ライフサイエンスコーパス: day care

1 , and living with young children who were in day care.

2 ren present, or the number of hours spent in day care.

3 olerance and impose a burden on families and day care.

4 procedure via an open surgical procedure in day care.

5 udy site's primary care center or usual same-day care.

6 l emergency departments for referral to next-day care.

7 n in throat isolates from children attending day care.

8 he nasopharynx of healthy children attending day care.

9 The new practice was well accepted by day care and kitchen personnel.

10 relations between various characteristics of day care and lower respiratory illness (LRI) in a cohort

11 Implementation of day care and school entry requirements for varicella vac

12 We reviewed progress toward adoption of day care and school entry requirements in each state and

13 cluding REDP 33, which was exhibited by both day care and sporadic-case isolates.

14 nzae throat isolates from children attending day care, and 32 NT H. influenzae nasopharyngeal clinica

15 Other factors, such as age, sex, day care, and a history of recurrent AOM, did not influe

16 s, farm animals, farming, visit to a stable, day care, and exposure to antibiotics during the first w

17 ing road dust, were assigned to residential, day care, and school addresses by using dispersion model

18 road traffic were estimated for residential, day care, and school addresses from birth and onward usi

19 children in the United States participate in day care, and these children are considered to be at hig

20 We identified family, school, day-care, and other social contacts and notified these p

21 ren with older siblings and those who attend day care are at increased risk for infections, which in

22 healthy children aged 2 to 6 years attending day care at the study area in northern Finland and parti

23 Next-day care at the study site's primary care center or usua

24 Day care attendance also increased risk (RR = 1.56, 95%

25 tivariate models adjusted for breastfeeding, day care attendance and maternal atopy, higher counts of

26 ivariate logistic model, cumulative hours of day care attendance and number of lower respiratory infe

27 hma at the age of seven, cumulative hours of day care attendance and reported respiratory infections

28 In the univariate analyses, day care attendance at 12 months was associated with an

29 on the basis of a parental history of atopy, day care attendance in early life is inversely associate

30 Day care attendance in early life was associated with a

31 We conclude that day care attendance is an important risk factor for LRI

32 vary with respect to the reported effects of day care attendance on childhood asthma.

33 The LRI rate ratio for day care attendance was 2.0 (95% confidence interval = 1

34 shold of greater than 37.5 hours per week of day care attendance was associated with a lower risk of

35 Day care attendance was associated with a threefold risk

36 contact with other children (older siblings, day care attendance).

37 ental history of asthma, male sex, siblings, day care attendance, exposure to tobacco smoke or molds,

38 asthma further increased the rate ratio for day care attendance.

39 ansient early wheezing except for parity and day care attendance.

40 d atopic multiple-trigger wheeze and between day-care attendance and nonatopic uncontrolled wheeze in

41 S-associated isolate and an isolate from one day care attendee who did not develop HUS.

42 A total of 149 day care attendees (aged 24-60 months) and their familie

43 Day care-attending unvaccinated children in PnCRM7 commu

44 accinations in early childhood, and starting day care between 1.5 and 3 years of age might prevent or

45 duce the high prevalence of allergy diets in day care by reforming the practices for inquiring about

46 e nasopharyngeal cultures recovered from 942 day care center (DCC) attendees in Lisbon, Portugal, 591

47 break strains from a Texas jail and Maryland day care center and 16 reference strains from Texas, Mar

48 n counties other than those inhabited by the day care center and sporadic-case individuals.

49 al E. coli O157:H7 isolates from symptomatic day care center attendees revealed that the REDPs of 25

50 entrations in air from apartment, office and day care center buildings were 93, 3700, and 660 pg/m(3)

51 (REDPs) (93 to 98% similarity) among the 39 day care center isolates and nine XbaI REDPs (63 to 93%

52 dic case), and Shiga toxin production by the day care center isolates was not significantly different

53 geographic region and demonstrated that the day care center outbreak and a HUS case in 1995 were cau

54 es of E. coli O157:H7 isolates from both the day care center outbreak and sporadic cases by CHEF-PFGE

55 i O157:H7, including 39 isolates from a 1994 day care center outbreak, 28 isolates from 18 individual

56 ave originated from travelers, community and day care center outbreaks, and persons infected with the

57 direct bacteriologic cultures of items in a day care center were conducted, which demonstrated high

58 s and pattern IV was associated with another day care center, suggesting different outbreaks.

59 a varicella outbreak in a highly vaccinated day-care center (DCC) population in Pennsylvania was inv

60 ooled analysis reinforce the hypothesis that day-care center attendance in infancy and prolonged brea

61 Day-care center attendance in the first year of life was

62 y stimulation of the immune system, that is, day-care center attendance, birth order, maternally repo

63 tricted to children who were enrolled in the day-care center continuously during the outbreak and att

64 proportion of vaccinees who were attending a day-care center in a small community in New Hampshire.

65 130 children attending outpatient clinics or day care centers (P < .001).

66 ong persons in community settings, including day care centers and correctional facilities, and among

67 f transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in day care centers and schools is low.

68 oniae clones were previously identified from day care centers in Portugal, primarily on the basis of

69 MRSA in child day care centers indicates accelerated spread of MRSA in

70 Plasmid pattern I infections occurred in 8 day care centers over a 6-month period, suggesting sprea

71 a vaccine administered to children attending day care centers was conducted during the 1996-1997 wint

72 e lifestyle guidance and management forms at day care centers" (life management guidance forms) for u

73 te to the varicella incidence in schools and day care centers.

