1 Prospective,
cross-sectional.
2 a from two 24-h recalls collected during the
cross-sectional 2011-2012 Australian National Nutrition
3 gible studies comprising 29 longitudinal, 49
cross-sectional,
22 qualitative, two mixed methods, four
4 Four
cross-sectional active case detection surveys were condu
5 plantation) were subjected to a systematical
cross-sectional AMR screening and, in parallel, TTV quan
6 Cross-sectional analyses demonstrated inverse associatio
7 Cross-sectional analyses explored associations between p
8 Prior
cross-sectional analyses have demonstrated an associatio
9 Cross-sectional analyses investigated associations betwe
10 Cross-sectional analyses of adiposity and sleep duration
11 Cross-sectional analyses were performed between 2003 and
12 Cross-sectional analyses were performed in two independe
13 lyses, as well as with sleep disturbances in
cross-sectional analyses.
14 This
cross-sectional analysis included 183 elderly individual
15 We performed a
cross-sectional analysis of 3,150 study participants.
16 The trial was a
cross-sectional analysis of 775 healthy women in the Wom
17 This baseline
cross-sectional analysis of a cohort study performed fro
18 This is a
cross-sectional analysis of a prospective cohort of 26 p
19 We conducted a
cross-sectional analysis of four automated immunoassays
20 Serial
cross-sectional analysis of Medicare fee-for-service ben
21 A
cross-sectional analysis of prevalence of hepatitis B vi
22 This
cross-sectional analysis of women enrolled in a cohort s
23 This retrospective,
cross-sectional analysis used the 2014 State Inpatient D
24 Retrospective
cross-sectional analysis using publicly available FDA da
25 For anchor-based
cross-sectional analysis, composite score MID (95% CI) w
26 In
cross-sectional analysis, current H. pylori infection at
27 In this
cross-sectional analysis, we used a type 1 diabetes gene
28 Cross-sectional analysis.
29 Cross-sectional and case-control studies have shown evid
30 ses in the HIV cascade of care are typically
cross-sectional and do not include the population stages
31 function biomarkers, but most work has been
cross-sectional and does not separate the effects of tra
32 with higher symptom reporting scores in both
cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, as well as wi
33 evaluated the association of SCT status with
cross-sectional and longitudinal changes in fitness and
34 ch has been refined and strengthened by many
cross-sectional and longitudinal studies linking eczema
35 If these findings are confirmed with larger
cross-sectional and prospective analyses, these approach
36 We investigated both
cross-sectional and prospective associations between ser
37 Low MMA% was
cross-sectional and prospectively associated with higher
38 stimation should be longitudinal rather than
cross-sectional and start with the population stages pre
39 21 prospective cohort,
cross-sectional,
and case-control studies including part
40 Muscle fibre
cross sectional area and protein synthesis of the myofib
41 44.1+/-4.8 at 56 days; P<0.05) and increased
cross-sectional area (mean+/-SEM: 21.9+/-0.4 microm(2) i
42 Thus, reduced
cross-sectional area (theta) and tortuosity largely acco
43 ired post-burn recovery of both muscle fibre
cross-sectional area and volume (P < 0.05).
44 INTERPRETATION: Group average spinal cord
cross-sectional area in HAM/TSP and progressive MS show
45 = 0.04) correlate with T4 to T9 spinal cord
cross-sectional area in HAM/TSP.
46 ith corresponding reductions in muscle fiber
cross-sectional area of 18, 42, and 69% after 3, 7, and
47 Spinal cord
cross-sectional area was measured in individuals (24 hea
48 mpairment of specific force (isometric force/
cross-sectional area) and unloaded shortening velocity;
49 phorus, these genotypes had 43% smaller root
cross-sectional area, 32% greater root length, 58% great
50 educed secondary growth had 39% smaller root
cross-sectional area, 60% less root respiration, 27% gre
51 US imaging measurements (thickness, width,
cross-sectional area, echogenicity) and 3.0-T MR imaging
52 T MR imaging measurements (thickness, width,
cross-sectional area, volume, and fat-water separation)
53 .01) was associated with thinner spinal cord
cross-sectional area.
