ライフサイエンスコーパス: debridement

1 e protocol was repeated for instrumentation (debridement).

2 rotocol was repeated during instrumentation (debridement).

3 promoting the healing of corneal epithelium debridement.

4 and light doses, with or without epithelial debridement.

5 orneal inflammation in mice after epithelial debridement.

6 with PRF or PRP with conventional open-flap debridement.

7 mJ/mm) applied once to the study burn, after debridement.

8 mes in comparison with mechanical epithelial debridement.

9 uring wound healing after corneal epithelial debridement.

10 are early recognition and complete surgical debridement.

11 ponse and the patient's compliance with oral debridement.

12 biopsy were collected at each surgical wound debridement.

13 erventional radiology drainage after initial debridement.

14 f of infection should determine the need for debridement.

15 as an aid in diagnosis and non-surgical root debridement.

16 d Hamp index taken after flap reflection and debridement.

17 tandard course of machine-driven subgingival debridement.

18 fully treated with voriconazole and surgical debridement.

19 r infected bone defects and/or osteomyelitis debridement.

20 ies of p38 and p42/44 MAPKs after mechanical debridement.

21 l after manual creation of a single wound by debridement.

22 e primary closure of flaps was ensured after debridement.

23 al amphotericin B), and 24 required surgical debridement.

24 ompared reconstructive therapy and open flap debridement.

25 curred in 45% of episodes, often early after debridement.

26 fter PTK, and 4 of 4 (100%) after epithelial debridement.

27 s despite antimicrobial therapy and surgical debridements.

28 t groups were identified: 1) access flap and debridement; 2) surgical resection; 3) application of bo

29 n experienced by patients during probing and debridement; 2) whether the treating hygienists could es

30 ntimicrobial gel/mouthrinse; 6) non-surgical debridement; 7) use of systemic antibiotics; and 8) 3-mo

31 tion was to provide SIT and perform surgical debridement (additional 0.89 euros per 1% fewer implants

32 07) and to the eyes that received epithelial debridement alone (3.74 x 10(-)(7); P = 0.01).

33 eatment strategies (non-surgical or surgical debridement alone or combined with adjunct therapies) we

34 PRP with open-flap debridement or open-flap debridement alone.

35 periodontal defects as compared to open flap debridement alone.

36 nhance the results as compared to mechanical debridement alone.

37 had PTK, and 4 of 166 (2.4%) had epithelial debridement alone.

38 herapeutic keratectomy (PTK), and epithelial debridement alone.

39 he localized defect was treated by open flap debridement along with scaling and root planing.

40 cal outcomes of the combination of Open flap debridement, Amniotic membrane and Demineralized Freeze

41 erapy alone or medical therapy combined with debridement, amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT), or

42 redictive values for identifying true NF and debridement among IVIG cases using our algorithms were 9

43 h the standard protocol involving epithelial debridement and 4 corneas by the transepithelial approac

44 ervention and were treated with single stage debridement and a closed packing technique.

45 eriodontal treatment consisted of mechanical debridement and adjunctive antibiotic therapy.

46 re refractory to medical therapy and require debridement and AMT for rapid re-epithelialization.

47 ereas it was seen in all eyes that underwent debridement and AMT.

48 mortality rates despite aggressive surgical debridement and antibiotic therapy.

49 ty or hospital LOS beyond that achieved with debridement and antibiotics.

50 treat this infection with combined surgical debridement and antifungal medication.

51 able in reported cases, with prompt surgical debridement and antifungal therapy.

52 ckets when compared to SRP immediately after debridement and at day 10 (P <0.05).

