ライフサイエンスコーパス: dermatologic

1 %), cardiac (11%), constitutional (11%), and dermatologic (11%).

2 strointestinal (34.0%), febrile (23.3%), and dermatologic (19.5%) diseases.

3 children with IBD had a higher prevalence of dermatologic (4.7% vs. 0.6%), hepatobiliary (including p

4 Toxicities were mainly constitutional (51%), dermatologic (82%), and GI (52%); there was one death on

5 7%), alterations in liver enzymes (64%), and dermatologic adverse effects (48%).

6 the most up-to-date information on managing dermatologic adverse effects of EGFRIs.

7 mptom-based treatment approach to the common dermatologic adverse effects seen with the epidermal gro

8 cts than traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy, dermatologic adverse events from EGFRIs are significantl

9 treatment discontinuations, hematologic and dermatologic adverse events, and growth inhibition.

10 the etiology of adult-onset respiratory and dermatologic allergic disorders remains unclear.

11 Eczema prevention is now an active area of dermatologic and allergy research.

12 Common treatment-related adverse events were dermatologic and gastrointestinal, predominantly grade 1

13 Diarrhea and dermatologic and hepatic toxicities were observed more f

14 uary 26, 2007, and February 17, 2012, at the Dermatologic and Mohs Micrographic Surgery Unit of the U

15 nt that has demonstrated activity in various dermatologic and rheumatologic conditions in addition to

16 ith the desire to scratch, is symptomatic of dermatologic and systemic disorders that often resist an

17 er a 1-month period timed in accordance with dermatologic appointments.

18 ted at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months after dermatologic appointments.

19 of less than age 17 years using a systematic dermatologic approach.

20 esults must be compared with caution because dermatologic assessment is more frequent in BRAF inhibit

21 a cohort of patients who underwent the same dermatologic assessment.

22 ofile of cutaneous toxic effects, continuous dermatologic assessments should be provided for all pati

23 c study, we analyzed pre- and post-treatment dermatologic biopsies from 58 Fabry patients enrolled in

24 ed SAF teledermatology can improve access to dermatologic care in a public safety-net hospital settin

25 shifting be used to improve the delivery of dermatologic care in resource-poor settings worldwide?

26 design, and research on bundled payments for dermatologic care is limited.

27 Optimal posttransplant dermatologic care may be determined based on the race or

28 re organizations for delivering high-quality dermatologic care, improving access, and capturing other

29 ntial to expand the practice and delivery of dermatologic care.

30 may be used in the practice and delivery of dermatologic care.

31 t al. in this issue are essential to improve dermatologic care.

32 ely be used as a method to provide pediatric dermatologic care.

33 s for improved access to and coordination of dermatologic care.

34 ocalized pruritus, in the absence of primary dermatologic causes.

35 ic population that can manifest as a serious dermatologic challenge for both patients and physicians.

36 A plethora of dermatologic changes have been described, some signaling

37 ir-associated eruption to better reflect the dermatologic classification of drug eruptions.

38 Participants included 2375 patients from a dermatologic clinic in Plantation, Florida.

39 University hospital dermatologic clinic study involving the environmental co

40 ctions were invited to return for a complete dermatologic clinical assessment including skin biopsy,

41 Many dermatologic clinical trials have suffered from small sa

42 Conclusion and Relevance: Dermatologic clinical trials within the United States re

43 Patients were those 18 years or older with dermatologic complaints who would have otherwise been re

44 reatment (including but not limited to pain, dermatologic complications, bleeding, and infection).

45 kin lesions that do not conform to any known dermatologic condition and that are consciously or subco

46 ggest a potential link between the patient's dermatologic condition and this complication.

47 nitive diagnosis of CLE or any other non-CLE dermatologic condition as established by a board-certifi

48 ing prescribing practices for acne, a common dermatologic condition for which free samples are often

49 between this complication and the patient's dermatologic condition is suggested.

