ライフサイエンスコーパス: deception

1 htly above chance when it comes to detecting deception.

2 nstraints that are typically associated with deception.

3 be particularly prone to mechanisms of self-deception.

4 gnitive simplicity, which is related to self-deception.

5 nforce the benefits of cheating enhance self-deception.

6 nd left Brodmann area 10 at the time of this deception.

7 study and understand brain mechanisms during deception.

8 n a functional MRI (fMRI) study of detecting deception.

9 he associated neural processes that underlie deception.

10 tizens' nonverbal signals of uncertainty and deception.

11 g and passively or actively participating in deception.

12 sible concerns about sampling and the use of deception.

13 MRI is a reasonable tool with which to study deception.

14 to appeal coverage decisions, 50% sanctioned deception.

15 ve modularity admits the possibility of self-deception.

16 extended to a behavioral definition of self-deception.

17 mproving the effectiveness of inter-personal deception.

18 insky to formalize a cognitive model of self-deception.

19 t angiosperm families, entice pollinators by deception [1].

20 26% of respondents sanctioned deception, 70% supported appealing, and 4% supported acc

21 " "not in the patient's best interest," and "deception." Additional questions measured career dissati

22 are "deceptive" or "unfair." Under the FTC's deception analysis, the focus is on whether consumers ar

23 to replicate prior group brain correlates of deception and improve on the consistency of individual r

24 at selected areas from Antarctic Peninsula (Deception and Livingstone Islands, Southern Shetlands).

25 erstand hemodynamic and neural correlates of deception and thus to detect deception with the added ad

26 glorious self-perception are typical of self-deception, and are thus crucial in the emergence and exp

27 rsonality traits, pain or physical pleasure, deception, and even social status.

28 Mimicry is a common form of deception, and most mimics gain the greatest fitness ben

29 le expect to cheat, they do not foresee self-deception, and that factors that reinforce the benefits

30 bout the relative costs and benefits of self-deception are informed by adopting a temporal view that

31 conflict is resolved, and varieties of self-deception are modeled as type-specific conflict-resoluti

32 Here, misidentification and/or deception are no longer formal requirements, and mimicry

33 Preferences regarding insurance company deception are related to perceptions of physician worklo

34 istical Manual of Mental Disorders specifies deception as a perpetrator characteristic, a far wider r

35 il pupation, which is consistent with sexual deception as an aspect of queen control.

36 te Carlo resampling, which we used to detect deception at an individual level.

37 e proposed system is able to detect identity deception (by using the first names of participants) wit

38 Self-deception can affect player beliefs, and hence player ac

39 Trivers argues that self-deception can increase fitness by improving the effectiv

40 If this deception continues for many trials, saccades gradually

41 We propose a novel deception detection system based on Rapid Serial Visual

42 t the location of the food into account, and deception did not occur if food was placed under the nor

43 In contrast, the extraordinarily specific deceptions evolved by orchids that attract a very narrow

44 his short-term psychological benefit of self-deception, however, can come with longer-term costs: whe

45 The regions of greater activation induced by deception identified by fNIRS were approximately consist

46 IRS) to investigate hemodynamic responses to deception in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) at the individu

47 sing number use college student samples, and deception in Web-based research is not uncommon.

48 cheat on tests are likely to engage in self-deception, inferring that their elevated performance is

49 Deception involves complex neural processes and correlat

50 As deception is a key defining component of factitious diso

51 Deception is common in nature and humans are no exceptio

52 decisions, our cognitive definition of self-deception is extended to a behavioral definition of self

53 The ability to detect deception is of vital importance in human society, playi

54 e abruptly ended by large eruptions from the Deception Island volcano, resulting in near-complete loc

55 chiatrists, their continuing support for the deception model is important, and begs an explanation.

56 me physicians seem to be willing to sanction deception of insurance companies.

57 ects by plants that are pollinated by sexual deception of males of the same insect species [2-4].

58 its is an increasing problem not only due to deception of the consumer but also because it poses heal

59 the hemochromatosis gene product, HFE), and deception of the host immune system (by viral homologs).

60 al frameworks of mimicry vs generalized food deception or pre-existing sensory bias.

61 Specific areas of the brain involved in deception or truth telling can be depicted with function

62 eful in social image management is strategic deception: our ability and willingness to manipulate oth

63 ' conjecture, arguing that the costs of self-deception outweigh its benefits.

64 that assesses the cumulative impact of self-deception over time.

65 Thus, in this unique example of sexual deception, pollination is achieved by co-opting and regu

66 e of robots, many people have concerns about deception, privacy, job loss, safety, and the loss of hu

67 During the deception process, specific areas of the frontal lobe (l

68 bserved among self-reported smokers, whereas deception regarding smoking status may explain most of t

69 he U.S. case against Iran is based on Iran's deceptions regarding nuclear weapons development.

70 Background noise, eavesdropping, and deception represent important neglected factors driving

71 testing) can inform the detection of illness deception, such tests need support from converging evide

72 more difficult for deceivers to confound the deception test using countermeasures.

73 nstrated that it is the cost associated with deception that stabilises honesty, and that the honest s

74 cording to their revealed level of strategic deception; these types were also distinguished by neural

75 ort-term memory, causal reasoning, planning, deception, transitive inference, theory of mind, and lan

76 Sanctioning of deception was substantial in this sample of prospective

77 l correlates of deception and thus to detect deception with the added advantages of being compact, te