ライフサイエンスコーパス: cross-species comparison

1 regulatory elements to be identified through cross-species comparisons .

2 neighborhood, advanced querying options and cross-species comparison.

3 functionally important 3' UTR motifs without cross-species comparison.

4 Barley1 exemplar sequences, thus, enhancing cross-species comparison.

5 ytical approach to gene recognition based on cross-species comparison.

6 such analyses and to examine the outcomes of cross-species comparison.

7 with annotated reference genomes to support cross species comparisons.

8 Basic Local Alignment Search Tool search for cross-species comparisons.

9 mpt targeted analysis in model organisms and cross-species comparisons.

10 mouse forebrain sample specimen to allow for cross-species comparisons.

11 ion of features within a genomic region, and cross-species comparisons.

12 ll-defined ontologies that enable meaningful cross-species comparisons.

13 ded detection of micro-exons and human-mouse cross-species comparisons.

14 xa is critical to accurate and comprehensive cross-species comparisons.

15 of utilizing conserved human cDNA probes for cross-species comparisons.

16 five parasite species and provides tools for cross-species comparisons.

17 s of teaching provides welcome reframing for cross-species comparisons.

18 cs tools that facilitate gene prediction and cross- species comparisons.

19 Coupled with these gene expression studies, cross-species comparison (a technique used to search for

20 t updates to BRM for miRNA data analysis and cross-species comparisons across datasets.

21 We demonstrate by cross-species comparison and by chromatin immunoprecipit

22 Improved search and display tools, wider cross-species comparisons and extended ontologies are so

23 within extensive regions of DNA by means of cross-species comparison, and de novo determination of t

24 In particular the method facilitates cross-species comparisons, and enables the handling of n

25 ecies will facilitate hypothesis generation, cross-species comparisons, annotation of genomes, and an

26 They can be applied to cross-species comparisons as well as to the study of chr

27 and correlated phenotypes, cross-tissue, and cross-species comparisons, as well as testing of a broad

28 non-redundant Barley1 exemplar sequences or cross-species comparison at the genome level, respective

29 cribe a challenge to the animal model and to cross-species comparisons by considering the case of the

30 ly sequenced prokaryotic genomes facilitates cross-species comparisons by genomic annotation algorith

31 this claim and present arguments based upon cross-species comparisons, EEG findings, and development

32 ges in RNA abundance on the proteome, and by cross-species comparison for identifying conserved or un

33 The cross-species comparison has facilitated the identificat

34 Microarray analysis and cross-species comparisons identified two conserved gene

35 that p.N314D is a common human variant, and cross-species comparisons implicate D314 as the ancestra

36 Reranking gene models with cross-species comparison improves gene prediction accura

37 Cross-species comparison indicates that 81 families are

38 s Lepidium (Brassicaceae) is well suited for cross-species comparisons investigating the origin of co

39 Cross-species comparisons narrowed the activity of the S

40 tivated research into network alignment: the cross-species comparison of conserved functional modules

41 between human and murine DN, we performed a cross-species comparison of glomerular transcriptional n

42 istics reported here permit the first direct cross-species comparison of putative homologous ganglion

43 To perform a cross-species comparison of selection on codon usage, wh

44 Similar to the way BLAST enables cross-species comparison of sequence data, tools that en

45 d reciprocal BLAST, we conducted a fly-human cross-species comparison of the phosphoinositide-3-kinas

46 grams presages the possibility of systematic cross-species comparison of the two genomes as a powerfu

47 A cross-species comparison of this complex structure with

48 plant species permits detailed discovery and cross-species comparison of transposable elements (TEs)

49 of the amygdala in emotional learning and in cross-species comparisons of emotional behavior.

50 n analysis of human brain and the utility of cross-species comparisons of gene expression.

51 binding proteins of S. pneumoniae or in many cross-species comparisons of gene loci.

52 Cross-species comparisons of gene neighborhoods (also ca

53 To date, cross-species comparisons of genetic interactomes have b

54 Cross-species comparisons of genomes, transcriptomes and

55 Cross-species comparisons of integrated networks may pro

56 ebrafish and serve as an important basis for cross-species comparisons of PVN/NPO structure and funct

57 Here, using a novel tool that allows cross-species comparisons of regulatory elements between

58 These findings emphasize that further cross-species comparisons of the pharmacology of PPI are

59 Recent studies have employed cross-species comparisons of transcription factor bindin

60 Cross-species comparison outlined an active 49-bp widely

61 nogaster demonstrate that reranking based on cross-species comparison outperforms the best gene model

62 Bioinformatic analysis and cross-species comparisons revealed sequence conservation

63 Cross-species comparison reveals the LHX3b-specific doma

64 ted rabbit > human > porcine > bovine, and a cross-species comparison showed good Spearman's rho corr

65 To develop a cross-species comparison strategy for identifying CRC ca

66 e been proposed based on observations and/or cross-species comparisons that did not standardize for s

67 In cross-species comparisons, the results obtained by diffe

68 tion and myelination that were validated via cross-species comparison to Ts65Dn trisomy mice.

69 analysis of the human data, supplemented by cross-species comparisons to macaques, indicated that CT

70 We suggest that cross species comparisons using large-scale genomic anal

71 A bioinformatic cross-species comparison using a gene expression signatu

72 of Escherichia coli genes were identified by cross-species comparison using an extended Gibbs samplin

73 To enable better cross-species comparisons, we developed methods for auto

74 ctions were also characterized to facilitate cross-species comparisons where possible.

75 erations of the GATA1 transcriptome, we used cross-species comparison with genes regulated by GATA1 e

76 y expressed miRNA were further assessed by a cross-species comparison with human osteoblasts and OS c

77 Cross-species comparison within a single MSY phylogeny e