コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 anges (P > .4) were small in superficial and deep veins across the spectrum of CEAP clinical classes
3 r transient thrombocytosis, 46 patients with deep vein (DVT) or arterial (ART) thrombosis and normal
4 dications ranging from serial imaging of the deep veins for 2 weeks to detect and treat only in case
9 gation of clotting from superficial veins to deep veins may be regulated by shear rate, which might e
13 mpression systems are successful in emptying deep veins of the lower limb and preventing stasis in a
14 confirmed symptomatic VTE (two involving the deep veins, one peripheral vein and one pulmonary emboli
15 hy can accurately depict the femoropopliteal deep veins, permitting concurrent testing for venous thr
17 Pulmonary emboli (PEs) and lower extremity deep vein thrombi (DVTs) were formed in five dogs, then
23 were possibly associated with TRF-budesonide-deep vein thrombosis (16 mg/day) and unexplained deterio
24 ermittent hemodialysis (2B); prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis (1A); use of stress ulcer prophylax
25 ermittent hemodialysis (2B); prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis (1B); use of stress ulcer prophylax
26 evidence of heterogeneity between effects on deep vein thrombosis (266 versus 311, OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.
27 receiving TASQ versus 10% receiving placebo; deep vein thrombosis (4% v 0%) was more common in the TA
28 r and thromboembolic events (6/11), that is, deep vein thrombosis (4), transitory ischemic attacks (2
29 ffective than no IPC prophylaxis in reducing deep vein thrombosis (7.3% versus 16.7%; absolute risk r
30 cal practice adherence for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis (99% vs 85%, respectively; OR, 15.4
31 y status of FHMI were highest for unprovoked deep vein thrombosis (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.69; 95% c
32 ase-series method to study the risk of first deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (n=7278) and first pulmonary
37 carefully selected patients with cancer with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and low-risk pulmonary emboli
38 determined the association of Thr312Ala with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) a
41 ratively may be at higher risk of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE).
44 Monitoring for TEE and assessment of risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) by the Wells prediction rule
45 Accurate detection of recurrent same-site deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a challenging clinical pro
49 ssessment of suspected ipsilateral recurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a major clinical challenge
53 months) and objectively documented proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism, with a
54 ing this period, one patient withdrew with a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) probably caused by an undiagn
56 luation on the use of compression devices as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis methods in orthop
61 ght lower the risk of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), although a cause-effect rela
62 In patients with suspected lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), compression ultrasound (CUS)
63 or a first unprovoked isolated distal (calf) deep vein thrombosis (DVT), has a low risk of recurrence
66 The incidence rates of grade 3 or higher deep vein thrombosis (DVT), rash, bradycardia, neuropath
67 normal clot properties can predict recurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT), we studied 320 consecutive p
73 nt (ED(50) = 0.45-0.65 mg/kg) and the rabbit deep vein thrombosis (ED(50) = 0.1-0.4 mg/kg) models.
74 ceding week lowered the risk of proximal leg deep vein thrombosis (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27-0
75 also a predictor for developing proximal leg deep vein thrombosis (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06-1
76 , 2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.77-2.79), deep vein thrombosis (incidence rate ratio, 1.92; 95% co
78 (n = 5), nausea (n = 2), chest pain (n = 2), deep vein thrombosis (n = 1), transaminitis (n = 1), and
79 y adverse events (n = 7), cataracts (n = 4), deep vein thrombosis (n = 3), cerebral infarction (n = 2
80 3] vs 10% [67/690]; p=0.92) or recurrence of deep vein thrombosis (OR 0.93 [95% CI 0.66-1.31]; 6.4% [
81 Cs were associated with an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis (OR 2.55, 1.54-4.23, p<0.0001) but
83 laxis compared with placebo reduced rates of deep vein thrombosis (pooled risk ratio, 0.51 [95% CI, 0
84 ophylaxis to IPC further reduced the risk of deep vein thrombosis (relative risk, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-
85 o significant difference in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (relative risk, 1.76 [95% CI, 0.50-
86 28, 0.97]; p=0.04; I=0%) but not symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (risk ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.59, 1.
