ライフサイエンスコーパス: day length

1 onally cold days (low temperatures and short day lengths).

2 melatonin secretion, which continue to track day length.

3 ays, is modulated by the circadian clock and day length.

4 cking midday across conditions with variable day length.

5 otes flowering of Arabidopsis in response to day length.

6 AMI was reported according to a standard 90-day length.

7 icient to trigger flowering, irrespective of day length.

8 lowering is triggered by seasonal changes in day length.

9 n of PCH1 shortens hypocotyls independent of day length.

10 ) to promote floral induction in response to day length.

11 s of cell proliferation following increasing day length.

12 plants to keep track of seasonal changes in day length.

13 e to the interaction between temperature and day length.

14 nes whose effects are strongly influenced by day length.

15 , carry ZmCCT alleles with no sensitivity to day length.

16 amus and regulate photoperiodic responses to day length.

17 dulation of sickness behaviors by changes in day length.

18 reversed by a discrete environmental signal, day length.

19 ransfer from static long day to static short day lengths.

20 ed with reproductive refractoriness to short day lengths.

21 triggered by exposing plants to appropriate day lengths.

22 them to misinterpret the salience of current day lengths.

23 maize-teosinte mapping population under long day lengths.

24 stication selection for adaptation to longer day lengths.

25 nd reactivity following acclimation to short day lengths.

26 wing prolonged exposure to short winter-like day lengths.

27 ctive axis repression in response to shorter day lengths.

28 By contrast, intermediate-duration day lengths (12.5-14 h long) either accelerate reproduct

29 s exposed for 2 or more weeks to long summer day lengths acquired a long-day photoperiodic history th

30 For each infant, average day length (ADL) was calculated during different cumulat

31 Day length and ambient temperature are major stimuli con

32 Our results suggest day length and diurnal temperature changes combine to mo

33 -induced hypocotyl elongation depends on the day length and light intensity.

34 In response to shortened day length and lower temperatures, female Cx. pipiense p

35 ndigenous to Afro-equatorial regions wherein day length and temperature exhibit little fluctuation th

36 lants perceive environmental signals such as day length and temperature to determine optimal timing f

37 tween elevation and latitude (seasonality in day length and temperature) seems more plausible.

38 e of the circadian clock to sense changes in day length and to mediate a diverse number of photoperio

39 Many organisms monitor the annual change in day length and use this information for the timing of th

40 mperature fluctuations, average temperature, day length and vernalization influence the flowering tim

41 modest alterations in entrainment to static day lengths and fails to interfere with seasonal respons

42 ers are influenced only by relatively recent day lengths and melatonin signals and ignore earlier one

43 roductive responses to intermediate-duration day lengths and melatonin signals.

44 d early flowering under both short- and long-day lengths and provided evidence for at least two disti

45 ut 6 months, and we suggest that stimulatory day lengths and the proliferation of nesting substrates

46 d, to measure accurately seasonal changes in day-length and regulate the expression of several key fl

47 ments, responding to changes in photoperiod (day length) and temperature.

48 in a manner that depends on the photoperiod (day length) and temperature.

49 l glucosinolates varied with temperature and day length, and contents of quercetin and kaempferol wer

50 anels in the field under both short and long day lengths, and of a maize-teosinte mapping population

51 Many plants use day length as an environmental cue to ensure proper timi

52 Day-length assessment involves the photoperiodic control

53 s a problem because there is no variation in day length at the Equator.

54 and the period length is correlated with the day length at the latitude of origin, implying the adapt

55 secretion is the endocrine representation of day length, but nothing is known about how long it takes

56 xhibited testicular regression in shortening day lengths, but only IGL-intact hamsters exhibited seas

57 Herein, we discuss the use of day length by animals at physiological and genetic level

58 The perception of the seasonal cues of day-length changes and exposure to cold influences flowe

59 Many plants monitor day-length changes throughout the year and use the infor

60 t, as well as early flowering, regardless of day length conditions.

