ライフサイエンスコーパス: deforestation

1 s for ecosystem services (e.g., avoidance of deforestation).

2 rtified palm oil was associated with reduced deforestation.

3 he spatial variability of impacts on avoided deforestation.

4 te change and requires their protection from deforestation.

5 use gas (GHG) emissions by sparing land from deforestation.

6 logical and social catastrophe attributed to deforestation.

7 hey effectively avoid degradation as well as deforestation.

8 line, as did a decline in the demand for new deforestation.

9 response of similar magnitude to effects of deforestation.

10 ew incentives for agricultural expansion and deforestation.

11 n estimated 2 million hectares of additional deforestation.

12 more complex quantitative model of mangrove deforestation.

13 g global progress on reducing emissions from deforestation.

14 ctly caused 27% of total and 40% of peatland deforestation.

15 implementation of policy measures to reduce deforestation.

16 climate benefits from reductions in tropical deforestation.

17 ed lands (intensification) while restricting deforestation.

18 tems from the combustion completeness during deforestation.

19 unable to explore the impact of large-scale deforestation.

20 ture expansion accounting for most remaining deforestation.

21 acteristics associated with the most avoided deforestation.

22 y for the very few species that can tolerate deforestation.

23 at is shrinking in availability and triggers deforestation.

24 of above-ground biomass (AGB) stocks due to deforestation.

25 on and Forest Degradation (REDD) and avoided deforestation.

26 ng points in the Amazon Basin resulting from deforestation.

27 ntal degradation as a product of large-scale deforestation.

28 considered both on- and off-lease sources of deforestation.

29 mated annual carbon releases due to tropical deforestation.

30 hange may also provide opportunities to halt deforestation.

31 ing the environmental and social problems of deforestation.

32 minerals are critically important drivers of deforestation.

33 ional variation in the land uses that follow deforestation.

34 The recent significant reductions in deforestation-80% reduction in the Brazilian Amazon in t

35 was the primary proximate cause of 1989-2008 deforestation (93%) and net carbon emissions (69%), by 2

36 Humans homogenize landscapes through deforestation, agriculture, and burning and thereby migh

37 s than anticipated from models incorporating deforestation alone because some species will colonize h

38 reased regional carbon emissions by 47% over deforestation alone, and secondary regrowth provided an

39 dominantly on reducing carbon emissions from deforestation alone.

40 rs of forest PAs are typically restricted to deforestation, although the extent of forest degradation

41 ding better monitoring to detect small-scale deforestation and a shift toward more incentive-based co

42 on deforestation, but a majority of Brazil's deforestation and agricultural expansion has occurred in

43 to high levels of pollutants resulting from deforestation and agricultural fires.

44 Costa Rica and Thailand, on average, reduced deforestation and alleviated poverty.

45 mmitted emissions, we estimate that stopping deforestation and allowing secondary forests to grow wou

46 ated landscape, heavily altered by extensive deforestation and anthropogenic burning.

47 edieval and Renaissance periods is caused by deforestation and associated biomass burning Hg emission

48 cal peatlands have experienced high rates of deforestation and conversion, which is often associated

49 te change through the Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) depend on mapping a

50 Reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD) may curb carbon emi

51 policies related to reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD).

52 CCs, state PAs, and ITs all avoided deforestation and degradation compared to analogous area

53 (iii) whether state PAs, CCs and ITs avoided deforestation and degradation compared with logging and

54 With deforestation and degradation taking place throughout th

55 nd private Conservation Concessions (CCs) on deforestation and degradation throughout the Peruvian Am

56 propensity-score matching to assess: (i) how deforestation and degradation varied across governance r

57 licies such as REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation) that provide financial in

58 management and REDD+ (reduced emissions from deforestation and degradation).

59 These may be aimed at reducing deforestation and degradation, or increasing terrestrial

60 al initiatives (e.g., Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation; Millenium Development Goa

61 ers with drastically different affinities to deforestation and document how thermal niche explains de

62 order to improve estimates of the impact of deforestation and drainage on tropical peatland carbon b

63 By analyzing satellite-derived deforestation and fire data from the Brazilian Amazon, w

64 , to evaluate the impact of certification on deforestation and fire from 2001 to 2015.

65 Conversely, deliberate limitation of deforestation and fire may be an effective intervention

66 egies to mitigate climate change by reducing deforestation and forest degradation (e.g. REDD+) requir

67 n initiatives such as Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) and avoided

68 d payments under the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) mechanism t

69 mly in the agenda of reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) programs.

