戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  demonstrating that they are not exclusively cotranscriptional.
2 gesting that splicing is more efficient when cotranscriptional.
3 ip1) gene-specific splicing is predominantly cotranscriptional.
4 phosphorylation by Ctk1 recruits factors for cotranscriptional 3' end processing in vivo.
5 lts indicate that Rpb4 contributes to proper cotranscriptional 3'-end processing in vivo.
6 I (Pol II) transcription sites to facilitate cotranscriptional 5'-capping of pre-mRNA and other Pol I
7                               Here we assess cotranscriptional A-to-I editing in Drosophila by isolat
8 tivity by KLFs reflects sequestration of the cotranscriptional activator CBP/p300, making this cofact
9 9 increases the affinity of a well-described cotranscriptional activator of nuclear hormone receptors
10 o acid reduces beta-catenin phosphorylation, cotranscriptional activity, and stability.
11  The snRNPs display patterns that indicate a cotranscriptional assembly model: U1 first, then U2, and
12        These results suggest a mechanism for cotranscriptional assembly of the export competent mRNP
13 tylation and deacetylation facilitate proper cotranscriptional association of spliceosomal snRNPs.
14  analysis suggests that Spt6 is required for cotranscriptional association of the factor Ctr9, a memb
15 ulation of transcription by Abd1 may enhance cotranscriptional capping and also act as a checkpoint t
16 inal domain results in a drastic decrease in cotranscriptional capping efficiency but is reversed by
17 d have suggested a checkpoint model in which cotranscriptional capping is a necessary step for the ea
18                                              Cotranscriptional capping of HIV mRNA is strongly stimul
19 nt phosphorylation of RNAP II CTD stimulates cotranscriptional capping of HIV-1 mRNA.
20 ation factor Spt5 are thought to orchestrate cotranscriptional capping of nascent mRNAs.
21 ind the phosphorylated pol II CTD permitting cotranscriptional capping of nascent pre-mRNAs.
22  and functions as an important checkpoint in cotranscriptional capping of RNA polymerase II (Pol II)
23 f the Pol II largest subunit (CTD), allowing cotranscriptional capping of the nascent pre-mRNA.
24                        The process uncouples cotranscriptional chromatin remodeling by dTip60 complex
25 bp4 compromised SSU processome formation and cotranscriptional cleavage of the pre-rRNA.
26  cleavage at the poly(A) site or at a second cotranscriptional cleavage site (CoTC).
27                 Following depletion of Rrp5, cotranscriptional cleavage was lost and preribosome comp
28  been demonstrated or suggested to involve a cotranscriptional component.
29 ntitatively modulate gene expression through cotranscriptional coupling mechanisms.
30                                    Regulated cotranscriptional decapping near promoter-proximal pause
31                                              Cotranscriptional degradation of nascent RNA has not bee
32 nucleases, Rat1 and Xrn1, both contribute to cotranscriptional degradation of nascent RNA, but this d
33 cues within nascent transcripts, specify the cotranscriptional engagement of the relevant RNA process
34                            mRNA capping is a cotranscriptional event mediated by the association of c
35 n yeast, histone H2B monoubiquitination is a cotranscriptional event regulating histone H3 methylatio
36                              The function of cotranscriptional events in the selection of alternative
37  of different poly(A) sites, suggesting that cotranscriptional events may influence the decision betw
38 eptapeptides and connects transcription with cotranscriptional events.
39 ting alternative RNA folds, are sensitive to cotranscriptional events.
40                 The prp8 mutation perturbs a cotranscriptional feedback mechanism linking COOLAIR pro
41  consistent with the experimental data and a cotranscriptional folding and assembly hypothesis were g
42 oped an optical-trapping assay to follow the cotranscriptional folding of a nascent RNA and used it t
43 econd crucial ingredient of the model is the cotranscriptional folding of the RNA transcript, sterica
44 well with RNA folding energies obtained from cotranscriptional folding simulations.
45 hat lattices can be made by annealing and/or cotranscriptional folding.
46  enable the precise mapping of events during cotranscriptional folding.
47 nce of CGI promoters that is revealed by the cotranscriptional formation of R loop structures.
48 ite of phosphorylation important for EBNA2's cotranscriptional function in mitosis.
49  identify ERI-1 as an important regulator of cotranscriptional gene silencing and post-transcriptiona
50 ns in deacetylating histones and suppressing cotranscriptional histone eviction.
51 de changes in Ser5-P CTD phosphorylation and cotranscriptional histone H3 lysine 36 trimethylation (H
52                                              Cotranscriptional histone methylations by Set1 and Set2
53 of the Paf1 complex, which regulates several cotranscriptional histone modifications, and Chd1, a chr
54 s, ranging from RNA Polymerase II pausing to cotranscriptional histone modifications.
