戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 raphy (during concurrent subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation).
2 may contribute to the therapeutic effects of deep brain stimulation.
3 nd lateral motor areas was not influenced by deep brain stimulation.
4 l open the door for novel therapies, such as deep brain stimulation.
5  severe refractory adults, psychosurgery and deep brain stimulation.
6 hese patients should still be considered for deep brain stimulation.
7 than current approaches such as lesioning or deep brain stimulation.
8 ht into targeting strategies for therapeutic deep brain stimulation.
9 s for feedback control in trials of adaptive deep brain stimulation.
10 s from 19 PD patients undergoing surgery for deep brain stimulation.
11 ulation may subvert the clinical efficacy of deep brain stimulation.
12 rmacological dopamine replacement therapy or deep brain stimulation.
13 , through drug discovery and new targets for deep brain stimulation.
14 ase (PD), and (iii) in PD during therapeutic deep brain stimulation.
15  fluid drainage, vagal nerve stimulation and deep brain stimulation.
16 rimotor urges, and (2) the TS treatment with deep brain stimulation.
17 ftereffects were not observed with classical deep brain stimulation.
18 e invasive experimental options like that of deep brain stimulation.
19 odes implanted in the subthalamic nuclei for deep brain stimulation.
20 put synchrony onto the cortex, is altered by deep brain stimulation.
21 fective, and it is less invasive compared to deep brain stimulation.
22 rary lead externalization during surgery for deep brain stimulation.
23  and that these symptoms are treatable using deep brain stimulation.
24 transcranial direct current stimulation, and deep brain stimulation.
25 ons between the therapeutic effectiveness of deep brain stimulation (3 months postoperatively) and de
26 skinesias, and underwent subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation 8 years after grafting.
27                                     Adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) uses feedback from brain s
28                                              Deep brain stimulation allows drastic reduction of dopam
29 tonia can be effectively treated by pallidal deep brain stimulation although the mechanism of this ef
30 cted by neurosurgical interventions, such as deep brain stimulation and cingulotomy.
31 de other sophisticated treatments, including deep brain stimulation and gene therapies.
32                               This so-called deep brain stimulation and other methodological advances
33 in depression and the mechanism of action of deep brain stimulation and perhaps chemical antidepressa
34             Physiologic therapies, including deep brain stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimula
35       Patients performed the tasks ON or OFF deep brain stimulation and/or ON or OFF dopaminergic the
36 lation, epidural electrical stimulation, and deep brain stimulation, and (4) technologies on the hori
37 anatomical circuits modulated by subthalamic deep brain stimulation, and infer about the inner organi
38 terpreting orofacial movements evoked during deep brain stimulation, and neuroimaging tractography ef
39 romodulation interventions, both invasive as deep brain stimulation, and non-invasive such as repetit
40  support the adjunctive use of neuroleptics, deep-brain stimulation, and neurosurgical ablation for t
41                      Although the targets of deep brain stimulation are grey matter structures, axona
42 erventions, such as intrathecal baclofen and deep brain stimulation, are promising options.
43 high beta frequency range, but the degree of deep brain stimulation-associated suppression in their c
44 but in some cases surgical intervention with deep brain stimulation becomes necessary to alleviate mo
45      We simulated the effects of subthalamic deep brain stimulation both proximally to the stimulatio
46 particularly relevant given recent data from deep brain stimulation, both for neurologic and psychiat
47     Recent consensus guidelines explain when deep brain stimulation can be considered for severe refr
48                                              Deep brain stimulation can provide striking tremor relie
49            While typically highly effective, deep brain stimulation can sometimes yield suboptimal th
50 elates with the degree of improvement during deep brain stimulation, compatible with the current view
51 her developed to reliably identify effective deep brain stimulation contacts and aid in the programmi
52 tivity for the volume of tissue activated of deep brain stimulation contacts was assessed using proba
53  a novel method to map behavioral effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) across a 3-dimensional brai
54 herence could pave the way to more efficient deep brain stimulation (DBS) algorithms for tremor.
