ライフサイエンスコーパス: culture bottle

1 alent to that of the vented standard aerobic culture bottle.

2 e species were recovered from a single blood culture bottle.

3 the mecA gene directly from a positive blood culture bottle.

4 BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F and Anaerobic/F blood culture bottles.

5 te broth) compared to inoculation into blood culture bottles.

6 liquots taken directly from BacT/Alert blood culture bottles.

7 ecA, vanA/B, and blaKPC) from positive blood culture bottles.

8 nto BACTEC Plus/F and BacT/Alert FAN aerobic culture bottles.

9 l and fungal isolates in 784 simulated blood culture bottles.

10 ida species causing BSI, directly from blood culture bottles.

11 -enriched blood samples and standard aerobic culture bottles.

12 s and resistance markers directly from blood culture bottles.

13 onventional techniques with culture in blood culture bottles.

14 7 (6%) were culture positive only with blood culture bottles.

15 using both membrane filter system and blood culture bottles.

16 ediatric FAN (PF) and Bactec Peds Plus blood culture bottles.

17 cal isolates of yeasts inoculated into blood culture bottles.

18 cus species directly from 200 positive blood culture bottles.

19 tance gene mecA directly from positive blood culture bottles.

20 . albicans and C. glabrata in positive blood culture bottles.

21 iological detection system with spiked blood culture bottles.

22 directly upon subculture from positive blood culture bottles.

23 ntification of S. aureus from positive blood culture bottles.

24 ely, with 190 GPCC-positive BacT/Alert blood culture bottles.

25 six Candida spp. directly from BACTEC blood culture bottles.

26 e with both membrane filter system and blood culture bottles, 11 (26%) with membrane filter system on

27 Of the 231 MP culture bottles, 114 cultures were positive for MTB and

28 e with both membrane filter system and blood culture bottles, 15 (12%) were culture positive only wit

29 th (1) both membrane filter system and blood culture bottles, (2) membrane filter system only, and (3

30 e with both membrane filter system and blood culture bottles, 26 (16%) with membrane filter system on

31 spectively, with 174 GPCC-positive ESP blood culture bottles, 98.5% (67 of 68) and 98.5% (129 of 131)

32 uspected sepsis into an original FAN aerobic culture bottle and an FA bottle.

33 made directly from the contents of the blood culture bottle and hybridized for 90 min at 55 degrees C

34 ntigen test with samples from positive blood culture bottles and defined the duration of detectable p

35 ovine serum albumin to the sample from blood culture bottles and found that it decreased the effects

36 inoculated into aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles and incubated at 35 degrees C in an auto

37 o nonvented BM and BD standard aerobic blood culture bottles and incubated in their respective instru

38 dentifying S. pneumoniae from positive blood culture bottles and may enable a diagnosis of pneumococc

39 in comparison to routine subculture of blood culture bottles and phenotypic identification of microbe

40 outine and 25 simulated yeast-positive blood culture bottles and showed 100% sensitivity and 100% spe

41 ctively, with 200 GPCC-positive BACTEC blood culture bottles, and 100% (74 of 74) and 99.1% (115 of 1

42 Blood culture bottles, and possibly continuous-monitoring bloo

43 directly extracted from 234 BacT-Alert blood culture bottles, and results were compared to those obta

44 ered from both solid medium and spiked blood culture bottles, and the results were obtained in <10 mi

45 ntify organisms directly from positive blood culture bottles as culture-based methods.

46 87 blood culture sets collected in FAN blood culture bottles at Geisinger Medical Center.

47 sed molecular diagnostics for positive blood culture bottles (BCBs) has not been rigorously assessed.

48 Manufacturers generally recommend that blood culture bottles be loaded into instruments within a shor

49 The BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic blood culture bottle (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Instrument S

50 umoniae and W. confusa in four of four blood culture bottles (both aerobe and anaerobe bottles).