87 CI, 0.74, 1.08]; p=0.26; I=0%), symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (risk ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.60, 1.
88 , 0.58 [95% CI, 0.34, 0.97]; p=0.04) but not deep vein thrombosis (risk ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.74, 1.
89 6 patients (32%), and the most frequent were deep vein thrombosis (six patients), constipation (four
90 haracterization of pediatric upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UE-DVT) and of UE postthrombotic s
92 o image experimental venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis [DVT]) and pulmonary embolism (PE).
93 frapopliteal leg deep veins (isolated distal deep vein thrombosis [IDDVT]) are frequently diagnosed i
95 tional interpretations versus 1.5% (9/585, 5 deep vein thrombosis and 4 PE) in trinary interpretation
96 address this, we adopted a stenosis model of deep vein thrombosis and analyzed venous thrombi in pept
97 romboembolic deterrent stockings in reducing deep vein thrombosis and appeared to be as effective as
99 mbolisms occurred, including six symptomatic deep vein thrombosis and four pulmonary emboli, resultin
100 ion, and inflammatory activity of T cells in deep vein thrombosis and its consequences for venous thr
101 tect source thrombi and culprit emboli after deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (DVT-PE).
104 or the initial 5 to 10 days of treatment for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism as well as f
105 or the initial 5 to 10 days of treatment for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism as well as f
106 type of heparin thromboprophylaxis decreases deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in medical-s
107 mber 31, 2004, and in which risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism were assesse
108 ct on venous thromboembolism (which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism), but the ev
109 omes and Measures: Rates of symptomatic VTE (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, confirmed b
115 ent and included serious adverse events (eg, deep vein thrombosis and systemic complications) and min
116 diagnosis of proximal or inferior vena caval deep vein thrombosis and treated with CDT from 2005 to 2
117 n between FHMI and VTE applied to unprovoked deep vein thrombosis and was not explained by modifiable
120 eduction in risk of the specific endpoint of deep vein thrombosis compared with no statin use (RR 0.7
121 8-year-old German-Caucasian man arrived with deep vein thrombosis DVT, pain, oedema and rubor of righ
126 measure of relative risk, the odds ratio for deep vein thrombosis in subjects with GlcCer levels belo
128 describe the prevalence of postdecannulation deep vein thrombosis in the cannulated vessel in adults
129 ormatics Trial (GIFT) of Warfarin to Prevent Deep Vein Thrombosis included patients aged 65 years or
131 ltrate the thrombus and vein wall rapidly on deep vein thrombosis induction and remain in the tissue
133 e of symptomatic central venous line-related deep vein thrombosis is associated with worse outcomes,
134 treatment of acute proximal lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis is increasing in the United States
138 us thromboembolism defined as a composite of deep vein thrombosis or non-fatal or fatal pulmonary emb
139 A FN study was defined as development of deep vein thrombosis or PE within 3 months after a negat
140 y, independent of the presence or absence of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism at the time o
142 with inflammatory bowel disease who develop deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism often have ac
145 dy outcome was VTE (defined as patients with deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) that occurre
146 or cerebrovascular accident), venous events (deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism), and respira
147 (ie, one or more dose received, presence of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, or assessmen
148 role of dietary intake in the development of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolus (venous thromb
151 onfirmed with compression ultrasound showing deep vein thrombosis or with chest CT showing pulmonary
152 arly antithrombotics (91.46% versus 97.04%), deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis (73.79% versus 89.54%),
153 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 0.91), deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83
154 ic compression (IPC) is an effective form of deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis for general surgery pat
155 flow, improve compliance with antibiotic and deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, and improve overall pe
156 management, neurology consultation, Holter, deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, oral hypoglycemic inte
157 oley catheter removal, R = -0.089 [P = .63]; deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, R = 0.101 [P = .59]).
