ライフサイエンスコーパス: daily living

1 nkin Disability Scale, Barthel Activities of Daily Living).

2 ugh to require help with usual activities of daily living.

3 an enhanced ability to perform activities of daily living.

4 uld greatly facilitate her/his activities of daily living.

5 nctions that are essential for activities of daily living.

6 ent on informal caregivers for activities of daily living.

7 f life, physical function, and activities of daily living.

8 hing, allowing them to perform activities of daily living.

9 hing, allowing them to perform activities of daily living.

10 arthritis, and limitations on activities of daily living.

11 syndrome, and 13% had loss of activities of daily living.

12 nges in pain intensity and interference with daily living.

13 of spatial neglect during the activities of daily living.

14 otor sequencing, switching and activities of daily living.

15 d voice volume, and slowing of activities of daily living.

16 terference with work and other activities of daily living.

17 nic kidney disease, and functional status in daily living.

18 rding their ability to perform activities of daily living.

19 rment without interfering with activities of daily living.

20 ssments with information about activities of daily living.

21 re more frequently used in the activities of daily living.

22 vior/mood, and quality of life/activities of daily living.

23 o-primary parameter of overall activities of daily living.

24 rsing services, and support of activities of daily living.

25 ients require caregivers for assistance with daily living.

26 in three or more instrumental activities of daily living.

27 ng is a particularly problematic activity of daily living.

28 ss, and boost participation in activities of daily living.

29 e benchmark ROM, essential for activities of daily living.

30 n important role in performing activities of daily living.

31 nd self-reported ability to do activities of daily living.

32 d 16% had difficulty with >/=1 activities of daily living.

33 ures of the ability to perform activities of daily living.

34 nd difficulty with one or more activities of daily living.

35 tem to complete functional tasks relevant to daily living.

36 h >/=3 versus 0 limitations in activities of daily living, 1.36 (1.0-1.86) with moderate or severe ve

37 le score declines were 1.9 for activities of daily living, 1.7 for instrumental activities of daily l

38 4.33, P = .02) and (2) loss of activities of daily living (2.71; 95% CI, 1.07-6.84, P = .04).

39 d goals focusing on achievable activities of daily living; 2) applying time-limited trials in certain

40 with at least 1 limitation in activities of daily living (59.6% versus 74.7%; P=0.001), or below the

41 ] to 64.1 [62.7-65.2], p=0.16; activities of daily living, 62.3 [61.6-63.0] to 64.6 [63.1-65.6], p<0.

42 ] to 64.3 [63.0-65.3], p=0.24; activities of daily living, 62.7 [62.1-63.3] to 65.0 [63.5-65.9], p<0.

43 -64.5], p=0.0416; instrumental activities of daily living, 63.0 [62.4-63.7] to 64.1 [62.7-65.2], p=0.

44 .6-65.7], p=0.01; instrumental activities of daily living, 63.5 [63.0-64.0] to 64.3 [63.0-65.3], p=0.

45 smoking status, limitations in activities of daily living, a wide range of chronic illnesses, and sel

46 gnition), the Interview for Deterioration in Daily Living Activities in Dementia (to assess function)

47 Similarly, Interview for Deterioration in Daily Living Activities in Dementia scores revealed more

48 ding age, psychiatric diagnosis, deficits in daily living activities, and detox or ECT use.

49 observable functioning across four domains (daily living activities, cognitive, emotional control, i

50 tified by age, illness severity, deficits in daily living activities, dangerousness, and use of ECT e

51 the SF-12 questionnaire about limitations in daily living activities.

52 ze their health and enhance participation in daily living activities.

53 led or requiring assistance for at least one daily-living activity, with housekeeping, grocery shoppi

54 those in the placebo group in activities of daily living (ADCS-ADL difference in slope 3.98 [95% CI

55 er's Disease Cooperative Study/Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Inventory score (range, 0-78).

56 er's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) scale, on which scores range fro

57 er Disease Cooperative Studies-activities of daily living (ADCS-ADL) scale.

58 ess dependence in instrumental activities of daily living (adjusted mean difference, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.

59 l impairment and impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) (defined as severe or moderate to sev

60 d the quality of life measures activities of daily living (ADL) and EQ-5D-3L index.

61 ted functional status based on activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (IADL).

62 Daily Living (IADL) and basic Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and trajectories of dependency before

63 ing from an armless chair) and activities of daily living (ADL) limitations (transferring, eating, an

64 quality-of-life measures: the activities of daily living (ADL) part of the Friedreich's Ataxia Ratin

65 rease of >/= 0.5 points on the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale between the beginning of chemot

66 y Living (IADL) Scale, and the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale.