54 ubjects showed a significant increase in the
cross-sectional areas of the internal carotid, basilar,
55 We did a retrospective
cross-sectional assessment of prevalence of MCRPE infect
56 oke exposure.This metabolomics study shows a
cross-sectional association between stunting and low ser
57 Cross-sectional associations between engagement in menta
58 We examined whether there are
cross-sectional associations of mean relative leukocyte
59 e conducted a two-stage meta-analysis of the
cross-sectional associations of systolic and diastolic B
60 Cross-sectional associations support the view that enhan
61 ying five periodontitis case definitions for
cross-sectional associations with lifestyle factors amon
62 e identified studies (randomised, cohort, or
cross-sectional)
by searching MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL,
63 Observational,
cross-sectional case series at a referral institutional
64 This prospective
cross-sectional case series was conducted at the Departm
65 We conducted a multisite,
cross-sectional,
case-control study in U.S. pulmonary an
66 This investigation was a
cross-sectional,
case-control, functional magnetic reson
67 s, we searched five electronic databases for
cross-sectional,
case-control, or cohort studies publish
68 A
cross-sectional clinic-based study, the Singapore Diabet
69 m the Masked Hypertension Study (n = 811), a
cross-sectional clinical investigation of systematic dif
70 6 weeks after delivery, and a second matched
cross-sectional cohort (n = 81) was additionally recruit
71 obese individuals was further validated in a
cross-sectional cohort of 381 participants.
72 This investigation was a
cross-sectional cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries u
73 Prospective,
cross-sectional,
comparative instrument validation study
74 is shuttled in a peristaltic wave driven by
cross-sectional contractions of tubes.
75 Cross-sectional,
correlational, observational study.
76 were evaluated in another phase 2 study with
cross-sectional data (n = 215) and longitudinal data (n
77 Since
cross-sectional data does not allow causal inference it
78 reproductive age (WRA) (age range: 15-49 y).
Cross-sectional data for PSC (8 surveys; n = 8413) and W
79 by sleep characteristics.This study included
cross-sectional data from 119,859 white European adults,
80 mo) by country and infection-burden category.
Cross-sectional data from 16 surveys (n = 29,293) from t
81 We overviewed
cross-sectional data from 16 surveys for preschool child
82 MI risk in Costa Rican Hispanics.We analyzed
cross-sectional data from 1932 case subjects with a firs
83 We analyzed
cross-sectional data from 230 asymptomatic members of fa
84 We analyzed
cross-sectional data from 5,187 adults and 853 adolescen
85 ment algorithms to account for these effects.
Cross-sectional data from 8 surveys for PSC (n = 8803) a
86 Cross-sectional data from the 1999 to 2006 US National H
87 reproductive age (WRA) (age range: 15-49 y).
Cross-sectional data from the Biomarkers Reflecting Infl
88 en categories of BP using Markov modeling of
cross-sectional data from the National Health and Nutrit
89 dy using nationally representative, repeated
cross-sectional data from the US National Health Intervi
90 Our modelling study used
cross-sectional data on treatment for fever and RDT stat
91 tion analysis that combined case-control and
cross-sectional data sets.
92 Cross-sectional data suggest that accelerated biological
93 es that use advanced imaging, those that use
cross-sectional data to explore structure-function relat
94 Cross-sectional data were analyzed using structural equa
95 These findings rely on
cross-sectional data, preventing assessment of relations
96 and Event Data Project to construct a repeat
cross-sectional database, which was analyzed by using a
97 used a subset of the UK Biobank Resource, a
cross-sectional dataset including 247 diseases and 117,3
98 A prospective,
cross-sectional,
descriptive study.
99 ure-independent studies have been limited by
cross-sectional design and small cohort size.
100 The study used a repeated
cross-sectional design involving 3 waves of data collect
101 WT mice (5-20 mo) were investigated in a
cross-sectional design using (18)F-FDG (n = 43) and tran
102 e functional magnetic resonance imaging in a
cross-sectional design.
103 diabetes characterized for a wider range of
cross-sectional diabetic kidney disease phenotypes.
104 Material/The study is a
cross-sectional diagnostic study performed in 66 patient
105 end is due to the variation in the effective
cross-sectional diameter of DNA duplex and the thickness
106 METHODS AND We examined
cross-sectional differences in MD by age and menopausal
107 andard volume of distribution (VT) to assess
cross-sectional differences in plaque load.
108 This investigation was a
cross-sectional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) study at
109 hese Photonic Needles probes have sub-10 mum
cross-sectional dimensions, lengths greater than 3 mm-su
110 Cross-sectional distribution- and anchor-based approache
111 METHOD: We estimate
cross-sectional,
ecological regression models with data
112 was differentially associated with age, and
cross-sectional florbetapir positron emission tomography
113 the Harvard Aging Brain Study who underwent
cross-sectional flortaucipir F 18 (previously known as A
114 Cross-sectional functional magnetic resonance imaging st
115 mortem T1-weighted MRI, was used to identify
cross-sectional group differences in brain volume.
