戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 mercial kits to determine the extent of this cross-reaction.
2 ucrose-containing medium showed little or no cross-reaction.
3 genic virus via viral interference or immune cross-reaction.
4 -dimensional features that may promote their cross-reaction.
5 ce of homogeneous DRAG and glutaraldehyde in cross-reaction.
6         This raises the potential problem of cross-reaction.
7 due to a multiple infection rather than to a cross-reaction.
8 only one sample may allow for confusion with cross reactions.
9 graph theory to disentangle the few existing cross-reactions.
10 000 TCR-peptide MHC class I interactions for cross-reactions.
11 tically significant B. burgdorferi serologic cross-reactions.
12 ligand mimetics have low affinities and show cross-reaction among the three selectins, precluding eff
13           The assay was tested for potential cross-reactions among the three pairs of antibodies.
14 he mechanism corresponds more to trapping by cross-reaction and coaggregation rather than classical s
15 nd rye might also trigger EoE as a result of cross-reaction and/or cross-contamination with wheat.
16 studies were performed using seroconversion, cross-reaction, and interference panels, archived clinic
17 ological distance and the strength of immune cross-reaction are expressed separately.
18 ence of new, so far unknown allergies due to cross-reactions are expected.
19 most efficient method of diagnosis, although cross-reactions are possible in patients recently vaccin
20                                 Furthermore, cross-reaction between the bacterial OspA and human LFA-
21         Here we investigated the serological cross-reaction between the two viruses.
22                                           In cross-reactions between (bc)Pd(ns(CH)()3) and ns(X) (X =
23                                              Cross-reactions between antigenic determinants on human
24                                     Allergic cross-reactions between cypress and peach have been repo
25                                              Cross-reactions between either 1 or 2 and various disulf
26  apoptosis, although there are no detectable cross-reactions between externally added and endogenous
27 alization assays showed variable immunologic cross-reactions between most of the AAV serotypes.
28                    We failed to identify any cross-reactions between the synthetic peptides in the pa
29 es ( approximately 1/30,000), explaining why cross-reactions between unrelated pathogens are infreque
30         Interestingly, most co-reactions are cross-reactions but not co-sensitizations.
31 ce acids and bases in both self-exchange and cross reactions, by stepwise mechanisms utilizing the fa
32  amplify desired targets and avoid undesired cross reactions can be a combinatorial challenge.
33 CDR3beta loop that, when altered, modify the cross-reaction capability of the TCR to position 4 and p
34                       We identified a single cross-reaction consisting of an anti-self TCR recognizin
35 3+/2+-His18 couple, and E0' = 176 mV for the cross-reaction couple, His82-Fe3+-His18 + e- --> Met80-F
36                                              Cross-reactions due to infection with environmental myco
37 s homology filtering, minimizes non-specific cross-reaction, filters target sites based on RNA duplex
38 and HPV-45) exhibited detectable serological cross-reaction for the class of antibodies that inhibit
39                                            A cross-reaction has also been developed, allowing for the
40  and Schizosaccharomyces pombe proteins, and cross reactions have also been examined.
41            To probe this effect further, HAT cross-reactions have been performed with sterically hind
42  calculations highlight the need to consider cross reactions in the cell and suggest that localizatio
43 he sole carbon source showed a high anti-MTD cross-reaction in the cytoplasm, whereas cells that were
44 al for the probability of celecoxib inducing cross-reactions in AERD patients was calculated to be be
45                                         This cross-reaction is intriguing yet important since it illu
46 ver, the directionality and quality of these cross-reactions is critical in determining their biologi
47 constant for the Cr(aq)OO(2+)/CH(3)C(O)OO(*) cross reaction, k(Cr) = 1.5 x 10(8) M(-1) s(-1), was det
48  in females are "bad" in males--analogous to crossing reaction norms.
49                                              Cross-reactions occurred in 96.3% of patients with histo
50 oduce [(tpy)(bpy)Ru(III)OH](2+); and (3) the cross reaction of [(tpy)(bpy)Ru(III)OH](2+) and [(bpy)(2
51 -alpha and PCaPK-beta, and the immunological cross-reaction of expressed cloned fragments of these ge
52                                 There was no cross-reaction of human or AGM sera between RSV and PVM
53 normal host self-proteins, thus leading to a cross-reaction of immune response against virus with hos
54  Paraneoplastic retinopathy is caused by the cross-reaction of neoplasm-directed autoantibodies again
55  SOA contained a product consistent with the cross-reaction of phenoxy and naphthoxy radicals.
56 n within the ventricle can be explained by a cross-reaction of the anti-KChIP2 antibody with a differ
57 an anti-keratin 19 antibody, which is due to cross-reaction of the antibody with Nmi, and suggests an
58 plex V in leaves was not meaningful due to a cross-reaction of the antibody with the chloroplast form
59 pe II/1b (primers 389 and 492) abolished the cross-reaction of the antisense primer for genotype II/1
60                                          The cross-reaction of the BK.T-1 antibody suggests a possibl
61 tudied plant enzymes was demonstrated by the cross-reaction of the yeast enzyme to a antiserum direct
62         Unlike the reactions of lectins, the cross-reactions of most rabbit antisera with these polys
63 ns to evaluate whether co-reactions are true cross-reactions or co-sensitizations by allergens with t
64 lusive serotyping results due to nonspecific cross-reactions; or novel genotypes.
