ライフサイエンスコーパス: dental implant

1 fect associated with the subsequently placed dental implant.

2 strategically extracted in preparation for a dental implant.

3 a natural tooth and when to extract it for a dental implant.

4 measurements, even in subjects with metallic dental implants.

5 feature important for both natural teeth and dental implants.

6 alveolar bone loss around natural teeth and dental implants.

7 iated with changes in crestal bone levels on dental implants.

8 premolar region), were recruited to receive dental implants.

9 The study cohort included 341 dental implants.

10 s an alternative approach to osseointegrated dental implants.

11 erformed often for subsequent treatment with dental implants.

12 uently has insufficient bone mass to support dental implants.

13 ar ridge defects for placement of endosseous dental implants.

14 novo osseous formation for the placement of dental implants.

15 microtopographies during osseointegration of dental implants.

16 in the planning and placement of endosseous dental implants.

17 nt between the implant-abutment interface in dental implants.

18 ent (GFC) on guided bone regeneration around dental implants.

19 achieving GBR of osseous defects surrounding dental implants.

20 with non-smokers in patients with IL and DL dental implants.

21 ograft bone composite in defects surrounding dental implants.

22 le treatment for osseous defects surrounding dental implants.

23 the standard of care for patients requiring dental implants.

24 te sodium on guided bone regeneration around dental implants.

25 cts in the canine mandible around endosseous dental implants.

26 e increases early bone formation rate around dental implants.

27 to titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) endosseous dental implants.

28 ent's age to the survival of osseointegrated dental implants.

29 cessfully osseointegrated titanium root-form dental implants.

30 biofilms, such as plaque on natural teeth or dental implants.

31 e suitable for bone regeneration therapy for dental implants.

32 n around hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated titanium dental implants.

33 esent practices of surgical periodontics and dental implants.

34 potential to be used as a novel way to clean dental implants.

35 of soft tissue thickness on early MBL around dental implants.

36 iseases influencing the long term success of dental implants.

37 e and supporting structures around teeth and dental implants.

38 sment of hard and soft tissue changes around dental implants.

39 illin before surgical placement of one-stage dental implants.

40 ted to tooth loss and their replacement with dental implants.

41 nce, applied in the oral area compromised by dental implants.

42 l rate and marginal BL changes compared with dental implants.

43 the C/I ratio on the success rate and MBL of dental implants.

44 mpare this new implant to standard root-form dental implants.

45 rom peri-implant oral mucosa around titanium dental implants.

46 ollowing clinical therapies: 1) placement of dental implants; 2) interdisciplinary dentofacial therap

47 A total of 73 dental implants (57 in the maxilla, 16 in the mandible)

48 t site, which received a wide-body, threaded dental implant 6 months later.

49 dontal disease treatment or to functionalize dental implant abutments to improve soft tissue integrat

50 A total of 376 dental implants and 323 sinus lifts were analyzed.

51 uated for the radiographic crestal BL around dental implants and adjacent teeth at time of implant cr

52 and masseter muscles) and artifactual (e.g., dental implants and air-tissue interfaces).

53 e successes and failures of a large group of dental implants and compare them to published literature

54 trophic posterior areas of the mandible with dental implants and compare these procedures with altern

55 The outcomes of both dental implants and endodontically treated teeth have be

56 nt evidence of metal particle release around dental implants and future areas for research.

57 es of immune function at subcrestally placed dental implants and healthy periodontal sites during a 1

58 he microbiota in plaque around these ligated dental implants and molars were studied at 0, 1, 2, 3, a

59 ranked the statement, "Periodontists perform dental implants and related procedures" less importantly

60 Tissues surrounding dental implants and teeth develop clinical inflammation

61 with one group receiving alendronate-coated dental implants and the other group serving as controls.

62 m (Ti) and titanium alloys have been used in dental implants and total hip arthroplasty due to their

63 relationship between the amount of KM around dental implants and various peri-implant parameters, wit

64 lveolar bone volume to support an endosseous dental implant, and the need for a secondary augmentatio

65 roups: one group received alendronate-coated dental implants, and the other group served as control.

