ライフサイエンスコーパス: deprived area

1 n advantaged areas; and 10.22, 7.73-13.53 in deprived areas).

2 urvival was associated with living in a more deprived area.

3 but mortality was higher among patients from deprived areas.

4 d to be least evident in those from the most deprived areas.

5 tandardised rates between the least and most deprived areas.

6 twice as common in women and more common in deprived areas.

7 s should be adopted in both deprived and non deprived areas.

8 ity of care, especially in socioeconomically deprived areas.

9 rates were less pronounced in more socially deprived areas.

10 Need was greatest for people living in more deprived areas.

11 respond to the incentives than are those in deprived areas.

12 the life chances of young children living in deprived areas.

13 h or complement the "original" inputs to the deprived area after sensory restoration and can thus be

14 More deprived areas and those receiving greater Teenage Pregn

15 300 people from deprived areas and with chronic illnesses took part in a

16 Compared with the least deprived areas, children from the most deprived areas we

17 5 years earlier in people living in the most deprived areas compared with the most affluent, with soc

18 Children in deprived areas had a higher proportion of risk factors;

19 Patients from the most deprived areas had a seven-fold higher infection rate (1

20 Patients from more deprived areas had poorer 3-year HAQ outcome than those

21 Individuals living in socially deprived areas have reduced access to the transplant wai

22 Survival was better in less deprived areas (hazard ratio (HR) per tertile of househo

23 Patients from less deprived areas (higher quintile of the deprivation index

24 e between the most deprived (IMD4) and least deprived areas (IMD1) (0.22; 95% confidence interval [95

25 hildren and their families from 72 similarly deprived areas in England who took part in the Millenniu

26 re pronounced among persons residing in more deprived areas; limited evidence was found for regional

27 ontrast, there was a high risk of CA-MRSA in deprived areas linked with overcrowding, homelessness, l

28 at home or in a hospice than those from more deprived areas (lower quintile of the deprivation index;

29 Our findings suggest that patients from deprived areas might be especially susceptible to postop

30 ere young age (< 55 years), living in a more deprived area, nonwhite ethnicity, having advanced-stage

31 ar disease than patients living in the least deprived areas (odds ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval

32 ular dental attenders living in economically deprived areas of Teesside.

33 would be useful especially in less affluent deprived areas of the world where SCD is most prevalent.

34 hages/myeloid cells in hypoxic/metabolically deprived areas of tumors.

35 Compulsory admission was greater in more deprived areas (OR 1.22, 1.18-1.27) and in areas with mo

36 irth orders >1, were not breastfed, lived in deprived areas, or were diagnosed with eczema.

37 orer 3-year HAQ outcome than those from less deprived areas (P = 0.019, adjusted for baseline HAQ sco

38 ualities between the least deprived and most deprived areas remain.

39 o be male and be from less socioeconomically deprived areas than nonengagers.

40 emale, and to live in less socioeconomically deprived areas than nonparticipants.

41 black African, and Pakistani people lived in deprived areas than those of other ethnic groups (36.9-5

42 ung by diverting blood flow away from oxygen-deprived areas towards regions rich in O2.

43 (13 of 579 [2.2%]) than those from the least deprived areas (two of 580 [0.3%]; p=0.0040).

44 th disorder 11.0%, 95% CI 10.9-11.2% in most deprived area vs 5.9%, 5.8%-6.0% in least deprived).

45 least deprived areas, children from the most deprived areas weighed less (standard deviation [SD] sco

46 ncident venous leg ulcers living in the most deprived areas were less likely to receive the recommend

47 Older women and those from deprived areas were less likely to respond, but only age

48 Furthermore, areas adjacent to these deprived areas were themselves at greater risk of CA-MRS

49 Falls were largest for the most deprived areas with the highest initial level of CHD mor

50 gap in CHD rates between the most and least deprived areas would halve with falls in systolic blood