51 ng of antifungal susceptibilities from blood culture bottles by disk diffusion and Etest and the resu

52 he adoption of tissue inoculation into blood culture bottles compared to conventional techniques (mea

53 nical laboratories tested 722 positive blood culture bottles containing gram-positive cocci in cluste

54 The assay was tested on 470 positive blood culture bottles containing Staphylococcus aureus or ente

55 The BacT/Alert PF bottle is a reliable blood culture bottle for pediatric blood culture specimens and

56 bination of membrane filter system and blood culture bottles for culture of diluted vitrectomy casset

57 be necessary to routinely incubate FAN blood culture bottles for more than 3 days.

58 on techniques have allowed analysis of blood culture bottles for organisms such as methicillin-resist

59 One hundred BacT/ALERT blood culture bottles growing gram-positive cocci in clusters

60 If the blood culture bottles had been incubated for 5 days, an additi

61 s, but the routine use of an anaerobic blood culture bottle has been challenged in recent years.

62 ecies determination for anaerobes from blood culture bottles has become increasingly important with t

63 BacT/Alert FAN blood culture bottles have been shown to enhance the recovery

64 tes from positive BacT/Alert SA and SN blood culture bottles (identified as 10 MRSA strains, 10 MSSA

65 microorganisms directly from positive-blood-culture bottles in a clinical setting.

66 esigned for use directly from positive blood culture bottles in a FISH format.

67 er of positive bottles within a set of blood culture bottles in their assessment.

68 andida albicans directly from positive-blood-culture bottles in which yeast was observed by Gram stai

69 ures of microbes were identified in 29 blood culture bottles, including mixed species of the same gen

70 current BacT/ALERT SA (BTA SA) aerobic blood culture bottle is made from glass, does not require vent

71 ntifungal disk diffusion directly from blood culture bottles is a rapid and easy method for fluconazo

72 of periprosthetic tissue specimens in blood culture bottles is more sensitive than conventional tech

73 n, culture of periprosthetic tissue in blood culture bottles is not only more accurate than but is al

74 Because the routine use of MB culture bottles is resource intensive (expensive and req

75 (herein referred to as yeast-positive blood culture bottles) is described.

76 signated the BacT/ALERT plastic SA (BTA PSA) culture bottle, is made from clear plastic to prevent br

77 Streptococcus pneumoniae from positive blood culture bottles may be difficult due to autolysis of pne

78 but inoculation of synovial fluid into blood cultures bottles may be a more immediate and practical m

79 The blood culture bottle method is technically easier and represen

80 with either membrane filter system or blood culture bottle, mold and Mycobacterium species were cult

81 An evaluation of 197 routine blood culture bottles newly positive for yeast by Gram stainin

82 tory specimens and in 232 BacT/ALERT MP (MP) culture bottles of respiratory specimens.

83 of most bacteria present in incubating blood culture bottles on average about 16 h sooner than Gram s

84 f culture of periprosthetic tissues in blood culture bottles on laboratory workflow and cost.

85 Blood specimens were divided into two culture bottles, one optimized for aerobic growth (F bot

86 ) membrane filter system only, and (3) blood culture bottles only.

87 filter system only, and 19 (11%) with blood culture bottles only.

88 filter system only, and 12 (29%) with blood culture bottles only.

89 imens are obtained and inoculated into blood culture bottles or four periprosthetic tissue specimens

90 verification of the BacT/Alert nonvent blood culture bottles (Organon Teknika, Durham, N.C.) was perf

91 nce between membrane filter system and blood culture bottle (P = .37).

92 re culture positive more commonly with blood culture bottles (P = .021).

93 ction of two aerobic and one anaerobic blood culture bottles per set results in improved yield compar

94 ethods using pelleted material from positive culture bottles performed best.

95 A total of 564 routine blood culture bottles positive for GPCC recovered from both ae

96 lidated with DNA extracted from BACTEC blood culture bottles positive for yeasts (n = 62) and was 100

97 We conclude that the number of culture bottles positive in a given culture set cannot r

98 In this study, we compared positive-blood-culture bottles processed by PCR coupled to high-resolut

99 albicans directly from yeast-positive blood culture bottles provides important information for optim

100 l established that standard BacT/Alert blood culture bottles require no more than 5 days of incubatio

101 the 270 bacteria isolated from the 255 blood culture bottles, results for pyrosequencing and culture-

102 ther to routinely utilize an anaerobic blood culture bottle should be influenced by the overall recov

103 on of infected joint fluid and bone in blood-culture bottles should be considered.