53 ritical in mediating efferocytosis and wound debridement and bridging the gap between innate and adap

54 d Freeze Dried bone Allograft with Open flap debridement and Demineralized Freeze Dried bone Allograf

55 zontal bony defects that underwent open-flap debridement and did not undergo resective or regenerativ

56 therapy, which includes disfiguring surgical debridement and frequently adjunctive toxic antifungal t

57 d on the corneas of live rabbits by complete debridement and in rabbit corneal epithelial primary cul

58 8MAPK inhibitor SB202190 on healing rates of debridement and keratectomy wounds was determined in org

59 neralized periodontitis received subgingival debridement and oral hygiene instructions each week for

60 The tunnel approach minimizes soft-tissue debridement and permits effective cortical cuts.

61 task at the wound site by facilitating wound debridement and producing chemokines, metabolites, and g

62 management of patients with PJI treated with debridement and retention of the prosthesis, resection a

63 Debridement and sequestrectomy with primary closure were

64 ividuals with LAP were treated by mechanical debridement and systemic antibiotics.

65 nd 12 mo following treatment with mechanical debridement and systemic antibiotics.

66 reported with the use of aggressive surgical debridement and systemic antifungal therapy.

67 n experienced by patients during probing and debridement and to determine whether the pain responses

68 s for necrotizing fasciitis include surgical debridement and treatment with cell wall-active antibiot

69 Subsequently, despite surgical debridement and treatment with Itraconozaole amputation

70 =0.51 for the comparison between placebo and debridement) and 51.6+/-23.7, 53.7+/-23.7, and 51.4+/-23

71 ascularization induced by mechanical injury (debridement), and in vitro in corneal epithelial cells.

72 Infection control, early surgical debridement, and antibiotic therapy are now the central

73 ge older than 18 years, receiving at least 1 debridement, and having been discharged from the system.

74 thelial cross-linking, customized epithelial debridement, and higher fluence shorter duration ultravi

75 l treatment, in 20 (95%) eyes that underwent debridement, and in 17 (100%) eyes that underwent AMT.

76 cluded oral hygiene instructions, mechanical debridement, and periodontal reevaluation.

77 osure and required hospitalization, surgical debridement, and prolonged antimicrobial therapy.

78 sed with 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate after debridement, and twice daily, for 2 weeks.

79 rosthetic joint infection (PJI) managed with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) h

80 Management by debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) i

81 re randomly assigned to receive arthroscopic debridement, arthroscopic lavage, or placebo surgery.

82 Mechanical debridement as well as mechanical debridement supplement

83 reduce the necessity for extensive surgical debridement as well as secondary wound closure by means

84 py, which consisted of full-mouth mechanical debridement at baseline and the 3-, 6-, and 12-month app

85 ily use of an EO mouthrinse after ultrasonic debridement benefited patients with and without diabetes

86 DP (excluding completion pancreatectomy and debridement) between January 1, 1984 and July 1, 2006 we

87 Following debridement both groups were grafted with a bovine-deriv

88 ed healing in response to corneal epithelial debridement by manifesting abnormal histology, lack of K

89 Pancreatic debridement can be performed during ECLS, using a compre

90 ical indications for video-assisted thoracic debridement compared with traditional management, includ

91 n anatomic PDs (APDs) of 2 to 3 mm, relative debridement depth (debridement depth/APD) ranged from 65

92 Overall, median debridement depth was 2.00 mm in I teeth and 1.86 mm in

93 s) of 2 to 3 mm, relative debridement depth (debridement depth/APD) ranged from 65% to 80% and 60% to

94 tions, Amoils epithelial scrubber epithelial debridement, diamond burr polishing and excimer laser ph

95 The addition of chlorhexidine to mechanical debridement did not enhance the results as compared to m

96 Aggressive surgical debridement/digit amputation and selected use of arteria

97 After defect debridement, direct bony defect measurements were made w

98 Debridement does not have any significant advantage in t

99 ge, 5-540) after initial endoscopic drainage/debridement, due to persistence of WOPN (n = 3), recurre

100 Others advocated debridement early in the course of the disease for all p

101 in in CAL of 1.30 mm compared with open-flap debridement, EDTA, or placebo, but no significant differ

102 of this study was to assess the subgingival debridement efficacy of GPAP in periodontal pockets with

103 ed with 0.5% toluidine blue, and subgingival debridement efficacy was assessed.