50 who consecutively consulted in the ED for a dermatologic condition was conducted under routine condi

51 he most common travel-related illnesses were dermatologic conditions (40%), diarrheal syndromes (25%)

52 se (primarily Campylobacter and Salmonella), dermatologic conditions (animal bites), systemic febrile

53 d 0.1%; odds ratio, 40.6 [CI, 10.2 to 161]); dermatologic conditions (deployed, 34.6%; nondeployed, 2

54 ser surgery are indicated for certain common dermatologic conditions in children, although the optima

55 Although research on quality of life and dermatologic conditions is well represented in the liter

56 ) refers to a group of erythematous, scaling dermatologic conditions that have been associated with s

57 capsulated drug therapy for the treatment of dermatologic conditions with infectious and inflammatory

58 fibromyalgia, the chronic fatigue syndrome, dermatologic conditions, dyspepsia, physical health-rela

59 s, malignancies, inflammatory bowel disease, dermatologic conditions, or solid-organ or bone marrow t

60 race-matched patients presenting with benign dermatologic conditions.

61 decrease the prevalence of diaper-associated dermatologic conditions.

62 ndomized controlled trials across a range of dermatologic conditions.

63 systemic drugs for the treatment of various dermatologic conditions.

64 nue triple therapy with close monitoring and dermatologic consultation.

65 Many hospitals do not have inpatient dermatologic consultative services, and most have reduce

66 Identifying dermatologic contraindications to smallpox vaccination b

67 Dichotomous dermatologic depictions of heroes and villains in movies

68 The most common specific dermatologic diagnoses were cutaneous larva migrans, myi

69 Photographs are invaluable dermatologic diagnostic, management, research, teaching,

70 At dermatologic digital follow-up aided by confocal microsc

71 etected among 2 MITF p.E318K carriers during dermatologic digital follow-up.

72 een research and clinical care: knowledge of dermatologic disease has facilitated the understanding o

73 Lichen planus is a dermatologic disease that affects both skin and mucosa.

74 Dermatologic disease, although seldom life threatening,

75 vidends in identifying the genetic causes of dermatologic disease, both in heritable mutations and th

76 Four patients (7.9%) had an associated dermatologic disease.

77 of rheumatic, hepatobiliary, pancreatic, and dermatologic diseases were compared with age-/sex-/count

78 sity is a major risk factor for inflammatory dermatologic diseases, including atopic dermatitis and p

79 help inform the treatment and management of dermatologic diseases.

80 While typically considered a dermatologic disorder, intraoral signs of neurofibromato

81 A wide range of autoimmune/dermatologic disorders can manifest as DG, although the

82 rch in healthy individuals and patients with dermatologic disorders has provided insights into the co

83 rome (SJS) are rare, acute, life-threatening dermatologic disorders involving the skin and mucous mem

84 Psychosocial dysfunction in dermatologic disorders is more frequent than commonly re

85 ngiogenesis and its potential for therapy of dermatologic disorders, one must understand the many dua

86 the progression of pathology and prevent the dermatologic disturbances in Fabry patients, and that pe

87 cal signs of Fabry disease often manifest as dermatologic disturbances such as angiokeratomata, hypoh

88 requesting price data on commonly prescribed dermatologic drugs in 2009, 2011, 2014, and 2015.

89 The price of prescription dermatologic drugs rose considerably from 2009 to 2015,

90 ade 3 and 4 toxicities were neutropenia, GI, dermatologic effects, pain, and electrolyte disturbances

91 y the primary oncology team and referred for dermatologic evaluation as appropriate.

92 , neutropenia (42%), neurologic events (7%), dermatologic events (7%), and thromboembolism (2%).

93 ad higher rates of cardiac, respiratory, and dermatologic events than did the placebo group.

94 with ADA-SCID were evaluated with a complete dermatologic examination and skin biopsy when indicated.

95 A systematic dermatologic examination of 16 patients included in a Eu

96 mline mutations when found to have MBAITs on dermatologic examination.

97 hite than white OTRs reported having regular dermatologic examinations (5 [11.4%] vs 8 [36.4%]) and k

98 amily have undergone complete neurologic and dermatologic examinations.

