ライフサイエンスコーパス: dentist

1 or adolescent covered by Medicaid had seen a dentist.

2 trials, one randomized by patient and one by dentist.

3 eagues: six physicians, 12 surgeons, and one dentist.

4 he combined efforts of the physician and the dentist.

5 observation rather than that reported by the dentist.

6 ers systematically referred the patient to a dentist.

7 alcohol intake from either the hygienist or dentist.

8 ation products or under the supervision of a dentist.

9 ive births and were less likely to visit the dentist.

10 stated that they never referred patients to dentists.

11 ed 45 periodontal patients referred by three dentists.

12 e dental scaling task, were higher among the dentists.

13 n the degree of trust and rapport with their dentists.

14 low and did not vary greatly among the three dentists.

15 n by dental nurses or hygienists rather than dentists.

16 uction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists.

17 ment outcomes compare with children visiting dentists.

18 as technically competent as that provided by dentists.

19 ntibiotic prescribing rate (practices = 316; dentists = 1,001); or (2) individualised graphical A&F p

20 tists = 438) and 609 intervention practices (dentists = 1,550).

21 or A&F intervention group (practices = 632; dentists = 1,999).

22 e 533 participants in this study (14.8% male dentists; 13.7% male non-dentist health care professiona

23 eak pinch force (35.7 +/- 3.8 N) compared to dentists (24.5 +/- 4.1 N) (P = 0.001).

24 Thirty-one dentists (29 men and two women) who had identified the d

25 practices and 778 patients (Patient RCT = 37 dentists/300 patients; Cluster RCT = 50 dentists/478 pat

26 ers OPG was more commonly ordered by general dentists (31%) followed by prosthodontists (30%), wherea

27 contemplated, 44% (n = 74) reported seeing a dentist, 43% (n = 73) took an analgesic or antibiotic me

28 ata was available for 152 control practices (dentists = 438) and 609 intervention practices (dentists

29 n compound in April 1993 were compared to 47 dentists (45 men and two women) who lived in the area bu

30 = 37 dentists/300 patients; Cluster RCT = 50 dentists/478 patients).

31 randomised to the control (practices = 163; dentists = 567) or A&F intervention group (practices = 6

32 tal antibiotic prescribing (practices = 316; dentists = 998).

33 gh presurgical evaluation by the restorative dentist, a template and heat-cured/metal-reinforced prov

34 s study tested the hypothesis that informing dentists about patients' dental anxiety prior to commenc

35 r in the proportions of children attending a dentist after screening between the control group and th

36 orced appliances fabricated by the referring dentists after 3 to 4 months of healing.

37 Physicians and dentists alike must become increasingly aware of impaire

38 y questionnaire provides information for the dentist and may also confer a psychological benefit on p

39 Analysis was based on 133 dentists and 2833 children.

40 s could improve future training programs for dentists and dental students.

41 ements under careful calibration of multiple dentists and how the replicability can relate to their u

42 During the past two decades, dentists and microbiologists have relied on periodontal

43 Seventy percent of the dentists and nurses brushed at least twice a day compare

44 Dentists and other health care professionals are familia

45 ent, "Periodontists' treatments help general dentists and other specialists increase successful thera

46 Dentists and physicians have long recognized variations

47 esigned originally as a standardized way for dentists and physicians to convey information about the

48 g the jaw but also a new partnership between dentists and radiologists.

49 anagement programs in the offices of general dentists and referral guidelines which limit referral of

50 Six dentists and six senior-year dental students were recrui

51 s caries treatment thresholds among Japanese dentists and to identify characteristics associated with

52 This systematic review aimed to determine dentists' and therapists' current lesion threshold for c

53 t reported having rarely been evaluated by a dentist, and 59% had CP.

54 Two-thirds of the nurses, 56.3% dentists, and 36.4% other health professionals flossed a

55 ns, oncology specialists, otolaryngologists, dentists, and other allied professionals.

56 g practicing and student physicians, nurses, dentists, and other health care professionals.

