ライフサイエンスコーパス: critically ill patient

1 ave been associated with risk of seizures in critically ill patients.

2 inst the profound pathologies encountered in critically ill patients.

3 whether physician diversity reflects that of critically ill patients.

4 th clinically relevant outcomes in extubated critically ill patients.

5 acokinetics has been poorly studied in obese critically ill patients.

6 f contrast-associated acute kidney injury in critically ill patients.

7 (step and global position system) data from critically ill patients.

8 ospital transport is a hazardous process for critically ill patients.

9 tions arising through the day-to-day care of critically ill patients.

10 otonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors in critically ill patients.

11 in modifies duration of delirium and coma in critically ill patients.

12 l infection in recipients are often found in critically ill patients.

13 te translocation of bacteria to the lungs in critically ill patients.

14 anxiety, and stress disorders in families of critically ill patients.

15 xiety, and acute stress in family members of critically ill patients.

16 specially common in individuals who care for critically ill patients.

17 placement is a common procedure performed on critically ill patients.

18 ion after subarachnoid hemorrhage similar to critically ill patients.

19 e is associated with superior survival among critically ill patients.

20 ng current blood glucose meters for use with critically ill patients.

21 our understanding of the role of lactate in critically ill patients.

22 , inhaled gases, and aerosols in the care of critically ill patients.

23 he incidence of invasive fungal infection in critically ill patients.

24 clinical judgment of the risk of seizures in critically ill patients.

25 y affect outcome in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients.

26 in the intensive care setting of sedation in critically ill patients.

27 was feasible, effective, and seemed safe in critically ill patients.

28 ne hyperresorption is highly prevalent among critically ill patients.

29 if similar pathogenic degradation occurs in critically ill patients.

30 of resources and may delay resuscitation of critically ill patients.

31 igher oxidative stress in volunteers than in critically ill patients.

32 lthcare providers with those of relatives of critically ill patients.

33 specially common in individuals who care for critically ill patients.

34 d beside modality for risk stratification of critically ill patients.

35 cted vitamin D deficiency in the majority of critically ill patients.

36 a large, academic medical center database of critically ill patients.

37 individualizing care to enhance outcomes for critically ill patients.

38 tional approach to glucocorticoid therapy in critically ill patients.

39 gnificantly up-regulated in the diaphragm of critically ill patients.

40 nd clinical outcomes in medical and surgical critically ill patients.

41 ssociated with adverse outcome in subsets of critically ill patients.

42 the basis of routines to identify and treat critically ill patients.

43 e, blood pressure, and heart rate in febrile critically ill patients.

44 been associated with increased mortality in critically ill patients.

45 ations for how they are used for identifying critically ill patients.

46 Corticosteroids are frequently used in critically ill patients.

47 has significant therapeutic implications for critically ill patients.

48 re may be a better predictor of mortality in critically ill patients.

49 tant, modifiable risk factor for delirium in critically ill patients.

50 ry provides rapid pathogen identification in critically ill patients.

51 percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for critically ill patients.

52 ains a major cause of respiratory failure in critically ill patients.

53 s and leading to questions over their use in critically ill patients.

54 ily risk of individual organ dysfunctions in critically ill patients.

55 tributor to weaning difficulty in ventilated critically ill patients.

56 atients was observed in this large cohort of critically ill patients.

57 s commonly used to assess immune function in critically ill patients.

58 ed with increased morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients.

59 of AKI, death, and other adverse outcomes in critically ill patients.

60 and contractile weakness of the diaphragm in critically ill patients.

61 lly in hospitalized and immunocompromised or critically ill patients.

62 amage in mechanically ventilated and sedated critically ill patients.

63 ety of withholding proton pump inhibitors in critically ill patients.

64 ng the persisting poor outcomes for infected critically ill patients.

65 utilized to fill resource gaps in caring for critically ill patients.

66 spective follow-up analysis from a cohort of critically ill patients.

67 racy of a blood glucose monitoring system in critically ill patients.

68 afe medication practices that is specific to critically ill patients.

69 surgery, but possibly increase morbidity in critically ill patients.

70 ability are associated with poor outcomes in critically ill patients.

71 ble instruments are difficult to complete in critically ill patients.

72 monitoring duration for seizure detection in critically ill patients.