104 omated alert signal indicating growth in the culture bottle sounded.

105 ion (PJI) diagnosis using an automated blood culture bottle system for periprosthetic tissue culture

106 ion (PJI) diagnosis using an automated blood culture bottle system for periprosthetic tissue culture.

107 with 40 positive (clinical and spiked) blood culture bottles tested in batches of 5.

108 ntification of S. aureus directly from blood culture bottles that contain GPCC offers important infor

109 lococcus aureus directly from positive blood culture bottles that contain gram-positive cocci in clus

110 e evaluated aliquots from 244 clinical blood culture bottles that demonstrated yeasts on Gram stain u

111 raction of bacterial DNA directly from blood culture bottles that gave quality DNA for PCR in as litt

112 BacT/Alert non-charcoal-based blood culture bottles that were flagged positive by the BacT/A

113 A total of 231 clinical samples from blood culture bottles that were flagged positive by the BacT/A

114 ulation of periprosthetic tissues into blood culture bottles, the greatest accuracy of diagnosis was

115 ned and designated a nonvented aerobic (NVA) culture bottle; this bottle does not require venting.

116 Middlebrook 7H10 agar, or in VersaTREK broth culture bottles (Trek Diagnostics).

117 Each blood culture bottle was inoculated with fresh blood from heal

118 rrent BacT/Alert standard aerobic (VA) blood culture bottle was redesigned and designated a nonvented

119 ed labor cost savings of culture using blood culture bottles was $10,876.83 (+/-$337.16).

120 Culture in blood culture bottles was cost-effective, based on the estimat

121 f Staphylococcus species from positive blood culture bottles was evaluated in a multicenter clinical

122 ve cocci (GPC) directly from VersaTREK blood culture bottles was evaluated.

123 nd anaerobic (SN) 3D media; each of the four culture bottles was filled with 6 to 9 ml of blood.

124 , N.C.), a new nonvented pediatric FAN blood culture bottle, was compared to that of the original ped

125 Specimens from MP culture bottles were analyzed by Accuprobe and conventio

126 robic resin and BacT/Alert aerobic FAN blood culture bottles were comparable in their abilities to re

127 The six different blood culture bottles were each inoculated with 1000 yeasts pe

128 Contaminated rubber diaphragms of blood culture bottles were identified, and the pseudo-outbreak

129 ed and fifty-five consecutive positive blood culture bottles were included.

130 Blood culture bottles were incubated in a BacT/Alert3D instrum

131 The remaining 117 culture bottles were negative in the LC assay and grew v

132 the utility of extended incubation of blood culture bottles were reviewed at four tertiary care micr

133 the clinical blood culture evaluation, blood culture bottles were spiked with diluted organism suspen

134 A total of 419 yeast-positive blood culture bottles were studied, consisting of 258 clinical

135 Inoculated blood culture bottles were weighed to estimate volume.

136 ), was tested on Bactec and BacT/Alert blood culture bottles which signaled positive on automated blo

137 Blood culture bottles with antimicrobial removal systems are r

138 A total of 319 positive patient blood culture bottles with GPC seen in clusters with Gram stai

139 on smears made directly from positive blood culture bottles with gram-positive cocci in clusters (GP

140 Blood culture bottles with initial bacterial densities of <10

141 31 monomicrobic isolates from positive-blood-culture bottles with one spot having a score of 99.9%, t

142 A total of 276 blood culture bottles with Staphylococcus aureus were tested b

143 Candida glabrata can be identified in blood culture bottles within 2.5 h using peptide nucleic acid

144 n directly from signal-positive Bactec blood culture bottles within 24 h of positive signal, with res