ライフサイエンスコーパス: cut-off

1 ing a maximum biofilm thickness of 30 mum as cut-off).

2 f 0.21ngml(-1) (very lower than the clinical cut-off).

3 alse discovery rate (FDR) to be lower than a cut-off.

4 of about 1.4 nm with a 400-Da molecular mass cut-off.

5 ened using the tool, and 4% scored above the cut-off.

6 ios differed markedly between galactomannan (cut-off 0.5: optical density index, 0.97, 0.81, 124.4; c

7 ble, with AUROC for: sputum eosinophilia (3% cut-off) 0.69; neutrophilia (65% cut-off) 0.88; asthma c

8 ophilia (3% cut-off) 0.69; neutrophilia (65% cut-off) 0.88; asthma control (cut-off Asthma Control Qu

9 5: optical density index, 0.97, 0.81, 124.4; cut-off 1.0: 0.97, 0.93, 422.1; cut-off 3.0: 0.61, 0.99,

10 membrane thickness: 20 mum, molecular weight cut-off: 10 kDa) using fiber optics.

11 pg/ml; NT-proBNP: sensitivity 73%, NPV 97%, cut-off 1000 pg/ml).

12 FpEF (BNP: sensitivity 63%, specificity 61%, cut-off 110 pg/ml; NT-proBNP: sensitivity 68%, specifici

13 three cases (BNP: sensitivity 67%, NPV 86%, cut-off 115 pg/ml; NT-proBNP: sensitivity 62%, NPV 87%,

14 cellulose dialysis tubing (molecular weight cut-off 12 kDa) at 37 degrees C with shaking in the dark

15 n four cases (BNP: sensitivity 76%, NPV 97%, cut-off 145 pg/ml; NT-proBNP: sensitivity 73%, NPV 97%,

16 End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score alone (cut-off 18) was the best predictor of survival.

17 olled according to Asthma Control Test score cut-off: 20) and eight healthy controls were included.

18 -glucan (cut-off 80 pg/ml: 0.90, 0.42, 6.57; cut-off 200 pg/ml: 0.70, 0.61, 3.7), lateral-flow device

19 tone, with an unchanged low molecular weight cut off (~250 Da).

20 0.81, 124.4; cut-off 1.0: 0.97, 0.93, 422.1; cut-off 3.0: 0.61, 0.99, 109.8), beta-D-glucan (cut-off

21 NT-proBNP: sensitivity 68%, specificity 56%, cut-off 477 pg/ml).

22 th the use of a xenon lamp equipped with the cut-off 600 nm filter.

23 pg/ml; NT-proBNP: sensitivity 62%, NPV 87%, cut-off 760 pg/ml).

24 -off 3.0: 0.61, 0.99, 109.8), beta-D-glucan (cut-off 80 pg/ml: 0.90, 0.42, 6.57; cut-off 200 pg/ml: 0

25 Using a 2-fold cut-off, 9 genes were highly expressed in all HCC, 11 in

26 With the < 5% E cut-off, a significant relationship was observed, but th

27 Applying a calculated optimal cut-off absorbance-value of 2.1, differentiated S. pneum

28 Urinary NGAL, at respective cut-off, accurately discriminates acute allograft reject

29 eristic (ROC) curve was drawn to determine a cut-off ADC value for the differentiation between benign

30 At a cut-off ADC value of </=0.99, it had a sensitivity of 93

31 When a cut-off ADC value of 1.791x10(-3) mm(2)/s was used, sens

32 ing logistic regression, controlling for MBL cut-off, age, gender, and age and gender interaction.

33 e TPA spectrum, the effective TPA wavelength cut-off, and the Kerr nonlinear refractive index have be

34 10 years of follow-up, regardless of the FFR cut-off applied.

35 therapy in patients programmed to high-rate cut-off (Arm B) or delayed ventricular tachycardia thera

36 rophilia (65% cut-off) 0.88; asthma control (cut-off Asthma Control Questionnaire score of 1) 0.63; a

37 Lower-disparity thresholds cut off at very low spatiotemporal frequencies, which is

38 With a cut-off at 100 ng/mL, urinary NGAL accurately predicted

39 erentiating ccRCC from other RCC subtypes, a cut-off AV of 86-89 HU, aorta-based corrected AV of 89-9

40 erties were achieved with a molecular weight cut-off below 500 g mol(-1) and a low fouling tendency.

41 arithmically divergent with the ultra-violet cut-off, but physically meaningful regularized polaron e

42 hort-wavelength transverse elastic modes are cut off by applied force and the DNA's bending stiffness

43 stiffness, whereas long-wavelength modes are cut off by confinement.