55                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) allows for direct recording
56                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) and cortical responsive sti
57                       Emphasis was placed on deep brain stimulation (DBS) and randomized clinical tri
58                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a putative approach for
59 out the response of this dystonia subtype to deep brain stimulation (DBS) at the internal globus pall
60                    Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) can improve motor complicat
61 e subthalamic nucleus (STN) in patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes.
62                                      Whether deep brain stimulation (DBS) exerts its clinical benefit
63 allidus externa (GPe) in children undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) for dystonia and investigat
64                To explore the feasibility of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for intractable SIB seen in
65 mbic areas has arisen in patients undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) for neuropsychiatric disord
66                          The experience with deep brain stimulation (DBS) for pain is largely based o
67                               The benefit of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson disease (PD)
68 pose a novel, closed-loop approach to tuning deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD
69 mparative studies of the efficacy of 'awake' deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD
70                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease is
71                      Based on the success of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for treating movement disor
72                Multiple open-label trials of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for treatment-resistant dep
73                    Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been found to restore t
74                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been proposed as a trea
75                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been used to treat a va
76 multiple sclerosis tremor using lesioning or deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been variable.
77                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a powerful s
78                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has improved the prospects
79                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has proven to be a safe and
80                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has shown promise for treat
81                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has virtually replaced abla
82                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) improves motor symptoms in
83                               High-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) in motor thalamus (Mthal) a
84         We review the current application of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson disease (PD) a
85 eus (PPTg) has been proposed as a target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in parkinsonian patients, p
86 pplication in 1999, the potential benefit of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in reducing symptoms of oth
87  double-blind trial comparing active to sham deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the anterior limb of the
88 ical profiles, but both disorders respond to deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the same subcortical tar
89                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a clinical therapy used
90                                     Cortical deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising therapeutic
91                                     Accumbal deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising therapeutic
92                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising treatment fo
93                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a surgical procedure use
94                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established modal
95                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective surgical tr
96                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an emerging intervention
97     Subcallosal cingulate white matter (SCC) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an evolving investigatio
98                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is currently being investig
99 se this feedback to control when therapeutic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is delivered.
100                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is increasingly applied for
101 arge-balanced pulses used by the standard HF deep brain stimulation (DBS) is modulated by the smooth
102                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is undergoing a transformat
103                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used to treat a number o
104  growing body of evidence demonstrating that deep brain stimulation (DBS) of globus pallidus internus
105                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of subcallosal cingulate wh
106 dying the rewarding and punishing effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of subcortical emotional ne
107                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subcallosal cingulat
108       The location of the optimal target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus
109                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus
110                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus
111                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus
112                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus
113                           Mechanisms whereby deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus
114 morbid for a spectrum of sleep disorders and deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus
115                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus
116                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus
117 ients failing ERP therapy are candidates for deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral capsule/vent
118                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral capsule/vent
119                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral capsule/vent
120 n humans and rodents has explored the use of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral capsule/vent
121 Pi) in reward and punishment processing, and deep brain stimulation (DBS) of these structures has bee
122                                  Remarkably, deep brain stimulation (DBS) provides beneficial effects
123                    Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) represents a well-establish
124           Closed-loop control is a promising deep brain stimulation (DBS) strategy that could be used
125          The risk of suicide behaviours post-deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery in Parkinson's dise
126  basal ganglia of 15 patients with PD during deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery of the bilateral ST
127                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeted at the nucleus acc
128                                              Deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy has become an essen
129 ase (PD) patients' leukocytes pre- and post- Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) treatment and compared to h
130                               High-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) with a single electrical so
131 ement of focal lesions or the application of deep brain stimulation (DBS) within circuits that modula
132            Direct modulation of the NAS with deep brain stimulation (DBS), a surgical procedure curre
133 is divided into invasive approaches, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), and noninvasive approaches
134  Parkinson's disease, on and off subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS), focussing on adaptive sens
135 leus (STN) or globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS), found that stimulation at
136 ith pallidotomy and then with high-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS), has led to a renaissance i
137 lso survey recent progress in imaging-guided deep brain stimulation (DBS), imaging-based (neurofeedba
138  the nature of motor activity in response to Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), in the mouse.