74 ase clinic attendees, and children attending day care centers.

75 by health care providers or from schools and day care centers.

76 visual acuity testing in children attending day care centers.

77 dy was to compare allergen concentrations in day-care centers (DCC) with those in private homes.

78 Epinephrine is also underused by parents, day-care centers and schools.

79 res on practices concerning special diets in day care centres and allergy knowledge were collected fr

80 dren, and the prevalence of allergy diets in day care centres decreased by 43% to 4.3% (IQ range 3.05

81 The new form was implemented into 40 Finnish day care centres in the capital region in 2013-2015.

82 days with chemotherapy being administered in day care centres, where unusual home pathogens can be en

83 onse of 104 healthy children, recruited from day-care centres and schools, to 12 different berry prod

84 These results indicate that vaccinating day care children against influenza helps reduce influen

85 ons to assess the full effect of vaccinating day care children against influenza.

86 d contacts (n = 120) of influenza-vaccinated day care children had 42% fewer febrile respiratory illn

87 Whether vaccinating day care children reduces household transmission of infl

88 hildren through home visits, group meetings, day care, community events, service provision, and liais

89 We randomly assigned household and day-care contacts, 2 to 40 years of age, in Almaty, Kaza

90 cts, 10 of 32 school-bus riders, and 9 of 61 day-care contacts.

91 Patients assigned to next-day care did not demonstrate clinically important disadv

92 Depending on duration of attendance, day care during infancy can either increase or reduce ri

93 ngs at home and in relation to attendance at day care during infancy.

94 l, 0.7 to 1.0; P=0.04), as did attendance at day care during the first six months of life (adjusted r

95 usted HR, 2.24 [95% CI, 1.67-3.02]), started day care early or late (before 18 months: adjusted HR, 1

96 Moreover, the "day care" effect at some loci was accounted for by the i

97 ing asthma, although the mechanism for this "day care" effect is largely unknown.

98 Implementation of day care entry requirements in 2000 or earlier was assoc

99 verage by state to year of implementation of day care entry requirements.

100 HPyV10), breastfeeding (CMV), younger age at day-care entry (BKPyV, KIPyV, WUPyV, TSPyV, HPyV10, HPyV

101 e of additional risk factors associated with day care environment.

102 We investigated the interactions between day care exposure in the 1st 6 mo of life and genotypes

103 o acquired the disease through contacts at 2 day care facilities (attack rate, 88.1 per 1000); and (3

104 sporadic if it was reported from a school or day care facility >6 weeks after or >/=10 days before ot

105 yed at home compared with those who attended day care for >36 months was 1.32 (95% confidence interva

106 Day-care histories were censored at the age of diagnosis

107 Day-care histories were examined in a case-control study

108 Day care hours and number of respiratory infections were

109 ng children with maternal history of asthma, day care in early life had no protective effect on asthm

110 Children attending day care in the 1st year of life have lower risks for de

111 We examined the relation between day care in the first year of life and asthma, recurrent

112 Among all study participants, day care in the first year of life was inversely associa

113 Prior experience in adult day care may lessen this association.

114 o study questions arising through the day-to-day care of critically ill patients.

115 ormatics to support clinicians in the day-to-day care of older adults.

116 0.04-0.93; P = .041) and children attending day care (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.84; P = .029) had a d

117 Old allergy attitudes persisted among day care personnel, indicating the need for continuous e

118 of updated allergy knowledge was noted among day care personnel.

119 der children at home or to other children at day care protects against the development of asthma and

120 ry of asthma influences the relation between day care-related exposures and childhood asthma.

121 becoming infected were 35.4 times those for day-care/school contacts (95% confidence interval (CI):

122 authors prospectively studied household and day-care/school contacts of cases in Almaty, Kazakhstan.

123 , they lived in the community and were using day care services a mean 1.7 days per week.

124 a nursing home, sometimes after using adult day care services.

125 Rate ratios were similar regardless of the day care setting, number of other children present, or t

126 safe, immunogenic, and nontransmissible in a day care setting.

127 The burden of allergy diets in day care settings could be decreased by simple pragmatic

128 hood quality, natural settings, schools, and day care settings.

129 lness, number of siblings, and attendance at day care showed an increase in the rate of all RI in inf

130 age and were recruited from primary care and day care sites in the St Louis metropolitan area; they w

131 originally ascertained from primary care and day care sites in the St. Louis area and then underwent

132 (at four polymorphisms in three loci) with "day care" that had an effect on early-life immune phenot

133 cline upon nursing home placement, but prior day care use also attenuated this association.

134 his study was to examine the associations of day care use and nursing home placement with the rate of

135 Day care use at baseline was not related to cognitive de

136 ing home placement such that higher level of day care use substantially reduced association of placem

137 abstracted from medical records and data on day care use, respiratory symptoms, and physician diagno

138 Attendance at day care was a risk factor for asymptomatic rotavirus in

139 dinal carriage data from Israeli toddlers in day care, we found a lower risk of colonization with typ

140 the odds ratios for 1-18 and 19-36 months of day care were 1.74 (95% CI: 0.89, 3.42) and 1.32 (95% CI

141 history of allergies and having children in day care were found to be related to the symptom of a ru

142 ore exposure to other children at home or at day care were more likely to have frequent wheezing at t

143 al infections among COAST children attending day care, whereas interactions at other loci were indepe

144 e the US, exposure to reptiles and attending day-care with another child with diarrhea.

145 samples) and from the homes of children and day-care workers (602 samples) using electrostatic dust