with classic coronary risk factors and with nadir CD4 count < or =200

55 We also studied 15 control subjects with no coronary risk factors and/or unobstructed coronary arter

56 ealth behaviors, general physical condition, coronary risk factors, and dietary habits.

57 After adjustment for age, standard coronary risk factors, and dietary intake of linoleic ac

58 ychosocial work environment, social support, coronary risk factors, and physical height.

59 without CKD, which was matched for age, sex, coronary risk factors, and systemic hemodynamics (n = 42

60 prehypertension, its association with other coronary risk factors, and the risk for incident cardiov

61 potential confounders, including traditional coronary risk factors, anthropometric factors, dietary i

62 When coronary risk factors are also taken into consideration,

63 Adjustment for lipids and other coronary risk factors as well as randomized aspirin assi

64 We measured coronary risk factors at each survey and estimated the r

65 eased risk of future MI independent of other coronary risk factors, atherogenic factors such as lipid

66 effects of actual investments made to change coronary risk factors between 1981 and 1990, as well as

67 d in asymptomatic individuals with a greater coronary risk factor burden.

68 years of education explained by established coronary risk factors but not by job strain or social su

69 ls, and coronary vasomotion in patients with coronary risk factors but with angiographically normal c

70 t rest and during hyperemia in patients with coronary risk factors but without CAD.

71 or evidence of coronary disease, we assessed coronary risk factors, calculated Framingham risk of a c

72 er socioeconomic differences in a variety of coronary risk factors can be accounted for by change in

73 After adjustment for age, smoking, and other coronary risk factors, cataract extraction was significa

74 further benefits would result if the classic coronary risk factors could be reduced to primordial lev

75 ume, and fasting concentrations of metabolic coronary risk factors did not differ between the groups

76 Further adjustment for other coronary risk factors did not substantially modify the a

77 ed aspirin and beta carotene assignment, and coronary risk factors, dietary fish intake was associate

78 f their strong associations with established coronary risk factors, eg, high blood pressure and high

79 r multivariable adjustment for age, sex, and coronary risk factors, exercise-induced NSVT was not sig

80 are demonstrated in individuals with either coronary risk factors for coronary artery disease or dif

81 hird, a low HDL frequently accompanies other coronary risk factors (for example, insulin resistance,

82 Elderly patients with coronary risk factors frequently require treatment with

83 In others whose affected relative had coronary risk factors (group B, n=24), FMD was also only

84 Participants with at least 1 coronary risk factor (>45 years) underwent computed tomo

85 est-practice interventions to reduce classic coronary risk factors, if successfully implemented in bo

86 s aged >or=40 y (n = 5442) with CVD or >or=3 coronary risk factors in 1998 (after folic acid fortific

87 nary artery calcification is associated with coronary risk factors in older adults.

88 Coronary risk factors included drug-treated hypertension

89 ht loss of at least 10 lbs at least 3 times--coronary risk factors including core laboratory determin

90 ietary intervention trial, the Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project (STRIP), for d

91 The Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project for Children (

92 In the Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project for Children (

93 neous adjustment for lipids and a variety of coronary risk factors, LDL particle diameter was no long

94 Height and standard coronary risk factors made smaller contributions.

95 Additional contributions were made by coronary risk factors--mainly smoking--and from factors

96 esting that immunodeficiency and traditional coronary risk factors may contribute to atherosclerosis.

97 th aggressive management of other modifiable coronary risk factors, may improve cardiovascular diseas

98 After adjusting for known coronary risk factors, MBF responses to CPT revealed a n

99 Subjects (197 men, 187 women) had coronary risk factors measured in childhood (mean age 15

100 resence of coronary artery calcification and coronary risk factors measured in childhood and young ad

101 Coronary risk factors measured in children and young adu

102 African Americans had more coronary risk factors, more markers of poor outcome afte

103 However, in normal controls without coronary risk factors (n = 22), the epicardial LA increa

104 +/- 23.5%) during CPT, whereas patients with coronary risk factors (n = 34) revealed a decrease of ep

105 o 73 years old (15 women, 14 men) who had no coronary risk factors, no history of coronary artery dis

106 that sex differences exist in the effect of coronary risk factors on vascular risk.

107 whether it could be explained by established coronary risk factors or psychosocial factors.

108 ein cholesterol >/= 130 mg/dL with 2 or more coronary risk factors, or with documented CAD were inclu

109 with no or one calcium deposit and no or one coronary risk factor other than diabetes, multiple (> or

110 of the coronary circulation associated with coronary risk factors, possibly reflecting developing co

111 vel was observed in patients with the fewest coronary risk factors present, suggesting that control o

112 The demographic characteristics and coronary risk factor profiles of persons with previously

113 We evaluated standard coronary risk factors, quantified coronary calcium mass

114 Each group was subdivided by coronary risk factors (RFs).

115 ic heart disease or diabetes plus additional coronary risk factor(s), in which effects on platelet re

116 y between blacks and whites, mean Framingham coronary risk factor scores were identical in black and

117 Three major coronary risk factors-serum cholesterol level, blood pre

118 d ischemic time, delayed graft function, and coronary risk factors showed that differences did not re

119 was reduced after adjustment for established coronary risk factors (smoking, body mass index, alcohol

120 diabetes had more severe chronic HF and more coronary risk factors than patients without diabetes.

121 ipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels were the coronary risk factors that showed the strongest associat

122 had antecedent exposure to one or more major coronary risk factors, that angiographic findings may va

123 Indications for TEE, coronary risk factors, the incidence of reduced left ven

124 After adjustment for the DHA level and coronary risk factors, the mercury levels in the patient

125 After adjustment for coronary risk factors, the multivariate odds ratios for

126 After adjustment for coronary risk factors, the relative risks of CVD were 0.

127 After adjustment for these and other coronary risk factors, the RR was 1.64 (95% CI, 0.97 to

128 In fully adjusted models for coronary risk factors, the RRs and 95% CIs were 1.00, 1.

129 Finally, among men with multiple coronary risk factors, those expending >/=4,200 kJ/wk ha

130 sectional population study of 485 women with coronary risk factors undergoing coronary angiography fo

131 Although the prevalence of most of the coronary risk factors varied significantly between black

132 ing for age, smoking, and a variety of other coronary risk factors, vitamin C supplement use was asso

133 rolling for current blood pressure and other coronary risk factors, we found that previous 2-year cha

134 gnment, antihypertensive medication use, and coronary risk factors, we found that systolic blood pres

135 ent for age, smoking, and a variety of other coronary risk factors, we observed a modest significant

136 sted for age, smoking, and other established coronary risk factors were 0.70 (0.48 to 1.03) for fish

137 ve protein levels were measured and baseline coronary risk factors were collected.

138 Coronary artery calcification and coronary risk factors were compared in 199 type 1 diabet

139 Standard coronary risk factors were generally related to both CAC

140 Coronary risk factors were measured in a subset of 2003

141 f age with cardiovascular disease or > or =3 coronary risk factors were randomized.

142 deposits with diabetes or multiple (> or =2) coronary risk factors were significantly associated with

143 r, with either a history of CVD or 3 or more coronary risk factors, were enrolled in a randomized, do

144 existing cardiovascular disease or 3 or more coronary risk factors, were randomly assigned to receive

145 Patients without coronary risk factors who comprised our control group as

146 laboratories in 95 premenopausal women with coronary risk factors who were enrolled in the National

147 ercholesterolemia, 8 smokers, and 22 without coronary risk factors) with normal coronary angiograms w

148 es, 30 asymptomatic subjects with comparable coronary risk factors without CAD or a family history of