139 r difficulties in evaluating the efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS), or understanding its mecha
140                            Chronic forniceal deep brain stimulation (DBS), recently shown to rescue h
141  When dyskinesia persists during therapeutic deep brain stimulation (DBS), the peak frequency of this
142  MRI studies and clinical procedures such as deep brain stimulation (DBS).
143 be accessed with surgical techniques such as deep brain stimulation (DBS).
144 n-human primate, swine, and rodent models of deep brain stimulation (DBS).
145 lation in some cases, was observed following deep brain stimulation (DBS).
146 t medical therapy (BMT, n=116) and bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS, n=164) at either the subtha
147 vestigate the safety and targeting errors of deep-brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes placed under int
148                                 Furthermore, deep-brain stimulation (DBS) for psychiatric disorders t
149  plasticity induction by repeated pairing of deep-brain stimulation (DBS) of the BG with M1 stimulati
150 roaches are available such as capsulotomy or deep-brain stimulation (DBS).
151  treatment assignment, were implanted with a deep brain stimulation device and received their assigne
152  a control signal for closed-loop control of deep brain stimulation devices, for adjustment of dopami
153                                 Conventional deep brain stimulation did not change the distribution o
154                                 Furthermore, deep brain stimulation directed to the interposed cerebe
155 lia function, and new keys for understanding deep brain stimulation effects on cognitive and motivati
156                 We hypothesized that driving deep brain stimulation electrodes at a frequency closely
157                             We recorded from deep brain stimulation electrodes implanted bilaterally
158 end, we recorded local field potentials from deep brain stimulation electrodes implanted bilaterally
159      We recorded local field potentials from deep brain stimulation electrodes implanted in the STN i
160 ncephalogram and local field potentials from deep brain stimulation electrodes in 9 Parkinson's disea
161 otential (LFP) recordings from patients with deep brain stimulation electrodes in the basal ganglia h
162  nature of this interaction we recorded from deep-brain stimulation electrodes implanted bilaterally
163 sensorimotor cortex were identified in which deep brain stimulation-evoked activation correlated with
164 e presence of paraesthesias, the most common deep brain stimulation-evoked adverse effect.
165 ic resonance imaging could be used to detect deep brain stimulation-evoked changes in functional and
166 n stimulation (3 months postoperatively) and deep brain stimulation-evoked changes in functional and
167      In addition, our findings indicate that deep brain stimulation-evoked functional activation maps
168 ion localizations, followed by evaluation of deep brain stimulation-evoked therapeutic and adverse ef
169 a-amplitude in primary motor cortex and that deep brain stimulation facilitates motor improvement by
170 y in the SCC of 15 human subjects undergoing deep brain stimulation for depression while they viewed
171 cern regarding ventralis intermedius nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor has been the
172 bus pallidus internus in patients undergoing deep brain stimulation for medically intractable primary
173  been implicated in the clinical benefits of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease.
174 rom 16 hemispheres in 12 patients undergoing deep brain stimulation for severe dystonia using a speci
175       Moreover, based on our experience with Deep Brain Stimulation for treating obsessive-compulsive
176  selecting future strategies for closed loop deep brain stimulation for tremor control.
177 deep brain stimulation, whereas conventional deep brain stimulation globally suppressed beta activity
178  intrathecal infusion pumps, implantation of deep brain stimulation hardware, and general neurosurger
179                                              Deep brain stimulation has become an established means o
180                                              Deep brain stimulation has been Food and Drug Administra
181                                        While deep brain stimulation has been in the focus of academic
182                                              Deep brain stimulation has similar effects but requires
183               Among the invasive treatments, deep brain stimulation has the largest amount of existin
184        Transcranial magnetic stimulation and deep brain stimulation have emerged as therapeutic modal
185                               High-frequency deep brain stimulation (HFS) is clinically recognized to
186  clinical status and therapeutic response to deep brain stimulation; however, suppression of the sens
187 effects was conducted in 9 adults undergoing deep brain stimulation implantation surgery for chronic
188 electrode screening session, one month after deep brain stimulation implantation, the clinical benefi
189 e, efficient and selective than conventional deep brain stimulation, implying mechanistic differences
190 underwent ipsilateral ventral tegmental area deep brain stimulation in a specialist unit.