116 Patients underwent
cross-sectional imaging analysis at 3 months or later af
117 Cross-sectional imaging helps in differentiating it from
118 se with respect to endoscopic procedures and
cross-sectional imaging varies widely.
119 vidence of the effect of the same genes on a
cross-sectional measure of average drinking.
120 of the study included availability of only 2
cross-sectional measurements of malaria and the limited
121 In this
cross-sectional mega-analysis, we used the data from the
122 e gene-diet interaction was confirmed in the
cross-sectional Metabolic Syndrome Berlin Potsdam study
123 were evaluated, along with their surface and
cross sectional microstructure.
124 Observational
cross-sectional mixed-methods study.
125 From the planform shape and
cross-sectional morphologies of iceberg-keel plough mark
126 Cross sectional morphology showed that silica particles
127 graphy methods that have rectangular channel
cross-sectional morphology.
128 We analyzed
cross-sectional MUAC and triceps (triceps skinfold thick
129 This investigation was a
cross-sectional,
multicenter observational study in the
130 Cross-sectional,
multicenter paper-pencil survey on pers
131 This study is a
cross-sectional,
multilevel analysis of the 2010-11 Ment
132 at mass index, and central fat mass index.In
cross-sectional multivariable analyses, higher intake of
133 openia and/or osteopenia, assessed via total
cross-sectional muscle area and bone density at the L3 v
134 KG2C(+/del), NKG2C(del/del)) were studied in
cross-sectional (
n = 253) and prospective (n = 122) KTR
135 es (Canadian, longitudinal, N = 520; French,
cross-sectional,
N = 830) found that, qualitatively, 3 p
136 urban or rural residence) in nonpregnant WRA.
Cross-sectional,
nationally representative data from 10
137 Because of the
cross-sectional nature of the analysis, the findings do
138 with advantages over classifying eyes using
cross-sectional normative databases.
139 We used
cross-sectional observational data from UK Biobank.
140 Quantitative strands were most commonly
cross-sectional observational studies, which relied heav
141 This was a
cross-sectional,
observational study in which adult pati
142 In a single center, retrospective,
Cross-sectional,
observational study, 20 volunteers with
143 genetic or environmental variations.In this
cross-sectional,
observational study, milk was collected
144 A
cross-sectional,
observational study.
145 The addition of
cross-sectional OCTA along with en face OCTA improved th
146 NV detection with en face OCTA combined with
cross-sectional OCTA approaches that of the gold standar
147 e OCTA alone, and en face OCTA combined with
cross-sectional OCTA for the presence of CNV.
148 A alone, and with en face OCTA combined with
cross-sectional OCTA.
149 of SADS-affected families, we administered a
cross-sectional online survey across North America from
150 y searching MEDLINE and Embase databases for
cross-sectional or cohort studies published in English b
151 (BMI; weight (kg)/height (m)2) derived using
cross-sectional or longitudinal random-effects models ma
152 e was associated with dysanapsis in both the
cross-sectional (
OR, 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI],
153 considering either average levels over time (
cross-sectional)
or change in levels over time (longitud
154 We did two
cross-sectional PET studies at the Pacific Parkinson's R
155 Cross-sectional population-based study of US 2015 Nation
156 A
cross-sectional,
population-based random sample of parti
157 Nationwide,
cross-sectional,
population-based survey.
158 In this
cross-sectional,
population-based, observational study,
159 e patients' own experiences, and only record
cross-sectional,
professional impressions at the point o
160 corrected formulation that accounts for the
cross-sectional profile of the blood flow is proposed an
161 The overall
cross-sectional progression rate of 0.56 points on the S
162 This
cross-sectional prospective study was conducted from Mar
163 Cross-sectional,
prospective, comparative case series.
164 mbase for original studies that examined the
cross-sectional relationship between LLD and HCV or TBV,
165 Prior
cross-sectional research in adults has shown that anhedo
166 We performed partial correlation analysis of
cross-sectional resting-state (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose p
167 These
cross-sectional results show a strong dose-response asso
168 This
cross-sectional retrospective multicenter study analyzed
169 We used a US
cross-sectional sample of 1 545 634 patients (959 153 fa
170 Cohort A included a
cross-sectional sample of 34 MDD and 26 healthy control
171 This study examined a
cross-sectional sample of 98 right-handed, high-function
172 cedures was used to select a representative,
cross-sectional sample of adults 50 years and older from
173 ed in 19 recipients), who were identified on
cross-sectional screening of 741 patients, were randomly
174 f thermochemical piles and have asymmetrical
cross-sectional shape.