65 t (k(11)) has then been calculated from each cross reaction rate constant using the Marcus cross rela
66                        For each complex, the cross-reaction rate constants have been determined with
67 oton and electron transfer self-exchange and cross-reaction rates have been determined for reactions
68                                   With these cross-reactions, the biological properties of the SW wer
69 motifs revealed a hierarchy in the degree of cross-reaction: The more frequent an allergen was positi
70 oated with ErbB2-specific antibodies with no cross-reaction to ErbB3 or ErbB4.
71                This now appears to be due to cross-reaction to multiple copies of 18-bp inverted repe
72 y detected all S. pneumoniae genomes without cross-reaction to negative controls.
73 on and on autoimmune diabetes occurring as a cross-reaction to viral antigens.
74     Plasma immune to DENV showed substantial cross-reaction to ZIKV and was able to drive antibody-de
75                  Identification of proteins, cross-reactions to nuts, and ELISA inhibition tests sugg
76 with all group B reagents, but the number of cross-reactions varied with each kit.
77                                           No cross-reaction was observed with other HPV types.
78                               No significant cross-reaction was observed.
79 timization of the microarray composition and cross-reaction was performed using an original approach
80 PE membrane were observed as expected, while cross reactions were spotted for P(4,5)BP/PtdIns(4)P and
81                                              Cross-reactions were detected with all group B reagents,
82                                           No cross-reactions were detected with other mycoplasmas, ur
83                                      One-way cross-reactions were observed by CCIF between TGEV Mille
84               No significant interference or cross-reactions were observed.
85                                           No cross-reactions were seen with other parasites or human
86           Although the specificities of the "cross-reactions" were similar for KIR2DL2*001 and KIR2DL
87                                              Cross reaction with antibodies against mucin gene produc
88 Arabidopsis mitochondrial RecA protein shows cross-reaction with a soybean protein of about 44 kDa, i
89 and extensive LC-MS/MS sequence analysis and cross-reaction with an anti-ES-10 antibody.
90 atory pathogens showed only one low-level H3 cross-reaction with an H10N7 avian strain and only at 5.
91 h B cells become anergic as a consequence of cross-reaction with autoantigen in the bone marrow.
92 ven commonly used grains, with only a slight cross-reaction with barely.
93 A, cMyc and AcV5 tags show relatively little cross-reaction with endogenous proteins in a variety of
94 hought to be pathogenic in the kidney due to cross-reaction with glomerular antigens, leading subsequ
95 west detection limit of 60ng/ml and shows no cross-reaction with other analogous organophosphates or
96               The system exhibits no visible cross-reaction with other common pathogenic bacteria, ev
97 ae has been recognized in the MIF system and cross-reaction with other species is negligible.
98  sensitivity and a 100% specificity, with no cross-reaction with other viruses observed.
99 rt the idea that protection is mediated by a cross-reaction with self hsp58 in the joints.
100 oss-reactivity with each other and a one-way cross-reaction with T. phagedenis.
101                     The antibody showed some cross-reaction with tetrahydro substance S (36%) which d
102 birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 and subsequent cross-reaction with the apple protein Mal d 1.
103 ose of the nonimprinted films and negligible cross-reaction with the tested nonspecific analyte.
104                In addition to the functional cross-reaction with Tn4399, a second distinguishing feat
105                                              Cross-reactions with certain hemodialysis filters, beta-
106 vian and human assays exhibited unacceptable cross-reactions with feces from other hosts.
107 nical strains of S. porcinus were tested for cross-reactions with group B streptococcal reagents from
108 e distributions appear to be due to antibody cross-reactions with more abundant proteins.
109                                There were no cross-reactions with non-H5N1 influenza viruses or other
110 f 0.2 ng/ml for C. difficile toxin B with no cross-reactions with other enterotoxins, nontoxigenic C.
111                                              Cross-reactions with other molecules in the medium are a
112  parvum DNA in human stool, and there are no cross-reactions with other parasites commonly found ther
113 nt IgM and syphilitic sera in the absence of cross-reactions with rabbit antisera to avirulent trepon
114 by serologic methods test their reagents for cross-reactions with selected S. porcinus cultures or an

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top