73 ng the process of intrahospital transport of critically ill patients.

74 nt factor in the unexplained anemias seen in critically ill patients.

75 of off-target ventilation (OTV) delivery in critically-ill patients.

76 In five critically ill patients (21%), there was no change in ga

77 Of these critically ill patients, 282 were at risk of ARDS (30%,

78 Critically ill patients 6 months to 5 years old.

79 4-10) during 51 intrahospital transports of critically ill patients, 80% of whom were mechanically v

80 Critically ill patients admitted between July 2000 and O

81 conducted a prospective cohort study of 350 critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units

82 All consecutive critically ill patients admitted with sepsis, involving

83 iated with adjusted 90-day mortality risk in critically ill patients admitted with sepsis.

84 eligible studies that randomly assigned 2607 critically ill patients after trauma to an ESA or placeb

85 r, cluster-randomized clinical trial of 3037 critically ill patients aged 75 years or older, free of

86 hragm biopsies of 36 mechanically ventilated critically ill patients and compared with those isolated

87 Constipation is common among critically ill patients and has been associated with adv

88 Nonhypoxemic mechanically ventilated critically ill patients and healthy volunteers served as

89 Delayed gastric emptying occurs in critically ill patients and impairs the delivery, digest

90 Focus on critically ill patients and included evaluations in othe

91 te kidney injury is a common complication in critically ill patients and is associated with increased

92 is common during endotracheal intubation of critically ill patients and may predispose to cardiac ar

93 e requisite skills necessary to manage these critically ill patients and presents a unique opportunit

94 tudy describes the experience of chronically critically ill patients and surrogates in an long-term a

95 ry coordination, labor-intensive support for critically ill patients, and effective chronic disease m

96 pharmacologic treatment, glucose targets for critically ill patients, and treatment of hospitalized p

97 n of pantoprazole to mechanically ventilated critically ill patients anticipated to receive enteral n

98 Half of all empiric antibiotics ordered in critically ill patients are continued for at least 72 ho

99 study results of fish oil administration in critically ill patients are controversial.

100 Studies showing this relationship in critically ill patients are lacking, whereas clearance o

101 Critically ill patients are susceptible to protein catab

102 ss during routine mechanical ventilation for critically ill patients are unknown.

103 e improvement for treatment of infections in critically ill patients, are lacking.

104 In various subsets of critically ill patients, arterial hyperoxia was associat

105 tor to high healthcare costs associated with critically ill patients as it has been shown that, despi

106 Surgical and critically ill patients at a tertiary medical center bet

107 educed mortality and should be considered in critically ill patients at high risk for death.

108 used for inhalational long-term sedation in critically ill patients at risk to develop epilepsy, our

109 of such infections to death is difficult in critically ill patients because of potential confounding

110 oxin detection that can be used right by the critically ill patients' bedside.

111 gained from randomized controlled trials in critically ill patients by assessing the incidence of el

112 (RBC) transfusion poses significant risks to critically ill patients by increasing their susceptibili

113 tion of dietary protein can be quantified in critically ill patients by using intravenous and enteral

114 lidity of whole blood glucose measurement in critically ill patient care settings.

115 saturation during endotracheal intubation of critically ill patients compared with usual care.

116 Pharmacokinetic data from 162 adult critically ill patients (creatinine clearance range, 5.4

117 lasma concentration-time data from 214 adult critically-ill patients (creatinine clearance 0-236mL/mi

118 lasma concentration-time data from 214 adult critically-ill patients (creatinine clearance 0-236mL/mi

119 Chronically critically ill patients, defined by tracheotomy for prol

120 ) and the need to admit and provide care for critically ill patients (demand).

121 Among critically ill patients, discordant expectations about p

122 agm muscle fibers of mechanically ventilated critically ill patients display atrophy and contractile

123 indings show that diaphragm muscle fibers of critically ill patients display atrophy and severe contr

124 Diaphragm muscle fibers from critically ill patients displayed significant atrophy an

125 de YY and ghrelin in control subjects and in critically ill patients, during feeding and fasting, and

126 Attempts to mobilise critically ill patients early after surgery are frequent

127 In critically ill patients, elevated blood lactate at admis

128 We studied 1,558 critically ill patients enrolled in a prospective observ

129 Among critically ill patients, exposure to positive or negativ

130 Chronically critically ill patients followed from palliative extubat

131 Pantoprazole is frequently administered to critically ill patients for prophylaxis against gastroin

132 administration of acid-suppressive drugs to critically ill patients for stress ulcer prophylaxis war