57 t were used by lawyers alongside physicians, dentists, and patients in elevating health care for blac

58 ed audit and feedback (A&F) interventions on dentists' antibiotic prescribing rates.

59 pplied under the idealized setting where the dentists are periodically recalibrated through group dis

60 ssive disorder that is mainly ascertained by dentists because of the severe periodontitis that afflic

61 This multicenter, block-randomized, dentist-blind, parallel-group study conducted in 8 sites

62 s for a high-caries-risk scenario, gender of dentist, city population, type of practice, conducting c

63 iteria can be quite robust to variation from dentists' clinical measurement differences, as seen from

64 The differences among the dentists' clinical measurements resulted in considerable

65 For 48 consenting patients, three dentists clinically examined each patient and recorded t

66 In the UK, doctors, dentists, coroners, and pharmacists are allowed to repor

67 Dentists deal with oral infections on a regular basis.

68 irst study to examine demographic cue use in dentists' decision-making for pain.

69 Prior sealant need caused variability in dentists' decisions, depending on the child's age and pa

70 nts may not be able to access dental care if dentists decline to participate in Medicaid because of l

71 early preventive dental care, children with dentist-delivered preventive dental care more frequently

72 Dentist-delivered preventive dental care was associated

73 s, nurses, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, dentists, dental hygienists, occupational therapists, ph

74 ssessed periodontal disease and a measure of dentist-diagnosed disease as predictors.

75 Two questions aimed to assess "dentist-diagnosed periodontal disease" and two inquired

76 their general practitioner rather than their dentist due to perceptions that a dentist is 'inaccessib

77 ery 6 months had better odds of visiting the dentist during pregnancy (P <0.001).

78 born women were 48% more likely to visit the dentist during pregnancy compared with non-Canadian coun

79 Dentists employing two hygienists were more likely to re

80 ws: female gender, practicing with one other dentist, employing two or more hygienists, and being >5

81 6,559 Yelp reviews were examined for general dentists, endodontists, pediatric dentists, oral surgeon

82 alth and pregnancy and those who visited the dentist every 6 months had better odds of visiting the d

83 Trained, standardized, and calibrated dentist examiners assessed 28 permanent teeth or tooth s

84 d at 4 time points by trained and calibrated dentist examiners using a standardized, national diagnos

85 one anatomy and quality and were restored by dentists familiar with the implant system.

86 this condition becomes a concern of clinical dentists for predominantly the middle-aged and aging pat

87 The families were assessed by calibrated dentists for severity of caries at both time periods.

88 d the work of dental therapists with that of dentists found that they performed at least as well.

89 male health professionals (58% of whom were dentists), from 40 to 75 years of age, who reported no d

90 ctors associated with it will assist general dentist (GD)-periodontist relationships and benefit pati

91 re more likely to refer patients compared to dentists geographically closer to a periodontist (P<0.02

92 to which periodontists' and general practice dentists' (GPs) behaviors and attitudes reflect current

93 r in their responses concerning how well the dentists had informed them about the procedure, they dif

94 s study (14.8% male dentists; 13.7% male non-dentist health care professionals; and 71.5% female nurs

95 One example of a good measure is, "Has any dentist/hygienist told you that you have deep pockets?",

96 bone combine to form the structure that most dentists identify as trabeculae on intraoral radiographs

97 rol and Prevention's (CDC) conclusion that a dentist in Florida transmitted human immunodeficiency vi

98 ity that children and adolescents had seen a dentist in the past 6 months as a function of the Medica

99 onfidence interval [CI], 53%-57%) had seen a dentist in the past 6 months than did uninsured children

100 Whether a child or adolescent had seen a dentist in the past 6 months.

101 inority female smokers who did not visit the dentist in the past year and reported the need for gum t

102 ptake are increased awareness of the role of dentists in diagnosing oral cancer, promotion of oral ca

103 e monthly antibiotic prescribing rate of all dentists in the health board; and (ii) delivered at 0 an

104 and were randomly allocated to intervention (dentist informed of MDAS score) and control (dentist not

105 h school education, and those who had seen a dentist infrequently and had subgingival calculus.