70 Reducing deforestation and forest degradation contributes to glob

71 lihood of success of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Count

72 in Bali have made progress toward action on deforestation and forest degradation in developing count

73 ts for reduced greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in tropical countri

74 f priority areas for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation to deliver multiple

75 such as policies for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation, conservation, sust

76 ricultural census and remote-sensing data on deforestation and forest degradation.

77 ce policies, such as Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation.

78 in the tropics, where the imbalance between deforestation and forest regrowth has large consequences

79 interviews, we quantify the impact of CAR on deforestation and forest restoration, investigating how

80 esult from forest growth; losses result from deforestation and from reductions in carbon density with

81 Both deforestation and future land-use management play import

82 e of the forest to the combined pressures of deforestation and global warming is therefore of great c

83 tive cloud formation driven by afforestation/deforestation and groundwater depletion projected to inc

84 This study provides evidence that reduced deforestation and increased agricultural production can

85 Although protected areas reduced deforestation and increased regrowth, these land cover c

86 Here we quantify mining-induced deforestation and investigate the aspects of mining oper

87 two situations in sub-Saharan Africa, where deforestation and land degradation overlap with hunger a

88 entives to reduce carbon dioxide fluxes from deforestation and land degradation.

89 approximately 5% of emissions from tropical deforestation and land-use change.

90 eater area of the tropical forest biome than deforestation and logging combined.

91 ntegrating bioclimatic models with projected deforestation and oil-palm agriculture suitability from

92 greatest threats to mangrove persistence are deforestation and other anthropogenic disturbances that

93 orest habitats due to commercially motivated deforestation and other economic activities.

94 ond new concessions (15.0% of emissions from deforestation and peat degradation) to also include exis

95 We examine scenarios of deforestation and postclearing land use to estimate the

96 ve turned to a classic degradation thesis of deforestation and presumed desertification within the Ea

97 tudy combines satellite data with government deforestation and production statistics to assess land-u

98 or both carbon emissions from gross tropical deforestation and reductions in those emissions - its sh

99 econometrically from the pattern of observed deforestation and spatial variation in the benefits and

100 The climate policy immediately stops deforestation and strongly increases afforestation, resu

101 Quantitative analysis of the nexus between deforestation and the emergence of Ebola virus disease (

102 egative emissions if positive emissions from deforestation and wood harvest were eliminated.

103 in coastal lagoons coincident with extensive deforestation, and after 1960 on offshore reefs.

104 etagrams, equivalent to 5-10 years of global deforestation, and an extinction debt of more than 140 b

105 the relationship between biodiversity loss, deforestation, and poverty around Kibale National Park (

106 We find that protection reduced deforestation: approximately 10% of the protected forest

107 The spatial patterns of deforestation are determined largely by the patterns of

108 The highest levels of deforestation are found about 900 B.C. when, at its peak

109 Further reductions in deforestation are likely to be increasingly costly and r

110 ring bat meat and living in areas undergoing deforestation are the most significant risk factors asso

111 Deforestation around this reserve has reduced the reserv

112 This difference is explained by increased deforestation associated with increased beef consumption

113 ef consumption under the subsidy and reduced deforestation associated with reduced beef consumption u

114 annual carbon emissions from gross tropical deforestation at 2.270 Gt CO2 yr(-1).

115 de that there is no substantive evidence for deforestation at Chaco and no obvious indications that t

116 g, literacy, and life expectancy increase as deforestation begins but then decline as the frontier ev

117 Almost half (36,158 km(2)) of the deforestation between 2004 and 2011 occurred in areas do

118 ng lease boundaries, causing 11,670 km(2) of deforestation between 2005 and 2015.

119 Cropland expansion fell from 10 to 2% of deforestation between the two periods, with pasture expa

120 om 6.7 to 26.4 Tg PM(2.5), were dominated by deforestation burning practices associated with indirect

121 ch forest regeneration in some areas offsets deforestation (but not biodiversity loss) elsewhere.

122 and policy in Brazil have focused on Amazon deforestation, but a majority of Brazil's deforestation

123 Halving carbon emissions from tropical deforestation by 2020 could help bring the international

124 Certification lowered deforestation by 33% from a counterfactual of 9.8 to 6.6

125 portunity to dilute the legacy of historical deforestation by concentrating conservation efforts in a

126 ced under the revised law, could end illegal deforestation by greatly reducing the cost of monitoring

127 assumed to indicate extensive pre-Columbian deforestation by large populations.