133 lcer prophylaxis is commonly administered to critically ill patients for the prevention of clinically

134 n, 2000, and Dec, 2014, we studied 1 028 235 critically ill patients from 182 ICUs across Australia a

135 opulation, and the handover and transport of critically ill patients from the emergency room to the i

136 Newly admitted critically ill patients, greater than or equal to 48 hou

137 We enrolled critically ill patients (>/=18 years) needing mechanical

138 - and fast-twitch diaphragm muscle fibers of critically ill patients had approximately 25% smaller cr

139 Fasted critically ill patients have larger, thicker-walled gall

140 Critically ill patients have manifest diaphragm muscle f

141 in some observational studies, but trials in critically ill patients have not shown benefit.

142 Chronically critically ill patients have recurrent infections, organ

143 tments that decreased/increased mortality in critically ill patients in 24 multicenter randomized con

144 assess the reliability of codes relevant to critically ill patients in administrative data.

145 tient populations at risk were most commonly critically ill patients in adult and neonatal intensive

146 racts, published in English, including adult critically ill patients in the ICU, evaluating periphera

147 ies to optimize the support of the family of critically ill patients in the ICU.

148 Hyperchloremia is frequently observed in critically ill patients in the ICU.

149 In this large cohort of critically ill patients, increased concentrations of lac

150 is common (12.9% (1207/9331) prevalence) in critically ill patients, independently associated with i

151 In critically ill patients, infusing glucose with insulin d

152 apted pathobiota." Under this framework, the critically ill patient is viewed as a host colonized by

153 d Services stating that the use of meters in critically ill patients is "off-label" and constitutes "

154 that weakness of diaphragm muscle fibers in critically ill patients is accompanied by impaired mitoc

155 ization of beta-lactam antibiotic dosing for critically ill patients is an intervention that may impr

156 Delirium in critically ill patients is associated with poor clinical

157 Persisting thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients is associated with, but not caus

158 inical significance of diaphragm weakness in critically ill patients is evident: it prolongs ventilat

159 ntinuous electroencephalography (EEG) use in critically ill patients is expanding.

160 he demand for palliative care services among critically ill patients is expected to grow.

161 In sepsis, the disease course of critically ill patients is often complicated by muscle f

162 Communication with family of critically ill patients is often poor and associated wit

163 y 2 weeks after translaryngeal intubation of critically ill patients is the presently recommended pra

164 ospectively associated with AKI and death in critically ill patients is unknown.

165 propose the evolution of a new phenotype of critically ill patients, its potential underlying mechan

166 In a large heterogenous cohort of critically ill patients, low admission peak plasma creat

167 Current recommendations to underfeed critically ill patients may cause harm in some long-stay

168 We conducted a nested, prospective study of critically ill patients mechanically ventilated for 7 da

169 admission until day 5 of the ICU stay in 30 critically ill patients (median [interquartile range] ag

170 physicians were involved in the care of 174 critically ill patients (median age, 60 [IQR, 47-74] yea

171 Many critically ill patients merit assessment by palliative c

172 ICU mortality than the Glasgow Coma Scale in critically ill patients, most likely a result of incorpo

173 The protocol was applied to study critically ill patients (n = 10) during the initial hypo

174 Physicians who care for critically ill patients need to be cognizant of the accu

175 In critically ill patients, nontunneled central venous cath

176 h combined antibiotic and steroid therapy in critically ill patients not fitting into established dis

177 re routine screening for clinical frailty in critically ill patients of all ages.

178 We recruited 1,695 critically ill patients, of which 1,645 with complete da

179 are empirically administered to the sickest critically ill patients, often without documented invasi

180 We enrolled 136 critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation and/or

181 ecision-making by surrogates for chronically critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation.

182 Over 30% of critically ill patients on positive-pressure mechanical

183 ues may result in improved identification of critically ill patients on the wards.

