ライフサイエンスコーパス: cross-contamination

1 logous subtypes was always present (4 to 33% cross-contamination).

2 atures such as detection of batch effect and cross contamination.

3 thymidine triphosphate to reduce the risk of cross contamination.

4 imeric at the ethylthio position without any cross contamination.

5 al explosive odors through training material cross-contamination.

6 e simplicity and minimize the risk of sample cross-contamination.

7 , are ideally discarded after use to prevent cross-contamination.

8 utions and an apparatus and a lack of sample cross-contamination.

9 pient to confine the droplets and to prevent cross-contamination.

10 CD patients may simply be reacting to gluten cross-contamination.

11 ginating laboratory and probably resulted in cross-contamination.

12 assays but are prone to false positives from cross-contamination.

13 for two proteins in a single sample without cross-contamination.

14 the same channel, demonstrating less than 1% cross-contamination.

15 have wrestled with concerns about planetary cross-contamination.

16 screening against multiple antigens without cross-contamination.

17 h NO2- and NO3- with little or no measurable cross-contamination.

18 st at high density to a surface with minimal cross-contamination.

19 pability, coculture ability, and low risk of cross-contamination.

20 ure optimal antimicrobial coverage and avoid cross-contamination.

21 obacterium avium complex (1 case), suspected cross-contamination (1 case), suspected specimen mislabe

22 ation, pH, etc.) can be finely tuned without cross-contamination, allowing the screening of a huge nu

23 port canine training in the field, detecting cross-contamination among training materials, and develo

24 he theoretical risks of cross-reactivity and cross-contamination among wheat, barley, and rye protein

25 genome coverage histograms, and can perform cross-contamination analysis for specimens prepared in s

26 tion testing, which is to detect significant cross-contamination and cell line misidentification.

27 The reduction of cross-contamination and greater range of injection ratio

28 this assay reduces the possibility of sample cross-contamination and requires less hands-on time than

29 the time to recycle NMR tubes while avoiding cross-contamination and tube damage.

30 ple agglutination assays in parallel without cross-contamination and using only microliter volumes of

31 sulting process is inexpensive, resistant to cross-contamination, and amenable to robotic processing.

32 384-well devices were found to be free from cross-contamination, and end point fluorescence detectio

33 he microFACS provides higher sensitivity, no cross-contamination, and lower cost.

34 n--both intentionally and through widespread cross-contamination--and for the past 60 years it has se

35 ling technique, while sample evaporation and cross-contamination are effectively eliminated.

36 ctious agents and an emphasis on eliminating cross-contamination are needed for parents and care-take

37 hondrial fractions were obtained with little cross-contamination, as determined by Northern analysis

38 There was no evidence of sample cross-contamination based on phylogenetic analysis of HI

39 howed reliable operation with no significant cross contamination between closely spaced channels.

40 aspirated under program control with minimal cross contamination between layers.

41 ng with the results of experiments examining cross contamination between wells.

42 ed in open-barred cages raise concerns about cross-contamination between animals, and accidental expo

43 Cross-contamination between cell lines is a longstanding

44 was used, which precludes the possibility of cross-contamination between donor-acceptor vesicles or t

45 as a result of either amplicon carryover of cross-contamination between patient samples.

46 Additionally, little evidence of cross-contamination between the IM and OM was evident by

47 sion data using different isotopes with less cross-contamination between transmission and emission da

48 tering the trap, thereby preventing unwanted cross contamination by other nearby droplets.

49 lly, scientific misrepresentation because of cross-contamination can be largely eliminated.

50 ents were likely the result of low-level DNA cross contamination caused by frequent specimen handling

51 The aims of this study was to assess the cross-contamination caused by lard concentration of 0.5-

52 emplate in the RealTime assay, but potential cross-contamination could be mitigated by treatment with

53 Cross-contamination could have occurred in 28 of 93 (30%

54 sent approach include reduced risk of sample cross-contamination, decreased analysis time, and greate

55 em that can occur when information regarding cross-contamination does not reach individual researcher

56 r cutting system that effectively eliminated cross-contamination during DBS processing.