104 Following surgical debridement, EMP was placed into the bony defect.

105 After surgical debridement, enamel matrix derivative (EMD) was placed i

106 s, repositioning, negative pressure therapy, debridement, enteral and parenteral feeding, vitamin and

107 The number of surgical debridements, flap use, or duration of antibiotic therap

108 LM (n = 20): one-stage full-mouth ultrasonic debridement (FMUD) associated with CLM (500 mg, every 12

109 e (AM) when performing full-mouth ultrasonic debridement (FMUD) in generalized aggressive periodontit

110 reated with one-stage, full-mouth ultrasonic debridement (FMUD).

111 session of full-mouth ultrasonic subgingival debridement followed 1 week later by Er:YAG application

112 Open, transperitoneal debridement followed by closed packing and drainage resu

113 1) consisted of sites treated with open flap debridement followed by placement of DOX blended with be

114 1 consisted of sites treated with open-flap debridement followed by placement of DOX gel-loaded COL

115 Mortality after debridement for necrotizing pancreatitis continues to be

116 opressor-dependent shock undergoing surgical debridement from 2010 to 2014 were identified at 130 US

117 roup (-1.9 mm), compared with the epithelial debridement group (-2.6 mm; P < 0.001) and with the unop

118 in) were similar in the placebo, lavage, and debridement groups: 48.9+/-21.9, 54.8+/-19.8, and 51.7+/

119 y, increasing use of video-assisted thoracic debridement has altered the traditional management of pl

120 riority of EGR over treatment with open flap debridement has been established.

121 Frequent debridement healed more wounds in a shorter time (P < .0

122 riosteal flap was raised and, after thorough debridement, horizontal and vertical dimensions between

123 Digital ischemic events were classified as debridement, hospital admission for intravenous (IV) adm

124 Three patients required mesh debridement; however, no instances of mesh explantation

125 The standard practice of irrigation and debridement (I&D) of open fractures within 6 hours of in

126 cultured, presence of abscess, incision and debridement (I&D), failure of a trial of outpatient anti

127 bacteremic infections requiring more than 1 debridement, immunosuppressive therapy, and the exchange

128 t of new cementum when compared to open flap debridement in a canine model.

129 early application of video-assisted thoracic debridement in children with empyema compared with tradi

130 l periodontal outcomes prior to root surface debridement in chronic periodontitis cases.

131 months, and healing corneas after epithelial debridement in P30 and P90 mice.

132 Early exploration and debridement in patients with complicated pancreatitis ma

133 ing the early use of video-assisted thoracic debridement in the management of empyema in children.

134 ser application as an adjunct to subgingival debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis (C

135 antibiotic therapy and the role of surgical debridement in treating chronic osteomyelitis are import

136 dily from day 2 until day 8 after mechanical debridement in vivo, paralleling vascular endothelial gr

137 ired eye exenteration and extensive surgical debridement, in addition to intravenous amphotericin B.

138 tk deficiency led to decreased cardiac wound debridement, increased infarct size, and depressed cardi

139 In the epithelial debridement injury model in which the basement membrane

140 Following chemomechanical debridement, intracanal bleeding from the periapical tis

141 Cross-linking with epithelial debridement is found to be most effective but various mo

142 e use of an antibiotic along with mechanical debridement is recommended for the treatment of Actinoba

143 Surgical debridement is typically required for joint infections a

144 aning methods before definitive root surface debridement is undertaken.

145 cture, reduction of joint dislocation, wound debridement, laceration repair, and multiple rib fractur

146 ated osteomyelitis successfully treated with debridement, local irrigation with polyhexamethylene big

147 ystem within the root canal and incompletely debridement may affect the long-term prognosis of root c

148 Plaque debridement may be accomplished by air polishing using a

149 103-treated patients had a similar number of debridements (mean [SD], 2.2 [1.1] for the high-dose, 2.

150 ri-implantitis combining stepwise mechanical debridement measures with adjuvant Povidone-iodine appli

151 ri-implantitis combining stepwise mechanical debridement measures with adjuvant povidone-iodine appli

152 s included 3 related deaths (8.1%), frequent debridements (median, 11 cases), and amputation revision

153 Infection resolved following thorough debridement, mesh removal, and prolonged antimicrobial t

154 However, in the debridement model, Smad 2 localization remained primaril

155 termined using an in vivo corneal epithelial debridement model.