191 patients treated with ventral tegmental area deep brain stimulation in an uncontrolled, open-label pr
192                    Further, it is noted that deep brain stimulation in any brain target hitherto trie
193                                              Deep brain stimulation in epilepsy has targeted gray mat
194 lity of reward and choice during therapeutic deep brain stimulation in four patients with treatment-r
195        Both animal studies and studies using deep brain stimulation in humans have demonstrated the i
196 udies confirm lasting therapeutic effects of deep brain stimulation in isolated dystonia, good treatm
197                                              Deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease patients m
198 bthalamic nucleus-the most common target for deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease-in cost-be
199 ation in the motor cortex evoked ambulation, deep brain stimulation in the striatum caused rotation a
200 ous system for therapeutic purposes, such as deep brain stimulation in the treatment of Parkinson's d
201 ore efficacious than conventional continuous deep brain stimulation in the treatment of Parkinson's d
202 us epilepticus, suggesting a pivotal role of deep brain stimulation in the treatment response.
203 e target of neurosurgical lesions as well as deep brain stimulation in these patients.
204          These results suggest that thalamic deep brain stimulation in tremor likely exerts its effec
205 OCD and thus appears to be an alternative to deep-brain stimulation in selected cases.
206                             Here, we explore deep brain stimulation-induced modulation of pathologica
207  7 weeks postoperatively, and one episode of deep-brain-stimulation-induced hypomania during the blin
208                         While high-frequency deep brain stimulation is a well established treatment f
209                                              Deep brain stimulation is an established neurosurgical t
210                                              Deep brain stimulation is now the treatment of choice fo
211 raoperative testing of subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation is unknown.
212                                              Deep brain stimulation may be a treatment option in supe
213                       Ventral tegmental area deep brain stimulation may be an effective treatment opt
214 anipulation of neural continence pathways by deep brain stimulation may offer new avenues for the tre
215 e pilot studies have suggested that adaptive deep brain stimulation may potentially be more effective
216                                              Deep brain stimulation may represent a viable alternativ
217 amic nucleus to its hyperdirect afferents by deep brain stimulation may subvert the clinical efficacy
218 e therapeutic and adverse effects induced by deep brain stimulation.media-1vid110.1093/brain/aww145_v
219 cacy, efficiency and selectivity of thalamic deep brain stimulation might be improved in this conditi
220 son's disease, and helps inform how adaptive deep brain stimulation might best be delivered.
221 ght exist in which activation resulting from deep brain stimulation might correlate with the presence
222 ecifically, we show that subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation modulates all the major component
223 ff treatment with either subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (n = 14) or intravenous levodopa
224                                              Deep brain stimulation of anterior thalamus for partial
225 f individuals with anorexia nervosa in which deep brain stimulation of different brain areas resulted
226 study are illustrated by an index case where deep brain stimulation of estimated predominant non-moto
227 eted pharmacotherapy with Avpr1b agonists or deep brain stimulation of the CA2 are potential avenues
228 us that eventually resolved after commencing deep brain stimulation of the centromedian nucleus of th
229  the cerebral cortex associated with chronic deep brain stimulation of the cerebellar output, a treat
230                                              Deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus internus a
231  solid evidence of the long term efficacy of deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus pars inter
232 ndary generalised dystonia were treated with deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus pars inter
233 ssive compulsive disorder who have undergone deep brain stimulation of the limbic and associative sub
234                                              Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens (NAc-DBS
235 sient behavior changes during intraoperative deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate and
236                                              Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN D
237                Recent evidence suggests that deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-D
238 n 13.3 +/- 6.3 years) who received bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus at the
239                                              Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus is an
240                                              Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus is an
241 rodes in Parkinson's disease patients, after deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus.