66 ISF) cathepsin-K levels of natural teeth and dental implants, and to assess the potential relationshi

67 Osseointegrated dental implants are a highly predictable procedure with

68 Dental implants are a predictable treatment option for r

69 Endosseous dental implants are available with various surface chara

70 Short dental implants are becoming an important addition to th

71 Dental implants are commonly used to replace missing tee

72 both osseous and soft tissue healing around dental implants are critical to clinical success, there

73 entation procedures around natural teeth and dental implants are performed to facilitate plaque contr

74 The large majority of dental implants are successful over the long term.

75 tance between two consecutive threads of the dental implant as reference points for natural teeth and

76 The use of endosseous dental implants as transmucosal devices necessitates the

77 limited to the placement and restoration of dental implants but to the implementation of PIMT to pot

78 resent study suggest that the placement of a dental implant by means of a flapless technique in a fre

79 icacy of bone induction for the placement of dental implants by two concentrations of recombinant hum

80 radiographs obtained from natural teeth and dental implants by using cemento-enamel junction and the

81 y-one (3.1%) of 2,641 implants placed by the Dental Implant Clinical Research Group between 1991 and

82 As the field of dental implants continues to grow at a rapid rate so doe

83 thics approval, in 8 oncologic patients with dental implants data were acquired in a trimodality setu

84 ds were used, with associations among them: "dental implant," "dental implants," "Osstell," "resonanc

85 The long-term survival of dental implants depends, in part, on control of bacteria

86 Immediate placement of dental implants (DI) in fresh extraction sockets is asso

87 nsory deficiency related to the placement of dental implants (DIs) and resulting in liability claims

88 e most difficult areas to successfully place dental implants due to poor bone quality and close appro

89 ically, these implants must be active in the dental implant environment where the implant is bathed i

90 e absence of adequate KM or AM in endosseous dental implants, especially in posterior implants, was a

91 s that published systematic reviews on short dental implants exhibit significant structural and metho

92 Because dental implant failure patterns tend to cluster within s

93 ent manner, the risk factors associated with dental implant failure.

94 ate the association between osteoporosis and dental implant failure.

95 al risk factors that may have contributed to dental implant failures.

96 The use of dental implants for single-tooth replacement cases intro

97 ggests that the bacteria surrounding exposed dental implants form a diverse microbiome regardless of

98 As endosseous dental implants gain greater acceptance because of high

99 ve patients treated with subcrestally placed dental implants grafted with a xenograft (Group A) and 5

100 Comparing the natural teeth group with dental implant group with regard to MBL measure, catheps

101 In both natural teeth and dental implant groups, despite higher MBL measures, cath

102 l rate of 88.1% at 168 months, when standard dental implants had a similar estimated survival rate of

103 Short dental implants had an estimated survival rate of 88.1%

104 The rehabilitation of the oral cavity with dental implants has become a predictable treatment modal

105 he maintenance of osseointegrated endosseous dental implants has been controversial.

106 The concept of immediate loading of dental implants has been researched in animal and man.

107 The microbiota colonizing dental implants has been said to be similar to the micro

108 long-term outcomes, this aspect of one-stage dental implants has not been investigated.

109 universally accepted concept of delay-loaded dental implants has recently been challenged.

110 Research interest on immediate placement of dental implants has shifted from implant survival toward

111 Osseointegrated dental implants have become a routinely recommended proc

112 Dental implants have been used to replace missing teeth

113 ts concerning the outcome of treatment using dental implants have included more detailed data which a

114 Conventionally, endosseous dental implants have required 3 to 6 months of uninterru

115 ew cases of full-mouth rehabilitation, using dental implants, have been reported in periodontally com

116 s of 14 patients with metal implants (either dental implants, hip prostheses, shoulder prostheses, or

117 g long-term outcomes of immediate loading of dental implants immediately placed into infected sites.

118 c-based devices on 34 non-submerged titanium dental implants in 17 patients.