156 After epithelial debridement, mounting, and pressurization on an artifici

157 interval, 0.05-1.1, P=0.07), while surgical debridement (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1

158 ation of 100% ethanol followed by mechanical debridement of corneal and limbal epithelium.

159 veness of a buccal SFA used for the surgical debridement of deep intraosseous defects compared to the

160 The surgical debridement of intraosseous periodontal defects resulted

161 g postnatal growth and healing of epithelial debridement of Krt12(Cre/Cre)/ZAP bitransgenic mice.

162 Conservative debridement of necrotic bone, pain control, infection ma

163 Surgery included debridement of necrotic tissue, carpal tunnel decompress

164 active bowel disease, and extensive surgical debridement of perineal lesions is often necessary.

165 lorite is an effective irrigant for chemical debridement of root canals.

166 evidence to recommend the use of mechanical debridement of second molars after the extraction of thi

167 ent transoral/transmural endoscopic drainage/debridement of sterile (27, 51%) and infected (26, 49%)

168 lly limbal stem cell deficient by n-heptanol debridement of the entire corneal epithelium followed by

169 ical features of apical delta may complicate debridement of the infected root canal system.

170 Treatment is limited to antibiotic therapy, debridement of the infected tissue, and, in severe cases

171 nto the next phase and, in turn, can promote debridement of the injury site, cell proliferation and a

172 In this case, thorough debridement of the material resulted in subsequent heali

173 owing reflection of mucoperiosteal flaps and debridement of the root surface and defect, root conditi

174 a small study suggests that ultrasonic root debridement of the second molar and a three-visit plaque

175 and one developed perineal sepsis requiring debridement of the transposed gracilis.

176 Both methods resulted in effective debridement of treated surfaces, the plaque area being r

177 ss, transoral/transmural endoscopic drainage/debridement of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) aft

178 study is to evaluate healing after open-flap debridement (OF) of intrabony periodontal defects alone

179 econdary to active controls versus open flap debridement (OFD) alone and to defect-type modifying BG

180 Control group (n= 10) received open flap debridement (OFD) and Demineralized Freeze Dried bone Al

181 ccal Class II furcation defects to open-flap debridement (OFD) and to determine the influence of ET i

182 signed to evaluate the efficacy of open-flap debridement (OFD) combined with PRF, 1% MF gel, and PRF

183 concentrates (PCs) in addition to open flap debridement (OFD) has been investigated.

184 ided into two treatment groups: 1) open flap debridement (OFD) in endodontically treated teeth (contr

185 d gains in defect fill compared to open flap debridement (OFD) in intrabony defects.

186 icacy of PRF and 1.2% ATV gel with open flap debridement (OFD) in treatment of intrabony defects (IBD

187 ed either with autologous PRF with open flap debridement (OFD) or OFD alone.

188 ribution of IMP to the outcomes of open-flap debridement (OFD) treatment of intrabony defects.

189 a-TCP) implant to EMD alone and to open-flap debridement (OFD) when surgically treating 1- to 2-wall

190 o evaluate and compare efficacy of open flap debridement (OFD) with or without PRF or PRF + 1.2% RSV

191 r molars were randomly assigned to open flap debridement (OFD), MBA, or MBA with a bioabsorbable coll

192 ssigned to one of four treatments: open flap debridement (OFD), OFD plus EMD, OFD plus DG, or OFD plu

193 e treated with autologous PRF with open-flap debridement (OFD), PRF + HA with OFD, or OFD (controls)

194 PRF and HA bone graft placed after open-flap debridement (OFD).

195 trabony defects in comparison with open flap debridement (OFD).

196 ed either with autologous PRF with open flap debridement (OFD+PRF) or OFD alone.

197 ach in the following three groups: open flap debridement [OFD] alone, bone graft [BG], and bone graft

198 % vs 83.2%, P < .001), or undergone surgical debridement on admission (4.3% vs 61.3%, P = .001).

199 of the following treatment groups: open flap debridement only (OFD), OFD with bioabsorbable porcine-d

200 ed and root surfaces subjected to mechanical debridement only.

