戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                We found 1399 articles; after critical appraisal, 54 studies were included.
2                  Self-reported confidence in critical appraisal also increased (2.5+/-0.5 vs. 3.9+/-0
3                                  Independent critical appraisal and data abstraction by 2 reviewers.
4 he reporting quality using the Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Re
5                                              Critical appraisal and data extraction were independentl
6                                              Critical appraisal and data extraction were performed by
7                      This article provides a critical appraisal and review of the literature on ident
8  the guidelines, we did a literature search, critical appraisal, and evidence grading according to th
9  study reports, impeding the identification, critical appraisal, and replication of studies.
10 n of future randomized trials and thoughtful critical appraisal by health care providers.
11             This research fosters debate and critical appraisal, contributes to veterinary ethics, an
12                                        After critical appraisal, data were analyzed using a random-ef
13                                              Critical appraisal exercises used in the training of cri
14               Several literature reviews and critical appraisals have been published to summarize the
15               In particular, the teaching of critical appraisal in the setting of journal clubs does
16                                 Standardized critical appraisal of 164 articles was conducted by 2 in
17   Data Extraction and Synthesis: Independent critical appraisal of all provisionally included studies
18 the clinician should be made on the basis of critical appraisal of available large clinical datasets.
19    Lung donor shortages have resulted in the critical appraisal of cadaveric donor acceptability crit
20 dence of infection and disease, and allows a critical appraisal of different culling policies for era
21 he most recently published data and offers a critical appraisal of findings.
22 lly associated with distance from the truth; critical appraisal of individual articles is recommended
23                                   However, a critical appraisal of literature shows that this conject
24 of the patient perspective, medical history, critical appraisal of medications, a meeting between the
25                          We aim to provide a critical appraisal of newer markers and the current stat
26 yed and their key criteria are considered by critical appraisal of one, char.
27                                              Critical appraisal of performance criteria is needed to
28 owing seven criteria provide a basis for the critical appraisal of probability models.
29                               The paper is a critical appraisal of recent advances in the treatment o
30                            Here we provide a critical appraisal of recent strategies allowing an incr
31                    To perform a contemporary critical appraisal of robotic-assisted radical prostatec
32 ative summary of study characteristics and a critical appraisal of study quality.
33 sited within the evidence-based framework of critical appraisal of the accumulation of clinical studi
34                       This review provides a critical appraisal of the empirical research on racial a
35 as increasingly stressed the need to combine critical appraisal of the evidence with patient's values
36  surgical skills curriculum and to provide a critical appraisal of the included tools, using contempo
37 dition to treatment recommendations based on critical appraisal of the literature and clinical experi
38  topics on their agendas, become facile with critical appraisal of the literature, and schedule time
39                                            A critical appraisal of the preclinical and clinical evide
40  In contrast, independent experts had a more critical appraisal of the provided care in regards to ti
41 ical or research setting, and a balanced and critical appraisal of the strengths and weaknesses of th
42                 The article concludes with a critical appraisal of these activities and a considerati
43 t, favorability assessments, and presence of critical appraisals of evidence quality were analyzed.
44 ces of information on the World Wide Web and critical appraisals of the promises and the challenges o
45                        This paper provides a critical appraisal on whether bone failure may represent
46  on Level D (Expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal, or based on physiology, bench resear
47                      After applying standard critical appraisal policy and endorsement procedures, AS
48                                              Critical appraisal revealed a median of 75% of desired c
49                                              Critical appraisal showed a low-moderate level of overal
50 mings were identified by the adoption of the Critical Appraisal Skills Program quality assessment, ma
51        Quality appraisal was conducted using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) and NVivo fac
52   Critical appraisal was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tools.
53 essed their quality as good according to the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP).
54 onal Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies, the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme for the qualitative
55 studies using a combined appraisal tool (The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Research
56 studies was independently assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool for health econ
57 ies and qualified the risk of bias using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool.
58       Article quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool.
59                                              Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tools were used to a
60 ogical rigor was assessed using the relevant Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tools.
61 essions covering study design, analysis, and critical appraisal techniques.
62 h clinical trials are subjected routinely to critical appraisal, there has been no attempt to apprais
63                                    The Crowe Critical Appraisal tool was used to evaluate the quality
64 g the Johns Hopkins Strength of the Evidence critical appraisal tool.
65                                              Critical appraisal using predefined criteria was conduct
66                             Study selection, critical appraisal using the QUADAS II instrument and ex
67                                              Critical appraisal was performed using the Critical Appr
68 ses, using two independent reviewers, formal critical appraisal with QUADAS and meta-analysis with ra

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。