242                               High frequency deep brain stimulation of the thalamus can help ameliora
243                                              Deep brain stimulation of the vALIC resulted in a signif
244                       Ten patients receiving deep brain stimulation of the ventralis intermedius thal
245 gic tremors, and stereotactic destruction or deep brain stimulation of the ventrolateral thalamus has
246  Furthermore, this circuit could explain why deep brain stimulation of the zona incerta is beneficial
247                     Previous case reports on deep brain stimulation of this region, now understood to
248 udy, we hypothesized that spatially targeted deep brain stimulation of ventromedial prefrontal cortex
249                                     Wireless deep brain stimulation of well-defined neuronal populati
250                We tested the hypothesis that deep-brain stimulation of the hippocampus or entorhinal
251               This finding might explain why deep-brain stimulation of the STN can impair subjects' a
252 etwork-disclosing the distributed effects of deep brain stimulation on cortico-subcortical connection
253 ting neuromodulation success and for guiding deep brain stimulation or other target-based neuromodula
254 h the long-term therapeutic effectiveness of deep brain stimulation (P < 0.05), with the strongest co
255     The latter could be exploited to improve deep brain stimulation, particularly if tremor suppressi
256 , respectively, and that subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation predominantly suppresses the form
257 rents-a radical departure from commonly used deep brain stimulation protocols-is sufficient to modula
258  the relatively selective effect of adaptive deep brain stimulation provides a rationale for why this
259 tem that tracks tremor phase to control when deep brain stimulation pulses are delivered to treat ess
260                                    Moreover, deep brain stimulation relatively selectively suppressed
261 te matter (WM) pathways, and the efficacy of deep-brain stimulation relies upon activation of WM.
262                                     Thalamic deep brain stimulation resulted in activation within est
263 lation is known to play an important role in deep brain stimulation's therapeutic mechanism.
264 lysis of responders to subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation (SCC DBS) for depression demonstr
265                    Here, we demonstrate that deep brain stimulation selectively suppresses certain sp
266 pting information processing in the STN with deep brain stimulation should abolish the normalization
267 S.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) is increasingly used in
268                          Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) protects dopaminergic n
269                Bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) has been shown to impro
270 patients both on and off subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS), while they performed a
271  hypothesis that pairing subthalamic nucleus deep-brain stimulation (STN-DBS) with motor cortical tra
272                 While functional imaging and deep brain stimulation studies point to a pivotal role o
273      Although both adaptive and conventional deep brain stimulation suppressed mean beta activity amp
274                       One hypothesis is that deep brain stimulation suppresses abnormally enhanced sy
275 hat clinically effective subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation suppresses synchrony locally with
276 se microelectrode recordings captured during deep brain stimulation surgery as participants engage in
277 mulation in the SN of 11 patients undergoing deep brain stimulation surgery for the treatment of Park
278 eurons (SPNs) in patients with PD undergoing deep brain stimulation surgery, compared with patients w
279 acy across different clinical indications of deep brain stimulation surgery.
280 ion will lead to improved interventions like deep brain stimulation, tailored to specific components
281 ucleus' portions deemed to be appropriate as deep brain stimulation target to treat motor symptoms in
282                                              Deep brain stimulation targeted to the vALIC.
283 n tremor should reveal the role of different deep brain stimulation targets in tremor generation.
284 longside with the growth of neuroimaging and deep brain stimulation techniques.
285 frequency-based design in the development of deep brain stimulation therapy for PD.
286                                              Deep brain stimulation therapy is an effective symptomat
287                         Sustained locking of deep brain stimulation to a particular phase of tremor a
288                                              Deep brain stimulation to different targets has been pro
289 ecent behavioral experiments have shown that deep brain stimulation to the STN results in impulsivity
290 h Parkinson's disease undergoing surgery for deep brain stimulation to the subthalamic nucleus (STN)
291 ot study, we assessed safety and efficacy of deep brain stimulation to the supero-lateral branch of t
292 nson's disease and for pioneering the use of deep-brain stimulation to alleviate symptoms of the dise
293                           Effective adaptive deep brain stimulation truncated long beta bursts shifti
294                                     Adaptive deep brain stimulation uses feedback about the state of
295 ases of epilepsy, current procedures such as deep brain stimulation, vagus, and trigeminal nerve stim
296 ut controlled antiparkinsonian medication or deep brain stimulation was allowed.
297 invasive neuromodulation therapies, notably, deep brain stimulation, where clinically relevant treatm
298 ive effect on burst duration during adaptive deep brain stimulation, whereas conventional deep brain
299 n the globus pallidus, a key target area for deep brain stimulation, which has not been mapped noninv
300 sed in the cochlear implant, bionic eye, and deep brain stimulation, which involves implantation of a

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top