201 While 14% of the patients had intraoperative debridement, only 3 underwent complete LVAD removal.

202 2 ulcers occasionally may require additional debridement or AMT.

203 ed with either autologous PRF with open-flap debridement or autologous PRP with open-flap debridement

204 The jury also recommended against pancreatic debridement or drainage for sterile necrosis, limiting d

205 t or drainage for sterile necrosis, limiting debridement or drainage to those with infected pancreati

206 Either a 2-mm debridement or keratectomy was made in 129SVE wild type

207 debridement or autologous PRP with open-flap debridement or open-flap debridement alone.

208 stology) and treat (often requiring surgical debridement or resection, and/or prolonged antibiotic th

209 consisted of video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement or, if not feasible, laparotomy.

210 y more likely than never-smokers to have had debridement (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.1-18.3) or admission for I

211 he effect of one-stage full-mouth ultrasonic debridement (OSFMUD) on clinical and immunoinflammatory

212 tment at the time of laparoscopy (pseudocyst debridement, ovarian cyst excision).

213 After a full-mouth ultrasonic debridement, patients were randomly assigned to an EO or

214 37.5%-46.7%) after a median of 62 days from debridement; patients without failure were followed up f

215 82 patients received full-mouth periodontal debridement performed within 48 hours.

216 d ventilator-free days, number and timing of debridements, plasma and tissue cytokine levels at 0 to

217 Subgingival debridement plus adjunctive SDD reduced deep pockets (>

218 linical series were patients scheduled for a debridement procedure of an infected sternal wound after

219 inless steel wires were collected during the debridement procedure.

220 l bevel gingivectomy combined with open flap debridement procedures for Px and Bx.

221 ith periodontitis were allocated randomly to debridement procedures in four weekly sections (quadrant

222 allograft and GTR and superior to open flap debridement procedures in improving clinical parameters

223 Debridement (removal of necrotic tissue and foreign bodi

224 ently, SDD adjunctive to repeated mechanical debridement resulted in dramatic clinical improvement in

225 thogen identification, and successful use of debridement, retention, and chronic antibiotic suppressi

226 Wound debridement samples and contralateral (healthy) skin swa

227 l communities in chronic wounds, we analyzed debridement samples from lower-extremity venous insuffic

228 Wound debridement samples were obtained from 10 patients monit

229 Patients received whole-mouth ultrasonic debridement, scaling and root planing, and a 7-day presc

230 nt of implants was performed with ultrasonic debridement, soft tissue curettage (STC), glycine powder

231 nt of implants was performed with ultrasonic debridement, soft tissue curettage (STC), glycine powder

232 For infected wounds, obtain a post-debridement specimen (preferably of tissue) for aerobic

233 The combination of ultrasonic debridement, STC and GPAP with adjuvant Povidone-iodine

234 The combination of ultrasonic debridement, STC, and GPAP with adjuvant povidone-iodine

235 Mechanical debridement as well as mechanical debridement supplemented with chlorhexidine can be benef

236 Three patients underwent 2 debridement surgeries.

237 time from the first symptoms of infection to debridement surgery was 3 days (IQR: 2-5 days).

238 Periodontal open flap debridement surgery was provided for the remainder of th

239 patients with EOSII, treatment consisting of debridement surgery with implant retention followed by c

240 he adjacent teeth with periodontal open flap debridement surgery.

241 treatment with conventional mechanical root debridement/surgical procedures and may additionally par

242 s need both effective and minimally abrasive debridement techniques.

243 During open flap debridement, the defects were randomly assigned to recei

244 After debridement, the investigators collected wound specimens

245 g full-thickness flap reflection and initial debridement, the tooth roots were notched at the apical

246 The more frequent the debridements, the better the healing outcome.

247 pproach that includes aggressive wound care, debridement, thrombolytic therapy, restoration of tissue

248 for each site clinically and after surgical debridement to characterize defect morphology, root conf

249 tis/myonecrosis often necessitates extensive debridement to ensure survival.

