ライフサイエンスコーパス: death certificate

1 ath were derived by chart review or from the death certificate.

2 had that specific etiology mentioned on the death certificate.

3 s between events or conditions listed on the death certificate.

4 Underlying cause of death on the death certificate.

5 ion database or kidney disease listed on the death certificate.

6 y, specificity, and predictive values of the death certificate.

7 cause-of-death section of the New York City death certificate.

8 al deaths and almost all stillbirths have no death certificate.

9 278 (13.7%) had respiratory TB listed on the death certificate.

10 fined cause of death as that listed on their death certificates.

11 eath than with the causes of death listed on death certificates.

12 , medical history, physical examination, and death certificates.

13 determining cause of death than reliance on death certificates.

14 cause and CVD mortality were abstracted from death certificates.

15 (date and ICD-10 code) was ascertained from death certificates.

16 influenza infection by laboratory results or death certificates.

17 g 36 who were diagnosed only on the basis of death certificates.

18 Causes of death were obtained from death certificates.

19 ALS cases were ascertained through death certificates.

20 cause-specific mortality as determined from death certificates.

21 CHD were obtained from hospital records and death certificates.

22 cal records in a records-linkage system, and death certificates.

23 most drug poisoning deaths as "accidents" on death certificates.

24 cords with genealogy data and 250,000 linked death certificates.

25 s a form of punishment, and falsification of death certificates.

26 orture, and 32% (25/78) for falsification of death certificates.

27 and confirmed by use of medical records and death certificates.

28 algorithms for hospitalization databases and death certificates.

29 h due to CVD confirmed by medical records or death certificates.

30 comes were ascertained by medical records or death certificates.

31 sease were obtained from medical records and death certificates.

32 than non-Hispanic Whites in studies based on death certificates.

33 ical staff and reviewed patients' charts and death certificates.

34 from autopsy results, hospital records, and death certificates.

35 0 to 414) was the underlying cause on 62% of death certificates.

36 er sources of care during 1993-1995 and from death certificates.

37 lying cause of death from ALS collected from death certificates.

38 diagnoses, and mortality was determined from death certificates.

39 sease were obtained from medical records and death certificates.

40 h for subjects who died were determined from death certificates.

41 ay be overrepresented as a cause of death on death certificates.

42 uses of death were ascertained from official death certificates.

43 62.5%) had cryptosporidiosis listed on their death certificates.

44 , and cause of death was ascertained through death certificates.

45 HCV infection is greatly underdocumented on death certificates.

46 s (from 520 patients), supplemented by state death certificates.

47 views, medical records, autopsy reports, and death certificates.

48 corded liver disease had HCV listed on their death certificates.

49 data about the coding of individual cause of death certificates.

50 bout the drugs and other substances named on death certificates.

51 e, sex, and race-ethnicity was obtained from death certificates.

52 ed through linkage with hospital records and death certificates.

53 sensus guidelines and compared with reported death certificates.

54 Causes of death were ascertained from death certificates.

55 008 using ECGs, hospital discharge codes and death certificates.

56 ontributing causes-of-death data recorded on death certificates.

57 re obtained from death registry matching and death certificates.

58 ed with poisoning mortality as identified on death certificates.

59 e relatives was determined and verified from death certificates.

60 ned through interviews, medical records, and death certificates.

61 ined noncancer mortality rates from national death certificates, 1975 to 2005.

62 njured patients with in-hospital deaths, 825 death certificates (43%) listed a noninjury cause of dea

63 's kappa (kappa) statistic = 0.69) than with death certificates (61%; kappa = 0.54).

64 ugh cause-of-death information obtained from death certificates, 70% (n = 174) through linkage of dea

65 from the presenting cancer (ascertained from death certificates), adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnic

66 n of nonmalignant respiratory disease on the death certificate, adjusting for a wide range of potenti

67 Causes of deaths were ascertained through death certificates; ALS was not identified separately un

68 hree physician epidemiologists, based on the death certificate and additional records surrounding the

69 ion until 31 March 2008 were abstracted from death certificates and a database of hospital admissions

70 -up of individual patients was obtained from death certificates and cancer registries.

71 standard demographic techniques, we analyzed death certificates and census data and made sex-specific

72 onditions leading to death was obtained from death certificates and comprehensive assessments that we

73 We tabulated the drugs named on death certificates and computed age-adjusted and age-spe

74 ome was death from infection identified from death certificates and confirmed through medical record

75 visits and by review of medical records and death certificates and defined by the presence of ascite

76 d from cause of death information coded from death certificates and from discharge diagnoses coded fr

77 s of observation (n = 1,560) aggregated from death certificates and geographic divisions, the authors

78 scertained through blind physician review of death certificates and hospital or pathology reports.