67 ed on ability to perform basic activities of daily living (ADL) tasks and instrumental ADL.

68 Disability in activities of daily living (ADL) was identified from report of inabili

69 ght (m)(2)), and self-reported activities of daily living (ADL) were obtained.

70 Disabilities in basic activities of daily living (ADL) were present in 139 (32%) of 428 pati

71 rticipants with limitations in activities of daily living (ADL) were randomized to physiotherapy and

72 nant of the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL), in older patients with asymptomatic

73 am, Timed Get Up and Go (GUG), Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental Activities in Daily Liv

74 ating Scale (UPDRS), scales of activities of daily living (ADL), neuropsychological testing, and PET

75 vestigated: annual death rate, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), physical performance in three tests

76 s assessed with three metrics: activities of daily living (ADL), the Braden Scale, and the Morse fall

77 was available on self-reported Activities of Daily Living (ADL).

78 instrumental (IADL) and basic activities of daily living (ADL).

79 scale (FARS), and a survey of activities of daily living (ADL).

80 the inability to perform basic activities of daily living (ADL).

81 Frailty, activities of daily living (ADL)/instrumental ADL (IADL) disability, C

82 quarter mile) or difficulty in activities of daily living (ADL; e.g., transferring).

83 cial situation, functionality (activities of daily living [ADL] + instrumental activities of daily li

84 health status, limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs) (ADLs and instrumental ADLs), emerge

85 and to determine the number of activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs (IADLs) for wh

86 Activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs (IADLs) were e

87 tatus with regard to mobility, activities of daily living (ADLs) and Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) scor

88 Functional Status survey of 5 activities of daily living (ADLs) at hospital admission and 3, 6, and

89 Difficulty with 9 activities of daily living (ADLs) was assessed by a questionnaire.

90 rized as (1) any disability in activities of daily living (ADLs), (2) any disability in instrumental

91 ory (NPI), ability to complete activities of daily living (ADLs), caregiver distress, cognitive safet

92 Impairment in activities of daily living (ADLs), defined as self-reported difficulty

93 We modelled the effect of activities of daily living (ADLs), living conditions, occupational and

94 dependently and complete basic activities of daily living (ADLs).

95 asures; instrumental and basic activities of daily living (ADLs); and emergency department (ED) visit

96 ncludes basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADLs, IADLs), cognition (Mini-Cog test), h

97 ear risk of severe, persistent activities-of-daily-living (ADLs) disability, defined as dependence in

98 a disability scale (measuring activities of daily living [ADLs] and instrumental ADLs).

99 , drug and/or alcohol use, and activities of daily living and a newly designed 20-minute computerized

100 s require more help with their activities of daily living and additional hours of close supervision p

101 iodical clinical reassessment, activities of daily living and care management.

102 of her instrumental and basic activities of daily living and denies falls.

103 jectories for both measures of activities of daily living and fewer emergency department visits than

104 estimating equations (for Katz activities of daily living and Functional Activities Questionnaire sco

105 with both impaired recovery in activities of daily living and increased mortality.

106 onal disability (P < 0.001 for activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living

107 al disability as determined by activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living

108 The Activities of Daily Living and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

109 f-care ability was measured by activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living

110 rkinson's Disease Rating Scale Activities of Daily Living and Motor Exam ratings.

111 Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) (activities of daily living and motor subsections), timed tests and Par

112 ical manifestations can impair activities of daily living and often linger for years.

113 self-reported difficulty with activities of daily living and prior hospitalizations.

114 as the ability to perform six activities of daily living and the ability to walk independently.

115 tion maternal reports of perceived stress in daily living and the effect of stress on health were rec

116 ncreased odds of disability in activities of daily living and worse motor-sensory function in the fol

117 ations (basic and instrumental activities of daily living) and cognitive impairment after hospitaliza

118 daily living and instrumental activities of daily living), and (2) informal caregiving (hours of car

119 y), general functional status (Activities of Daily Living), and cardiac assessments.

120 y living, 1.7 for instrumental activities of daily living, and 2.2 for depressive symptoms; scores on

121 r more difficulties with the 5 activities of daily living, and 270 of 707 patients (38.2%) foresaw th

122 ions in instrumental and basic activities of daily living, and a mean length of stay of 6 days.

123 ealth-related quality of life, activities of daily living, and anxiety and depression were recorded.

124 ivities of daily living, basic activities of daily living, and cognition.

125 tions in basic or instrumental activities of daily living, and cognitive impairment.