99 s different types of HSR and highlights some dermatologic examples that have resulted in improved hea

100 ions was also suggested, while arthritis and dermatologic features appeared to be most influenced by

101 Dermatologic features provide a major diagnostic clue to

102 able adult progeroid syndrome with prominent dermatologic features, constitutional genomic instabilit

103 In this cross-sectional study, dermatologic findings for film heroes and villains in ma

104 The dermatologic findings of 16 cases of CS and COFS syndrom

105 in skin dichotomy in film by (1) identifying dermatologic findings of the all-time top 10 American fi

106 Dermatologic findings of the all-time top 10 American vi

107 es include identification and frequencies of dermatologic findings of the top 10 film villains and of

108 lains have a higher incidence of significant dermatologic findings than the top 10 heroes (60% vs 0%;

109 American film villains, (2) comparing these dermatologic findings to the all-time top 10 American fi

110 all-time top 10 American film villains have dermatologic findings, including cosmetically significan

111 acilitated by an awareness of the associated dermatologic findings.

112 Our findings indicate the relevance of dermatologic follow-up in HSCT recipients.

113 Guggulipid also appeared to cause a dermatologic hypersensitivity reaction in some patients.

114 rs only) were high across a wide spectrum of dermatologic illnesses and did not vary significantly by

115 e are no DICOM standards for camera-acquired dermatologic images to date.

116 Dermatologic imaging is evolving without defined standar

117 A variety of dermatologic immune-related adverse events including mac

118 ypes 1 and 2 cause infections manifesting as dermatologic, immunologic, and neurologic disorders.

119 e CRPS as a neurological disorder with major dermatologic implications.

120 Of the individual organ systems, dermatologic involvement had the largest effect (P = 0.0

121 lyses revealed that malar rash, a subtype of dermatologic involvement, was linked significantly (P =

122 sis, often aided by recognition of a keynote dermatologic lesion, may permit prompt, timely treatment

123 es to reduce the iron overload and clear the dermatologic lesions in porphyria cutanea tarda, and dia

124 Dermatologic lesions included oral ulcers (100%), genita

125 cular neoplasm that frequently presents with dermatologic lesions.

126 An extensive search of the dental and dermatologic literature was performed on MEDLINE.

127 Cultural practices that present with dermatologic manifestations in the pediatric population

128 matomyositis and tacrolimus ointment for the dermatologic manifestations of juvenile dermatomyositis

129 uced, and has classic systemic, mucosal, and dermatologic manifestations.

130 sleep deprivation, and exercise, on several dermatologic measures: transepidermal water loss, recove

131 tors associated with primary nonadherence to dermatologic medications and study whether electronic pr

132 3, among a cohort of new patients prescribed dermatologic medications at a single, urban, safety-net

133 pecialties as well as primary care prescribe dermatologic medications; as insurance formularies becom

134 nical trial was conducted in ambulatory care dermatologic offices from June 6, 2011, to April 14, 201

135 Tacrolimus dermatologic ointment is a potentially safe and effectiv

136 ies as well as treatments approved for other dermatologic or oncologic conditions.

137 nts were women who had taken minocycline for dermatologic or rheumatologic disorders for extended per

138 career paths of the founders of the major US dermatologic organizations, such as the New York Dermato

139 ingly providing care for children undergoing dermatologic out-of-operating room procedures.

140 cyte antigen loci with carbamazepine-induced dermatologic outcome and MC4R with atypical antipsychoti

141 ted incidence of PCP in all immunosuppressed dermatologic patients (0.1% vs 1.3%; chi21 = 8.2; P = .0

142 region, and, as mice lacking IRF-2 exhibit a dermatologic phenotype resembling many aspects of human

143 atively and qualitatively, and (3) analyzing dermatologic portrayals of film villains in depth.

144 ry and laser therapy applicable to pediatric dermatologic practice have been made.

145 of those receiving betamethasone-containing dermatologic preparations had documented hypopituitary-a

146 lfa-2b, and various betamethasone-containing dermatologic preparations.