55 ral mechanisms, including the stimulation of cotranscriptional histone modifications.
56 d, but are generally accepted to be post- or cotranscriptional in character.
57 ng frame, gives rise to the C protein, while cotranscriptional insertion of an extra base gives rise
58 imize transcription elongation, coordinating cotranscriptional interactions of many factors/snoRNAs w
59  RNA folding, such as molecular crowding and cotranscriptional kinetic effects, may ultimately lead t
60                                              Cotranscriptional loading of RNA processing factors onto
61 t did not impair RNA Pol II transcription or cotranscriptional m(7)G capping.
62 g from an insufficiency in components of the cotranscriptional machinery.
63  UAP56 and NXF1, essential components of the cotranscriptional machinery.
64 gest that Naf1p and Cbf5p are recruited in a cotranscriptional manner during H/ACA snoRNP assembly, p
65        In this issue, Munoz et al. uncover a cotranscriptional mechanism for activating alternative p
66  together, our results are consistent with a cotranscriptional mechanism for generating the cap 4 str
67 ense splicing increases FLC expression via a cotranscriptional mechanism involving capping of the FLC
68  binding of Spt6 to Ser2-P RNAPII provides a cotranscriptional mechanism to recruit Iws1, REF1/Aly, a
69                                              Cotranscriptional methylation of histone H3 lysines 4 an
70                                          The cotranscriptional mRNA processing and packaging reaction
71 ssociates with genes to facilitate efficient cotranscriptional mRNA processing.
72 rase II initiation and elongation as well as cotranscriptional mRNA processing.
73               Additional experiments suggest cotranscriptional PCPA counteracted by U1 association wi
74                                          The cotranscriptional placement of the 7-methylguanosine cap
75 el mouse models to further examine roles for cotranscriptional/post-transcriptional gene regulation d
76  a critical role for H2B deubiquitination in cotranscriptional pre-mRNA processing events.
77 criptional elongation is required for normal cotranscriptional pre-mRNA splicing.
78 ferentially inhibits super-enhancer-directed cotranscriptional pri-miRNA processing.
79 ted an evolutionarily conserved function for cotranscriptional processes in the maintenance of genome
80 ring the coordination of DNA replication and cotranscriptional processes.
81                              Taken together, cotranscriptional processing and stability of a set of s
82                                  The role of cotranscriptional processing by RNA interference and by
83            Finally, we present evidence that cotranscriptional processing events determine the recrui
84 tes chromatin modifications and suggest that cotranscriptional processing events play a primary role
85  a model in which hypoxia-induced changes to cotranscriptional processing lead to selective retention
86 ude that CDK11 plays a critical role for the cotranscriptional processing of all HIV mRNA species.
87       Thus, CDK12 plays an important role in cotranscriptional processing of c-FOS transcripts.
88 ription complex for efficient elongation and cotranscriptional processing of mRNA.
89  stimulates RNA polymerase II elongation and cotranscriptional processing of pre-mRNA.
90 on of serine 7 was shown to be important for cotranscriptional processing of two snRNAs in mammalian
91 iated transcription-replication conflicts by cotranscriptional protein engagement of nascent RNA is e
92 an TH1- or TH2-skewing cell culture systems, cotranscriptional R-loops (RNA/DNA duplex and displaced
93                 In this study, we found that cotranscriptional R-loops formed at a CAG-70 repeat inse
94 clin T components of P-TEFb are required for cotranscriptional recognition of the 3' box RNA 3' end p
95 S) and Set3C deacetylation activities, their cotranscriptional recruitment is stimulated by the phosp
96 otein (TBP) block mRNA export, implying that cotranscriptional recruitment of Npl3 is required for ef
97                                              Cotranscriptional recruitment of pre-mRNA splicing facto
98       These findings support a model whereby cotranscriptional recruitment of Rnf20 at MLL-fusion tar
99                             However, how the cotranscriptional recruitment of splicing factors is reg
100  that Npl3 promotes splicing by facilitating cotranscriptional recruitment of splicing factors.
101 provide evidence that the mechanism involves cotranscriptional recruitment of SR proteins to RNAP II
102 longation complex, which functions in direct cotranscriptional recruitment of the mRNA export protein
103                             In contrast, the cotranscriptional recruitment of the RNA-binding protein
104  this as a fail-safe mechanism to ensure the cotranscriptional recruitment of TRAMP before or during
105 riptional snRNP recruitment and suggest that cotranscriptional recruitment of U2 or the tri-snRNP is
106 ospho-CTD is likely involved directly in the cotranscriptional recruitment of Yra1.
107 dies of active genes, arguing against simple cotranscriptional recruitment to RNA substrates.
108 imulating the degradation process upon their cotranscriptional recruitment.
