ライフサイエンスコーパス: cultural evolution

1 Biological methods can be extended to human cultural evolution.

2 l for more consideration of individual-level cultural evolution.

3 d Big God religions is a master narrative of cultural evolution.

4 gue that prosocial religion develops through cultural evolution.

5 glect important individual-level accounts of cultural evolution.

6 ffects propagated via a long-term process of cultural evolution.

7 informed by knowledge of human behavior and cultural evolution.

8 Richerson et al. make a compelling case for cultural evolution.

9 and dual inheritance, in addition to purely cultural evolution.

10 taphysical fact is integral to the theory of cultural evolution.

11 ecially problematic for developing models of cultural evolution.

12 and collaborative interdependence may affect cultural evolution.

13 rences may influence collective behavior and cultural evolution.

14 It can be seen as a key mechanism of cultural evolution.

15 sion thickets that are obstacles to modeling cultural evolution.

16 orate them into population-dynamic models of cultural evolution.

17 overimitation studies, within a framework of cultural evolution.

18 nature, whereas moral codes are products of cultural evolution.

19 and adds complexity to our understanding of cultural evolution.

20 ships ("intertextuality") and contributes to cultural evolution.

21 lels and interactions between biological and cultural evolution.

22 on of biological principles of learning with cultural evolution.

23 may apply to information channeling in human cultural evolution.

24 their tools may be the result of cumulative cultural evolution--a phenomenon considered to be a hall

25 Cultural evolution allows these rules to change over tim

26 the application of phylogenetic modeling to cultural evolution and argue that the use of these metho

27 evel public information transfer, leading to cultural evolution and divergence among colonies.

28 govern supernatural monitoring are honed by cultural evolution and have given rise to Big Gods, they

29 population level across generations to track cultural evolution and multigenerational behavioral proc

30 ss the societal implications of the study of cultural evolution and of the interactions of humans wit

31 he distinctive human capacity for cumulative cultural evolution, and new research has begun to probe

32 Here we provide ethnographic evidence of how cultural evolution, at the level of individuals, can be

33 which the author proposes a new paradigm of cultural evolution based not on the individuals' charact

34 in this direction with an emphasis on human cultural evolution, but the same algorithm applies to al

35 Both genetic and cultural evolution can be described as systems of inheri

36 ptations for flexible learning combined with cultural evolution can explain how each child has the po

37 up living within the framework of Cumulative Cultural Evolution (CCE), the interplay between CCE and

38 It also incorporates a realistic aspect of cultural evolution: cultural innovations, such as those

39 opment of societies suggest that patterns in cultural evolution do occur.

40 aldino's proposed extension of the theory of cultural evolution embraces emergent group-level traits.

41 lies that the traits required for sequential cultural evolution first appeared in the last common anc

42 linguistic change associated with divergent cultural evolution following human migration.

43 s in theoretical population genetics because cultural evolution has many parallels with, as well as c

44 vestigate the hypothesis that the process of cultural evolution has played an active, leading role in

45 ues approximate conditions that characterize cultural evolution in the small-scale societies in which

46 Biologists should help to guide a process of cultural evolution in which society determines how much

47 the interdisciplinary challenges of studying cultural evolution, including its relation to the tradit

48 raits and the implications for the theory of cultural evolution, including ramifications for the evol

49 Existing models of cultural evolution, inspired by models of genetic evolut

50 The quantitative description of cultural evolution is a challenging task.

51 We show that cultural evolution is necessarily a separate process fro

52 has been claimed that a meaningful theory of cultural evolution is not possible because human beliefs

53 An alternative approach to studying cultural evolution is to examine patterns of modern cult

54 e predictions of these models, and models of cultural evolution more generally, can be tested in the

55 ins of structure in language, and argue that cultural evolution must be considered alongside biologic

56 Models of cultural evolution need to address not only the organiza

57 een the genetic evolution of species and the cultural evolution of beliefs, skills, knowledge, langua

58 ings between meanings and words leads to the cultural evolution of communicatively optimal vocabulary

59 Understanding the cultural evolution of complicated group-level traits req

60 itional explanatory advantages regarding the cultural evolution of group-level traits that emerge fro

61 y dynamics can be formulated to describe the cultural evolution of language and the biological evolut

62 imental paradigm for studying the cumulative cultural evolution of language.

63 es could constrain the direction and rate of cultural evolution of learned songs.

64 one-to-one learning bias, which leads to the cultural evolution of optimal communication, is shown to

65 We unambiguously demonstrate that cultural evolution of society can be observed and quanti

66 I investigate both the cultural evolution of vocabulary systems and the biologi

67 complicated by the cumulative nature of the cultural evolution of vocabulary systems.

68 tury (such as the one we used) are rare, the cultural evolution on shorter timescales can be studied

69 ve not previously been observed in models of cultural evolution or gene-culture interactions.

70 pose a conceptual extension of the theory of cultural evolution, particularly related to the evolutio

71 mensional conceptual map is complementary to cultural evolution research that has sought to explain p

72 ycle correspond with discontinuities in Maya cultural evolution, suggesting that the Maya were affect

73 Here we propose a dynamic model of cultural evolution that accommodates empirical observati

74 ism is a set of traditions developed through cultural evolution that adapts to people's intuitions to

75 of human history, there are regularities in cultural evolution that can be detected using computatio

76 iocognitive mechanisms underlying cumulative cultural evolution, the consequences of demography on cu

77 evolution, the consequences of demography on cultural evolution, the empirical validity of assumed so

78 In turn, cultural inheritance leads to cultural evolution, the prevailing mode of human adaptat

79 kes into account two properties intrinsic to cultural evolution: the differential distribution of tra

80 ssion, can change the parameters that affect cultural evolution, thereby altering the population's cu

81 While scientific discourse typically links cultural evolution to group selection and genetic evolut

82 to collaboration and social organization in cultural evolution to include cognition.

83 oses a conceptual extension to the theory of cultural evolution to include emergent group-level trait

84 ution that recurs because of the capacity of cultural evolution to produce practices adapted to innat

85 The foundation of cultural evolution was laid in the late 20th century wit

86 Many of the first quantitative models of cultural evolution were modified from existing concepts

87 Moral codes, however, are outcomes of cultural evolution, which accounts for the diversity of