79 ction and stroke events were identified from death certificates and hospital records.

80 medical record review and fatalities through death certificates and medical record review.

81 revascularization procedures, obtained from death certificates and medical records, by baseline peri

82 fied over a median of 4.6 y were verified by death certificates and medical records.

83 Causes of death were ascertained from death certificates and medical records.

84 In addition, persons completing death certificates and NHS physicians interpreting death

85 Underlying cause of death was obtained from death certificates and other sources and coded and categ

86 Causes of death were ascertained from death certificates and primary care and health authority

87 The accuracy of GUE reporting on death certificates and the etiology of fatal GUE merit f

88 underlying causes of death was obtained from death certificates and the National Death Index.

89 50,080 individuals, ascertained by validated death certificates and the national death registry.

90 Birth certificate data linked to infant death certificates and to infant discharge abstracts wer

91 Methadone was named on 2,149 death certificates and was the most frequently named sub

92 codes from inpatient and outpatient care and death certificates and were confirmed by medical record

93 cience Center Enterprise Data Warehouse, and death certificates and were linked to the UPDB for analy

94 ian of the decedent frequently completed the death certificate, and HCV and HBV often were not detect

95 tal discharge diagnoses, birth certificates, death certificates, and a study of neonatal seizures con

96 patients or their proxies, medical records, death certificates, and autopsy and biopsy reports.

97 se of death was similar to that for clinical death certificates, and could therefore be acceptable fo

98 n = 83,103) were ascertained from linkage to death certificates, and hazard ratios (HRs) for all- and

99 for 1999, obtained from physicians' reports, death certificates, and interviews with physicians.

100 data were obtained from physicians' reports, death certificates, and interviews with physicians.

101 iograms, hospital discharge diagnosis codes, death certificates, and Medicare claims data.

102 ed experts used study data, medical records, death certificates, and proxy reports to adjudicate caus

103 ough contact with next of kin, collection of death certificates, and searches of the National Death I

104 th cases identified through medical records, death certificates, and state cancer registries.

105 We reviewed EMS and hospital records, state death certificates, and the national death index to dete

106 den countries are based on clinical records, death certificates, and verbal autopsy studies.

107 Death certificates are inaccurate and do not report PCI-

108 Death certificates are widely used in epidemiologic and

109 rtension and diabetes mellitus (mentioned on death certificate as either primary or contributing caus

110 The death certificate assigned coronary heart disease in 51.

111 Compared with the physician panel, the death certificate attributed 24.3% more deaths to corona

112 eath among 1244 child reports with available death certificates/autopsy reports included sudden infan

113 Death certificate-based 12-year mortality was analyzed a

114 Comparisons were made with a retrospective, death certificate-based determination of SCD incidence u

115 e, a simultaneous comparison was made with a death certificate-based method of determining SCD incide

116 Standard death certificate-based methods for ascertaining deaths

117 The retrospective death certificate-based review yielded 1,007 cases (inci

118 Retrospective death certificate-based surveillance results in signific

119 nment may be due to underreporting of SLE on death certificates, but may also represent underdiagnosi

120 to have a malignant neoplasm listed on their death certificates, but the PMR was 6.07 (95% CI 4.88-7.

121 le-Cause Mortality Files, compiled from U.S. death certificates by the National Center for Health Sta

122 Among 2683 decedents, the death certificate coded coronary heart disease as the un

123 Rate of fetal injury deaths, based on fetal death certificates coded with an underlying cause of dea

124 nderlying cause of death was identified from death certificates collected through 2006 (mean follow-u

125 entions targeted at improving the quality of death certificate completion are urgently needed.

126 ngly support the need to include training in death certificate completion as part of physician educat

127 ve residents had received formal training in death certificate completion.

128 We analyzed all death certificate data (n = 19,617) from Los Angeles Cou

129 of Death in HIV (CoDe) protocol, which uses death certificate data and clinical markers.

130 Survey using death certificate data and medical examiner records to c

131 Death certificate data are often used to study the epide

132 According to death certificate data between 1969 and 2013, an overall

133 s among persons aged 25 years or older using death certificate data collated by the National Center f

134 Using New York death certificate data for 1989-1991 and 1999-2001 and h

135 -2006, were linked to hospital admission and death certificate data for 71,681 pairs of maternal gran

136 We analyzed all monthly death certificate data from Los Angeles County, Californ

137 National death certificate data greatly overestimate deaths in wh

138 extracted for this observational study from death certificate data in the US Centers for Disease Con

139 Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of death certificate data of reproductive-age women, live b

140 and Hospital Activities (CPHA) and national death certificate data reported to the National Vital St

141 We reviewed death certificate data to assess the accuracy of deaths

142 The authors used death certificate data to evaluate national trends in th

143 tions (OIs) in 1993, national multiple-cause death certificate data were examined using two approache

144 National Vital Statistics' death certificate data were used to calculate death rate

145 Computerized death certificate data were used to identify all deaths

146 US death certificate data were used to identify deaths due

147 by the federal government and based on state death certificate data, identifies such deaths by assign

148 ted for each case from the same linked birth-death certificate data, matched to the case on year of b

149 nal mortality statistics, which are based on death certificate data, may overestimate the frequency o

150 Using death certificate data, most investigators have noted a

151 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention death certificate data, using International Statistical

152 e was identified by using state and national death certificate data.