126 with one or more instrumental activities of daily living, and difficulty with one or more activities

127 ction, motor nerve conduction, activities of daily living, and erectile function did not show a signi

128 ble to perform the majority of activities of daily living, and had a normal social life.

129 edication variables, decreased activities of daily living, and impaired cognition did not consistentl

130 health, and ability to conduct activities of daily living, and increases in chronic pain and inabilit

131 of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, and mobility activities was commonplace am

132 of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, and mobility activities) and/or cognitive

133 es in mortality, disability in activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning amo

134 ales, covering pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, and quality of life (KOOS4); scores range

135 with measures of functioning, activities of daily living, and quality of life.

136 rmance, cognitive instrumental activities of daily living, and recurrent depression.

137 ndency," "peripheral vision," "self-image," "daily living," and "driving" dimensions.

138 the level of independence for activities of daily living appear to have more predictive value.

139 edications, and impact of visual function on daily living approximately 50% to 80% of the time.

140 Patients' activities of daily living are often affected although these can be am

141 nts was self-reported extended activities of daily living at 6 months, measured with the Nottingham E

142 being limited in instrumental activities of daily living at baseline, distance to the nearest ophtha

143 ts had disability in essential activities of daily living at the beginning of the study, and the leve

144 sed vital status, instrumental activities of daily living, basic activities of daily living, and cogn

145 led at baseline in 4 essential activities of daily living: bathing, dressing, walking, and transferri

146 Despite the fact that most activities of daily living clearly have motor and cognitive components

147 erate to severe limitations in activities of daily living (clinical functional score >/=2) should use

148 men's functional capacities in activities of daily living, cognition, and physical performance were w

149 iated with deletion carriers indicated worse daily living, communication, and social skills compared

150 Because typical activities of daily living comprise both continuous control tasks such

151 eing unable to perform various activities of daily living, conferred increased risks.

152 so created, with dependence in activities of daily living defined as S&E <80%.

153 tion score); and disability in activities of daily living (defined as none, mild, or moderate-severe)

154 daily living and instrumental activities of daily living), despite adjustment for covariates such as

155 tients' self-reported extended activities of daily living did not differ between groups at 6 months (

156 socioeconomics might compress activities of daily living disability, that is, benefits of success, b

157 3.8 to -4.0; p=0.0004), in the activities of daily living domain was -12.4 (-17.3 to -7.5; p<0.0001),

158 ced ability to perform routine activities of daily living due to vision loss is warranted.

159 itor data were obtained during activities of daily living during a 24-hour time period.

160 vement is also relevant to the activities of daily living during spontaneous behaviour.

161 a quantitative measure of the activities of daily living during spontaneous behaviour.

162 have a steady improvement in the activity of daily living during the first 6 months after discharge.

163 Additionally, it impairs activities of daily living (e.g., speaking, chewing, and swallowing).

164 , difficulty with Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, exhaustion, and low physical activity (P <

165 impaired ability to carry out activities of daily living, falls, prolonged recovery time after hospi

166 chronic diseases and impaired activities of daily living, faster walking speed, and favorable object

167 ate significant differences in activities of daily living function changes for residents in the Green

168 The mean activities of daily living function showed deterioration over time, an

169 Four different activities of daily living function trajectories were identified for 1

170 The outcome was activities of daily living function, and the main independent variable

171 sment Method for the ICU, Katz activities of daily living, Functional Activities Questionnaire (measu

172 atus (Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living >/=4) and nutritional status (absence of ca

173 d that disability according to activities of daily living had significantly reduced annually between

174 following functional outcomes: activities of daily living, health status, and return to usual major a

175 cupational therapy can improve activities of daily living; however, information about the clinical ef

176 Score (mRS>2) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL<8) and cognitive performance were cal

177 /=1 impairment in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) (aOR = 2.57, 95% CI: 0.97, 6.78).

178 ical structure of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) and basic Activities of Daily Living

179 e performance and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) in community-living older persons.

180 the Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Questionnaire.

181 bility Scale, the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Scale, and the Activities of Daily L

182 27/30 in 31%, and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) showed impairment in 34% of the pati

183 ily Living (ADL), Instrumental Activities in Daily Living (IADL), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA),

184 ed by gait speed, instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), modified Rankin Scale, and NIH Stro

185 ly living [ADL] + instrumental activities of daily living [IADL]), cognition, depression, and nutriti

186 ways to disrupted instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs).

187 e dependencies in instrumental activities of daily living ("impaired physical function") in patients

188 of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living), improvement and severity (Clinical Global

189 -related aberration changes on activities of daily living in DED.