175 Cross-sectional,
single-center, observational study.
176 This research was
cross-sectional,
so we cannot be sure of the temporal se
177 ffraction mapping is a powerful tool for the
cross-sectional strain analysis of complex 1D nanostruct
178 g approach, we non-destructively explore the
cross-sectional strain and the related strain-relief def
179 Many
cross-sectional studies have evaluated risk factors for
180 In
cross-sectional studies increased vaginal bacterial dive
181 Cross-sectional studies suggested that allergy prevalenc
182 Pooled analysis of the 7
cross-sectional studies suggested that those with SDB ha
183 Thirteen studies (1 cohort study and 12
cross-sectional studies) were included, involving 38263
184 rval [CI], .99-1.48; P = .061) in cohort and
cross-sectional studies, and the odds ratio to be 1.85 (
185 cognitive impairment and dementia in various
cross-sectional studies, but whether hypoperfusion prece
186 For the
cross-sectional studies, the pooled odds ratio from the
187 e studies and standard mean differences from
cross-sectional studies, using random-effect models.
188 In previous
cross-sectional studies, we found an association between
189 sults suggest caution in using biomarkers in
cross-sectional studies.
190 er of causal effects cannot be inferred from
cross-sectional studies.
191 with data from only two case-control and two
cross-sectional studies.
192 Community based
cross - sectional study was conducted on 701 adults 35 a
193 or the diagnosis of PCOS was undertaken in a
cross sectional study involving 65 women without PCOS an
194 repeated 9.4 +/- 0.4 years after the Fontan
Cross-Sectional Study (Fontan 1) and compared with previ
195 This investigation was a
cross-sectional study at a single academic tertiary refe
196 This
cross-sectional study comprised a study group of 30 eyes
197 Cross-sectional study conducted from January 6, 2014, to
198 This was a
cross-sectional study conducted from May 23, 2014, to Ja
199 This
cross-sectional study demonstrates that sIL-2R is a usef
200 This is a
cross-sectional study designed to evaluate the histologi
201 This
cross-sectional study estimated potential for cartilage
202 This
cross-sectional study examined all Cochrane reviews that
203 Cross-sectional study from a tertiary-care retinal refer
204 Cross-sectional study from August 2014 through June 2017
205 Cross-sectional study from the 2010-2014 National Health
206 We conducted a
cross-sectional study in a network comprising an ACH and
207 Population-based,
cross-sectional study in a random sample aged 65 years o
208 Cross-sectional study in the National Prostate Cancer Re
209 This
cross-sectional study included 122 diabetic patients fro
210 METHOD: This
cross-sectional study included 159 young social drinkers
211 This
cross-sectional study included 669 women with intracrani
212 This
cross-sectional study included patients undergoing proce
213 Cross-sectional study including 40 KTR with more than 10
214 gnostic value of ptc characteristics in this
cross-sectional study including 85 biopsies of patients
215 The objective of this
cross-sectional study is to investigate levels of saliva
216 We performed a
cross-sectional study of 104 consecutive adults (56.7% f
217 We performed a
cross-sectional study of 1530 nondiabetic adults in the
218 A prospective
cross-sectional study of 31 patients with ERM from retin
219 chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in a
cross-sectional study of 400 Malawian children aged 12-5
220 oncow milk consumption and height.This was a
cross-sectional study of 5034 healthy Canadian children
221 A
cross-sectional study of a school-based cohort in late a
222 This investigation was a
cross-sectional study of CSME grading in monoscopic imag
223 A
cross-sectional study of former elite, male, rugby playe
224 Thus, in the current
cross-sectional study of healthy young adults, we tested
225 prevalence of antibodies to Ebola virus in a
cross-sectional study of household contacts of the survi
226 oductive age (25-44 y).The HEIRS Study was a
cross-sectional study of iron status and HFE mutations i
227 We performed a
cross-sectional study of matrix turnover in HIV type 1 (
228 In a prospective,
cross-sectional study of more than 100 patients, we foun
229 In the separate
cross-sectional study of patients who underwent psychome
230 In this
cross-sectional study of primary eye care practices in B
231 ometimes ambiguous information, and detailed
cross-sectional study of the microscale soft noble metal
232 In a
cross-sectional study of U.S. adults, we observed some p
233 A
cross-sectional study on patients who were healthy and p
234 nducted (written informed consent acquired),
cross-sectional study performed in a consecutively selec
235 We conducted a
cross-sectional study to evaluate the correlation of ret
236 This
cross-sectional study used the American College of Cardi
237 Cross-sectional study using baseline (2013-2015) data fr
238 Serial
cross-sectional study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sam
239 Materials and Methods This
cross-sectional study was approved by the institutional
240 MATERIAL/A retrospective,
cross-sectional study was carried out on CBCT and OPG da
241 A
cross-sectional study was conducted among HIV-infected p
242 A
cross-sectional study was conducted for 3 years in easte
243 This population-based
cross-sectional study was conducted from 2004 to 2011 an
244 This
cross-sectional study was conducted on 90 participants,
245 In 2014, a population-based
cross-sectional study was performed in two previously tr
246 This pre-post,
cross-sectional study was performed using data from 17,1
247 METHODS AND A retrospective
cross-sectional study was performed.