153 these causes using 1989-2001 US linked birth/death certificate data.

154 using 1989-1991 California linked birth and death certificate data.

155 ity rates were determined through the use of death certificate data.

156 e Washington State Trauma Registry linked to death certificate data.

157 Hospital discharge and death-certificate data were linked for all patients unde

158 population from routine cancer-registry and death-certificate data.

159 followed through 1992-1993 for a hospital or death certificate diagnosis of CLD or cirrhosis (ICD-9-C

160 es were identified by hospital records or by death certificates during the follow-up period.

161 We used data from death certificates filed in the United States from 1999

162 er for Health Statistics of the CDC from all death certificates filed in the United STATES: From thes

163 e most frequent cause of death listed on the death certificate for patients, and cardiovascular disea

164 Using linked birth and death certificates for all births in the U.S. between 19

165 adjudicators was better than agreement with death certificates for all disease-specific causes of de

166 We linked individual-level data with death certificates for all registered singletons births

167 or proxies and obtaining medical records and death certificates for ESRD cases.

168 te the validity of mortality estimation from death certificates for two such cancers, melanoma and my

169 Recent studies looking at information from death certificates found people with intellectual disabi

170 We used data from US death certificates from 1983 to 1997 to calculate median

171 US death certificates from 1990 to 2004 for which hepatitis

172 We validated HZ coding on death certificates from California, using hospital recor

173 Causes of deaths were ascertained through death certificates from January 1, 1989, through 1998.

174 Individual death certificates from Kentucky during 1911-1919 were a

175 ess is enhanced by obtaining paper copies of death certificates from the states, because death certif

176 sed cause-of-death and demographic data from death certificates from the US National Center for Healt

177 ation of Diseases system diagnostic codes on death certificates from the US National Mortality Databa

178 The death certificate had a sensitivity of 83.8% (95% CI, 81

179 Death certificates had only 58% accuracy (95% confidence

180 virus (HCV)-infected persons recorded on US death certificates has been increasing, but actual rates

181 certained over an average of 13.7 years from death certificates, hospital records, and ECG changes at

182 Diabetes incidence was identified from death certificates, hospitalization and nursing home rec

183 agriculture occupation was described on the death certificate in 115 (35%) of these men.

184 ple cause of death (MCOD) data in 12 million death certificates in 2006-2010.

185 Using computerized data from all death certificates in the United States between 1973 and

186 Between 1979 and 1988, 1,784 death certificates in the United States listed Wegener's

187 a genealogy of the Utah population linked to death certificates in Utah over a period of 100 years.

188 harge diagnosis of AN, or who had a cause-of-death certificate including an AN diagnosis.

189 cancer (n = 5) in hospitalization records or death certificates, including 36 who were diagnosed only

190 The listing of hemochromatosis on death certificates increased 60% from 1979 to 1992.

191 Death certificates indicated PD was a substantial contri

192 The authors obtained death certificate information in a cohort of 260 patient

193 withdrawal of anticonvulsant medication, and death certificate information provided no evidence to su

194 Based on death-certificate information, mortality was 16.7 times

195 om CVD and cardiometabolic diseases based on death-certificate information.

196 d: 238 attributed to cardiovascular disease (death certificate International Classification of Diseas

197 Accuracy of coding on death certificates is difficult to ascertain.

198 ntial diagnosis of stroke subtype on routine death certificates is inaccurate, we aimed to estimate s

199 Limitations: Underreporting of SLE on death certificates may have resulted in underestimates o

200 Death certificates may lack accuracy and misclassify the

201 ods for calculating CLD mortality rates from death certificates may underestimate hepatitis C-related

202 y hospital discharge diagnosis (n = 208) and death certificates (n = 13).