161 analysis of 11 studies comparing the risk of deep vein thrombosis related to PICCs with that related
165 PICCs are associated with a higher risk of deep vein thrombosis than are CVCs, especially in patien
166 cal trial of patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis treated with a fixed-dose catheter
167 in the thrombotic vein, we identify a set of deep vein thrombosis upregulated cytokines and chemokine
168 omputed tomography combined with testing for deep vein thrombosis using compression ultrasonography w
169 dies, the weighted frequency of PICC-related deep vein thrombosis was highest in patients who were cr
171 screened high-risk patients, 20 asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis were detected with venous duplex ul
172 21 years, 52% women) with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis were randomized to receive ultrasou
173 (n = 32), other venous thromboses (including deep vein thrombosis) (n = 42), and clotted devices (n =
174 for pulmonary embolism, 1% (29 of 2327) for deep vein thrombosis, 7% (61 of 866) for sepsis, 16% (22
175 Finally, complications (pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, acute respiratory distress syndrom
176 thrombus and plasma of baboons subjected to deep vein thrombosis, an example of inflammation-enhance
177 re hospitalized for proximal lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis, and 3649 patients (4.1%) underwent
179 failure, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, and myocardial infarction were ind
180 ors for venous thromboembolism, proximal leg deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism developing
181 ent, respiratory failure, pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis, and sepsis) after selected operati
182 no IVC filter vs IVC filter on PE, fatal PE, deep vein thrombosis, and/or mortality in trauma patient
183 ration rises more than 100-fold during acute deep vein thrombosis, but there are no prospective data
185 ab group, and grade 2 thrombosis and grade 2 deep vein thrombosis, each in one patient in the chemoth
186 eral and arterial thrombotic occlusions, and deep vein thrombosis, have been developed and evaluated.
187 rtions of treated HIV-infected patients with deep vein thrombosis, hepatitis C, renal impairment, thy
189 y disseminated intravascular coagulation and deep vein thrombosis, in tuberculosis (TB) patients.
192 pulmonary embolism at 6 months, symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, major bleeding, death at 3 and 6 m
193 redictors of PE (obesity, pregnancy, cancer, deep vein thrombosis, major procedure, spinal cord paral
194 onary artery disease, obesity, hypertension, deep vein thrombosis, male sex, high-sensitivity C-react
195 mortality in the developed world, underlying deep vein thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and stroke.
196 efficacy end point was the composite of any deep vein thrombosis, nonfatal pulmonary embolism, or al
197 ts (catheter-related blood stream infection, deep vein thrombosis, occlusion, pain, infiltration, ble
198 n of statin use with venous thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism in adults we
199 nd collected data on venous thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism outcomes.
200 botic events (myocardial infarction, stroke, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism) and haemorr
201 tiple arteriovenous access thromboses, prior deep vein thrombosis, prior allograft thrombosis, collag
202 ient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and other syst
203 edical complications (myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and pneumonia)
204 s of acute renal failure requiring dialysis, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, sepsis, pneumo
205 fibrillation, supraventricular tachycardia, deep vein thrombosis, respiratory depression, atelectasi
206 re observed in rates of postoperative ileus, deep vein thrombosis, small bowel obstruction, urinary s
207 the composite of symptomatic or asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic pulmonary embolism, or
208 ring the first 3 weeks symptomatic recurrent deep vein thrombosis-pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE) occurre
209 ransgenic reporter mice, we demonstrate that deep vein thrombosis-recruited TEM receive an immediate
223 rade 3 to 5 nonhematologic toxicity included deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (21%), hemorrhag
224 ively), whereas most venous studies examined deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolus prevention (42%)
225 clinical patients with platelet activation (deep vein thrombosis; saphenous vein graft occlusion aft
226 ially lower for pulmonary embolism (54%) and deep-vein thrombosis (44%) than heart attack (88%) and s
230 FVL mutation poses a clearly higher risk for deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) than for pulmonary embolism.
