ライフサイエンスコーパス: criticism

1 dez-Diaz et al. provide more firmly grounded criticism.

2 s instead met with substantial and sustained criticism.

3 tics, anthropology, archaeology, and textual criticism.

4 s and accept the automated diagnosis without criticism.

5 arental disease status and hence are open to criticism.

6 ngle red fluorescent protein to address this criticism.

7 , generated substantial social and political criticism.

8 lp from health professionals without fear of criticism.

9 OM and PBM is challenging and under mounting criticism.

10 turalism about mental content have sustained criticism.

11 cial stimuli, the communication of praise or criticism.

12 f operative risk, which is the basis of much criticism.

13 tly revised (to 6 hours) in response to this criticism.

14 than measures of infection have been 2 major criticisms.

15 modification to incorporate suggestions and criticisms.

16 ed the supporting data for and against these criticisms.

17 ze the supporting data for and against these criticisms.

18 nd interpretation are not imperiled by these criticisms.

19 nd milk - the agency has been beleaguered by criticisms.

20 proposal and respond to the following major criticisms: 1) Medical futility is simply an attempt to

21 the evidence for such a decrease is open to criticism, a different type of evidence is needed.

22 The criticisms acknowledge that data supporting the approval

23 A common criticism against such neural network models is that it

24 ch those observed in vivo, addresses several criticisms aimed at pure oscillatory interference and co

25 Contrary to prediction, relatives' criticism and hostility did not predict how well patient

26 ping research has spawned healthy debate and criticism and offered insight into the question of why s

27 er patients') experiences of felt or enacted criticism and the consequent hidden anxiety.

28 We have evaluated both criticisms and find that all samples display virtually i

29 ost hoc analyses revealed that the number of criticisms and odd thoughts correlated significantly (r

30 nteraction in which the number of relatives' criticisms and patients' unusual thoughts was assessed.

31 response we address additions to as well as criticisms and possible misinterpretations of our propos

32 We reply here to these criticisms and provide some additional clarification, in

33 We address these criticisms and reinforce the conclusion that plants that

34 endency to respond in such a way as to avoid criticism) and social approval (the tendency to seek pra

35 Scientific scrutiny and criticism are the only viable remedies for bad science.

36 We argue that these criticisms are misplaced and explain why a coherent theo

37 We concluded that these recent criticisms are unconvincing.

38 Those criticisms are unjustified, both within the approaches o

39 The current discussion focuses on criticism as a positive force for improving epidemiologi

40 This approach can be subjected to strong criticism as substantial aspects of the biological syste

41 ing additive interaction has come under some criticism because of possible misspecification of the lo

42 The criticisms Brosnan and de Waal offered of Roma et al. ig

43 and then explore some common methodological criticism by analyzing a sample of contemporary coronary

44 In response to criticism by Guerrero-Bosagna regarding our statistical

45 Following criticism by Kondrashov, here we defend our methods for

46 "four questions" approach to strengthen the criticism by Maestripieri et al. of the non-evolutionary

47 ion of patients' neurocognitive deficits and criticism by others would predict the emergence of patie

48 with captive chimpanzees has addressed this criticism by showing that experimentally created traditi

49 immediate, working memory, and the number of criticisms by family members, the interaction of CPT per

50 This explanation may lend support to the criticisms by Leggett and others to the standard tunneli

51 ch involving humans has been turbulent, with criticism coming from the federal government, the academ

52 entire history it has drawn both praise and criticism concerning its reliability, limitations, succe

53 ualism, but from a scientific viewpoint such criticism could be easily answered.

54 r alone or in combination with interpersonal criticism, did not predict the number of patients' unusu

55 The criticisms do not always recognize that the decision to

56 Perhaps most critically, the criticisms do not appreciate the urgency of strong scien

57 These criticisms do not detract from our key findings, includi

58 his purpose, but this solution has come into criticism due to various disadvantages like notable toxi

59 We believe that our target article and the criticisms, elaborations, and extensions of the commenta

60 Our work, which we term "quantitative criticism," focuses on case studies involving two influe

61 was the subject of extensive discussion and criticism following its online publication.

62 lantation (LDLT), the procedure has received criticism for the risk it imposes on healthy persons.

63 ill disappoint those who await complaint and criticism, for example, about the difficulties of doing

64 medicines, but this accord has been met with criticism from international aid organizations.

65 Here, we respond to criticisms from commentators and attempt to clarify and

66 parent negligence, the authors explore these criticisms from the perspectives of both the plaintiff-p

67 temperament rather than anger in reaction to criticism, frustration, or unfair treatment places normo

68 Criticism has been levelled at climate-change-induced fo

69 of biological compartments using this assay, criticism has been raised that this method underestimate

70 A frequent criticism has been that phenol in DNA extraction solutio

71 tly been exempted from general discussion or criticism, has become an opportunity for the elected lea

72 However, the points of criticism have changed, reflecting recent paradigm shift

73 Criticisms have focused on 2 areas: internal deficiencie

74 old selection, based on the notion of higher criticism (HC).

75 public policies, which have faced increasing criticism in recent years.

76 We address these criticisms in our Response.

77 Other criticisms include insufficient data on the use of the p

78 These criticisms include the suggestions that (a) neural respo

79 Criticism includes that SSD does not take time-dependenc

80 e organize these proposals, suggestions, and criticisms into four thematic categories and assess thei

81 ieve that the principal error of Blinkhorn's criticism is that he does not consider our result in the

82 A recent major criticism is that large randomised trials do not always

83 It is shown here that neither of those criticisms is valid.

84 s' working memory deficits and interpersonal criticism jointly predicts psychotic thinking, consisten

85 hese refinements, we suggest, overcome older criticisms, justifying the value of the new wave of rese

86 to increase in recent years in spite of the criticisms leveled against it.

