ライフサイエンスコーパス: counselor

1 erage risk) discussed results with a genetic counselor.

2 cer are tested without ever seeing a genetic counselor.

3 il behavioral counseling and feedback from a counselor.

4 rief consultation with a nicotine dependence counselor.

5 entages or prescriptive phrases by the donor counselor.

6 an oncologist, while 20% preferred a genetic counselor.

7 Society, and US National Society of Genetic Counselors.

8 for classical HL by oncologists and genetic counselors.

9 0-minute booster conducted by master's-level counselors.

10 ssion delivered by substance abuse treatment counselors.

11 ommunity, molecular geneticists, and genetic counselors.

12 in comparison with pedigrees made by genetic counselors.

13 d parties who function as impartial decision counselors.

14 Results will be returned by genetic counselors 12 to 14 months after enrollment.

15 t (41%), Ph.D. geneticist (30%), and genetic counselor (18%); 72% of the total stated that they see p

16 Physician (14%) and genetic counselor (21%) involvement in parent decisions to discl

17 We implemented a unique hybrid asthma counselor and environmental intervention based on succes

18 CHD risk was disclosed by a genetic counselor and then discussed with a physician.

19 BRCA2 mutation carriers that can be used by counselors and clinicians who are interested in advising

20 peer-to-peer educational interviews between counselors and prescribers from all departments to reinf

21 eme was validated by a group of professional counselors and wisdom researchers.

22 e a mutation with a physician and/or genetic counselor, and 43 (36.8%) of 117 were thinking of testin

23 assessment, women rated the workbook, their counselor, and the program.

24 hers, genome researchers, ethicists, genetic counselors, and business partners.

25 The combined efforts of oncologists, genetic counselors, and cancer geneticists will be required to d

26 53% of Ph.D. geneticists, and 31% of genetic counselors; answers were statistically independent of po

27 ging genetic tests and technologies, genetic counselors are faced with the challenge of translating c

28 k as very easy to understand (94%) and their counselor as very knowledgeable (96%) and very skillful

29 Certified genetic counselors assist the endocrinology team by eliciting a

30 t improvements would increase over time in a counselor-assisted problem-solving (CAPS) intervention.

31 The calls were conducted by trained peer counselors at a breast cancer advocacy organization, the

32 control group (n =119; P = .004), as was the counselors' awareness of psychosocial problems regarding

33 osocial problems were discussed, the genetic counselors' awareness of these problems, and their manag

34 hose families had contact with a HEAL asthma counselor by 6 months showed a 4.09-day decrease [95% co

35 Three peer counselors conducted a 3-session intervention using a de

36 f symptoms according to the timing of asthma counselor contact, and a comparison to previous evidence

37 Participants were receptive to counselor contact: the median number of sessions was 8.5

38 counselor received MSI/IHC results, but the counselor contacted the patient to facilitate referral (

39 of motivational counseling given by trained counselors during a patient's hospitalization (n = 172)

40 nselor received the MSI/IHC results, and the counselor e-mailed the colorectal surgeon regarding appr

41 al to care, and one month then quarterly lay counselor follow-up visits.

42 Risk was disclosed by a genetic counselor followed by shared decision making regarding s

43 Telephone counselors found that 23% of HIV-positive users already

44 ater in the computer group compared with the counselor group (P =.03) among women at low risk of carr

45 The counselor group had lower mean scores on a decisional co

46 Counselor group measures were administered at baseline a

47 , 21.5% to 32.5%), with a higher rate in the counselor-guided group (37.9%) than in the self-guided g

48 highlight the role of the certified genetic counselor in this setting.

49 phone interviews with physicians and genetic counselors in a nationwide sample of 177 patients from 1

50 Australasia, Professional Society of Genetic Counselors in Asia, and Southern African Society for Hum

51 al predictive value, which may guide genetic counselors in recommending BRCA testing of additional re

52 Counselors initiated more discussion of psychosocial pro

53 ood asthma in NOLA and assess a novel asthma counselor intervention that provided case management and

54 the early 1970s, the ethical norm governing counselors involved in testing and screening for genetic

55 Genetic counselors may be extremely helpful to the practicing ga

56 We discuss views of genetic counselors, medical geneticists, and counselees on speci

57 a (GSA), and the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) have partnered to organize an essay co

58 embership of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) Special Interest Group (SIG) in Cancer

59 ses, physicians who were assisted by genetic counselors, nurse geneticists, or others (v counseling b

60 IV-infected adults met clinic staff and peer counselors on-site; those with CD4 </= 100/microL underw

61 sion, and only 5% of women reported seeing a counselor or participating in a cancer support group.

62 ) among those who had not yet seen an asthma counselor (p < 0.001).

63 is information should be provided to genetic counselors, parents of children with clefts, and health

64 Lay counselors participated in supervision and assessed whet

65 this issue examines the role of the genetic counselor, particularly in counseling individuals at ris

66 er risk assessments based on computer versus counselors' pedigrees.

67 Counselors previously naive to prolonged exposure therap

68 After July 2008, the colorectal surgeon and counselor received MSI/IHC results, but the counselor co

69 June 2008, colorectal surgeons and a genetic counselor received the MSI/IHC results, and the counselo

70 In the intervention group, the counselors received the results of this questionnaire be

71 roblems by questionnaire facilitates genetic counselors' recognition and discussion of their clients'

72 Risk prediction provided by the counselor requires reliable estimates of the mutation pe

73 Consequently, genetic counselors should exercise great caution in the interpre

74 effective and appropriate if clinicians and counselors take into consideration the beliefs and value

75 ignificantly more likely to prefer a genetic counselor to an oncologist (P = .02).

76 enetics, we conclude that efforts of genetic counselors to adhere to the principle of justice or equi

77 (3) They can be used by genetic counselors to incorporate information from GWA studies f

78 frequency of carrier cells can cause genetic counselors to misdiagnose a mosaic as an inherited heter

79 may be for oncologists to work with genetic counselors to provide pretest education and medical reco

80 to patients, including ways for patients and counselors to stay in contact.

81 tion with other community based eye donation counselors, to promote awareness regarding eye donation

82 icant differences in study populations, peer counselor training methods, peer visit schedule, and out

83 pared for 120 pairs of pedigrees produced by counselors versus computer tool.

84 Peer counselors visited intervention mothers once antenatally

85 ling delivered by practice nurses or trained counselors was also effective.

86 CETA provided by lay counselors was highly effective across disorders among t

87 In addition, counselors were available for further counseling at any

88 viders (including nurse managers, nurses and counselors) were purposively selected from the clinics.

89 pretest education be delivered by a genetic counselor, while 22% preferred an oncologist.

90 supportive counseling even when delivered by counselors who typically provide supportive counseling.

91 Fifty-seven percent of counselors would seek professional psychologic support t