203 Physicians who had signed selected death certificates (n = 6,927) were sent a questionnaire

204 We reviewed polysomnograms and the death certificates of 112 Minnesota residents who had un

205 The authors reviewed death certificates of active New York City police office

206 all death certificates of these fetuses and death certificates of live-born co-twins of fetuses that

207 eoplasms other than leukaemia were listed on death certificates of people with Down's syndrome less t

208 ase was recorded more often than expected on death certificates of persons with NF1 who died at <30 y

209 Copies of all death certificates of these fetuses and death certificat

210 se (ICD-9 490 to 493.9, 496) listed on their death certificates; of these 2,554,959 decedents, only 1

211 death certificates from the states, because death certificates often provide additional information

212 Death certificates on which CJD was mentioned were also

213 identally diagnosed at autopsy or known from death certificates only.

214 odes for AF on hospital discharge records or death certificates or 12-lead ECGs performed during 3 tr

215 d up for 3 months for clinical, new imaging, death certificate, or autopsy evidence of subsequent PE.

216 g the identified relatives' medical records, death certificate, or cancer registry information were i

217 t disease was obtained from hospital records/death certificates over 22 years of follow-up.

218 ned from medical records, cancer registries, death certificates, pathology reports, and review of his

219 ten appeared to be infectious in origin, but death certificates provide insufficient information to d

220 sons with NF1 and, within the limitations of death certificates, provides population-based data about

221 omputed agreement on cause of death from the death certificate, proxy, and adjudication, as well as s

222 death was adjudicated using medical records, death certificates, proxy interview, and autopsy reports

223 e, hospital admission, disease registry, and death certificate records from the CALIBER programme, wh

224 Deaths were confirmed by death certificates, referring physicians, and medical re

225 tation conflicts with reports generated from death certificate registries.

226 individual cancer mortality rates from 2008 death certificate reporting from the Centers for Disease

227 es of death among men and women from 2009 US death certificate reporting; (2) individual cancer morta

228 e lung disease from 1979 through 1993, using death certificate reports of 31,314,160 decedents in the

229 15 distinct strata and reduced the number of death certificate requests by 76%.

230 questionable matches to reduce the number of death certificate requests to state offices.

231 es are hospital and ED discharge records and death certificates, respectively.

232 erified through the National Death Index and death certificate reviews.

233 curring through July 7, 1999, as verified by death-certificate reviews, and compared by morning vs af

234 Cases were identified though a state death certificate search, Centers for Disease Control an

235 her sensitivity (sensitivity = 50%-89%) than death certificates (sensitivity = 31%-81%).

236 improving the reporting of cause of death on death certificates should improve national vital records

237 The new evidence includes the death certificate stating the man's occupation to have b

238 se by the physician panel were excluded, the death certificate still assigned more deaths to coronary

239 rocardiograms, hospital discharge codes, and death certificates), stroke, heart failure, CHD, and mor

240 ases, interview studies with physicians, and death certificate studies (the Netherlands and Belgium)

241 A nationwide death certificate study in Flanders, Belgium, was conduc

242 r other soft-tissue neoplasm listed on their death certificates than were persons without NF1.

243 Data were derived from birth and fetal death certificates that were linked for the first and se

244 -up visits, hospital discharge diagnosis, or death certificates through 2011.

245 terhospital transfers), and fetal and infant death certificates to assess neonatal mortality rates am

246 etermined using the National Death Index and death certificates to characterize the mortality experie

247 ches of registers of hospital discharges and death certificates) to identify definite CCM diagnoses f

248 sively followed for mortality, identified by death certificate underlying or contributing causes, by

249 Death certificates, utilized by previous reports, have p

250 ssumption that death by stroke reported on a death certificate was due to the index stroke if death o

251 iew of 5 years of annual follow-up forms and death certificates was analyzed in 2,127 patients who ha

252 rom coronary heart disease, ascertained from death certificates, was classified as death from myocard

253 Using death certificates, we analyzed trends in NYC-specific a

254 Based on examination of US death certificates, we identified deaths in 26 states fo

255 tributing respiratory causes listed on their death certificates were more affected by air pollution,

256 certificates and NHS physicians interpreting death certificates were not blinded to the use of HT.

257 Death certificates were obtained for 96% (214) of the 22

258 Death certificates were obtained for all but three of th

259 Death certificates were obtained for all participants wh

260 gh December 1994 to obtain vital status, and death certificates were obtained for those who died.

261 Death certificates were obtained from individual states.

262 Death certificates were obtained from state health depar

263 Death certificates were obtained.

264 Death certificates were reviewed by 2 physicians.

265 ilable medical records, autopsy reports, and death certificates were reviewed to identify cause of de

266 ional registries of households, cancers, and death certificates were used to derive incidence and mor

267 , using an expanded definition that included death certificates where CLD, viral hepatitis, or CLD-re

268 As expected, death certificates with a diagnosis of Down's syndrome w

269 illnesses on hospital discharge records and death certificates, yet few of these cases have an etiol