147 The effects of early diagnosis, dermatologic presentation, and antifungal treatment on o

148 those returning from south central Asia, and dermatologic problems among those returning from the Car

149 t, as the number of outpatient surgeries for dermatologic problems in infants and children is steadil

150 n noninvasive to minimally invasive cosmetic dermatologic procedures are widely believed to be safe g

151 ine and prilocaine) is invaluable for office dermatologic procedures in children.

152 PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pediatric dermatologic procedures performed outside of the operati

153 ywood Dermatology), 2 patients presented for dermatologic procedures, complicated by persistent bleed

154 Noninvasive to minimally invasive cosmetic dermatologic procedures, including energy, neurotoxin, a

155 nses, even though patients who develop early dermatologic reactions have shown to have a positive out

156 in 21% of patients (severe in 3%) and severe dermatologic reactions in 8%.

157 association of complete response with early dermatologic reactions supports the role of a specific i

158 seline characteristics, development of early dermatologic reactions, and cause of treatment discontin

159 All but one patient developed early dermatologic reactions, and seven patients discontinued

160 Dermatologic remote expertise invalidated, enlarged, or

161 ed 101 SLE-affected sibpairs with respect to dermatologic, renal, immunologic, hematologic, neurologi

162 Adjusted NIH funding for dermatologic research diminished by 4.6% from $67.3 mill

163 The JID is a major resource for publishing dermatologic research.

164 its editorial leadership and the quality of dermatologic science have grown apace.

165 of recipients who may benefit from intensive dermatologic screening and immunosuppression reduction.

166 the application of network geometry in other dermatologic settings as well as in science and technolo

167 so does the need to recognize and treat the dermatologic side-effects of these agents.

168 ldren that include a prominent or diagnostic dermatologic sign/symptom.

169 However, those who have gastrointestinal or dermatologic signs and symptoms and many cysts in stool

170 Some dermatologic signs may also represent the hallmark lesio

171 zumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, at an academic dermatologic surgery section and cancer center.

172 rs useful and reliable for the evaluation of dermatologic surgery skills.

173 tissue from Mohs surgical excisions from the dermatologic surgery units at Memorial Sloan Kettering C

174 Opioids were over prescribed after dermatologic surgery.

175 bleeding is the most common complication of dermatologic surgery.

176 s been reported for the use of hemostasis in dermatologic surgery.

177 e for facial pseudoaneurysms that complicate dermatologic surgery.

178 ical skills (OSATS) to measure competence in dermatologic surgery.

179 events of BRAF inhibitors; therefore, strict dermatologic surveillance in a referral center aided by

180 ish standardized guidelines on follow-up and dermatologic surveillance in this high-risk patient popu

181 Strict dermatologic surveillance, periodic self-examination, an

182 Persistent pruritus is a common disabling dermatologic symptom associated with different etiologic

183 luded a spectrum of demographic, ophthalmic, dermatologic, systemic, socioeconomic, or occupational f

184 infections (16.3% vs. 0.8%); neutropenia and dermatologic toxic effects were more frequent with lenal

185 These dermatologic toxicities have previously led to reduction

186 ource in approaching patients on EGFRIs with dermatologic toxicities.

187 ression, constitutional symptoms, and GI and dermatologic toxicities.

188 icant edema, hypersensitivity reactions, and dermatologic toxicities.

189 tom (4%), hand and foot reaction (2%), other dermatologic toxicity (6%), other GI toxicity (4%), infe

190 Each dermatologic toxicity is described; prophylaxis and trea

191 evel, seven (30%) of 23 patients had grade 3 dermatologic toxicity.

192 rade 3+ toxicity included 15.1% GI and 37.7% dermatologic toxicity; all acute grade 4 toxicities were

193 nalyze the geometry of the evidence base for dermatologic treatments.

194 ling and licensure bodies and to demonstrate dermatologic value.

195 is 18%, pulmonary arterial hypertension 9%), dermatologic (warts 53%, panniculitis 30%), neoplastic (

196 s of granulomatous inflammation, followed by dermatologic work-up and systemic investigations.

197 Extensive dermatologic workup and serial skin biopsies failed to r