ライフサイエンスコーパス: critical care

1 ps exist in academic leadership positions in critical care.

2 lth problems and provide great challenges in critical care.

3 lemedicine, one better defined today as tele-critical care.

4 tay (LOS), re-operation, and re-admission to critical care.

5 les regarding advanced practice providers in critical care.

6 d signs and focuses on their applications in critical care.

7 o inform precision therapeutic approaches in critical care.

8 itutes best practice for informed consent in critical care.

9 performance and patient-centered outcomes in critical care.

10 are; this practice is slow to translate into critical care.

11 , impartiality, neutrality-can be applied to critical care.

12 e strategies to improve donor management and critical care.

13 in experimental stress models as well as in critical care.

14 ous catheter-associated infections requiring critical care.

15 ure need for healthcare resources, including critical care.

16 nhance the quality of neonatal and pediatric critical care.

17 costs, and to estimate the cost-utility, of critical care.

18 ity and morbidity for maternal admissions to critical care.

19 venteen experts had subspecialty training in critical care.

20 24 hours (52.8%) and increased admission to critical care (11.1%).

21 (3.6% vs 4.0%, P = 0.74), or re-admission to critical care (2.8% vs 2.9%, P = 0.92).

22 explain the underrepresentation of women in critical care academic leadership positions and identify

23 tudy shows major concerns in the delivery of critical care across Latin America, particularly in huma

24 of hospitalization in the year prior to the critical care admission was 28 hospitalized days/1,000 d

25 d for the next trauma patient who warrants a critical care admission.

26 The VTE risk appears highest in those with critical care admission.

27 Modern critical care amasses unprecedented amounts of clinical

28 n humanitarian action is mentioned, yet both critical care and humanitarian action share a fundamenta

29 milies or described a model of engagement in critical care and other vulnerable populations.

30 tance of collaboration between the fields of critical care and rehabilitation to optimize post-COVID-

31 ealthcare resource use was substantial after critical care and remained higher compared with matched

32 oviding rationale for time-limited trials of critical care and suggesting that the timing of decision

33 erstand how family rounds are implemented in critical care and to appraise the evidence on outcomes f

34 clinicians allocate finite resources such as critical care and to support patient involvement in clin

35 mplete segregation of the operating theater, critical care, and inpatient ward areas) or no defined p

36 ed 30-day mortality and morbidity, length of critical care, and overall hospital stay.

37 se of author gender to analyze authorship of critical care articles indexed in PubMed between 2008 an

38 Despite critical care being a significant healthcare cost burden

39 mitigate the impact of emergency department critical care boarding on patient outcomes.

40 nner and applying humanitarian principles to critical care can improve the quality of patient care an

41 the success of social distancing is whether critical care capacities are exceeded.

42 Additional interventions, including expanded critical care capacity and an effective therapeutic, wou

43 Our estimates underscore the inadequacy of critical care capacity to handle the burgeoning outbreak

44 uded pediatric and adult emergency medicine, critical care, cardiac critical care, cardiology, neurol

45 Critical care cardiologists may be uniquely positioned t

46 Methods and Results The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is a multicenter

47 The CCCTN (Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network) is a multicente

48 t emergency medicine, critical care, cardiac critical care, cardiology, neurology, and nursing specia

49 The Critical Care Choosing Wisely Task Force recommends that

50 se to transform the methods of pulmonary and critical care clinical research.

51 le instrument to assess moral distress among critical care clinicians and develop tailored interventi

52 ed the importance of raising awareness among critical care clinicians and key stakeholders, advocatin

53 easures and strategies to address burnout in critical care clinicians are needed.

54 Critical care clinicians reported that a number of initi

55 ical questions and achieved unanimity on how critical care clinicians should manage conscientious obj

56 The purpose of this study was to assess how critical care clinicians were implementing the Critical

57 to clinical practice from a small sample of critical care clinicians.

58 Fifty years ago, distinguished critical care colleagues identified a syndrome of severe

59 ntation Liver and Intestine and Thoracic and Critical Care Communities of Practice, provides a critic

60 monary disease are foundational goals of the critical care community and the National Heart, Lung, an

61 an Society of Transplantation's Thoracic and Critical Care Community of Practice) are presented here.