61 s, in plants grown under different light and day-length conditions, and in plants overexpressing spli

62 mperature (15 degrees C) and short day (12-h day length) conditions.

63 Most mammals use changing annual day-length cycles to regulate pineal melatonin secretion

64 Concomitantly, prolonging day length decreased the uptake of fatty acids from trig

65 hanistically, we demonstrated that prolonged day length decreases sympathetic input into BAT and redu

66 PHYC also controls the day-length dependence of leaf size as the effect of day

67 s, we propose a model whereby the light- and day length-dependent interaction between FKF1 and COP1 c

68 timing of the evening peak of activity in a day length-dependent manner.

69 discrimination, the mechanism that generates day-length-dependent CO expression remains unknown.

70 Here, we report a study of the day-length-dependent response of cryptochrome 2 (cry2) a

71 Photoperiodism is a day-length-dependent seasonal change of physiological or

72 amsters to measure and respond to changes in day length depends upon accurate photoentrainment of the

73 n this issue Stoleru et al. demonstrate that day length determines which clock dominates the neural c

74 Individuals under decreasing day length developed slower and grew to a bigger size.

75 form precisely, which in turn is crucial for day-length discrimination by Arabidopsis.

76 NSTANS (CO) gene expression is necessary for day-length discrimination for photoperiodic flowering.

77 lling CO expression is clearly a key step in day-length discrimination, the mechanism that generates

78 in preterm infants, we investigated whether day length during early gestation was associated with se

79 Depending on day length, either M cells (short days) or E cells (long

80 Additionally, short day lengths enhanced the withdrawal of parasympathetic c

81 conditions (temperature, water availability, day length, etc.).

82 programmed for diapause (reared under short day lengths) fat storage was dramatically reduced and th

83 e Siberian hamsters utilize the decrement in day length following the summer solstice to implement ph

84 easonal reproductive cycles is the change in day length (i.e., photoperiod), encoded by the pattern o

85 hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) exposed to long day lengths (i.e., summer) or short day (SD) lengths (i.

86 nd buds in response to cold temperatures and day length in a manner that is relative to the level of

87 ol flowering time: such as the perception of day length in leaves, which leads to the production of a

88 We also studied the effect of day length in the presence of glucose on a DeltasigB Del

89 To test the hypothesis that short day lengths increase parasympathetic and sympathetic ton

90 Short day lengths increased both parasympathetic tone, as meas

91 seasonally breeding vertebrates, changes in day length induce categorically distinct behavioral and

92 ing mechanisms, which breaks from prevailing day length-induced gene expression.

93 Plants use day-length information to coordinate flowering time with

94 In temperate regions, the shortening day length informs many insect species to prepare for wi

95 nded period of cold to promote flowering and day length-insensitive crops able to exploit the longer,

96 long-day flowering response pathway through day-length-insensitive alleles of the PHOTOPERIOD1 gene,

97 he time of year when responsiveness to short-day length is re-established.

98 Photoperiod (day length) is a cue used by many seasonal breeders to p

99 CO protein are crucial mechanisms for proper day-length measurement in photoperiodic flowering.

100 Mice exposed to a prolonged day length of 16- and 24-h light, compared with regular

101 gher hospital charge and an increased 2(1/2)-day length of stay vs patients younger than 65 years.

102 ients, with a minimal complication rate, a 2-day length of stay, and good intermediate results.

103 onsistent with the independent regulation by day length of the several behavioral and physiological t

104 The short day lengths of late summer program the mosquito Culex pi

105 arges for index hospitalization, charges per day, length of stay, discharge disposition, tracheostomy

106 avings of $1685, and a mean reduction of 1.5 days length of stay.

107 zed into short (< or = 7 days) and long (> 7 days) length of stay (LOS) by median split.