184 ncentives for physicians to provide care for critically ill patients, particularly at institutions wi

185 sociated with development of ARDS in at-risk critically ill patients, particularly in trauma patients

186 In critically ill patients, plasma concentration of ghrelin

187 t the value of greater nutritional intake in critically ill patients, possibly due to varied patient

188 This Review surveys the microbial ecology of critically ill patients, presents the facts and unanswer

189 ts who are hemodynamically stable, including critically ill patients, rather than when the hemoglobin

190 pain (September 2012-October 2014) including critically ill patients ready for planned extubation wit

191 Hence, critically ill patients receiving CYP3A substrate drugs

192 g on whole-body protein turnover and studied critically ill patients receiving early enteral nutritio

193 re to account for this source of calories in critically ill patients receiving nutrition on CVVH may

194 In this study, most caregivers of critically ill patients reported high levels of depressi

195 and will advance the study and management of critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation

196 To observe how surrogates of chronically critically ill patients respond to information about pro

197 h hepatocellular carcinoma and a decrease in critically ill patients, retransplant recipients, donor

198 tion bays caring for a series of 3 simulated critically ill patients (sepsis, seizure, and cardiac ar

199 Thus, among critically ill patients, sepsis and non-infective SIRS a

200 monitoring system was acceptable for use in critically ill patient settings when compared to the cen

201 e the performance of blood glucose meters in critically ill patient settings.

202 A large portion of former critically ill patients show small fiber deficits which

203 ere form of antibiotic-associated colitis in critically ill patients signified by microbiota depletio

204 ential harm from unnecessary oxygen therapy, critically ill patients spend substantial periods in a h

205 Accurate diagnosis for Arabic speaking critically ill patients suffering from delirium is limit

206 Twenty-four mechanically ventilated critically ill patients suitable to receive enteral nutr

207 dividuals making decisions for incapacitated critically ill patients (surrogates) are common and ofte

208 Studies of mechanically ventilated critically ill patients that combine populations that ar

209 nt syndrome of acute brain dysfunction among critically ill patients that has been linked to multiple

210 regarding pain assessment and management in critically ill patients that interfere with effective ca

211 ontractile weakness, and in the diaphragm of critically ill patients the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway

212 tively common for pediatricians who care for critically ill patients to encounter families who object

213 The diverse responses of critically ill patients to infection with multi-drug res

214 and vasopressor drugs are routinely used in critically ill patients to maintain adequate blood press

215 Critically ill patients transported within the hospital

216 Among critically ill patients treated in ICUs in Brazil, imple

217 Anemic critically ill patients treated with IV iron and healthy

218 eding versus Target Enteral Feeding in Adult Critically Ill Patients) trial.

219 Critically ill patients typically present with hyperglyc

220 ng on mortality or incidence of pneumonia in critically ill patients under mechanical ventilation.

221 In critically ill patients undergoing EEG recordings, SIRPI

222 tients, hospitalized patients (including the critically ill), patients undergoing stress echocardiogr

223 In this large cohort of critically ill patients, underweight was independently a

224 Among non-critically ill patients, use of standardized cardiac tel

225 e accuracy in predicting 6-month outcomes of critically ill patients varied depending on the outcome

226 dominate and pathophysiology of diarrhoea in critically ill patients warrants further investigation.

227 l dysfunction contributes to poor outcome in critically ill patients, we wanted to assess the prognos

228 Almost one-third of mechanically ventilated critically ill patients were rehospitalized at a differe

229 A total of 1,493 critically ill patients were studied prospectively.

230 showed marked small nerve fiber pathology in critically ill patients, which may contribute to chronic

231 systemic inflammatory markers compared with critically ill patients who do not develop ICU-acquired

232 Critically ill patients who have a high risk of bleeding

233 The timing of renal-replacement therapy in critically ill patients who have acute kidney injury but

234 Critically ill patients who have bacteremia typically re

235 Four hundred twenty-one critically ill patients who were 50 years or older.

236 19 studies evaluating disability outcomes in critically ill patients who were 65 years and older.