62 This finding suggests that, despite recent critical care consensus guidelines recommending institut

63 The Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium (PC4) was formed to improve the

64 <=18 years of age meeting Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium criteria for ADHF were included

65 We analyzed the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium registry to determine the epide

66 al care rapid response teams are examples of critical care constructs that can provide high-quality c

67 No consensus exists on a standardized critical care content outline for medical student educat

68 p a national undergraduate medical education critical care content outline.

69 nds, the expert panel reached consensus on a critical care content outline.

70 al consensus undergraduate medical education critical care content outline.

71 onal, multistakeholder-recommended pediatric critical care core outcome set for inclusion in clinical

72 f a national undergraduate medical education critical care curriculum.

73 were potentially preventable (postoperative critical care delivery variables and complications).

74 ions on how to implement scalable models for critical care delivery, cultivate educational tools for

75 an and organizational factors affecting tele-critical care delivery.

76 y intensivists are an essential component of critical care delivery.

77 sychologic, and cognitive problems following critical care discharge.

78 used for diagnostic and management of common critical care diseases like sepsis, acute kidney injury,

79 s involved in airway management among junior critical care doctors.

80 follows: 1) undergraduate medical education critical care educators, 2) residency program directors

81 There were no differences in critical care end points between groups.

82 Additionally, changes in standardized critical care end points were compared between donors in

83 aft survival for all organs along with donor critical care end points.

84 te inflammatory response attributable to the critical care environment.

85 Trauma resuscitations are complex critical care events that present patient safety-related

86 care is an established mechanism to leverage critical care expertise to ICUs and beyond, but systemat

87 uage medical interpretation during pediatric critical care family meetings.

88 Pulmonary critical care fellows performed and documented their goa

89 Pulmonary/critical care fellows.

90 ion of women and racial/ethnic groups across critical care fellowship types.

91 ritically ill infants following surgical and critical care for long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) - i

92 ts of the GenOMICC (Genetics Of Mortality In Critical Care) genome-wide association study in 2,244 cr

93 to significantly influence the pace of tele-critical care growth and adoption.

94 Among a large, diverse assembly of critical care guideline recommendations using Grading of

95 We examined recommendations within critical care guidelines to describe the pairing pattern

96 ions addressed by IOM-compliant pulmonary or critical care guidelines were addressed by expert panels

97 Critical care had higher rates of both de-escalation and

98 relatively few cost-effectiveness studies in critical care have been published (average 4.6 studies p

99 Rationale: Advances in neonatal critical care have greatly improved the survival of pret

100 time, significant changes in healthcare and critical care have occurred.

101 om the National Institute of Health Research Critical Care Health Informatics Collaborative was studi

102 Rationale: Whether critical care improvements over the last 10 years extend

103 Applying principles of critical care in a context-specific manner and applying

104 are constructs that can provide high-quality critical care in all environments.

105 mme is the national clinical audit for adult critical care in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland.

106 Estimated cost-utility of critical care in Finland was of high value.

107 ision-making and communication challenges in critical care, including discordance about prognosis, mi

108 Currently, many critical care indices are not captured automatically at

109 ers, adult outpatient clinics, and adult non-critical care inpatient wards accounted for 26.4% (95% C

110 rgeons, hepatologists, anesthesiologists and critical care intensivists, radiologists, pathologists,

111 Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome for critical care intervention (0.69) and mortality (0.66) w

112 d, and their relationships to the receipt of critical care intervention and inhospital mortality were

113 tial Organ Failure Assessment for predicting critical care intervention was 38%.

114 .5%) patients admitted to the ICU received a critical care intervention.

115 ndomized controlled trials of anesthesia and critical care interventions and to determine the frequen

116 Failure Assessment scores frequently receive critical care interventions.

117 Tele-critical care is an established mechanism to leverage cr

118 cal care principles conveys the message that critical care is an integral part of health care and sho

119 Estimating the cost-utility of critical care is necessary to ensure reasonable use of r

120 Critical care is not limited to the walls of a hospital,

121 A pragmatic, codesigned model for critical care is offered as a suggested approach for cli

122 en well distinguished from the conditions of critical care itself.

123 xpert panel identified 19 highly recommended critical care knowledge topics and procedural skills.