250 3.8%) furcations were determined at surgical debridement to have a furcation invasion of Hamp degree

251 Surgical treatment ranges from arthroscopic debridement to implantation of autologous chondrocytes b

252 open fractures requires wound irrigation and debridement to remove contaminants, but the effectivenes

253 Intervention (local debridement) to elicit a bacteremia increased the mDC ca

254 e surgical intervention, ranging from minor (debridement) to major (resection, amputation).

255 SAP, from simple drainage, to resection, to debridement, to sequestrectomy, although somewhat tortuo

256 e superficial second-degree burn wound after debridement/topical antiseptic therapy significantly acc

257 2007 to receive standard therapy (burn wound debridement/topical antiseptic therapy) with (n = 22) or

258 stage of wound healing; however, aggressive debridement transforms chronic wounds to acute wounds an

259 rded in relation to the instruments used for debridement, use and type of surgical treatment, and mat

260 in cultured cells and by corneal epithelial debridement using a mouse whole-eye organ culture model.

261 ne instructions, motivation, and subgingival debridement using a piezoelectric instrument.

262 ts (19 eyes) underwent mechanical epithelial debridement using a rotating brush (group 2) during CXL

263 Surgical debridement, ventilator support, vasopressors, continuou

264 oviding SIT and performing only non-surgical debridement was both least costly and least effective.

265 rneal subbasal nerve plexus after epithelial debridement was measured.

266 The healing of corneal wounds after debridement was monitored and visualized by fluorescent

267 Corneal epithelial debridement was performed in control and macrophage-depl

268 a 3-mm superficial keratectomy or epithelial debridement was performed on adult Sprague-Dawley rats.

269 Epithelial debridement was performed on P2X(7) knockout (P2X(7)(-/-

270 Stromal swelling after epithelial debridement was significantly less in most treated corne

271 l brushes, even before thorough root surface debridement was undertaken.

272 The median number of debridements was 2 (range, 1-138).

273 es after arthroscopic lavage or arthroscopic debridement were no better than those after a placebo pr

274 Debridements were created in RPE-choroid-sclera explants

275 First, regenerative therapy by open debridement with a bioabsorbable synthetic bone graft, b

276 red full mouth subgingival and supragingival debridement with a host-modulating agent, SDD, provides

277 f PTAP included antibiotics, sphincterotomy, debridement with drainage, hepatic arterial revasculariz

278 efficacy of combining full-mouth subgingival debridement with Er:YAG laser application in the treatme

279 All patients with EOSII underwent surgical debridement with implant retention.

280 f a protocol combining full-mouth ultrasonic debridement with laser therapy in the treatment of initi

281 be left unoperated or to undergo epithelial debridement with or without treatment consisting of cros

282 dence, requires invasive procedures such as, debridement with primary closure or myocutaneous flap re

283 Group 1 patients underwent debridement with the help of a sterile #15 blade on a Ba

284 nition required wound necrosis on successive debridements with IFI evidence by histopathology and/or

285 d with liposomal amphotericin B and multiple debridements, with no disease on 1.5-year follow-up exam

286 a control group (two sessions of ultrasonic debridement within 1 week).

287 Epithelial debridement without basement membrane disruption produce

288 ved skin incisions and underwent a simulated debridement without insertion of the arthroscope.

289 By using the epithelial debridement wound model and CD11c-diphtheria toxin recep

290 in the repair of in vivo corneal epithelial debridement wounds and in the structural organization of

291 healing in vivo in mouse corneal epithelial debridement wounds and in vitro in primary human corneal

292 alization of full-thickness skin and corneal debridement wounds by mechanisms involving epithelial ce

293 Epithelial debridement wounds in cultured porcine corneas and scrat

294 Epithelial debridement wounds in cultured porcine corneas and scrat

295 Corneal epithelial debridement wounds of two sizes (1.5 and 2.5 mm) were ma

296 Epithelium debridement wounds were made, followed by the assessment

297 Healing rates were unaffected in debridement wounds, but were significantly slowed in ker

298 Epithelial debridement wounds, with and without removal of basement

299 that characterize fibrosis in mouse corneal debridement wounds.

300 time in individual mice with large and small debridement wounds.