237 tive heart failure and a more degradation in critically ill patients whose life continuation relies o

238 A critically ill patient with multiple postoperative infec

239 Glucose measurements were performed on 1,698 critically ill patients with 257 different clinical cond

240 Two thirds of the critically ill patients with acute kidney injury have pe

241 Among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury, exposu

242 anical ventilation or increased mortality in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress

243 he Early Versus Delayed Initiation of RRT in Critically Ill Patients with AKI (ELAIN) Trial from 90 d

244 Whether earlier initiation of RRT in critically ill patients with AKI can improve outcomes re

245 ngle-center randomized clinical trial of 231 critically ill patients with AKI Kidney Disease: Improvi

246 conclusion, early initiation of RRT in these critically ill patients with AKI significantly reduced t

247 Among critically ill patients with AKI, early RRT compared wit

248 es in standard banana bags meet the needs of critically ill patients with an alcohol use disorder is

249 Conclusions and Relevance: Among critically ill patients with an ICU length of stay of 72

250 ets to improve mortality and resource use in critically ill patients with cancer.

251 pacemaker optimization on cardiac output in critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock in the in

252 with oral vancomycin and IV metronidazole in critically ill patients with CDI.

253 ese findings do not support daily bathing of critically ill patients with chlorhexidine.

254 first-line therapy in appropriately selected critically ill patients with chronic obstructive pulmona

255 The optimal therapy for critically ill patients with Clostridium difficile infec

256 nd October 2015 were compared to consecutive critically ill patients with community-acquired severe a

257 multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 270 critically ill patients with convulsive status epileptic

258 clusions and Relevance: Among nonneutropenic critically ill patients with ICU-acquired sepsis, Candid

259 tudy of 260 nonneutropenic, nontransplanted, critically ill patients with ICU-acquired sepsis, multip

260 tic value of secretoneurin in two cohorts of critically ill patients with infections.

261 esources, and treatments with outcomes among critically ill patients with influenza A (H1N1pdm09) in

262 d easily available technique for identifying critically ill patients with intracranial hypertension.

263 We studied 16,968 critically ill patients with Kidney Disease Improving Gl

264 Critically ill patients with laboratory-confirmed Middle

265 plex pattern of physiological disturbance in critically ill patients with liver disease.

266 The mortality for critically ill patients with melioidosis in the Top End

267 anagement, and outcomes of a large cohort of critically ill patients with melioidosis.

268 The optimal blood glucose target in critically ill patients with preexisting diabetes and ch

269 Critically ill patients with primary neurologic injury a

270 mendations for the use of corticosteroids in critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock, ac

271 Among 20750 critically ill patients with sepsis in 107 hospitals wit

272 We sought to determine PCT use in critically ill patients with sepsis in the United States

273 A total of 1,080 critically ill patients with sepsis.

274 tcomes of atrial fibrillation in a cohort of critically ill patients with sepsis.

275 nt of acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically ill patients with sepsis.

276 thms to decrease duration of antibiotics for critically ill patients with sepsis.

277 nsfusion did not affect overall mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis.

278 presentation, outcome, and host response in critically ill patients with sepsis.

279 PATIENTS/Twenty-six critically ill patients with Sequential Organ Failure As

280 Critically ill patients with severe (n = 21) or non-seve

281 In a trial involving critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury,

282 viral replication patterns, and outcomes of critically ill patients with severe acute respiratory in

283 for the prediction of mortality and shock in critically ill patients with severe infections.

284 lactam antibiotics by continuous infusion in critically ill patients with severe sepsis is associated

285 Critically ill patients with severe sepsis or septic sho

286 his individual patient data meta-analysis of critically ill patients with severe sepsis, we aimed to

287 ttent infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients with severe sepsis.

288 sed prediction model for 28-day mortality in critically ill patients with SIRS and sepsis.

289 Critically ill patients with stable renal function (n =

290 Critically ill patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage sho

291 Daily bathing of critically ill patients with the broad-spectrum, topical

292 associated with temperature and mortality in critically ill patients with trauma or severe sepsis.

293 In critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic

294 gest that we should limit the PaO2 levels of critically ill patients within a safe range, as we do wi

295 PRoVENT (PRactice of VENTilation in critically ill patients without ARDS at onset of ventila

296 compared with placebo or no intervention in critically ill patients without neutropenia, but the qua

297 diagnosis of an invasive fungal infection in critically ill patients without neutropenia?

298 It allows prolonged hemodialysis sessions in critically ill patients without the need to systemically

299 ols have only been evaluated in nondelirious critically ill patients, yet delirium can affect as many

300 ional outcomes influence decision making for critically ill patients, yet little is known regarding t