119 Of these, seven trials with 363 dental implants in 262 participants were included in the

120 enient, and fast method to assess BMD around dental implants in animal studies.

121 The three dental implants in each quadrant received either DFDBA (

122 The three dental implants in each quadrant received either DFDBA (

123 Placement of endosseous dental implants in edentulous areas of the anterior maxi

124 roach in article selection focusing on short dental implants in humans.

125 This study demonstrated that osseointegrated dental implants in insulin-controlled diabetic rats main

126 s to identify microbiota surrounding exposed dental implants in patients with and without a history o

127 A total of 339 endosseous dental implants in place for at least 3 years in 69 pati

128 gible patients were restored with endosseous dental implants in the area treated with rhBMP-2/ACS and

129 rrier for BMP used in osseous defects around dental implants in the canine mandible.

130 acement with immediate provisionalization of dental implants in the esthetic zone results in excellen

131 n with the immediate or delayed placement of dental implants in the maxillary anterior segment.

132 have contributed to increased application of dental implants in the restoration of partial and comple

133 assuring adequate bone for the placement of dental implants in this area.

134 gnificantly stimulated bone formation around dental implants in this model after 1 month but not afte

135 ing the surrounding structures of endosseous dental implants include peri-implant mucositis and peri-

136 Forty single-tooth dental implants inserted after placement of bioglass and

137 Unintentional placement of dental implants into retained root fragments did not res

138 nce, a lack of adequate KM around endosseous dental implants is associated with more plaque accumulat

139 itial bone remodeling around these one-piece dental implants is dependent on the positioning of the r

140 The success of dental implants is highly dependent on integration betwe

141 Sinus surgery for dental implants is highly successful, but the preoperati

142 The placement of endosseous dental implants is largely considered a safe surgical pr

143 sts and therefore their continued use around dental implants is questioned.

144 ls was conducted to determine the effects of dental implant length and width on implant survival rate

145 With the increased use of short dental implants (<10 mm), a high crown/implant (C/I) rat

146 Formation of bacterial biofilms on dental implant material surfaces (titanium) may lead to

147 In conclusion, Ti-Cu alloy is a promising dental implant material with antimicrobial/antibiofilm a

148 re, the reformation of biologic width around dental implants, microgap if placed at or below the bone

149 rom January 1997 to July 2011, that examined dental implants of <10 mm with a 12-month follow-up were

150 through the interface between abutments and dental implants of external hexagon (EH) and internal he

151 rteen studies were selected, examining 1,955 dental implants, of which 914 were short implants.

152 inducing local bone formation in support of dental implant osseointegration.

153 t of bone drilling technique and sequence on dental implant osseointegration.

154 associations among them: "dental implant," "dental implants," "Osstell," "resonance frequency analys

155 ealth that has been reported for the average dental implant patient population.

156 n clinical practice in the rehabilitation of dental implant patients.

157 rameters of early soft tissue healing around dental implants placed following a one-stage protocol.

158 of 1,003 consecutively placed pure titanium dental implants placed from August 1987 to January 2002

159 etween immediate and conventional loading of dental implants placed immediately after extraction in p

160 augmentation procedures and that endosseous dental implants placed in bony areas treated with rhBMP-

161 dressed including long-term success rates of dental implants placed in combination with barrier membr

162 o compare the crestal bone loss (CBL) around dental implants placed in healed sites using flapped and

163 CBL around dental implants placed in healed sites using flapped and

164 less surgical technique influence CBL around dental implants placed in healed sites?" Databases were

165 ords of 30 consecutive patients treated with dental implants placed in post-extraction sockets augmen

166 ugmentation and to assess 1-year survival of dental implants placed in reconstructed sites.