124 evaluate gender differences in authorship of critical care literature.Methods: We used a validated da

125 espiratory failure refractory to traditional critical care management and optimal mechanical ventilat

126 Critical care management plays an important role in pati

127 a plethora of challenges including acute and critical care management, long-term care and rehabilitat

128 ns who are board certified in cardiology and critical care medicine ("dual-boarded cardiologists").

129 Portuguese, and incorporated into Society of Critical Care Medicine and American Heart Association/Pe

130 sociated consequences) of gender inequity in critical care medicine and determine strategies to attra

131 vers and implications, and are applicable to critical care medicine and more broadly throughout medic

132 Participants identified a gender gap in critical care medicine and provided important insight in

133 Accordingly, the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the American College of Emerg

134 group of experts assigned by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Inten

135 as appointed and assembled by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the Extracorporeal Life Suppo

136 e ICU has been recommended by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the Leapfrog Consortium.

137 Participants unanimously described critical care medicine as a specialty practiced predomin

138 Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Infection and Res

139 ss the overall level of burnout in pediatric critical care medicine fellows and examine factors that

140 Pediatric critical care medicine fellows and program directors.

141 Pediatric critical care medicine fellows in the United States are

142 l venous catheter placement across pediatric critical care medicine fellowship programs.

143 In developing the Society of Critical Care Medicine guidelines for family-centered ca

144 Critical care medicine is a medical specialty where wome

145 Critical care medicine is far from the first medical fie

146 t from editors at 31 respiratory, sleep, and critical care medicine journals to consolidate contempor

147 alence of and risk factors for burnout among critical care medicine physician assistants.

148 Severe burnout is common in critical care medicine physician assistants.

149 Pediatric critical care medicine program directors of Accreditatio

150 duate Medical Education-accredited pediatric critical care medicine programs between July 2017 and Se

151 Most pediatric critical care medicine programs use a global assessment

152 The American College of Critical Care Medicine provided 2002 and 2007 guidelines

153 14, the Tele-ICU Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine published an article regarding th

154 The Society of Critical Care Medicine standard operating procedures man

155 a staff physician in 12 of 60 ICUs (20%), a Critical Care Medicine trainee in 14 of 60 (23%), and a

156 ear residents (R2-R5) in 46 of 60 (77%), and Critical Care Medicine trainees in 19 of 60 (32%).

157 esidents and 14 of 19 units (74%) covered by Critical Care Medicine trainees.

158 are consistent with other procedures across critical care medicine training programs, adult and pedi

159 ormation from surveys done by the Society of Critical Care Medicine was included given the relevance

160 each extensively involved in the Society of Critical Care Medicine's ICU Liberation Campaign, review

161 n, Focused Professional Practice Evaluation, critical care medicine, healthcare quality, and The Join

162 erventional radiologists, and specialists in critical care medicine, infectious disease, and nutritio

163 ss with a diverse working group representing critical care medicine, palliative care, pediatric medic

164 erican Academy of Pediatrics, the Society of Critical Care Medicine, the American Medical Association

165 enging clinical scenarios in in-hospital and critical care medicine.

166 sional Practice Evaluation implementation in critical care medicine.

167 os Angeles, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine.

168 rofessional Practice Evaluation processes in critical care medicine.

169 as of improvement within our own Division of Critical Care Medicine.

170 Acute care, critical care, mental health acute care, and longterm ca

171 umonia with sepsis (CAP + S) not admitted to critical care.Methods: We conducted a randomized, double

172 essure lowering, neurosurgery, and access to critical care might all be beneficial in acute intracere

173 targeted forecasting of hospitalization and critical care needs.

174 vere disease (eg, hypoxic encephalopathy and critical care neuropathy) from those caused directly or

175 erest in patient and family participation in critical care-not just as part of the bedside, but as pa

176 CAM-ICU was administered by two well-trained critical care nurses and compared with reference standar

177 The sensitivities (95% CI) for the two critical care nurses when using the Arabic CAM-ICU compa

178 Critical care nurses, are the primary care providers to

179 onal aspects that were not restricted by the critical care organization definition or regulatory mand

180 The critical care organization survey recorded substantial v

181 e providers of established U.S. and Canadian critical care organizations and provides a research agen

182 Approximately 80% of critical care organizations had dedicated advanced pract

183 the effects of the integrative structure of critical care organizations on outcomes at the levels of

184 More than half of critical care organizations reported having burnout prev

185 The research agenda for the study of critical care organizations should include studies that

186 ewsletter) to query members of U.S. national critical care organizations.