106 procedures was obtained through patient and dentist interviews.

107 than their dentist due to perceptions that a dentist is 'inaccessible' on a physical and psychologica

108 The degree of agreement among the dentists is described by the interrater agreement kappa

109 n between ophthalmologists, radiologists and dentists is necessary during the treatment of such orbit

110 duced by the dental remuneration system, and dentists' lack of awareness of evidence-based practice.

111 of access to trained therapists, as well as dentists' lack of training and time in providing such a

112 Come), including a lone dentist, Laudumiey, surgeon-dentist to His Majesty, Phil

113 were not significantly affected by pediatric dentists' level of experience (p = .13, 95% CI = 0.12 to

114 Dentists, masked to the rheumatologic diagnoses, perform

115 ine immersion prior to reimplantation by the dentist may be helpful in preventing external root resor

116 Findings suggest dentists may wish to assess familiarity of their patient

117 Thirty studies, mainly involving dentists, met the inclusion criteria.

118 To prevent HAS-ECC, dentists must partner with other health providers to dev

119 imately better patient care, researchers and dentists need to know how to accurately characterize the

120 dentist informed of MDAS score) and control (dentist not informed) groups.

121 ducators promoting health." Non-periodontist dentists (NPDs) ranked the statement, "Periodontists per

122 Despite clear clinical guidance, dentists often prescribe antibiotics inappropriately.

123 stratified according to appointment (with a dentist or hygienist).

124 ctive periodontal disease was diagnosed by a dentist or specialist were included in the study.

125 nts were carried out by specialist pediatric dentists or postgraduate trainees.

126 > 1 preventive oral health visit from a PCP, dentist, or both before their third birthday.

127 en the provider of preventive services (PCP, dentist, or both) with Medicaid-enrolled children before

128 or general dentists, endodontists, pediatric dentists, oral surgeons, orthodontists, and periodontist

129 people in the control group (Registered with dentist (p=0.44), routine check-up within last year (p=0

130 effects of VH patients' demographic cues on dentists' pain management decisions.

131 menopausal females who regularly visit their dentist, particularly in those with more severe disease.

132 se of composite will continue to increase as dentists phase out dental amalgam.

133 rticularly important because the majority of dentists practice independently.

134 ations between the decision to intervene and dentist, practice, and patient characteristics were anal

135 survey was mailed to a random sample of 600 dentists practicing in the state of Virginia.

136 The present study showed that general dentists preferred OPG and CBCT compared to other dental

137 Dentists prescribe approximately 10% of antibiotics disp

138 (-5.7%; 95% CI -10.2% to -1.1%; p = 0.01) in dentists' prescribing rate in the intervention group rel

139 ciation (ADA) studies on the distribution of dentists provides information on the evolving number of

140 ciation (ADA) studies on the distribution of dentists provides information on the evolving numbers of

141 ntal Practice-based Research Networks, using dentist questionnaires and patient interviews for collec

142 Analyses revealed that dentists rated pain intensity higher and were more willi

143 Approximately 50% of dentists reported up to 24 patients having received peri

144 vitality, and radiographs were taken at the dentist's discretion.

145 mprising a line graph plotting an individual dentist's monthly antibiotic prescribing rate (practices

146 Questions that cannot be answered in the dentist's office with conventional radiographs are now a

147 gingival margin according to the restorative dentist's specifications.

148 tivity analyses examined the impact of using dentist's time as measured by observation rather than th

149 Studies measured what dentists said they would do rather than actually did.

150 Since dentists see thousands of patients during their careers,

151 Dentists should collaborate with physicians to minimize

152 In view of this, dentists should take careful medical histories, includin

153 alization and data collection, last visit to dentist, smoking habit, and present occupation, the asso

154 peri-implantitis; 2) information provided by dentists/specialists who perform the treatment; and 3) p

155 1), and the mean mercury level was higher in dentists than in nondentists (mean, 0.91 and 0.45 microg

156 By the time these children present to the dentist, the treatment options often become limited to s

157 A significant proportion of dentists/therapists said they would intervene invasively

158 dentin involvement, 12% (95% CI, 6%-22%) of dentists/therapists stated they would intervene, increas

159 % (95% confidence interval [CI], 15%-28%) of dentists/therapists would intervene invasively.