167 th around and onto the surface of endosseous dental implants placed in sites with extended peri-impla

168 Another objective was to evaluate the dental implants placed in the sites treated with rhBMP-2

169 nimal loss of mineralized hard tissue around dental implants placed non-submerged and at subcrestal p

170 en demonstrated for the long-term success of dental implants placed simultaneously with or after a si

171 some surgical complications associated with dental implant placement and discusses how to avoid and

172 laser sintering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate definitive prosth

173 Dental implant placement associated with sinus floor aug

174 ollowing tooth extraction, and if subsequent dental implant placement can reverse this neuroplasticit

175 the treatment planning phases of endosseous dental implant placement especially in cases with minima

176 alyze a cohort of 136 patients who underwent dental implant placement in the posterior maxilla at the

177 One month later, seven rats had dental implant placement into healed extraction sites.

178 Dental implant placement is a widely used treatment that

179 pport and adjacent anatomical structures for dental implant placement is limited by the inherent blur

180 Vertical ridge augmentation for dental implant placement is one of the greatest challeng

181 Patients had inadequate bone volume for dental implant placement or required preprosthetic ridge

182 Furthermore, dental implant placement reversed the extraction-induced

183 Computer-aided dental implant placement seems to be useful for placing

184 Healthy adult patients requiring one-stage dental implant placement were allocated randomly to rece

185 ful for alveolar ridge preservation prior to dental implant placement.

186 ined for histomorphometric analysis prior to dental implant placement.

187 linical signs of bone necrosis after routine dental implant placement.

188 0 weeks compared with 8 to 10 weeks prior to dental implant placement.

189 cal trial included 117 patients with planned dental implant placement.

190 ISF samples were obtained from natural teeth/dental implants presenting with either clinical health,

191 e maintenance enhancing the bone quality for dental implant procedures and esthetic restorative denti

192 ad and neck cancer, the presence of metallic dental implants produces streak artifacts in the CT imag

193 lae reflect the screw-joint character of the dental implant prosthesis.

194 que for vertical ridge augmentation prior to dental implant reconstruction.

195 nt as reference points for natural teeth and dental implants, respectively.

196 ects older than 21 years of age who received dental implant(s) in the posterior maxilla.

197 butable to periodontal reasons in favor of a dental implant should be carefully considered in partial

198 opsies were taken from extraction sockets or dental implant sites which were grafted with either auto

199 d at mandibular molar teeth but increased at dental implant sites.

200 resent study indicate that the evaluation of dental implant-supporting bone should include peripheral

201 molecular events in osseointegration at the dental implant surface remain largely unknown.

202 iographically evaluate bone formation around dental implant surfaces exposed to the space created at

203 Adhesion of bacteria to dental implant surfaces is the critical initial step in

204 udy showing disruption of biofilm from rough dental implant surfaces using cavitation bubbles from an

205 ul planning using CT scans before performing dental implant surgeries in premaxillary region.

206 r were mostly benign and compatible with the dental implant surgeries performed in these patients.

207 Dental implant surgery in the posterior maxilla often in

208 Hence, computer-aided dental implant surgery still requires improvement and sh

209 root resection, guided tissue regeneration, dental implant surgery, epithelialized free soft tissue

210 implantitis (RPI) is not a common sequela of dental implant surgery, its prevalence has been reported

211 elping cicatrization and wound healing after dental implant surgery.

212 he following keywords: "crestal bone loss"; "dental implant"; "surgery"; "flap"; and "flapless." Unpu

213 urpose was to compare and contrast predicted dental implant survival estimates assuming the independe

214 The study's purposes were to estimate dental implant survival in a statistically valid manner

215 A major reason for the success of modern dental implant systems has been the development of impla

216 may be more effective for use in endosseous dental implant systems.

217 table radiographic BL compared with adjacent dental implants (teeth BL, 0.44 +/- 0.23 mm; implant BL,

218 films on crowns and overdenture abutments of dental implants that had been recovered from patients du

219 nterrupted healing based on observations for dental implants that were characterized by a relatively

220 Regarding dental implants, the use of CAM is not cost effective.

221 atment have an uncertain understanding about dental implant therapy and its complications.

222 critical component of treatment planning in dental implant therapy is the amount of available bone.

223 For prosthetic-driven dental implant therapy, reconstruction of the alveolar b

224 ther highlights its diverse applications for dental implant therapy.