44 o penetrate the hot halo gas until they were cut off by shock heating from the dark matter halo.

45 Therefore, the optimal cut-off by CMR during the acute phase of an MI to predic

46 Blood flow through the aneurysm was cut-off by implanting a covered stent between celiac tru

47 l taxonomy units, even at the most stringent cut-off can represent multiple bacterial species, and th

48 A cut-off CFT value for treatment of macular edema in IU,

49 5 and 0.99 to 0.99 and 0.46 depending on the cut-off chosen.

50 col of microarray platforms was taken as the cut-off concentration of RNA samples in our studies.

51 d a detection limit of 5 ng/ml was used as a cut-off concentration of the analytes.

52 ndoscopic outcomes, and to determine the FCP cut-off concentration that correlated with patient outco

53 in feces, allowing for selection of optimal cut-off concentrations.

54 The resulting cut-off curves yield information regarding the hydrophob

55 A PCT algorithm, including 0.1 ng/ml cut-off, determined antibiotic cessation.

56 ed out on polar extracts by molecular weight cut off dialysis.

57 prevented when a 1000 MWCO (molecular weight cut off) dialysis membrane is placed in the front of the

58 ections, a PCT algorithm including 0.1 ng/ml cut-off did not achieve 25% reduction in duration of ant

59 at medium- and substrate-related diffraction cut-off edges.

60 ese results support an interpretation of the cut-off effect in food emulsions, based on the "amphipho

61 In all cases, a cut-off effect was observed, in line with previous obser

62 A "cut-off" effect was observed for the pyrene quenching by

63 interpretation for both the maximum and the "cut-off" effect.

64 more hydrophobic AOs, typically called the "cut-off" effect.

65 Notably, the observed decay of the over cut-off emission is found to be critically associated wi

66 Efficient proton acceleration reaching cut-off energies of up to 20 MeV with particle numbers e

67 emission at energies higher than the quantum cut-off (eV b ); a component that decays monotonically w

68 e and furthermore possesses a size dependent cut-off filter adjustable by the pore size of the hydrog

69 rafiltration through 10 kDa molecular weight cut-off filters was the most suitable extraction method.

70 The cut-off for 95% sensitivity was an ALT = 24 IU/L (70% sp

71 The cut-off for 95% specificity was ALT = 44 IU/L (64% sensi

72 ikely to have an IQ score < 80, the clinical cut-off for borderline intellectual disability.

73 piratory system of 30 mL/cm H2O was the best cut-off for discriminating patients regarding the abilit

74 Temporal Error Score that finds an objective cut-off for each taxonomic rank using information for th

75 A CriSTAL score of 6 was the optimal cut-off for high-risk of in-hospital death.

76 It chooses the best cut-off for individual markers using characteristics of

77 The optimal cut-off for ISS was 33, with sensitivity of 60.0%, speci

78 A cut-off for MPO was defined in 5000 population-based sub

79 vidence to suggest both 5% and 20% mFPA as a cut-off for raised ALT.

80 8 (p=0.045), and 24% versus 10% scored above cut-off for REM-sleep behaviour disorder (p=0.008).

81 redicted hydrodynamic radius larger than the cut-off for renal filtration, only Co-hArgI amine conjug

82 bjects exceeded the most stringent published cut-off for subtle parkinsonism of three definitions exa

83 it of 26 pg mL(-1) far below the established cut-off for this biomarker (15 ng mL(-1)) and was succes

84 In addition, 60-s cut-off for time to PVI indicates persistent isolation w

85 n of graphene photodetectors approaching THz cut-off frequencies.

86 te sensitivity characteristics and the first cut off frequency (fc) from the transient characteristic

87 output resistance makes the unity power gain cut-off frequency (f max ) of GKTFETs considerably large

88 ansconductance (g m ) and unity current gain cut-off frequency (f T ) than GFETs.

89 On the other hand, the first cut-off frequency (fc) ranges obtained from noise spectr

90 ding an intrinsic gain over 30, an intrinsic cut-off frequency fT up to 42 GHz and a maximum oscillat

91 We identified the band gap Eg and phonon cut-off frequency omegamax as the two most relevant feat

92 oscillating frequency higher than the filter cut-off frequency while for lower frequencies ENMO perfo

93 alysis is only reversed when motoneurons are cut off from GABA(B), GABA(A) and glycine receptor-media

94 A cut-off >0.72 kU/L of IgE towards Cor a 14 diagnosed 87%

95 evels of antibodies to HBs antigen above the cut-off (>12 mIU/mL) and 30 of 90 (33%) had HBs-specific

96 ynamic relation with a non-Feynman onset and cut-off has no correspondence in either nonlinear optics

97 The optimal cut-off HBsAg level and HBsAg reduction to predict HBsAg

98 atients with high and low cystatin C (median cut-off), higher plasma NGAL levels were independently a

99 , as well as the predictive value of the 10% cut-off in 'day-3' parasitaemia.