87 In this Comment, we discuss the criticisms leveled in detail, and review some recently p

88 So too can it serve as a framework for criticism of biomedical research, theory, and practice.

89 general failure of management and results in criticism of contemporary management procedures.

90 These objections are often couched as criticism of determinism, reductionism, or methodologica

91 However, there is growing criticism of in vitro CRP studies that use commercial CR

92 A common criticism of LFA tests is that they have poor detection

93 Much of the criticism of meta-analysis has been based on simple misu

94 aches, provides a structured process for the criticism of observational studies, and helps avoid comm

95 Criticism of orthodox models of prejudice reduction is p

96 We respond to criticism of our recent paper by examining assumptions a

97 Significant criticism of patient care was reported in 13% of cases w

98 Second, try to avoid knee-jerk, obstructive criticism of proposed measurements.

99 A common criticism of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) is tha

100 We argue that his criticism of research on foresight in great apes is misg

101 raising technologies, and address the recent criticism of the appraisal programme with regard to trea

102 One criticism of the approach is an inability to validate it

103 The criticism of the CDC investigation consists largely of a

104 n this paper, the authors extend the growing criticism of the concept of pseudoreplication.

105 AD is more complex and less clear, prompting criticism of the hypothesis.

106 The most compelling criticism of the latter 'methane hydrate' hypothesis has

107 This study should not be interpreted as a criticism of the trend to use guidelines in general; rat

108 A frequent criticism of the WTO system is that it reduces national

109 Their desire to avoid such criticism of their moral status as 'good' parents create

110 Criticism of these methods (e.g. see Cooper, this issue,

111 One major criticism of these studies might be based on the unavail

112 A common criticism of this hypothesis is that mitochondrial funct

113 care unit has largely escaped the withering criticism of those bent on measuring and improving the q

114 ssay sensitivity are also inadequate for the criticism of treatment guidelines.

115 We tackle traditional criticisms of "no-fault" compensation systems for medica

116 One of the major criticisms of ALPPS is the associated high mortality rat

117 Over the years, criticisms of both the avoidance paradigm and the two-fa

118 ve methods, published critiques of CEAs, and criticisms of general CEA methods and reporting practice

119 The advantages and historical criticisms of meta-analysis are described, as are the ba

120 Criticisms of meta-analysis that are applicable are equa

121 We address theoretical criticisms of our approach by pointing out that while a

122 has also been its shortcoming, with frequent criticisms of sampling inadequacies and questions regard

123 In addition to general criticisms of scientific studies on empirical aesthetics

124 Criticisms of such models have focussed on at least two

125 Criticisms of the ACA include the increased role of gove

126 We examined criticisms of the IARC classification process to determi

127 Then, the major criticisms of the SDT theory are outlined, and these iss

128 orous support for the recent hypothesis that criticisms of the state, its leaders, and their policies

129 We also discuss potential criticisms of this approach as well as strategies that c

130 Next, three criticisms of this overlap model are presented and addre

131 One of the criticisms of this research is that the exposure has not

132 rnational policy instruments exposes them to criticism or abandonment and reduces opportunities to im

133 Poor sensitivity, hostility, criticism, or disinterest characterize maternal-child in

134 ons of biologists and a target of continuous criticism over many years.

135 pirical support, it has received substantial criticism over the years since it was proclaimed in the

136 y has not been complacent in its response to criticism: preclinical stroke studies now demonstrate co

137 omparison individuals, to negative comments (criticism) referring to themselves.

138 This criticism reflects changing views on patient autonomy an

139 available evidence and multinational expert criticism, revised the Rome II diagnostic criteria for t

140 bers, the interaction of CPT performance and criticism significantly predicted the number of patients

141 Both criticisms suffer from a miscomprehension of the definit

142 ave been subjected to a variety of technical criticisms suggesting that the specificity may not be re

143 Felt or enacted criticism teaches parents informal social rules which di

144 s using prior sensitivity analysis and model criticism techniques.

145 efore looking carefully at the real thing--a criticism that applies also to studies with microRNAs.

146 One criticism that has been posed regarding the validity of

147 A recent criticism that the biological species concept (BSC) undu

148 Part 1 of this two-part series discussed the criticisms that have been leveled at the pharmaceutical

149 art of this two-part series will discuss the criticisms that have been leveled at the pharmaceutical

150 In this article, we evaluate the criticisms that have been leveled at this approach and p

151 lex interventions, and considers some of the criticisms that have been published in response to the g

152 h they become vulnerable to some of the same criticisms that they level against stereotype theory As

153 Faced with mounting criticism, the ABIM suspended certain content requiremen

154 Despite this criticism, the use of variables encoding racial/ethnic c

155 not been validated and have been subject to criticism, they are prompting prospective studies and mo

156 al cancer, is intended to offer constructive criticism towards the TNM classification of colorectal c

157 Despite recent criticism, we argue that the supergene concept remains r

158 Affirming and expanding earlier criticism, we demonstrate that inclusive fitness is inst

159 In response to this criticism, we have developed a freely available tutorial

160 s attention to technical details who opposed criticism with hard work and strong family values.

161 r clinical phenomenon, has come under rising criticism with increasing calls for an etiologically bas