190 gnitive decline or the loss of activities of daily living in patients with mild AD.

191 evel on basic and instrumental activities of daily living in pre- and post-liver transplant patients.

192 used to determine the impact of nystagmus on daily living in terms of both physical and psychosocial

193 s a loss in ability to perform activities of daily living including a loss of independent ambulation.

194 ture of older age that impacts activities of daily living, independence, and integration in modern so

195 west limitations to performing activities of daily living independently.

196 ency was measured using the Katz Activity of Daily Living index, and neuropsychiatric symptoms were a

197 amination), functional status (activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living),

198 Newly acquired disability in activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, a

199 ing disability outcomes (i.e., activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, a

200 r's Disease Co-operative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL) scales from baseline a

201 er's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory; ADCS-ADL), and model the relatio

202 parkinsonian motor disability, activities of daily living, levodopa-induced motor complications (as a

203 depressed (odds ratio 1.35 per activities of daily living limitation of sepsis survivor, 95% confiden

204 CI): 1.09, 1.83), instrumental activities of daily living (linear coefficient = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.58, 1

205 on functional status using the Activities of Daily Living-Long Form (ADL-L) and cognitive status with

206 ty, the need for assistance in activities of daily living, makes paraplegia an important target for p

207 he seven-item minimum data set-activities of daily living (MDS-ADL), respectively.

208 iving (on the Minimum Data Set-Activities of Daily Living [MDS-ADL] scale of 0 to 28 points, with hig

209 nnaire (measuring instrumental activities of daily living), Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form

210 ears, with a Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score of 6 or more, Myasthenia Gra

211 culated based on limitation in activities of daily living, mobility limitation, comorbidity, cognitiv

212 but reported problems with motor aspects of daily living more frequently.

213 ting Scale (UPDRS; Mentation + Activities of Daily Living + Motor) change and Motor plus Activities o

214 h regard to ability to perform activities of daily living (n = 391, r = -0.54, P < .001), emotional w

215 me was the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (NEADL) Scale score at 3 months after rando

216 d with the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (NEADL) scale.

217 ated with more difficulties in activities of daily living (odds ratio = 1.41, 95% confidence interval

218 he number of difficulties with activities of daily living (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.6), an

219 degree of dependence in seven activities of daily living (on the Minimum Data Set-Activities of Dail

220 d as dependency in one or more activities of daily living or in three or more instrumental activities

221 iated with disability in basic activities of daily living or with cognition.

222 bility (OR, 1.4), and impaired activities of daily living (OR, 1.8) were independently associated wit

223 % CI, 1.37-4.38), instrumental activities of daily living (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.37-4.38), as well as l

224 al function domains, including activities of daily living (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.37-4.38), instrumental

225 (95% CI 1.08-1.35), P = 0.001] and stress in daily living [OR 1.16 (1.03-1.30), P = 0.014] were assoc

226 y (difficulty with one or more activities of daily living) or death up to 2025, by use of evidence-ba

227 found on the CSDD, cognition, activities of daily living, or on rates of hospitalization, nursing ho

228 limitations in one instrumental activity of daily living, or slow gait speed.

229 ysical components (P = 0.030), activities of daily living (P = 0.001), mini nutritional assessment (P

230 of disability in instrumental activities of daily living (P = 0.04 at 3 mo and P = 0.002 at 12 mo).

231 to motor disability (P<0.001), activities of daily living (P<0.001), levodopa-induced motor complicat

232 r assistance with instrumental activities of daily living [P = .015] and lower physical function scor

233 joint swelling and tenderness, activities of daily living, patient global assessment, recurrence, int

234 In contrast, measures of activity of daily living performance, executive function and tests o

235 ent for measuring instrumental activities of daily living, Physical Component Summary of the Medical

236 -assessment questionnaires for activities of daily living, quality of life and erectile function.

237 ant/disease-specific outcomes, activities of daily living, quality of life, global impression of chan

238 [CI], -175 to -43), London Chest Activity of Daily Living Questionnaire = 18 (95% CI, 7-30), and St.

239 lk distance (6MWD), London Chest Activity of Daily Living Questionnaire, and quality of life were ass

240 elated measure of instrumental activities of daily living (r = -0.60) (P < .001 for both).

241 ned to </=5 points of baseline Activities of Daily Living [range 0-100], 63.3% returned to </=10 poin

242 It facilitates every major activity of daily living ranging from basic communication, mobility

243 Improvement in activities of daily living, recognition tasks, and assessments of ligh

244 ere assessed on 5 preoperative activities of daily living recommended by the American College of Surg

245 requires memory decline while activities of daily living remain intact.