128 estation, substantially overestimate avoided deforestation (by over 65%, based on our estimates).

129 still face a high risk of extinction unless deforestation can be controlled.

130 d tropical protected areas (PAs) that reduce deforestation can therefore play an important role in mi

131 re we show that tropical PAs overall reduced deforestation carbon emissions by 4.88 Pg, or around 29%

132 ate models predict that large-scale tropical deforestation causes reduced regional precipitation, alt

133 Declining deforestation coincided with a collapse of commodity mar

134 this policy using annual nationwide data on deforestation, concession licenses, and potential agricu

135 s since increased to pre-2006 levels whereas deforestation continued to decline, suggesting that anti

136 and 2012, when compared to expected rates of deforestation controlling for spatial variation in defor

137 Complementary policies to directly limit deforestation could help limit these effects.

138 We demonstrate that efforts to halt deforestation could mediate some orang-utan habitat loss

139 he largest landholders (>2,500 ha) to annual deforestation decreased over time (63% decrease between

140 Carbon loss from deforestation, degradation, harvesting and peat fires is

141 r the regeneration of these species, whereas deforestation degrades landscapes.

142 ive anthropogenic degradation in the form of deforestation, drainage and fire are converting it into

143 tC by 2100) but also indirectly through less deforestation due to higher crop yields (16 GtC by 2100)

144 recently available forest loss data to test deforestation effects on International Union for Conserv

145 d-use change, consisting of a gross tropical deforestation emission of 2.9 +/- 0.5 Pg C year(-1) part

146 multaneous regrowth, the net contribution of deforestation emissions to rising atmospheric CO2 concen

147 e assumptions are most effective at limiting deforestation, even when cropland area must increase to

148 The first deforestation event likely coincided with the widespread

149 A deforestation event today leads to a time-delayed future

150 reak occurring in a site is linked to recent deforestation events, and that preventing the loss of fo

151 Deforestation exacerbates this process, increasing the p

152 mely, temperature increase of 4 degrees C or deforestation exceeding 40% of the forest area.

153 In the absence of widespread deforestation, exploitation of forest products shaped a

154 e of recent societies, linked to large-scale deforestation, extensive and intensive agriculture, reso

155 In Brazil's Amazon, mining drives deforestation far beyond operational lease boundaries, y

156 but they also show that interactions between deforestation, fire and drought potentially lead to loss

157 The consequences of deforestation for aboveground biodiversity have been a s

158 rgest decreasing trend because of continuous deforestation for charcoals.

159 Tropical deforestation for the establishment of tree cash crop pl

160 Our study showed that deforestation for tree plantations decreased SOC stocks

161 rn in levels of human development across the deforestation frontier.

162 ports, increases in food prices, and greater deforestation globally.

163 We show that even if deforestation had completely halted in 2010, time lags e

164 While the effectiveness of PAs in reducing deforestation has been estimated, the impact on global c

165 relative effectiveness of which in avoiding deforestation has been the subject of recent debates.

166 Tropical deforestation has caused a significant share of carbon e

167 n relatively intact landscapes; even minimal deforestation has had severe consequences for vertebrate

168 Combined effects of climate change and deforestation have altered precipitation patterns in the

169 ing positive incentives for farmers to forgo deforestation have been designed but not fully implement

170 Territorial approaches to deforestation have been effective and could consolidate

171 ferences in land-use policies, resulting in "deforestation havens." We analyze the determinants of in

172 Chiquitano, a region that has become the new deforestation "hot spot" in South America.

173 and control measures on larger properties in deforestation hotspots, may be increasingly limited in t

174 nment- and industry-led policies can contain deforestation if future market conditions favor another

175 ns debatable because of the disproportionate deforestation impacts of the less common strategies.

176 sis to understand the impacts of large-scale deforestation in India on monsoon precipitation and foun

177 ands were particularly effective at avoiding deforestation in locations with high deforestation press

178 reasing carbon emissions from gross tropical deforestation in many other tropical countries that, fro

179 Deforestation in mid- to high latitudes is hypothesized

180 However, the effect of certification on deforestation in oil palm plantations remains unclear.

181 rs (i.e., replacement land uses) of mangrove deforestation in Southeast Asia between 2000 and 2012.

182 Since the 1960s, large-scale deforestation in the Amazon Basin has contributed to ris

183 From 2006 to 2010, deforestation in the Amazon frontier state of Mato Gross

184 y production in Brazil, which contributes to deforestation in the Amazon.