57 cell lines and provided evidence suggesting cross-contamination during sequencing.

58 eted HTS is the risk of specimen-to-specimen cross-contamination during the library preparation step

59 athogenic sequences in clinical samples, but cross-contamination during the processing of the samples

60 , prisons, and public houses, and laboratory cross-contamination events and unusual clinical presenta

61 The device also allows for automated cross-contamination-free recovery of reaction products f

62 of raw fruits and vegetables, prevention of cross contamination in the kitchen, and measures that de

63 We evaluate the level of cross-contamination in our platform by both tracking flu

64 ibility that detectable fVIII mRNA is due to cross-contamination in the hepatocyte or LSEC preparatio

65 Exposure to these pathogens may be through cross-contamination in the home or the environment.

66 multiple lines of evidence suggest possible cross-contamination in these samples, which were process

67 rmacy practices that could have led to blood cross-contamination included reuse of needles and syring

68 Sample cross-contamination is not a problem using this polymer-

69 ble disposable materials, eliminating sample cross contamination, minimizing complex handling, and ke

70 The results also suggest that cross-contamination occurs between patients and HCWs and

71 With or without corrections for cross-contamination of 123I into the 99mTc window, stria

72 rdrop molecular transport which leads to the cross-contamination of droplet contents.

73 Biofilms are implicated in cross-contamination of food products, biofouling and var

74 collector photoreactor to assess subsequent cross-contamination of lettuce and soil by contaminants

75 ational anthrax through the postal system by cross-contamination of mail.

76 we were unable to demonstrate any carryover cross-contamination of negative samples.

77 The cross-contamination of non-target feeds with coccidiosta

78 en blender which was the probable source for cross-contamination of other food items.

79 diminish contamination of meat products and cross-contamination of produce crops because of cattle s

80 nation, which appeared to result mainly from cross-contamination of specimens during RNA extraction.

81 a wide range of g-force and time conditions, cross-contamination of the DC pellet and supernatant wit

82 of preformed plugs of reagent, which reduces cross-contamination of the plugs, eliminates formation o

83 ables grown closely in the same facility, is cross-contamination of zoonotic bacterial pathogens espe

84 Despite this potential cross-contamination, our data indicate that we have dete

85 The closed real-time RT-PCR system avoided cross-contamination possible with RT-PCR and the excessi

86 e outline simple measures to detect or avoid cross-contamination, present a framework for cell line a

87 els below the limit of detection, suggesting cross-contamination rather than adulteration.

88 ctured by Copan, Inc., in which we evaluated cross-contamination, the accuracy of plating, and the qu

89 in the skull and adjacent cortex showed some cross-contamination, the concentration of radioactivity

90 ships among power, within-cluster structure, cross-contamination via between-cluster mixing, and infe

91 Signal cross-contamination was approximately 0.2% between indiv

92 The absence of cross-contamination was demonstrated by plating a total

93 No cross-contamination was detected in a challenge experime

94 In our malaria DBS assay, cross-contamination was encountered despite cleaning tec

95 Peptide cross-contamination was excluded.

96 showed that the rate of specimen-to-specimen cross-contamination was highly significant in HTS.

97 ing, the system was easy to implement and no cross-contamination was observed among samples.

98 No cross-contamination was observed on an alternating posit

99 No cross-contamination was observed.

100 arryover and 1 s per sample, accepting minor cross contamination, was achieved using multiplexed solv

101 plasmic RNA from a single cell type, free of cross-contamination, we studied the oocyte of the frog X

102 antimicrobial therapy and theoretic risk for cross-contamination were evaluated.

103 To prevent cross-contamination while keeping the solution in the ne

104 ACR exhibited the least cross contamination with other PM domains or intracellul

105 likelihood of misidentification and possible cross-contamination with this laboratory neotype, it is

106 ger EoE as a result of cross-reaction and/or cross-contamination with wheat.