108 days), time to ileostomy output (2 versus 3 days), length of stay (4 versus 7 days), and decreased I

109 ondary endpoints included SSI incidence at 4 days, length of stay, cosmetic outcome, and patient sati

110 ch as operative time, blood use, ventilation days, length of stay, time to enteral independence, reje

111 Ventilator-free days, lengths of stay, organ failures, and 28-day mortal

112 eter in shock did not affect ventilator-free days, lengths of stay, organ failures, and mortality of

113 gth dependence of leaf size as the effect of day length on leaf size is abolished in phyC mutants.

114 t mediate the effects of seasonal changes in day length on mammalian behavior mediate effects of seas

115 d LD cycles to assess the effects of altered day length on PER and TIM dynamics in clock cells within

116 The prevalent hypothesis is that day length perception is mediated through coupling of an

117 moter CONSTANS (CO) plays a critical role in day-length perception and exhibits complex regulation; C

118 is not due to a defect in the perception of day length periodicity or in gibberellic acid metabolism

119 The memory for long-day lengths persisted in pinealectomized hamsters for 6.

120 iological rhythms to the sidereal year using day length (photoperiod) [2].

121 Seasonal synchronization based on day length (photoperiod) allows organisms to anticipate

122 terns, which are driven by annual changes in day length (photoperiod) and melatonin secretion.

123 Here, we demonstrate that day length (photoperiod) during development induces endu

124 before birth and is linked to the pattern of day length (photoperiod) exposure experienced by the mot

125 Plants utilize variation in day length (photoperiod) to anticipate seasonal changes.

126 We hypothesize that changes in day length (photoperiodism) may be an important environm

127 nisms have developed the capacity to measure day length (photoperiodism).

128 ondence between the observed spacing and the day length provides quantitative support for the photosy

129 of flowering, suggesting mechanisms by which day length regulates flowering time.

130 This repression is relieved by shortening day length resulting in up-regulation of the CBF pathway

131 Prolonged exposure to short winter day lengths results in refractoriness, a spontaneous rev

132 stematic screening of the effects of altered day length revealed a complex relationship between phase

133 Day-length sensing involves an interaction between the r

134 ue in barley but probably also in many other day-length-sensitive crop plants, where they may tune ad

135 Here we show that loss of day-length-sensitive flowering in tomato was driven by t

136 However, day-length sensitivity in crops limits their geographica

137 proposition that cry2 and phyA are the major day-length sensors in Arabidopsis, we show that phyA med

138 ) and phytochrome A (phyA) and their role as day-length sensors in Arabidopsis.

139 Changes in day-length, shift-work, and transmeridian travel lead to

140 The day-length-specific removal of CDF1-dependent repression

141 ed process where various cues including age, day length, temperature and endogenous hormones fine-tun

142 pattern approximating the rate of change in day length that occurs during autumn at the latitude thi

143 apausing mosquitoes (those reared under long day lengths) the primary follicles were arrested in a st

144 Plants react to seasonal change in day length through altering physiology and development.

145 sonal environmental variations by monitoring day length to initiate flowering.

146 nges in behavior by transmitting a signal of day length to other sites in the organism.

147 rs are seasonal breeders that use changes in day length to synchronize their reproductive effort with

148 ts mediating the input and interpretation of day length to the output of specific hormones that ultim

149 populations requiring substantially shorter day lengths to initiate flowering than perennial populat

150 Plants commonly use photoperiod (day length) to control the timing of flowering during th

151 posed to different day/night temperature and day-length treatments to assess expression changes in fl

152 ysiologically respond to seasonal changes in day length under conditions of natural light exposure.

153 Instead, foraging range size and day length were relatively small and short, respectively

154 nte and tropical maize is delayed under long day lengths, whereas temperate maize evolved a reduced s

155 esponse to environmental conditions, such as day length, which regulate the onset of flowering, and p

156 ng plants like Arabidopsis thaliana, measure day length with a rhythm that is not reset at lights-off

157 integration of environmental signals such as day-length with the internal development status in Arabi

158 Under long day lengths ZmCCT alleles from diverse teosintes are con