100 of the inflated radiation impedance close to cut-off in a medium with a plasma-like permittivity.

101 ts an astonishing non-Feynman-like onset and cut-off in the excitation spectrum of the ground state e

102 Using a cut off level of 3 mug/mL, postoperative morbidity (odds

103 rst, we determined a serum MBL concentration cut-off level associated with diminished MBL pathway fun

104 nsitivity of 63% and specificity of 52% by a cut-off level at 27.5 points to diagnose overt HE.

105 pies and alleviate colonoscopy capacity, the cut-off level for a positive FIT result was increased fr

106 characteristic (ROC) curve - derived optimum cut-off level of >140mAU/ml.

107 62.9% and 93.3% at an ROC - derived optimum cut-off level of 18mAU/ml.

108 ficity of 87% and a sensitivity of 58% for a cut-off level of 203 mg/L (AUC: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.63-0.83)

109 As a single test, an IL-6 cut-off level of 432 pg/mL on day 1 yielded a specificit

110 0.83 (95 % [CI]: 0.76-0.91) with the optimal cut-off level of 56 ng/mL, providing 77.1 % sensitivity

111 was 0.75 (95 % [CI]: 0.66-0.85), with a best cut-off level of 72 ng/mL providing 70.6 % sensitivity a

112 y identification of AKI and to determine the cut-off level of uNGAL for diagnosing AKI in hospitalize

113 There are only a few studies evaluating the cut-off level of urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated

114 veral orders of magnitude below the clinical cut-off level of ~4 ng/mL.

115 e algorithm does not require a predetermined cut-off level, and our simulation studies suggest that i

116 Cut off levels for all three Fusarium toxins were valida

117 am allowed for instant adjustment of the FIT cut-off levels to optimize program performance.

118 diagnosis of cashew allergy and to identify cut-off levels to replace oral food challenges.

119 trated percentage BRAFV600E/BRAFwt above the cut-off (mean, 29.6 +/- 41.1).

120 At data cut-off (median follow-up 126 days [IQR 84-217]), 44 pat

121 ng hydrolysates were filtered through a 1kDa cut-off membrane and fractionated by size exclusion chro

122 ng ultrafiltration with low molecular weight cut-off membranes, cation exchange chromatography and re

123 sed on the chosen statistical or fold change cut-off; microarray analysis can provide essentially mor

124 One hundred kilodalton cut-off microdialysis catheters were implanted at a medi

125 During follow-up, cut-off MRD thresholds in BM and PB associated with a 10

126 The initial utilisation of molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) dialysis generated fractions of low molec

127 ydrolysate was subjected to molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) filtration, following which the non-ultra

128 ion of FH2h with 30-0.3 kDa molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) membranes in order to obtain a 1 kDa rete

129 0 mL/min), although at the most conservative cut-off (nGFR </= 20) it had low sensitivity (55.3%), sp

130 ble or using 5 kg weight bands, there was no cut-off observed in the higher BMI patients where there

131 Similarly, E/e' ratio cut off of 13 performed poorly in identifying patients w

132 es), and when systolic BP is lowered below a cut off of 140 mm Hg with some further reduction limited

133 Using a cut-off of >1.5-fold change, 48 microRNA were Rapamycin-

134 ng results with previous studies and using a cut-off of >100 kb, the rate of de novo CNVs in BD was i

135 A cut-off of >198 pg/mL was used to define amyloid-negativ

136 vity of 61% and a specificity of 96% using a cut-off of 0.34ng/ml.

137 Dividing the cohort in two groups with a BSA cut-off of 1 m(2) provided the best-fit allometric model

138 Tremor stability index with a cut-off of 1.05 gave good classification performance for

139 indicator for systemic inflammation using a cut-off of 10 mg/l.

140 "obese" (O) or "non-obese" (NO) using a BMI cut-off of 25 kg/m(2).

141 characteristic analysis, anti-PLA2R levels (cut-off of 45 U/mL) during the pretransplantation period

142 i-permeable membrane with a molecular weight cut-off of 5 kDa.