248 In a separate
cross-sectional study we analysed the relation between p
249 Here, we describe a
cross-sectional study where subjects at different stages
250 In a
cross-sectional study with 40 healthy students recalling
251 A
cross-sectional study with a 2-stage cluster sample desi
252 ith TMJOA and explored this association in a
cross-sectional study with human patients.
253 nitis and asthma multimorbidity at baseline (
cross-sectional study) and (iii) to follow-up using visu
254 ion-based screening study in Germany.In this
cross-sectional study, 15,950 participants aged >/=55 y
255 In this
cross-sectional study, 239 former preterm infants with g
256 In this
cross-sectional study, 352 subjects were carefully chara
257 In this
cross-sectional study, genome-wide microarray was used t
258 In this prospective
cross-sectional study, OCTA was used to examine the eyes
259 In this
cross-sectional study, patellofemoral joint alignment (b
260 In this
cross-sectional study, the authors used a comprehensive
261 1 participants aged 20 years or older from a
cross-sectional study, the National Health and Nutrition
262 the use of electronic purchase data.In this
cross-sectional study, we examined household store purch
263 alysed data from a nationally representative
cross-sectional study, What About Youth, which enrolled
264 ided informed consent to participate in this
cross-sectional study.
265 te LA age-matched patients participated in a
cross-sectional study.
266 Observational,
cross-sectional study.
267 able surrogate for glaucoma severity in this
cross-sectional study.
268 Population-based
cross-sectional study.
269 raphy to measure cerebral metabolism in this
cross-sectional study.
270 healthy controls (HC) were enrolled in this
cross-sectional study.
271 ith healthy controls were recruited for this
cross-sectional study.
272 d above were enrolled in a population-based,
cross-sectional study.
273 Prospective,
cross-sectional study.
274 Retrospective, uncontrolled,
cross-sectional study.
275 Retrospective
cross-sectional study.
276 lar disease, and cerebrovascular pathology.A
cross-sectional subset of the Nutrition, Aging, and Memo
277 f HIV gene diversification can allow precise
cross-sectional surveillance with a desirable temporal r
278 We used data from a nationwide
cross-sectional survey (the China Patient-Centered Evalu
279 egression analysis, we collected data from a
cross-sectional survey collected 1 year after the floodi
280 A
cross-sectional survey design was used to collect data f
281 December 2015, we conducted a representative
cross-sectional survey of 8-17-year-olds living in the 7
282 re VISHRAM was introduced, we did a baseline
cross-sectional survey of adults randomly selected from
283 A
cross-sectional survey of categorical general surgery in
284 m Monitoring the Future, a national, annual,
cross-sectional survey of students in secondary schools
285 A
cross-sectional survey was conducted in a general popula
286 A comprehensive
cross-sectional survey was performed in Curacao in June
287 In this
cross-sectional survey, data were collected from a rando
288 Nationally representative
cross-sectional survey.
289 he Scottish Health Surveys are record-linked
cross-sectional surveys representative of the adult popu
290 Four
cross-sectional surveys were conducted in conjunction wi
291 Two
cross-sectional surveys were conducted in Lake Victoria
292 Cross-sectional surveys were conducted in Madang Provinc
293 he course of this study, in population-based
cross-sectional surveys, 5,206 men and 3,106 women aged
294 tenatal clinic (ANC) attendees enrolled in 2
cross-sectional surveys, exposure was categorized in 200
295 A
cross-sectional twin study was conducted from August 27,
296 -up study of TENOR I patients using a single
cross-sectional visit in 2013/2014.
297 However, diffuse
cross-sectional volume deficits across all subfields wer
298 Whereas this has been shown for
cross-sectional volume, it is unclear whether volume cha
299 n = 254) and two independent MS cohorts: (1)
cross-sectional with paired serum and CSF samples (n = 1
300 Cross-sectional X-ray imaging has become the standard fo