225 lel arm study was to evaluate the effects of dental implant thread design on the quality and percent

226 Dental implant thread geometry has been proposed as a po

227 rmined goal was established to bioengineer a dental implant to load the bone at the interface in a pr

228 n age 46.7 years) who received a total of 75 dental implants together with indirect sinus lifting pro

229 In dental implant treatment, the long-term prognosis is dep

230 llary incisors should be kept in mind during dental-implant treatment in the anterior maxilla.

231 10 mm) and standard (>/=10 mm) rough-surface dental implants under functional loading.

232 Fifty-one patients with and 9 without dental implants underwent a PET/CT study.

233 o present the clinical results of treating a dental implant using recombinant human bone morphogeneti

234 ublished systematic reviews focused on short dental implants using established checklists such as the

235 The adequacy of bone for the placement of a dental implant was approximately twice as great in the r

236 tely and 3 months postextraction, and then a dental implant was placed.

237 ealing time, core biopsy was obtained, and a dental implant was placed.

238 ce and structure as a commercially available dental implant was used.

239 The soft tissue organization around dental implants was different for upper and lower jawbon

240 The peak failure rate of short dental implants was found to occur between 4 and 6 years

241 ds of 106 patients treated with at least one dental implant were reviewed.

242 A total of 525 short (<10 mm) dental implants were analyzed, of which 253 were 3.5 mm

243 osa adjacent to the cover screw of submerged dental implants were analyzed.

244 Dental implants were evaluated by radiographic and clini

245 of patients >/=18 years old with one or more dental implants were included.

246 A total of 26 HA-coated dental implants were inserted in 100 grafted sinuses of

247 Ninety dental implants were inserted in edentulous areas of nin

248 Ninety endosseous dental implants were inserted in the mandibles of nine h

249 Forty-eight dental implants were placed (2 types in each dog: 24 hyd

250 After 3 months, 12 dental implants were placed at three levels in each dog:

251 Dental implants were placed immediately after extraction

252 Dental implants were placed immediately after extraction

253 A total of 158 dental implants were placed in non-perforated augmented

254 A total of 23 dental implants were placed in the augmented sinuses wit

255 After an average healing time of 4.9 months, dental implants were placed in the grafted sinuses.

256 Twelve dental implants were placed in the maxilla and mandible

257 Titanium machine-polished dental implants were placed in the prepared sites, and c

258 A total of 27 dental implants were placed subcrestally in 21 periodont

259 t which time core biopsies were obtained and dental implants were placed.

260 In each quadrant, three dental implants were placed.

261 CT images through the patient's dental implants were reconstructed using both standard C

262 partially edentulous patients restored with dental implants were reviewed.

263 Two types of dental implants were used in each dog: hydroxyapatite (H

264 Dental implants were used to restore her dentition.

265 an earlier time point compared with standard dental implants, where the peak failure rate occurred be

266 l edentulism with submerged and nonsubmerged dental implants which follows the concept of osseointegr

267 ciation between dissolution of titanium from dental implants, which suggests corrosion, and peri-impl

268 tudy comprised 30 patients carrying titanium dental implants, who had neither a metallic prosthesis n

269 seful for the modification of orthopedic and dental implants with coatings and biological growth fact

270 oral microorganisms into the FAI microgap of dental implants with different characteristics of the co

271 o the fixture-abutment interface microgap of dental implants with different fixture-abutment connecti

272 al therapy (SPT) among patients treated with dental implants with different periodontitis histories a

273 icance of KM in the maintenance of root-form dental implants with different surfaces.

274 analyze, in real time, sealing capability of dental implants with healing screw interfaces.

275 Minimal histologic bone loss occurred when dental implants with non-matching implant-abutment diame

276 ge with sufficient native bone to surround a dental implant without imposing on a vital structure wer

277 onsecutive patients with subcrestally placed dental implants without any grafting material (Group B)

278 rge osseous defect adjacent to an endosseous dental implant would produce the greatest regeneration o