187 for ICU leaders is crucial to the success of critical care organizations.

188 bjectives: To examine the temporal trends of critical care outcomes in minority and non-minority-serv

189 ed core outcome set is lacking for pediatric critical care outcomes.

190 ophysiologies responsible for poor pediatric critical care outcomes.

191 ) purposively sampled from four specialties (critical care, palliative care, oncology, and surgery).

192 ically ill, (2) the outcomes associated with critical care patient boarding, and (3) local strategies

193 lizing the potential for big data to improve critical care patient outcomes will require unprecedente

194 emonstrated its potential for characterizing critical care patients and environmental factors.

195 injury, myocardial injury, and mortality in critical care patients remain unknown.

196 phen thus produces modest fever reduction in critical care patients, along with clinically important

197 enting a freshest available RBC strategy for critical care patients, there is no evidence to suggest

198 mortality, and renal injury in postoperative critical care patients.

199 mulative fluid balance on mortality in adult critical care patients.

200 ion efforts are particularly important among critical-care patients who are older, have altered mobil

201 reduce multidrug-resistant organisms in non-critical-care patients.

202 In this Critical Care Perspective, we discuss the historical con

203 A position paper outlining critical care pharmacist activities was last published i

204 this taskforce delineate the activities of a critical care pharmacist and the scope of pharmacy servi

205 omain of patient care, primarily relating to critical care pharmacist duties and pharmacy services.

206 made for patient care, primarily relating to critical care pharmacist duties and pharmacy services.

207 , 21 recommendations address the role of the critical care pharmacist in patient and medication safet

208 Critical care pharmacists are essential members of the m

209 ate the statement from a paper in 2000 about critical care pharmacy practice and makes recommendation

210 of central venous catheters and access to a critical care physician during sepsis treatment are impo

211 outpatient ICU recovery clinic visit with a critical care physician, nurse practitioner, pharmacist,

212 Critical care physicians continue to be challenged to re

213 anical ventilation, drawing the attention of critical care physicians to the potential injurious effe

214 k prediction models specific to the maternal critical care population.

215 hods, results, and relevant implications for critical care practice and training.

216 iritual fulfilment are central challenges of critical care practice in the USA.

217 drug-interference could confound its use in critical care practice.

218 sign, methods, results, and implications for critical care practice.

219 hods, results, and relevant implications for critical care practice.

220 Promoting critical care principles conveys the message that critic

221 Regular and consistent consideration of critical care principles in humanitarian settings provid

222 hat they obtained valid informed consent for critical care procedures with the use of bundled consent

223 Moral distress is a common experience among critical care professionals, leading to frustration, wit

224 safely administered in a setting with basic critical care, provided that there is a continuous patie

225 hreatening occurrence that is encountered by critical care providers.

226 ically significant results in anesthesia and critical care randomized controlled trials are often fra

227 ion among team members, and context-specific critical care rapid response teams are examples of criti

228 ality of evidence regarding their effects on critical care remains weak and the risk of bias high.

229 option of rapid genomic testing in pediatric critical care requires robust clinical and laboratory pa

230 and <19 years old in Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network intensive care units with

231 nd future directions for adult pulmonary and critical care research, the NHLBI assembled a multidisci

232 authors and one-fourth of senior authors of critical care research, with minimal increase over the p

233 f its entries hold promise for observational critical care research.

234 egarding gender differences in authorship of critical care research.Objectives: To evaluate gender di

235 on staffing schedules for each unit from the Critical Care Resources Registry 2016-2017 annual survey

236 ase preventable harm by providing additional critical care resources to patients with clinical deteri

237 Because of overcrowding and limited critical care resources, critically ill patients in the

238 (clonidine and dexmedetomidine) in pediatric critical care sedation.

239 Compared to a critical care setting, GI complications are not commonly

240 ion-making for unrepresented patients in the critical care setting.

241 ician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the critical care setting.

242 more accurate assessment of patients in the critical care setting.