246 in Dementia (CSDD), cognition, activities of daily living, resource use, and caregiver's depression s

247 ontribute to exaggerated BP responses during daily living, resulting in repetitive increments in load

248 isease Cooperative Study Group Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS ADL); performance-based measure

249 isease Cooperative Study Group Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS ADL); performance-based measure

250 er's Disease Cooperative Study activities of daily living scale (ADCS-ADL), and the clinical dementia

251 er's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living scale (ADCS-ADL; range, 0 to 78, with lower

252 n the SMMSE and on the Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale (BADLS, on which scores range from 0

253 e (H-Y) and Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale (S&E).

254 Index, the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale as well as recovery from apraxia.

255 ) score) was assessed with the Activities of Daily Living Scale of the Knee Outcome Survey.

256 tionnaire, Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale), potential prediagnostic motor (hypo

257 vities Questionnaire, and Katz Activities of Daily Living Scale).

258 mary Index, Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living scale, and ambulatory capacity.

259 d Chinese version Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale, respectively.

260 Daily Living and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scales and the Physical Component Summary o

261 n), and functional disability (activities of daily living scales, Pfeffer Functional Activities Quest

262 ioration in the UPDRS part II (activities of daily living) score (mean baseline, 0.00; mean follow-up

263 Patient activity of daily living scores (0-100 scale) increased progressivel

264 tion was associated with worse activities of daily living scores (p = 0.002) over the course of the 1

265 ciated with worse instrumental activities of daily living scores (p = 0.15) or worse Medical Outcomes

266 (PSPRS) and Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living (SEADL) scale at up to 52 weeks.

267 ge of motion and progressed to activities of daily living, sitting, standing, and walking as tolerate

268 atic instruction in reading, arithmetic, and daily living skills is the most effective approach to te

269 teaching reading, arithmetic, and functional daily living skills to students with disabilities sugges

270 al regressions in the subgroup revealed that daily living skills were predicted by the presence of an

271 stionnaire, summary index, and activities of daily living subscale; and version 2 of the 12-item Shor

272 Older Americans Resource Study Activities of Daily Living subscales.

273 in off time (p=0.105), and the activities of daily living subscore (part II) of the UPDRS (p=0.080).

274 Other aspects of their activities of daily living such as schooling, professional, and social

275 Care workers ration support in activities of daily living, such as eating, drinking, elimination and

276 arent-reported improvements in activities of daily living supported these findings.

277 re likely to have a decline in activities of daily living than those without insomnia (23% vs 9%; P =

278 elopment of cirrhosis that include issues of daily living that have an impact on their work environme

279 ce Scale score (which measures activities of daily living); the Total Functional Capacity scale; the

280 Disease Rating Scale Nonmotor Experiences of Daily Living, the original Unified Parkinson's Disease R

281 6) intensity based on how many activities of daily living they performed for the care recipient.

282 ptoms and ability to undertake activities of daily living), UMSARS II (neurological motor evaluation)

283 + Motor) change and Motor plus Activities of Daily Living UPDRS change, measured in untreated patient

284 e assessments further included activities of daily living (UPDRS-II), motor complications (UPDRS-IV),

285 daily living and instrumental activities of daily living using the Chinese Barthel Index and Chinese

286 Mean pain interference with activities of daily living was 5.5 of 10 before treatment and decrease

287 patial neglect symptoms in the activities of daily living was also generally accompanied by significa

288 efit to cognitive instrumental activities of daily living was also observed (treatment x time interac

289 a nonvalidated 10-item test of activities of daily living was seen.

290 c conditions and dependency in activities of daily living was strong and significant, even after adju

291 A 10-item test simulating activities of daily living was used to evaluate patients' functionalit

292 measure of pain, function, and activities of daily living, was the primary outcome measure.

293 eatment-related limitations in activities of daily living were greater with surgery than with observa

294 lic, and ePAD pressures during activities of daily living were higher than the ranges of these values

295 ns cited for desiring PAD were activities of daily living were not enjoyable (89.7%) and losses of au

296 n, swelling and stiffness, and activities of daily living were obtained from 16,222 individuals >55 y

297 ld, visual search, reading and activities of daily living were performed before and after each interv

298 ns, psychosocial function, and activities of daily living were pooled separately for mild cognitive i

299 ic gait improves endurance for activities of daily living while promoting cognition and mood.

300 e the hemodynamic responses to activities of daily living with symptom-limited upright exercise.