143 These results support the generally accepted cut-off of 5% fat for steatosis and indicate 20% as a th

144 Using a mean IC50 cut-off of 50, sera from control rabbits immunized with

145 0 mug kg(-1) and by on-site column test with cut-off of 500 mug kg(-1).

146 pgmL(-1) (far below the clinical established cut-off of 600 pgmL(-1)) for IL-8 protein in undiluted s

147 A cut-off of greater than or equal to 4 Bush Francis Catat

148 In 12-13-year-old children a cut-off of poorer than 0.20 logMAR had a sensitivity of

149 We aimed to identify the optimal cut-off of TEI by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR

150 and potentially beyond the spatial frequency cut-off of the objective.

151 eedback and suggests that the high-frequency cut-off of the outer hair cell transmembrane potential i

152 Using a cut-off of uncorrected visual acuity poorer than 0.20 lo

153 s per week, would quasiuniversally offer 40% cuts off of current overprescriptions.

154 At data cut-off on Jan 7, 2016, 29 (76%) patients in the ipilimu

155 rrence-free survival assessed after database cut-off on Nov 29, 2013.

156 7 of those 126 assessed scored 32 or above (cut-off) on the AQ.

157 High-rate cut-off or delayed ventricular tachycardia therapy progr

158 pecial considerations including pre-define a cut-off percentage for detecting very low mutant copies

159 rm was rectified to produce unipolar NEFO by cutting off phases 2 and 4.

160 t a 45% catheter to vein ratio was the ideal cut off point to maximise sensitivity and specificity (A

161 + IPL complex was obtained at a FD </= 1.66 (cut off point, asymptotic 95% Confidence Interval: lower

162 of 1.4, which when using our pipeline is the cut-off point for detection of clear amyloid-positivity

163 or a predefined H. pylori IgG-antibody titer cut-off point for evaluating success of H. pylori eradic

164 00.0%) and a high sensitivity (53.8%) with a cut-off point of 1.5 in the ratio before and after of Fr

165 ctor solution with a simple structure (using cut-off point of a loading of 0.5) that together account

166 A cut-off point of at least 21% decrease in H. pylori IgG-

167 The cut-off point of intrahepatic triglyceride (IHTG) conten

168 Cut-off point of the ROC curve was established at 2.8 mm

169 reproducible measure of disease defined by a cut-off point reflecting clinical minimally detectable c

170 The (11)C-Pittsburgh compound B cut-off point value of 1.4 was approximately equivalent

171 ion, though some earlier studies used a 24-h cut-off point with some improved outcomes.

172 At the 0.35 kU/l cut-off point, 71.2% of patients were positive to Ole e

173 copies/mL at Week 24 represented the optimal cut-off point, which may predict favourable outcomes in

174 different PMPEs were calculated using a 15% cut-off point: 1) full-mouth (MB-B-DB/MB-B-DL); 2) two d

175 nts outside intensive care unit at different cut-off points for hypoglycemia.

176 The optimal cut-off points of NLR, PLR, and LMR were 2.57, 123.5 and

177 d oral food challenge (OFC) outcomes to find cut-off points which can diagnose egg allergy.

178 The cut-off points with the best diagnostic accuracy were fo

179 ental parameters have been studied including cut-off pore size, interstitial fluid pressure, and tumo

180 Using 6 million IU/mL as the cut-off, pre-treatment results were concordant in 70.4%

181 trode protection layer with molecular weight cut-off property from adsorbed linear branched polyethyl

182 especially in the 0-1000 Da molecular weight cut-off range.

183 ol samples with an average current signal-to-cut-off ratio of 10.8.

184 d that by embedding a current source in this cut-off region, more than an order of magnitude enhancem

185 Based on the cut-off score (0.361) obtained from the multivariable mo

186 4-point, Little Schmidy index (LS4) using a cut-off score of 1 to indicate fall risk with sensitivit

187 The optimal cut-off scores to identify persons at low risk of compli

188 The sensitivity and specificity of different cut-off scores were explored.

189 performance, for a 10% predicted probability cut-off, sensitivity = 52.8%, specificity = 94.0%, PPV =

190 era sign, collar sign and other signs (sinus cut-off sign, hump sign, band sign).

191 However, a cut-off size of 35 mm was predictive of CPN (P = 0.005).

192 systematic analysis, genetics can be used to cut off the routes of escape.

193 jection port was designed to host the pieces cut off the TLC.