243 g on behalf of unrepresented patients in the critical care setting.Methods: An interprofessional, mul

244 lications are not commonly observed in a non-critical care setting; however, they still have a negati

245 of advanced practice providers in acute and critical care settings continue to increase.

246 atients with sepsis and organ dysfunction in critical care settings have broadly been negative.

247 All patients admitted to critical care settings in the centers.

248 s and quality of infectious diseases care in critical care settings.

249 itical care clinicians were implementing the Critical Care Societies Collaborative Choosing Wisely re

250 However, although professional critical care societies have proposed new clinical crite

251 nts, and pharmacist members of four national critical care societies in the United States.

252 thoracic surgeon, 2 anesthesiologists and 1 critical care specialist assessed the risk for aerosol d

253 ltrasound is recommended/mandated by several critical care specialties.

254 To date, we are unable to find critical care specific literature on the implementation

255 ad a significantly longer median duration of critical care stay (25.5 vs. 15.5 d, P = 0.02).

256 Alberta Health Services Critical Care Strategic Clinical Network.

257 m Brazil (ORganizational CHaractEeriSTics in cRitical cAre study) and England (Intensive Care Nationa

258 l stay of 29 days (25% required preoperative critical care support).

259 Patients recruited from non-critical care surgical and medical wards were randomly a

260 The number of critical care survivors is growing, but their long-term

261 derstanding of the long-term consequences of critical care survivorship is essential.

262 n the involvement of family members in daily critical care team rounds.

263 e essential members of the multiprofessional critical care team.

264 rch terms included electronic ICU, tele-ICU, critical care telemedicine, and ICU telemedicine with ap

265 ressure (BP) management is a crucial part of critical care that directly affects morbidity and mortal

266 ed frequently severe complications requiring critical care that induced significant short- and long-t

267 Despite advances in surgical techniques and critical care, the rate of complications and death is st

268 sociated with admission factors, exposure to critical care therapies, and pain and sedation managemen

269 we observed that complications and prolonged critical care therapy drive prolonged critical illness m

270 nces among these postgraduate intensive care/critical care training program.

271 he SARS-CoV-2 and support clinicians without critical care training who may be suddenly asked to care

272 valuated for powering bias among high-impact critical care trials and the associated risk of masking

273 The design of most high-impact critical care trials biased results toward the null by o

274 n Institutes of Health Research and Canadian Critical Care Trials Group Research Coordinator Fund.

275 ter define the competencies required in core critical care ultrasonography and standardize the assess

276 Critical care ultrasonography has become established wit

277 If not found, professionals related to critical care ultrasonography were contacted.

278 d program have defined competencies for core critical care ultrasonography.

279 Paired blood cultures were taken in the Critical Care Unit at a teaching hospital.

280 rtment (ED) dwell time before admission to a critical care unit has an adverse effect on patient outc

281 se staffing trends analyses, while acute and critical care units in 123 facilities were used in the a

282 Twenty-five pediatric critical care units in the United States, the Netherland

283 re suggests that dexmedetomidine sedation in critical care units is associated with reduced incidence

284 All children admitted to the pediatric critical care units on designated study days (n = 994).

285 ortality amongst sepsis patients admitted to critical care units.

286 Critical care units.

287 rates of direct discharge to home across all critical care units.

288 .1%) of all antibiotics were administered in critical care units.

289 were randomised and their participating non-critical-care units assigned to either routine care or d

290 p) in the intervention period across 194 non-critical-care units in 53 hospitals.

291 onisation on pathogens and infections in non-critical-care units is unknown.

292 spitalized for cytotoxic chemotherapy at non-critical-care units were offered daily 2% CHG bathing.

293 uate the use of chlorhexidine bathing in non-critical-care units, with an intervention similar to one

294 ients with hematological malignancies at non-critical-care units.

295 spitalized for cytotoxic chemotherapy at non-critical-care units.

296 hexidine and targeted nasal mupirocin in non-critical-care units.

297 ssion was 28 hospitalized days/1,000 d; post critical care was 88 hospitalized days/1,000 d for those

298 Critical care workforce and staffing models are myriad a

299 ides analyses and perspective of a survey of critical care workforce, workload, and burnout among the

300 training and staffing models for the future critical care workforce.