233 hlegmasia/VLG) after initiating treatment of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT); in 8 patients, cancer was no
235 al [CI], 0.51-0.90; P=0.008), including both deep-vein thrombosis (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.92; P=0.0
236 rimary efficacy outcome was the composite of deep-vein thrombosis (symptomatic or asymptomatic detect
238 ge prophylaxis might reduce the frequency of deep-vein thrombosis among high-risk hospitalized patien
239 ostic techniques (compression ultrasound for deep-vein thrombosis and computed tomography pulmonary a
240 pulmonary embolism indication, patients with deep-vein thrombosis and concomitant pulmonary embolism
241 he first occurrence of pulmonary embolism or deep-vein thrombosis and performed analyses of the data
242 rophylaxis and markedly reduced the rates of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism among hospit
243 e comprise the major arterial thromboses and deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism comprise ven
244 or the treatment and secondary prevention of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism has been sho
247 ome was a composite of asymptomatic proximal deep-vein thrombosis and symptomatic venous thromboembol
248 o difference in the primary end point of leg deep-vein thrombosis but a reduced rate of pulmonary emb
249 high-dose tinzaparin developed a symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis compared with nine assigned aspirin
250 requently develops in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis despite treatment with anticoagulan
251 olism up to postoperative day 11, defined as deep-vein thrombosis detected by mandatory bilateral ven
254 onsecutive hospitalized patients at risk for deep-vein thrombosis in the absence of prophylaxis.
255 was symptomatic, radiographically confirmed, deep-vein thrombosis in the arm or leg or pulmonary embo
256 right-sided PICC were more likely to develop deep-vein thrombosis in the ipsilateral arm (HR 3.37, 95
257 were significantly more likely to develop a deep-vein thrombosis in the ipsilateral arm compared wit
261 mbolism is strongly associated with proximal deep-vein thrombosis of the legs (popliteal, femoral, or
262 0.41 to 1.45; P=0.42), whereas the rates of deep-vein thrombosis only were 0.09 and 0.20, respective
263 ged at least 18 years with acute symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis or acute symptomatic pulmonary embo
265 estimates of the likelihood of freedom from deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism at 90 days we
266 clinically diagnosed, objectively confirmed deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism at 90 days.
267 oagulant drugs and SFJ ligation); subsequent deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism occurred in 9
268 ated use of medical resources; no subsequent deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism was observed
269 cial-vein thrombosis in terms of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, progression
270 icacy outcome was a composite of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, progression
272 s significantly more effective in preventing deep-vein thrombosis than 30 mg of enoxaparin twice dail
273 ly assigned 692 patients with acute proximal deep-vein thrombosis to receive either anticoagulation a
275 h comprised events of pulmonary embolism and deep-vein thrombosis) was more common in the PFO closure
276 ptomatic pulmonary embolism (with or without deep-vein thrombosis) were assigned to receive edoxaban
277 edications included warfarin (presumably for deep-vein thrombosis), antihypertensive agents, and a st
278 common grade three or higher toxicities were deep-vein thrombosis, 57 (26%) of 223 versus 27 (12%) of
279 physician was alerted to a patient's risk of deep-vein thrombosis, and 1251 patients to a control gro
280 A total of 4921 patients presented with deep-vein thrombosis, and 3319 with a pulmonary embolism
281 ) with an objectively confirmed diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis, and an indication to receive antic
284 outcome was the composite of any symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, any nonfatal pulmonary embolism, a
285 ein thrombosis, or asymptomatic proximal-leg deep-vein thrombosis, as detected with the use of system
286 e, non-interventional study of patients with deep-vein thrombosis, done in hospitals and community ca
287 h-dose tinzaparin was superior in preventing deep-vein thrombosis, it was associated with a higher ra
288 mboembolism, pulmonary embolism, symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, or asymptomatic proximal-leg deep-
289 bilateral venography, documented symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, or documented symptomatic pulmonar
290 he composite secondary end point of proximal deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and death (2.7
292 All women who had a recorded diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis, venous thrombosis not otherwise sp
293 mptomatic pulmonary embolism with or without deep-vein thrombosis, we compared rivaroxaban (15 mg twi
294 d anticoagulant therapy for the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis, without the need for laboratory mo
298 of graduated compression stockings (GCS) for deep vein thrombus (DVT) prophylaxis in acute stroke pat
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。