194 SbcCD cuts off the top of a cruciform DNA by making incisions

195 e than conventional starving therapy by only cutting off the energy supply.

196 scaled up to the industrial level, either by cutting off the lines of control for endogenous metaboli

197 Using a higher cut-off, the bladder thickness/weight measurement has a

198 iminating capability of OncoScore (OncoScore cut-off threshold = 21.09; AUC = 90.3%, 95% CI: 88.1-92.

199 ore metric or using a maximum expected error cut-off threshold.

200 It does not require a P-value cut-off to define differential expression, and works wel

201 The best cut off value was 93.5 muU/ng protein, at which the sens

202 With a cut-off value > 0.015 mmol/l indicating IBS, the sensiti

203 However, the current PDFF cut-off value (5%) used to define steatosis by magnetic

204 ated that 16.95 units was the most effective cut-off value (COV) to discriminate correctly between ce

205 l [CI]: 0.982, 0.998), and the calculated PH cut-off value (tvortex >/= 14.3%) resulted in sensitivit

206 Only resistin (cut-off value 13.7 ng/ml) and IL-6 (cut-off value 473.4

207 esistin (cut-off value 13.7 ng/ml) and IL-6 (cut-off value 473.4 pg/ml) were reliable early markers o

208 emoglobin (fHb) concentrations below the FIT cut-off value and later development of colorectal advanc

209 A vWF-Ag cut-off value at 315% can clearly stratify patients with

210 of 112.5 ml was a marker of SAP and 433.0 ml cut-off value could be used to predict the need of inter

211 ith discrepancy, 16 mm Hg was still the best cut-off value for HVPG-Free, but not for HVPG-IVC, among

212 There is no established cut-off value for increased number of IELs in the bulb.W

213 ainly retrospective, of low size, and lack a cut-off value for MPO.

214 The best cut-off value for prediction of EEs was MLV>/=20 mm with

215 =50 mm Hg, which is the universally accepted cut-off value for the diagnosis of the vasodepressor for

216 Using a vWF-Ag cut-off value of >/= 241%, the AUC for detection of CSPH

217 Compared to the FFR cut-off value of </=0.80, the diagnostic accuracy of the

218 V (area under the curve, 0.78) and a bipolar cut-off value of 1.55 mV (area under the curve, 0.69) be

219 a negative FIT result at baseline (below the cut-off value of 10 mug Hb/ g feces).

220 Using this model, the current 'day-3' cut-off value of 10% predicts the potential presence of

221 gnosis of colorectal cancer, ferritin with a cut-off value of 100 mcg/L had a sensitivity of 93% (CI:

222 An FCP cut-off value of 150 mg/kg achieved the highest summatio

223 FCP concentration with a cut-off value of 150 mg/kg had only fair to good accurac

224 IL-6 with cut-off value of 157.0 pg/ml was a predictor of necrosis

225 We identified a driving pressure cut-off value of 19 cm H2O where an ordinal increment wa

226 the model, with untransformed AFP values, a cut-off value of 2 was identified.

227 100% specificity and 79% sensitivity; a PDFF cut-off value of 2.0% identified patients with steatosis

228 A cut-off value of 2.1 kPa/year was associated with an 8.4

229 ROC analysis yielded an optimal cut-off value of 2.245 (AUC=0.999, p<0.001, sensitivity=

230 At an optimal cut-off value of 23.9 pg/mL, the sensitivity and specifi

231 0.839; 95% CI, 0.751-0.927) with an optimal cut-off value of 24.3%.

232 We identified a plateau pressure cut-off value of 29 cm H2O, above which an ordinal incre

233 A cut-off value of 50 nmol/L was used to define VDD.

234 r-operator characteristic curves, a unipolar cut-off value of 6.78 mV (area under the curve, 0.78) an

235 t cytokine (P < 0.0001), and with an optimal cut-off value of 67.5 pg/mL, the sensitivity and specifi

236 analysis because they only identify the high cut-off value of a biomarker by utilizing color changes

237 antibodies [EMA]) and to determine the lower cut-off value of anti- anti-TTG level that best predicts

238 erated characteristics analysis for the best cut-off value of anti-TTG level for diagnosis of CD was

239 The cut-off value of CFT for initiating systemic treatment w

240 In a post hoc analysis, a cut-off value of CFT for systemic treatment initiation i

241 ent to 0.04 unit/mL and 260 ng/dL) below the cut-off value of circulating PLA2 (2.07 nM, equivalent t

