ライフサイエンスコーパス: deep sedation

1 to generate sufficient ventilation, even in deep sedation.

2 sary to clarify the nature and parameters of deep sedation.

3 ts undergoing ERCP procedures under propofol deep sedation.

4 Each combination regimen was titrated to deep sedation.

5 ed to the hypnotic effects of anesthesia and deep sedation.

6 sing of speech remains resilient even during deep sedation.

7 performed safely while the patient is under deep sedation.

8 uscular blockade, with the goal of achieving deep sedation.

9 tatus; and conditions potentially justifying deep sedation.

10 opy units, is there a better alternative for deep sedation?

11 3.5 mm Hg vs 10 +/- 3.5 mm Hg; P = .015) or deep sedation (12 +/- 4 mm Hg vs 10.5 +/- 4 mm Hg; P <.0

12 ed were cardiovascular instability (17%) and deep sedation (15%).

13 poor ventilator synchronization, unnecessary deep sedation, agitation, and an overall optimum sedatio

14 elirium, respectively, adjusting for time in deep sedation and a principal component score consisting

15 n and new reports describe the advantages of deep sedation and anesthesia over moderate sedation for

16 However, in more recent times, deep sedation and bed rest have been part of routine med

17 Deep sedation and delirium are common in the ICU.

18 various agents and techniques available for deep sedation and general anesthesia are reviewed.

19 As the distinction between deep sedation and general anesthesia becomes less clear,

20 ically ventilated patients includes reducing deep sedation and increasing rehabilitation therapy and

21 ntly in low tidal volume ventilation despite deep sedation and result in volumes substantially above

22 hesiologists considers that propofol implies deep sedation and should only be administered by anesthe

23 owing early diaphragmatic activation even in deep sedation and, 2) metabolic changes within the diaph

24 e/alert, drowsy/arousable, asleep/arousable, deep sedation, and general anesthesia.

25 ight sedation levels (including avoidance of deep sedation) are safe in critically ill patients with

26 ents (n = 65 in light sedation and n = 64 in deep sedation) available for analysis.

27 voidance of pain, agitation, and unnecessary deep sedation, but these outcomes are challenging to ach

28 s for Medicare & Medicaid Services policy on deep sedation can be viewed as supporting an ongoing con

29 dicaid Services issued a policy stating that deep sedation can only be administered by an anesthesiol

30 With both modes, deep sedation caused a significant increase in PaCO2, wh

31 ence and time to resolution of postcoma/post-deep sedation delirium.

32 lung injury are at especially high risk for deep sedation, delirium, and associated long-term physic

33 f respondents reported targeting moderate to deep sedation following cannulation, with the use of sed

34 avenous etomidate was administered to induce deep sedation for defibrillation threshold testing.

35 r, few controlled studies on BPS targeted to deep sedation for diagnostic endoscopy were found.

36 the use of general anaesthesia and propofol deep sedation for patients undergoing endoscopic retrogr

37 atic stress disorder symptoms (p = .07); the deep sedation group had more trouble remembering the eve

38 At the 4-wk follow-up, patients in the deep sedation group tended to have more posttraumatic st

39 gligible (from 5.9% to 7.6%, p = 0.97); with deep sedation, however, ineffective triggering index inc

40 ll with sedation scores during conscious and deep sedation in pediatric patients, and also with end-t

41 The use of moderate to deep sedation is becoming common in emergency medicine f

42 Perioperative necessity of deep sedation is inevitably associated with diaphragmati

43 assigned to either the light (n = 69) or the deep sedation (n = 68) group.

44 who were under general anesthesia (n=15) or deep sedation (n=8) and were breathing spontaneously dur

45 Deep sedation occurred in 191 (76.1%) patients within 4

46 epression dismissed, and vigorous preemptive deep sedation or anesthesia provided.

47 her light (patient awake and cooperative) or deep sedation (patient asleep, awakening upon physical s

48 ments in the first 48 hours in the light and deep sedation range.

49 sion to quantify relationships between early deep sedation (RASS, -3 to -5) and patients' outcomes.

50 Sedation levels varied from very deep sedation (SAS score = 1, BIS score = 43) to mild ag

51 ized system discriminated between light- and deep-sedation states with an average accuracy of 75%.

52 brane oxygenation support is associated with deep sedation, substantial sedative exposure, and increa

53 ure management after cardiac arrest requires deep sedation to prevent shivering and discomfort.

54 The negative impact of deep sedation to the point of coma, even for brief perio

55 Techniques vary from no sedation to deep sedation using drugs with a good safety profile and

56 rly use of vasopressors, and dialysis, early deep sedation was an independent predictor of time to ex

57 ereas a large observational study found that deep sedation was associated with decreased 180-day surv

58 Though deep sedation was targeted, all cardiopulmonary complica

59 odifiable barriers for mobilization, such as deep sedation, will be important to increase mobilizatio

60 s sedation with combined hypnotic agents and deep sedation with etomidate is a safe and effective pro

61 During deep sedation with etomidate, episodes of apnea, hypoxia

62 s sedation with combined hypnotic agents and deep sedation with etomidate.

63 use of propofol by nonanesthesiologists for deep sedation with minimal adverse side effects, the ada

64 use of anesthesia assistance (AA) to achieve deep sedation with propofol during colonoscopy has signi

65 Deep sedation with propofol, administered by anaesthesia

66 upper endoscopy under general anaesthesia or deep sedation with propofol.