160 el-dentin junction, 48% (95% CI, 40%-56%) of dentists/therapists would intervene restoratively.

161 The extent that dentists' thresholds for intervening restoratively have

162 The survey was mailed to 800 dentists throughout the state of Virginia.

163 female patient was referred from her general dentist to evaluate advanced periodontitis in the maxill

164 including a lone dentist, Laudumiey, surgeon-dentist to His Majesty, Philip V, King of Spain.

165 other, but with periodic conferences of the dentists to clarify general measurement criteria.

166 al caries observed could be used 1) to alert dentists to covert MA use in their patients and 2) as th

167 reliabilities of these scales, when used by dentists to quantify the patient's pain, suggest that ne

168 eful tools that potentially could be used by dentists to screen for low BMD.

169 te- (percent receiving fluoridated water and dentist-to-population ratio) and individual-level mediat

170 cigarette smoking; infrequent visits to the dentist; tooth brushing less than once per day; older ag

171 the uncalibrated CPI, as measured by general dentists trained by periodontists in a large epidemiolog

172 nterviewed about tobacco use and examined by dentists trained to use standardized clinical criteria.

173 ource of medical care, and 85% had a regular dentist, up from 89% and 60%, respectively, at baseline.

174 The study found that dentists used demographic cues when making pain manageme

175 tal examinations by 3 trained and calibrated dentists using NHANES protocols.

176 Eighty-nine dentists viewed patients with different demographic cues

177 Eight dentists viewed standardized videotapes showing palpatio

178 = $172) and higher among children with only dentist visits (CRT = 1.48, payment = $234) and both PCP

179 CRT = 1.48, payment = $234) and both PCP and dentist visits (CRT = 1.52, payment = $273).

180 sted results indicated that children who had dentist visits (with or without PCP visits) had signific

181 may lead to a greater reduction in CRT than dentist visits alone.

182 ian visits, emergency department visits, and dentist visits; and whether the child had experienced un

183 ental care prior to age 2 years from PCPs or dentists vs no preventive dental care.

184 Overall, in this practice, the dentist was best placed to deliver the intervention rath

185 The dentist was not aware of GER status, and the gastroenter

186 The highest agreement for diagnosis among dentists was for severe periodontitis (88%) and the lowe

187 One of two dentists was randomly selected to examine and treat pati

188 The application of pinch force by dentists was related to the required scaling forces, whe

189 Those dentists who practiced with one other dentist were twice as likely to refer more frequently wh

190 hand carriage rates in patients, nurses, and dentists were 9.8%, 6.6%, and 5%.

191 Higher Medicaid payment levels to dentists were associated with higher rates of receipt of

192 ldren with early preventive care visits from dentists were more likely to have subsequent dental care

193 provided may serve as a reference guide for dentists when making the decision to save or extract a c

194 examinations were performed by a calibrated dentist who was masked to the diabetic status of the pre

195 written behaviour change message relative to dentists who had not (95% CI -10.4% to -1.9%; p = 0.01).

196 uction in the antibiotic prescribing rate of dentists who had received the written behaviour change m

197 The proportion of dentists who indicated surgical intervention into enamel

198 r periodontal specialist and trained general dentists who measured CPIs in the main study of a nation

199 Those dentists who practiced with one other dentist were twice

200 -group difference in the prescribing rate of dentists who received a health board comparator relative

201 95% CI -8.6% to 0.1%; p = 0.06), nor between dentists who received A&F at 0 and 6 mo relative to thos

202 performed during pregnancy by two calibrated dentists who were unaware of the case-control status.

203 s well as other primary care specialists and dentists will need to advise patients as to whether they

204 Providing the dentist with information of the high level of a patient'

205 Seventy-two patients presenting to dentists with clinically significant erosive tooth wear

206 Approximately 60% of patients presenting to dentists with erosive tooth wear have significant gastro