185 Our study highlights frontiers of mangrove deforestation in the border states of Myanmar, on Borneo

186 The recent 70% decline in deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon suggests that it i

187 rm that all protection regimes helped reduce deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon.

188 ind that the remote forcing from large-scale deforestation in the northern middle and high latitudes

189 represent up to 40% of the carbon loss from deforestation in the region.

190 Deforestation in the tropics is not only responsible for

191 Achieving zero illegal deforestation in this context would require the private

192 at use in estimating the spatial patterns of deforestation in this globally important biome.

193 iques to investigate the association between deforestation in time and space, with EVD outbreaks in C

194 To reduce greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation, Indonesia instituted a nationwide morator

195 m caused by mesoscale circulations driven by deforestation-induced heterogeneities in land cover.

196 Tropical deforestation is a significant cause of global carbon em

197 The impact of carbon payments on deforestation is calibrated econometrically from the pat

198 model's near-surface temperature response to deforestation is consistent with recent observations, an

199 Mining-induced deforestation is not unique to Brazil; to mitigate adver

200 ut 1 degrees C over the last 60 y, and total deforestation is reaching 20% of the forested area.

201 Tropical deforestation is responsible for around one tenth of tot

202 Deforestation is the largest source of greenhouse gas em

203 protected areas in the United States whereas deforestation is the main threat in developing countries

204 low 35 degrees N there is weak evidence that deforestation leads to warming.

205 Avoiding deforestation leakage requires harmonizing deforestation

206 d of fire ignition associated with advancing deforestation, logging, and fragmentation may act as nuc

207 that anthropogenic pressures resulting from deforestation may be a contributing cause of character d

208 then the carbon savings achieved by avoiding deforestation may be partially negated by increased emis

209 o forest margins fragmented and disturbed by deforestation may be particularly exposed to zoonotic in

210 e last five to six centuries, when intensive deforestation occurred in Eastern Europe, points to an a

211 indirect effects of deforestation, simulated deforestation of 20% and 40% within the Xingu River basi

212 y matching methods to evaluate the impact on deforestation of Costa Rica's renowned protected-area sy

213 be increasingly frequent because of ongoing deforestation of Indonesian peatlands.

214 Deforestation of mangroves is of global concern given th

215 dy vegetation resulting from 12,201 km(2) of deforestation of moist forests and 6,825 km(2) of regrow

216 aragua and Guatemala, experienced both rapid deforestation of moist forests and significant recovery

217 When indirect effects were considered, deforestation of the Amazon region inhibited rainfall wi

218 Similarly, deforestation often does not result in the immediate los

219 e impact of climate change and anthropogenic deforestation on biodiversity is of growing concern worl

220 Nor has the effect of deforestation on climate been demonstrated over large ar

221 impact of land use changes and human driven deforestation on fire frequency and population exposure

222 t sequencing, we characterize the effects of deforestation on microbial communities across multiple b

223 te the biogeophysical effects of large-scale deforestation on monsoon regions.

224 NSMD governance regimes reduced deforestation on participating properties by 2-23%.

225 ct" effects (through changes in rainfall) of deforestation on river discharge and energy generation p

226 We investigate impacts of deforestation on the South American monsoonal circulatio

227 of a dieback of the entire ecosystem due to deforestation only of parts of the rainforest.

228 plants typically ignore the effect of future deforestation or assume that deforestation will have a p

229 Environmental disturbances like deforestation or climate change may influence lake therm

230 concessions (21.1% of emissions) and address deforestation outside of concessions and protected areas

231 2000 to 2010, then nationwide emissions from deforestation over that decade would have been 241-615 M

232 agricultural intensification and expansion, deforestation, overfishing, and mangrove conversion), qu

233 Mangrove forests have experienced extensive deforestation owing to global demand for commodities, an

234 although less pronounced, period of elevated deforestation peaked at approximately A.D. 400 when herb

235 obal commodity chains increasingly make zero-deforestation pledges.

236 Our findings suggest that deforestation policies to date, which have been particul

237 Furthermore, we found that anthropogenic deforestation practices biased to lowlands and natural v

238 For future land cover, we developed spatial deforestation predictions from 10 years of satellite dat

239 We show that, for any given level of deforestation pressure, strictly protected areas consist

240 voiding deforestation in locations with high deforestation pressure.

241 station controlling for spatial variation in deforestation pressure.

242 e use areas and indigenous lands can balance deforestation pressures by leveraging local support to c

243 ffective can also depend on (i) the level of deforestation pressures to which an area is exposed and

244 has the potential to alter behavior on high-deforestation properties.