242 A cut-off value of symptomatic SBP of </=85 mm Hg seems mo

243 The optimal cut-off value of the appendiceal diameter was 6.5 mm.

244 To obtain an optimal cut-off value of the strain ratio for differentiating be

245 Therefore one cut-off value of these parameters for all the rectus mus

246 s without discrepancy, 16 mm Hg was the best cut-off value predicting survival, independently of bein

247 eiver operating characteristic analysis, and cut-off value that most accurately identified individual

248 The cut-off value that most accurately identified subjects w

249 Reducing the PDFF cut-off value to 3.0% identified patients with steatosis

250 I treatment reported TS, and the optimum RDQ cut-off value was 3.06 (sensitivity, 65.4%; specificity,

251 A cut-off value was established to improve discrimination.

252 Cut-off value was estimated at 28.8 Hz from negative vir

253 With a cut-off value<8 mm Hg for central venous pressure, kappa

254 nd 37% of stenoses at the 0.75, and 0.80 FFR cut-off value, respectively, and was characterized by mi

255 risk individuals with a FIT result below the cut-off value, we associated baseline concentrations of

256 2), with lipid arc >/=80 degrees the optimal cut-off value.

257 ter consecutive fHb concentrations below the cut-off value.

258 rillation but calls into question the 90-day cut-off value.

259 Cut off values are not available for tree nuts.

260 eral flow immunoassay is developed using two cut-off values (10 and 50 mg kg(-1) gliadin) to provide

261 around the tests employed and the diagnostic cut-off values (for bacterial numbers) used to diagnose

262 Diagnostic accuracy, optimal cut-off values and best position for FE NO50 within a pa

263 hanges in LSM do not correlate with HVPG and cut-off values are not reliable in ruling out CSPH after

264 Considering the cut-off values associated with the positivity rate of He

265 PDFF cut-off values at 90% specificity were 16.3% for grades

266 However, current cut-off values denoting slow clearance based on the prop

267 ristics can be achieved by allowing separate cut-off values for both sexes.

268 ical cerebrospinal fluid Alzheimer's disease cut-off values for cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-beta1-42

269 algorithms based on subjective diagnoses and cut-off values for continuous predictors.

270 eria, developed using sensitive and specific cut-off values for demyelination and incorporating new k

271 stic (ROC) curves, we determined the optimal cut-off values for each score for these outcomes.

272 Subsequently cut-off values for healthy volunteers were calculated.

273 (ROC) curve analysis was performed to define cut-off values for high and low ratios of these indices.

274 The cut-off values for levels of hemoglobin in buffer and st

275 Optimal M30 cut-off values for mild and severe ballooning were 330 a

276 the ROC analysis, there were no satisfactory cut-off values for OPN that would distinguish patients w

277 eometric formula determined sample sizes and cut-off values for SDs.

278 compared with those from the guaiac test for cut-off values for stool samples, positivity rates, and

279 Cut-off values for the best sum of sensitivity and speci

280 When applying the pre-specified cut-off values of 34 mL/m(2) for LAVI and -15% for GLS,

281 For qualitative analysis, the cut-off values of beta-lactams, tetracyclines, quinolone

282 ls of the contamination rate were adopted as cut-off values of contamination reads.

283 Optimal cut-off values were determined with receiver operating c

284 Cut-off values were established by applying ROC curve an

285 was to determine the reference values (i.e. cut-off values) for absolute signal intensity and T2 rel

286 At all cut-off values, FIT sensitivity for CRC was higher (rang

287 At optimal cut-off values, which had 69-98% sensitivity in detectin

288 CFnoLD and determine fibrosis stage-specific cut-off values.

289 in a dichotomous manner using pre-specified cut-off values.

290 ecificity could be achieved by adjusting the cut-off values.

291 e or negative findings based on manufacturer cut-off values.

292 An optimal concentration cut-off was established for the floral source-specific m

293 rable to embolism-forming cavitations, which cut off water supply, ultimately causing leaf death.

294 A significant shift in the cut off wavelength of the BNNSs based photodetectors was

295 The device has an 8 microm cut-off wavelength at 77 K and exhibits a quantum effici

296 oom temperature photovoltaic response with a cut-off wavelength of 3.4 mum was demonstrated.

297 is varied, the device exhibits well-defined cut-off wavelengths of either approximately 8.7 or appro

298 gating luciferase and Au NPs is digested and cut off, which results in the recovery of bioluminescenc

299 a 45% catheter to vein ratio was the optimal cut off with high sensitivity and specificity to reduce

300 Using 50 mug/g as cut off yielded a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity o