ライフサイエンスコーパス: cross-sectional study

1 The institutional review board approved this cross-sectional study.

2 Retrospective, repeated cross-sectional study.

3 Examination Survey (2003-2012) in a repeated cross-sectional study.

4 Multicenter, cross-sectional study.

5 Prospective cross-sectional study.

6 d above were enrolled in a population-based, cross-sectional study.

7 ttransplant symptomatic CMV infection in the cross-sectional study.

8 Retrospective, population-based cross-sectional study.

9 Retrospective, cross-sectional study.

10 Prospective, cross-sectional study.

11 Population-based, cross-sectional study.

12 ty of Medical Sciences were included in this cross-sectional study.

13 Retrospective, uncontrolled, cross-sectional study.

14 patients were enrolled in this multi-center cross-sectional study.

15 Retrospective cross-sectional study.

16 men (MSM) called for a comprehensive serial cross-sectional study.

17 te LA age-matched patients participated in a cross-sectional study.

18 te LA age-matched patients participated in a cross-sectional study.

19 This is a national cross-sectional study.

20 Observational, cross-sectional study.

21 ided informed consent to participate in this cross-sectional study.

22 Population-based cross-sectional study.

23 raphy to measure cerebral metabolism in this cross-sectional study.

24 able surrogate for glaucoma severity in this cross-sectional study.

25 healthy controls (HC) were enrolled in this cross-sectional study.

26 ith healthy controls were recruited for this cross-sectional study.

27 64 male participants) were enrolled in this cross-sectional study.

28 mothers with gestational diabetes (GDM) in a cross-sectional study.

29 rting observational cohort, case control and cross sectional studies.

30 ctanoic acid (PFOA) serum levels in previous cross-sectional studies.

31 Longitudinal and cross-sectional studies.

32 mal eyes, and were greater than described in cross-sectional studies.

33 with data from only two case-control and two cross-sectional studies.

34 longitudinal retrospective, prospective, and cross-sectional studies.

35 hough evidence for this has relied solely on cross-sectional studies.

36 between smoking and TL reported in previous cross-sectional studies.

37 sity have now been identified in large-scale cross-sectional studies.

38 diovascular risk has been assessed mostly in cross-sectional studies.

39 large extensively genotyped case-control and cross-sectional studies.

40 sults suggest caution in using biomarkers in cross-sectional studies.

41 er of causal effects cannot be inferred from cross-sectional studies.

42 noma (ESCC), although evidence is limited to cross-sectional studies.

43 We conducted 2 main analyses for this cross-sectional study: (1) an estimate of the total numb

44 ion-based screening study in Germany.In this cross-sectional study, 15,950 participants aged >/=55 y

45 In this cross-sectional study, 239 former preterm infants with g

46 In a descriptive cross-sectional study, 242 (46.1%) participants of 525 t

47 es, including 31 randomized trials (7%), 116 cross-sectional studies (27%), and 278 cohort studies (6

48 In this cross-sectional study, 29 automobiles from 15 automobile

49 In this multinational cross-sectional study, 322 physicians from 289 centres i

50 In this cross-sectional study, 352 subjects were carefully chara

51 In this cross-sectional study, 42 patients were recruited at the

52 In this case-control, cross-sectional study, 704 eyes of 445 participants unde

53 MATERIAL/In this cross-sectional study, 748 consecutive patients with sus

54 In this cross-sectional study, 8.5% of patients using proton pum

55 In this cross sectional study a total of 123 patients (one eye e

56 Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, a nationally representative surve

57 a pharmacovigilance-based, nonexperimental, cross-sectional study aimed at finding the prevalence of

58 The present cross-sectional study aimed at identifying two common ge

59 This cross-sectional study aims to investigate the correlatio

60 Cross-sectional study among physicians and nurses (90 IC

61 We utilized a cross-sectional study analyzing clinical features and sa

62 nitis and asthma multimorbidity at baseline (cross-sectional study) and (iii) to follow-up using visu

63 largest in low-sexual-activity populations, cross-sectional studies, and studies which evaluated inf

64 rval [CI], .99-1.48; P = .061) in cohort and cross-sectional studies, and the odds ratio to be 1.85 (

65 ith control groups (15 cohort studies, three cross-sectional studies, and two clinical trials) were i

66 This cross-sectional study assesses cytokine levels in peri-i

67 This investigation was a cross-sectional study at a single academic tertiary refe

68 A total of 2,346 cattle were examined in a cross-sectional study at four abattoirs in Cameroon.

69 We conducted a cross-sectional study at the Altino Ventura Foundation i

70 cognitive impairment and dementia in various cross-sectional studies, but whether hypoperfusion prece

71 disease, systemic immune activation, and, in cross-sectional studies, changes in the enteric virome.

72 In cross-sectional studies, chronic helminth infections hav

73 A cross-sectional study comparing serum miRNA samples with

74 We conducted a cross-sectional study comparing the fecal microbiomes of

75 This cross-sectional study comprised a study group of 30 eyes

76 This cross-sectional study conducted a national survey of non

77 Prospective, observational cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary care acade

78 Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional study conducted at academic and communit

79 Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study conducted at Miami Veterans Affair

80 Cross-sectional study conducted from January 6, 2014, to

81 This was a cross-sectional study conducted from May 23, 2014, to Ja

82 In a cross-sectional study conducted in 2012-2013, we examine

83 This issue was investigated using a cross-sectional study conducted in 2013.

84 tudy in 974 Turkish children selected from a cross-sectional study conducted using ISAAC (Internation

85 In a cross-sectional study, conducted in an ambulatory care c

86 We conducted a cross-sectional study consisting of 945 siblings from 33

87 In this 7-year cross-sectional study (covering birth cohorts 1988-1995)

88 This cross-sectional study demonstrates that sIL-2R is a usef

89 In this cross-sectional study, dermatologic findings for film he

90 This cross-sectional study design took place in outpatient cl

91 , because of the limitations inherent to the cross-sectional study design, further studies are needed

92 This is a cross-sectional study designed to evaluate the histologi

93 In this cross-sectional study done at the Yale School of Medicin

94 This cross-sectional study estimated potential for cartilage

95 This cross-sectional study evaluated the relationship between

96 A cross-sectional study evaluating 300 forest service empl

97 This retrospective, cross-sectional study examined a single-center neuropath

98 This cross-sectional study examined all Cochrane reviews that

99 repeated 9.4 +/- 0.4 years after the Fontan Cross-Sectional Study (Fontan 1) and compared with previ

100 en and adolescents in 19 US population-based cross-sectional studies from the National Survey of Chil

101 mined myocardial function in a retrospective cross-sectional study from a cohort of AD patients and a

102 Cross-sectional study from a tertiary-care retinal refer

103 Cross-sectional study from August 2014 through June 2017

104 year) participated in this laboratory-based cross-sectional study from June 19, 2007, to November 26

105 t examinations as part of a university-based cross-sectional study from September 2011 to October 201

106 Cross-sectional study from the 2010-2014 National Health

107 In this cross-sectional study, genome-wide microarray was used t

108 Many cross-sectional studies have evaluated risk factors for

109 A number of cross-sectional studies have investigated multigeneratio

110 Cross-sectional studies have revealed microbial signatur

111 ed were trials and cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies in which the association between

112 We conducted a cross-sectional study in 2,308 adults (age, 20-72 yr).

113 topic dilution tandem mass spectrometry in a cross-sectional study in 325 Malawian children, aged 12-

114 In a cross-sectional study in 746 Caucasian women aged 65.0 +

115 We conducted a cross-sectional study in a network comprising an ACH and

116 Population-based, cross-sectional study in a random sample aged 65 years o

117 senic and markers of cardiometabolic risk: a cross-sectional study in Chihuahua, Mexico.

118 We conducted a cross-sectional study in low-risk health care workers (H

119 ions between UNGD activity and symptoms in a cross-sectional study in Pennsylvania.

120 Cross-sectional study in the National Prostate Cancer Re

121 This was a prospective, hospital based, cross-sectional study in which all consecutive cases of

122 Materials and Methods In a cross-sectional study, in vivo lumbar MR elastography wa

123 Materials and Methods This retrospective cross-sectional study included 108 consecutive patients

124 This cross-sectional study included 122 diabetic patients fro

125 METHODS AND This cross-sectional study included 158 individuals with chro

126 METHOD: This cross-sectional study included 159 young social drinkers

127 This cross-sectional study included 32 participants with AD w

128 The sample of this cross-sectional study included 40 OSA patients and 45 ag

129 This cross-sectional study included 669 women with intracrani

130 This cross-sectional study included 88 office workers.

131 tting, and Participants: This retrospective, cross-sectional study included anonymized urine samples

132 A cross-sectional study included patients in monotherapy f

133 This cross-sectional study included patients undergoing proce

134 This cross-sectional study includes 271 singletons born in Ba

135 This cross-sectional study includes 56 patients with periodon

136 Cross-sectional study including 40 KTR with more than 10

137 To address this limitation, we conducted a cross-sectional study including 43,593 working adults fr

138 gnostic value of ptc characteristics in this cross-sectional study including 85 biopsies of patients

139 In cross-sectional studies increased vaginal bacterial dive

140 ptive vs condom use or among longitudinal vs cross-sectional studies, indicating that parent sexual c

141 This cross-sectional study investigates whether susceptibilit

142 METHODS AND This cross-sectional study involved a sample of 206 former Na

143 A cross sectional study involving 60 patients subdivided i

144 or the diagnosis of PCOS was undertaken in a cross sectional study involving 65 women without PCOS an

145 The trial was a cross-sectional study involving 1442 participants (women

146 ere performed on 24 genes related to NS in a cross-sectional study involving 95 children who underwen

147 The objective of this cross-sectional study is to investigate levels of saliva

148 In this cross-sectional study, magnetic resonance images were ac

149 ptom prevalence data were extracted from 167 cross-sectional studies (n = 116628) and 16 longitudinal

150 Participants in this cross-sectional study (n = 171) were from a cohort of co

151 In this cross-sectional study, neuroanatomical volumes associate

152 In this prospective cross-sectional study, OCTA was used to examine the eyes

153 beta-cell dysfunction in a population-based cross sectional study of 4,427 women and 2,394 men aged

154 Serial cross-sectional studies of adults aged 20 years or older

155 Cross-sectional studies of the language system in early

156 Retrospective cross-sectional study of 1 050 815 beneficiaries older t

157 We performed a cross-sectional study of 104 consecutive adults (56.7% f

158 Cross-sectional study of 13,893 patients with chronic ob

159 We conducted a cross-sectional study of 1341 patients from the Genkyst

160 We performed a cross-sectional study of 1530 nondiabetic adults in the

161 d drinking/smoking behaviors, we conducted a cross-sectional study of 1870 college students from Shan

162 A prospective cross-sectional study of 31 patients with ERM from retin

163 o December 19, 2011) was a population-based, cross-sectional study of 3353 persons aged 40 to 80 year

164 chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in a cross-sectional study of 400 Malawian children aged 12-5

165 Cross-sectional study of 431 asthmatics.

166 oncow milk consumption and height.This was a cross-sectional study of 5034 healthy Canadian children

167 In a cross-sectional study of 59 participants with nondiabeti

168 Using a nationally representative cross-sectional study of 7,137 children under five years

169 This was an observational cross-sectional study of 76 postmenopausal females.

170 In a cross-sectional study of 787 patients with newly diagnos

171 Cross-sectional study of 810 adults attending secondary

172 A matched, cross-sectional study of 85 black children aged 5 to 16

173 We performed an open-label, prospective, cross-sectional study of 872 high-risk subjects (more th

174 Data were from a cross-sectional study of 9,447 participants of the 1999-

175 A cross-sectional study of a large cohort of adolescents f

176 In a cross-sectional study of a middle-aged population, avera

177 Retrospective cross-sectional study of a racially diverse referred sam

178 A cross-sectional study of a school-based cohort in late a

179 A cross-sectional study of anal and cervical HPV infection

180 This investigation was a cross-sectional study of CSME grading in monoscopic imag

181 We conducted a cross-sectional study of de-identified residual diagnost

182 We undertook a cross-sectional study of elderly inhabitants of Kinshasa

183 A cross-sectional study of former elite, male, rugby playe

184 Cross-sectional study of graft thickness using anterior

185 Thus, in the current cross-sectional study of healthy young adults, we tested

186 igated annual rhythms of brain activity in a cross-sectional study of healthy young participants.

187 prevalence of antibodies to Ebola virus in a cross-sectional study of household contacts of the survi

188 oductive age (25-44 y).The HEIRS Study was a cross-sectional study of iron status and HFE mutations i

189 This cross-sectional study of low anterior resection for rect

190 We performed a cross-sectional study of matrix turnover in HIV type 1 (

191 Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study of men and women 18 to 33 years of

192 In a prospective, cross-sectional study of more than 100 patients, we foun

193 We performed a cross-sectional study of obesity indicators and rhinitis

194 We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study of patients planning mastectomy at

195 In the separate cross-sectional study of patients who underwent psychome

196 In this cross-sectional study of primary eye care practices in B

197 , and Participants: This investigation was a cross-sectional study of respondents 40 years and older

198 Cross-sectional study of sepsis readmissions between 200

199 In a cross-sectional study of subjects undergoing colonoscopy

200 We conducted a cross-sectional study of subjects who were classified as

201 This is a pooled cross-sectional study of survey data collected for the y

202 ometimes ambiguous information, and detailed cross-sectional study of the microscale soft noble metal

203 our knowledge, since 2004 there has been no cross-sectional study of the prevalence, focus, and comp

204 In a cross-sectional study of U.S. adults, we observed some p

205 Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional study of US internal medicine residency

206 We performed a cross-sectional study on 13 patients with adrenomyeloneu

207 he premanifest disease phase, we performed a cross-sectional study on asymptomatic (n = 12) and sympt

208 A cross-sectional study on patients who were healthy and p

209 ontitis and GDM in the meta-analyses of four cross-sectional studies (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.32) a

210 These associations were validated in the cross-sectional study (P < 0.0001).

211 In this cross-sectional study, patellofemoral joint alignment (b

212 nducted (written informed consent acquired), cross-sectional study performed in a consecutively selec

213 were observational cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies; reported on age at onset of men

214 Cross-sectional studies show that activity fluctuations

215 sample size limits definite conclusions, our cross-sectional study showed seropositivity to the NT5c1

216 Data from this cross-sectional study showed that on average, the longer

217 Results are consistent with previous cross-sectional studies showing association between PFOA

218 Cross-sectional studies suggested that allergy prevalenc

219 Pooled analysis of the 7 cross-sectional studies suggested that those with SDB ha

220 This was a cross-sectional study that employed quantitative data co

221 The study was a hospital-based cross-sectional study that was conducted in Menelik II R

222 Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies, the Critical Appraisal Skills P

223 For the cross-sectional studies, the pooled odds ratio from the

224 In this cross-sectional study, the authors used a comprehensive

225 1 participants aged 20 years or older from a cross-sectional study, the National Health and Nutrition

226 In a cross-sectional study, the number and growth potential o

227 We did a cross-sectional study to describe the prevalence, nature

228 ed 110 participants, aged 18-22 y, in a 30-d cross-sectional study to document sleep and circadian be

229 We conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate the correlation of ret

230 In cross-sectional studies triclosan and parabens, ubiquito

231 This cross-sectional study used the American College of Cardi

232 Retrospective cross-sectional study using a comprehensive database of

233 Cross-sectional study using baseline (2013-2015) data fr

234 Retrospective cross-sectional study using Medicaid claims data from 20

235 Design, Setting, and Participants: Serial cross-sectional study using nationally representative da

236 Cross-sectional study using patients admitted from the e

237 Serial cross-sectional study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sam

238 e studies and standard mean differences from cross-sectional studies, using random-effect models.