109  domains of life and plays many key roles in cotranscriptional regulation and in recruiting other fac
110 This review discusses the multiple layers of cotranscriptional regulation of alternative splicing in
111 ignal is required for efficient termination, cotranscriptional RNA cleavage at the poly(A) site is no
112 urthermore, the phenomena of termination and cotranscriptional RNA cleavage can be uncoupled, and the
113 g establish the roles of the poly(A) signal, cotranscriptional RNA cleavage events, and 5'-3' exonucl
114 resulting in termination and, in some cases, cotranscriptional RNA cleavage.
115           However, the experimental study of cotranscriptional RNA folding has been limited by the la
116                                              Cotranscriptional RNA processing and surveillance factor
117 ng chromatin recruitment and activation of a cotranscriptional RNA processing enzyme, Xrn2.
118  majority of genes seemed normal in terms of cotranscriptional RNA processing events, although there
119 ation, Pol II escape, productive elongation, cotranscriptional RNA processing, and termination.
120  role in the regulation of transcription and cotranscriptional RNA processing.
121 ggest a role for CBX3 in aiding in efficient cotranscriptional RNA processing.
122 onents, suggesting its function in efficient cotranscriptional RNA processing.
123 ted DNA-RNA hybrid; and (iii) changes in the cotranscriptional RNA secondary structure upstream of th
124 r DNA structures, 'G-loops', which contain a cotranscriptional RNA: DNA hybrid on the C-rich strand a
125  activity, thus suggesting a transcriptional/cotranscriptional role for IFN-gamma/IFNGR1 as well as a
126 ing that Bur1 is not a significant source of cotranscriptional Rpb1 phosphorylation.
127     To address this, we previously developed cotranscriptional selective 2-hydroxyl acylation analyze
128           Herein, we use full-length RNA and cotranscriptional self-cleavage assays to compare reacti
129  Here, we improve the broad applicability of cotranscriptional SHAPE-Seq by developing a sequence-ind
130 ributed biotin-SAv roadblocks can be used in cotranscriptional SHAPE-Seq experiments to identify the
131 strengths of each transcription roadblock in cotranscriptional SHAPE-Seq.
132  to nascent messenger RNA transcripts causes cotranscriptional silencing of the source locus and the
133 at splicing efficiency has a major impact on cotranscriptional snRNP recruitment and suggest that cot
134    Although splicing catalysis is frequently cotranscriptional, some introns are excised after polyad
135 wever, the influence of chromatin factors on cotranscriptional splice site usage remains unclear.
136 ociated with prespliceosome formation during cotranscriptional spliceosome assembly.
137                      These studies show that cotranscriptional spliceosome rearrangements are driven
138 des DIRAS3, provides an example of imprinted cotranscriptional splicing and a potential model system
139  RNA polymerase II elongation increases both cotranscriptional splicing and splicing efficiency and t
140 fficiency and that faster elongation reduces cotranscriptional splicing and splicing efficiency in bu
141               These results suggest that the cotranscriptional splicing apparatus influences establis
142                        However, evidence for cotranscriptional splicing as well as for coupling betwe
143                Importantly, introns with low cotranscriptional splicing efficiencies are present in t
144               To determine the prevalence of cotranscriptional splicing in Drosophila, we sequenced n
145             The analysis also indicates that cotranscriptional splicing is less efficient for first i
146 munoprecipitation (ChIP) assay, we show that cotranscriptional splicing occurs approximately 1 kb aft
147 itination by USP49 is required for efficient cotranscriptional splicing of a large set of exons.
148 e data suggest that H2A.Z occupancy promotes cotranscriptional splicing of suboptimal introns that ma
149 rains Deltadst1 and Deltapaf1 show different cotranscriptional splicing phenotypes, suggesting that d
150                         The kinetic model of cotranscriptional splicing suggests that slow elongation
151 n contrast, U2 snRNP recruitment, as well as cotranscriptional splicing, is deficient on short second
152         Consistent with the kinetic model of cotranscriptional splicing, the rapid RNAPII elongation
153  efficient splicing signals are critical for cotranscriptional splicing.
154 percent of the introns assayed manifest >50% cotranscriptional splicing.
155 g is imposed by a checkpoint associated with cotranscriptional splicing.
156 epletion of individual components shows that cotranscriptional SSU processome formation is a sensitiv
157 st cellular genes but has a modest effect on cotranscriptional termination.
158                       Because RNA editing is cotranscriptional, the mtRNAP is implicated in RNA editi
159      Such a placement would enable efficient cotranscriptional translation and facile transertion of
160 ts of DNA replication, RNA transcription and cotranscriptional translation of membrane proteins cause
161 spatial separation of DNA and ribosomes with cotranscriptional translation.
162 recruitment from transcription, suggest that cotranscriptional U1 recruitment contributes to optimal
163                                              Cotranscriptional ubiquitination of histone H2B is key t

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top