245 rea receives less scrutiny than the tropical deforestation rate.

246 protect intact forests are necessary to slow deforestation rates and to avert a new wave of global ex

247 tablishment, we show that protection reduces deforestation rates by 150% relative to unprotected port

248 or logging in Indonesia increased site-level deforestation rates by 17-127%, 44-129%, or 3.1-11.1%, r

249 However, although annual deforestation rates fell during this period by 68-85% fo

250 Annual deforestation rates in the Brazilian Amazon fell by 77%

251 Registered properties initially showed lower deforestation rates than unregistered ones, but these di

252 that, between 1999 and 2005, disturbance and deforestation rates throughout the Peruvian Amazon avera

253 could alter cropland requirements and hence deforestation rates.

254 59% of the area that has experienced reduced deforestation rates.

255 ntive structures for reducing emissions from deforestation (REDD+) in Indonesia would have had on gre

256 e aforementioned feedback, which occurs when deforestation reduces transpiration to a point where the

257 In this pantropic study, conducted in active deforestation regions of Indonesia, Cameroon, and Peru,

258 g deforestation leakage requires harmonizing deforestation regulations across regions and commodities

259 the availability of cheap forestland, lower deforestation regulations attract investments by compani

260 With more stringent deforestation regulations in some countries, we ask whet

261 various possible predictors of anthropogenic deforestation, related to population, suitability for la

262 pical countries; the minor contribution from deforestation-related agricultural expansion to overall

263 Deforestation releases CO(2) to the atmosphere, which ex

264 Global efforts to reduce tropical deforestation rely heavily on the establishment of prote

265 We find that avoided deforestation remains the best strategy for minimizing f

266 We found that deforestation results in weakening of the ISMR because o

267 nsion, which explicitly accounts for avoided deforestation, results in larger improvements.

268 50% extinction rate under the nonoptimistic deforestation scenario and an approximately 37% loss rat

269 Realistic deforestation scenarios suggest that local regions will

270 In addition, the deforestation share attributable to remote areas increas

271 carbon capture and storage and afforestation/deforestation, showed that all NETs have significant lim

272 In the absence of indirect effects of deforestation, simulated deforestation of 20% and 40% wi

273 edge, of actor-specific contributions to the deforestation slowdown by linking agricultural census an

274 y assigned and because protection can induce deforestation spillovers (displacement) to neighboring f

275 We also find that deforestation spillovers from protected to unprotected f

276 As expected, deforestation substantially increased the odds of a spec

277 variates correlated with both protection and deforestation, substantially overestimate avoided defore

278 rest loss during this time and 12 times more deforestation than occurred within mining leases alone.

279 ly protected areas consistently avoided more deforestation than sustainable use areas.

280 in conservation biology because of the rapid deforestation that has occurred over the last 50 years.

281 nnual rates and spatial patterns of tropical deforestation that occurred between 1950 and 2009 in the

282 ese areas is difficult because the amount of deforestation that would have occurred in the absence of

283 LULC scenarios, we show that avoiding 10% of deforestation through better governance might result in

284 lationships with current trends of Amazonian deforestation to estimate reductions of 12 and 21 per ce

285 contrast, observational studies have linked deforestation to increased precipitation locally but hav

286 und no evidence that enrollees shifted their deforestation to nearby land.

287 A new study shows that deforestation today leaves a carbon and biodiversity deb

288 tion and document how thermal niche explains deforestation tolerance.

289 Further, in laboratory experiments, the more deforestation-tolerant species has critical thermal limi

290 The more deforestation-tolerant species is associated with warmer

291 therefore not have necessitated large-scale deforestation using stone tools.

292 Brazil's well-documented reduction in deforestation was offset by increasing forest loss in In

293 of 286 municipalities in different stages of deforestation, we found a boom-and-bust pattern in level

294 ve and could consolidate progress in slowing deforestation while providing a framework for addressing

295 ffect of future deforestation or assume that deforestation will have a positive effect on river disch

296 of these patterns allows us to predict where deforestation will have the strongest effects on soil bi

297 The loss of biodiversity and continued deforestation will lead to high risks of irreversible ch

298 erences in LULC between 1987 and 2005 showed deforestation with conversion of forest land to crop lan

299 ipitation changes depends on the location of deforestation, with remote effects showing a larger infl

300 Policies to reduce emissions from deforestation would benefit from clearly derived, spatia