239 Community based cross - sectional study was conducted on 701 adults 35 a

240 A cross sectional study was conducted at the University of

241 Community based cross sectional study was conducted on 780 participants

242 A pilot cross sectional study was conducted to investigate the r

243 Materials and Methods This prospective cross-sectional study was approved by the institutional

244 Materials and Methods This cross-sectional study was approved by the institutional

245 This cross-sectional study was based on 1004 participants 40

246 This cross-sectional study was carried out at the Kotka Healt

247 A cross-sectional study was carried out in the tropical ur

248 MATERIAL/A retrospective, cross-sectional study was carried out on CBCT and OPG da

249 A cross-sectional study was conducted among HIV-infected p

250 A population-based, cross-sectional study was conducted among subjects 60 ye

251 A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Hospital de la Sa

252 A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Departments o

253 This comparative cross-sectional study was conducted during 2014-2015.

254 A cross-sectional study was conducted for 3 years in easte

255 This population-based cross-sectional study was conducted from 2004 to 2011 an

256 Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was conducted from January 1, 2014

257 A cross-sectional study was conducted from May 31 to Augus

258 This multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in 15 cardiovascular

259 This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2012 in a single

260 A cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary eye ho

261 A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Eye Clinic, H

262 This cross-sectional study was conducted on 90 participants,

263 A cross-sectional study was conducted using NHANES data fr

264 Materials and Methods This cross-sectional study was exempt from institutional revi

265 A cross-sectional study was performed in 3281 healthy elit

266 A cross-sectional study was performed in a representative

267 In 2014, a population-based cross-sectional study was performed in two previously tr

268 This cross-sectional study was performed to review the first

269 This pre-post, cross-sectional study was performed using data from 17,1

270 METHODS AND A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed.

271 The aim of this cross-sectional study was to analyze the sensitization p

272 The aim of this cross-sectional study was to use cell phone data to asse

273 nese American Eye Study, a population-based, cross-sectional study, was conducted from February 1, 20

274 erican Eye Study (CHES), a population-based, cross-sectional study, was conducted from February 2010

275 In a separate cross-sectional study we analysed the relation between p

276 In a cross-sectional study we included obese subjects with as

277 In previous cross-sectional studies, we found an association between

278 METHODS AND In this cross-sectional study, we describe clinical and neuropat

279 In this nationwide, population-based, cross-sectional study, we estimated the point prevalence

280 the use of electronic purchase data.In this cross-sectional study, we examined household store purch

281 In this serial cross-sectional study, we obtained data from ten cross-s

282 In this cross-sectional study, we recruited volunteers aged at l

283 In this cross-sectional study, we searched the genetic database

284 In this cross-sectional study, we sought to determine the incide

285 In this population-based cross-sectional study, we used individual-level data fro

286 and Synthesis: Of 467 studies identified, 20 cross-sectional studies were assessed for methodological

287 cation, and generation.Repeated, independent cross-sectional studies were conducted between 1993 and

288 ting, and Participants: Three single-center, cross-sectional studies were performed in patients recru

289 Multiple cross-sectional studies were pooled to assemble all pers

290 Thirteen studies (1 cohort study and 12 cross-sectional studies) were included, involving 38263

291 alysed data from a nationally representative cross-sectional study, What About Youth, which enrolled

292 Here, we describe a cross-sectional study where subjects at different stages

293 lanine were measured in a longitudinal and a cross sectional studies with a total of 429 Chinese part

294 A secondary data analysis of a cross sectional study with 201 outpatients with heart fa

295 In this study, we used a cross-sectional study with 1090 community-dwelling Chine

296 In a cross-sectional study with 40 healthy students recalling

297 A cross-sectional study with a 2-stage cluster sample desi

298 ith TMJOA and explored this association in a cross-sectional study with human patients.

299 Design, Setting, and Participants: A serial cross-sectional study with time trends was conducted usi

300 A population-based cross-sectional study, with 37,582 participants recruite